Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Series Title
      Series Title
      Clear All
      Series Title
  • Reading Level
      Reading Level
      Clear All
      Reading Level
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Content Type
    • Item Type
    • Is Full-Text Available
    • Subject
    • Publisher
    • Source
    • Donor
    • Language
    • Place of Publication
    • Contributors
    • Location
1,938 result(s) for "Pain Treatment History."
Sort by:
Pain : a very short introduction
In this 'Very Short Introduction', Rob Boddice explores the history, culture, and medical science of pain. Charting the shifting meanings of pain across time and place, he focusses on how the experience and treatment of pain have changed. He describes historical hierarchies of pain experience that related pain to social class and race, and the privileging of human states of pain over that of other animals. From the pain concepts of classical antiquity to expressions of pain in contemporary art, and modern medical approaches to the understanding, treatment, and management of pain, Boddice weaves a multifaceted account of this central human experience. Ranging from neuroscientific innovations in experimental medicine to the constructionist arguments of social scientists, pain is shown to resist a timeless definition. Pain is physical and emotional, of body and mind, and is always experienced subjectively and contextually.-- Source other than Library of Congress.
Pain : a political history
Pain touches sensitive nerves in American liberalism, conservatism, and political life. In this history of American political culture, Keith Wailoo examines how pain has defined the line between liberals and conservatives from just after World War II to the present. From disabling pain to end-of-life pain to fetal pain, the battle over whose pain is real and who deserves relief has created stark ideological divisions at the bedside, in politics, and in the courts. Beginning with the return of soldiers after World War II and fierce medical and political disagreements about whether pain constitutes a true disability, Wailoo explores the 1960s rise of an expansive liberal pain standard along with the emerging conviction that subjective pain was real, disabling, and compensable. These concepts were attacked during the Reagan era, when a conservative backlash led to diminished disability aid and an expanding role of courts as arbiters in the politicized struggle to define pain. New fronts in pain politics opened nationwide as advocates for death with dignity insisted that end-of-life pain warranted full relief, while the religious right mobilized around fetal pain. The book ends with the 2003 OxyContin arrest of conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh, a cautionary tale about deregulation and the widening gaps between the overmedicated and the undertreated.
High prevalence of shoulder girdle muscles with myofascial trigger points in patients with shoulder pain
Background Shoulder pain is reported to be highly prevalent and tends to be recurrent or persistent despite medical treatment. The pathophysiological mechanisms of shoulder pain are poorly understood. Furthermore, there is little evidence supporting the effectiveness of current treatment protocols. Although myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) are rarely mentioned in relation to shoulder pain, they may present an alternative underlying mechanism, which would provide new treatment targets through MTrP inactivation. While previous research has demonstrated that trained physiotherapists can reliably identify MTrPs in patients with shoulder pain, the percentage of patients who actually have MTrPs remains unclear. The aim of this observational study was to assess the prevalence of muscles with MTrPs and the association between MTrPs and the severity of pain and functioning in patients with chronic non-traumatic unilateral shoulder pain. Methods An observational study was conducted. Subjects were recruited from patients participating in a controlled trial studying the effectiveness of physical therapy on patients with unilateral non-traumatic shoulder pain. Sociodemographic and patient-reported symptom scores, including the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire, and Visual Analogue Scales for Pain were compared with other studies. To test for differences in age, gender distribution, and education level between the current study population and the populations from Dutch shoulder studies, the one sample T-test was used. One observer examined all subjects (n = 72) for the presence of MTrPs. Frequency distributions, means, medians, standard deviations, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for descriptive purposes. The Spearman's rank-order correlation (ρ) was used to test for association between variables. Results MTrPs were identified in all subjects. The median number of muscles with MTrPs per subject was 6 (active MTrPs) and 4 (latent MTrPs). Active MTrPs were most prevalent in the infraspinatus (77%) and the upper trapezius muscles (58%), whereas latent MTrPs were most prevalent in the teres major (49%) and anterior deltoid muscles (38%). The number of muscles with active MTrPs was only moderately correlated with the DASH score. Conclusion The prevalence of muscles containing active and latent MTrPs in a sample of patients with chronic non-traumatic shoulder pain was high.
Fantastic Four: Age, Spinal Cord Stimulator Waveform, Pain Localization and History of Spine Surgery Influence the Odds of Successful Spinal Cord Stimulator Trial
Background: There is a dearth in our understanding of the factors that are predictive of successful spinal cord stimulator (SCS) trials and eventual conversion to permanent implants. Knowledge of these factors is important for appropriate patient selection and treatment optimization. Objectives: Although previous studies have explored factors predictive of trial success, few have examined the role of waveform in trial outcomes. This study sought to establish the relationship of neuraxial waveform and related measures to trial outcomes. Study Design: This study used a retrospective chart review design. Methods: Data were retrospectively collected on 174 patients undergoing SCS trials upon institutional review board approval of the study protocol. Indications for SCS were: complex regional pain syndrome, failed back surgery syndrome with radicular symptoms, peripheral neuropathy, and axial low back pain. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analyses were used to assess the association of demographic and clinical variables with SCS trial outcomes. Results: The study population comprised 56% women, had a median age of 55 (interquartile range [IQR], 44-64), and 32 of 174 (18%) patients failed SCS trials. Individuals with successful trials (≥ 50% pain relief) were significantly younger and had a median age of 54 years (IQR, 42-60) compared to those who failed SCS trials (median age 66 years; IQR, 50-76; P = .005). Adjusting for age, gender, number of leads, pain category, and diagnoses: surgical history (odds ratio [OR] = 4.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-15.8) and paresthesia-based tonic-stimulation (OR = 10.3; 95% CI, 1.7-62.0), but not burst or high frequency, were significantly associated with successful trials. Of note, the number of leads (whether dual or single), pain duration, characteristics, and category (nociceptive vs neuropathic) were not significant factors. An interaction between surgical spine history and lower extremity pain was significantly associated with a positive trial (P = .005). Limitations: This study was limited by its retrospective nature and focus on a patient population at a single major academic medical center. Conclusions: Paresthesia-based tonic stimulation, age, and surgical history have significant effects on SCS trials. Prospective and randomized controlled studies may provide deeper insights regarding impact on costs and overall outcomes. IRB Approval #: 2018P002216 Keywords: Pain duration, pain location, spinal cord stimulator trial, stimulator waveform, surgical history
Deliver Me from Pain
Despite today's historically low maternal and infant mortality rates in the United States, labor continues to evoke fear among American women. Rather than embrace the natural childbirth methods promoted in the 1970s, most women welcome epidural anesthesia and even Cesarean deliveries. In Deliver Me from Pain, Jacqueline H. Wolf asks how a treatment such as obstetric anesthesia, even when it historically posed serious risk to mothers and newborns, paradoxically came to assuage women's anxiety about birth. Each chapter begins with the story of a birth, dramatically illustrating the unique practices of the era being examined. Deliver Me from Pain covers the development and use of anesthesia from ether and chloroform in the mid-nineteenth century; to amnesiacs, barbiturates, narcotics, opioids, tranquilizers, saddle blocks, spinals, and gas during the mid-twentieth century; to epidural anesthesia today. Labor pain is not merely a physiological response, but a phenomenon that mothers and physicians perceive through a historical, social, and cultural lens. Wolf examines these influences and argues that medical and lay views of labor pain and the concomitant acceptance of obstetric anesthesia have had a ripple effect, creating the conditions for acceptance of other, often unnecessary, and sometimes risky obstetric treatments: forceps, the chemical induction and augmentation of labor, episiotomy, electronic fetal monitoring, and Cesarean section. As American women make decisions about anesthesia today, Deliver Me from Pain offers them insight into how women made this choice in the past and why each generation of mothers has made dramatically different decisions.
Comparative Efficacy of Supervised, Web-Based, and Self-Guided Exercise Interventions in Women with Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome
Background/Objectives: Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) is a common musculoskeletal condition that causes anterior knee pain, often linked to increased joint stress. Rehabilitation typically includes education, strength training, and functional exercises. Recently, telerehabilitation has become a promising alternative, particularly useful in improving access to care in rural areas. This study compares the effects of supervised (SE), web-based (WBE), and self-guided (SGE) exercise programs on pain, functionality, and fear of movement (kinesiophobia) in individuals with PFPS. Materials and Methods: Sixty female patients with PFPS participated in this randomized controlled trial. They were randomly assigned to one of three groups: SE, WBE, or SGE. Each program lasted six weeks, with exercises adjusted based on individual tolerance. Outcomes were assessed using the Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Scale, the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) for mobility, and the Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale. Results: All groups showed significant improvements in pain, functionality, and kinesiophobia (p < 0.05). The SE group achieved the greatest improvements across all measures, reducing pain and kinesiophobia while enhancing functionality (p < 0.017). The WBE group also showed significant improvements, outperforming the SGE group in all outcomes (p < 0.017). The SGE group demonstrated the least improvement but still achieved positive changes. Conclusions: Supervised exercise programs were the most effective in managing PFPS symptoms. However, the web-based programs also provided substantial benefits, making them a viable option when in-person supervision is not feasible. Future research should aim to enhance digital interventions for broader accessibility and engagement. Trial Registration: The study protocol was also registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06625086).
Impact of Patient-Clinician Relationships on Pain and Objective Functional Measures for Individuals with Chronic Low Back Pain: An Experimental Study
Purpose. To compare the effects of enhanced and limited patient-clinician relationships during patient history taking on objective functional measures and pain appraisals for individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Methods. Fifty-two (52) participants with CLBP, unaware of the two groups, were randomized using concealed allocation to an enhanced (n=26) or limited (n=26) patient-clinician relationship condition. Participants shared their history of CLBP with a clinician who enacted either enhanced or limited communication strategies. Fingertip-to-floor, one-minute lift, and Biering-Sorensen tests, and visual analogue scale for pain at rest were assessed before and after the patient-clinician relationship conditions. Findings. The enhanced condition resulted in significantly greater improvements in the one-minute lift test (F(1,49)=7.47, p<.01, ηp2=0.13) and pain at rest (F(1,46)=4.63, p=.04, ηp2=0.09), but not the fingertip-to-floor or Biering-Sorensen tests, compared with the limited group. Conclusions. Even without physical treatment, differences in patient-clinician relationships acutely affected lifting performance and pain among individuals with CLBP.
Effects of a footwear intervention on foot pain and disability in people with gout: a randomised controlled trial
Background There is limited evidence supporting the long-term effect of a foot care package that includes footwear for people with gout. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of a footwear intervention on foot pain and disability in people with gout over 6 months. Methods Participants with gout ( n  = 94) were randomly allocated to either a control group (podiatric care and gout education) or footwear intervention group (podiatric care and gout education plus a commercially available athletic shoe). Measurements were undertaken at baseline and 2, 4, and 6 months. Primary outcome was foot pain severity. Secondary outcomes were overall pain, foot impairment/disability, footwear comfort, fit, ease and weight. Data were analysed using repeated measures models. Results Baseline foot pain scores were low, and no differences in foot pain scores were observed between groups over 6 months (adjusted effect estimate: − 6.7, 95% CI − 16.4 to 2.9, P  = 0.17). Improvements between groups in overall pain scores (adjusted effect estimate: − 13.2, 95% CI − 22.2 to − 4.3, P  < 0.01) and foot impairment/disability scores (− 4.7, 95% CI − 9.1 to − 0.3, P  = 0.04) favouring the footwear intervention were observed at 2 months, but not at 4 or 6 months. Improvements between groups in footwear fit (adjusted effect estimate: − 11.1, 95% CI − 21.1 to − 1.0, P  = 0.03), ease (− 13.2, 95% CI − 23.8 to − 2.7, P  = 0.01) and weight (− 10.3, 95% CI − 19.8 to − 0.8, P  = 0.03) favouring the footwear intervention were also observed over 6 months. Similar improvements were observed for footwear comfort at 2 and 4 months. No other differences in secondary outcomes measured were observed at 6 months ( P  > 0.05). Conclusions Addition of footwear to a foot care package did not improve foot pain in people with gout. Short-term improvements in overall pain and foot impairment/disability and more durable improvements in footwear comfort and fit were observed with the footwear intervention. Trial registration ACTRN12614000209695. Registered 27 February 2014, http://www.anzctr.org.au/TrialSearch.aspx?searchTxt=ACTRN12614000209695&isBasic=True
Therapeutic potential of physical stabilization in VATS pain control: a randomized controlled trial
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has been widely used for low invasiveness and shorter recovery time. However, patients receiving VATS still experienced moderate-to-severe pain even under both regional and systemic analgesia. Little is known on the effect of non-pharmaceutical method with physical stabilization for post-VATS pain control. The study aims to investigate the feasibility of physical stabilization as a surrogate method for pain control. The single-blinded, randomized-controlled trial recruited the patients into physical stabilization group and standard care group after VATS. The patients in the intervention group tied a thoracic belt for all day, while the control group did not. Both groups had intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IVPCA) and on-demand oral analgesics. The primary outcome was the visual analogue scale for pain at the 6th, 24th and 48th hour post-VATS and at the hospital discharge. There were 18 patients assigned to the interventional group and 18 patients assigned to the control group. Four patients in the control group were dropped out from the study. Physical stabilization was found to enhance the analgesic effect post-operative 24–48 h compared to standard care (Difference of VAS: 1.11 ± 0.68 v.s. 0.5 ± 0.86, p  = 0.031). It had no effect on the dose of IVPCA or the use of oral analgesic agents. No complications direct to the thoracic belt or adverse outcome from the surgery were found in the study. Physical stabilization with thoracic belt to patients receiving VATS benefits to pain control, especially between the 24th and 48th hour post-VATS. Clinical Trial Registry number: NCT04735614.