Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Source
    • Language
240 result(s) for "Panobinostat"
Sort by:
Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Panobinostat
Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors cause an increase in acetylation that leads to an increase in DNA transcription and accumulation of different proteins, reducing cell proliferation and inducing cell death. Panobinostat is a first-in-line HDAC inhibitor approved for treating multiple myeloma in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone. It is a pan-deacetylase inhibitor and therefore inhibits not only HDAC but also other deacetylases. The main mechanism of action of panobinostat is to inhibit HDAC, which causes cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, leading to it being an antineoplastic drug. Pooled data of multiple-dose studies show that an oral dose of panobinostat 20 mg resulted in a maximum plasma concentration ( C max ) of 21.6 ng/mL approximately 1 h after administration, while doses between 10 and 30 mg resulted in dose proportional plasma levels. The absolute bioavailability of panobinostat is 21.4%, and it is moderately bound to plasma proteins. Renal impairment does not influence the intrinsic pharmacokinetics of panobinostat, however hepatic impairment causes an increase in the plasma concentrations of this drug. Therefore, starting treatment at lower doses could be considered in patients with mild to moderate hepatic impairment. Different ethnic backgrounds have an influence on the pharmacokinetics of panobinostat; however, due to major interindividual variability, no dose adjustment is recommended. The area under the concentration–time curve of panobinostat changes significantly under cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 inhibitors, CYP3A4 and CYP2D6 inducers, and P-glycoprotein inhibitors. Panobinostat itself is a CYP2D6 inhibitor, which influences the plasma levels of the CYP2D6 substrate dexamethasone. The main side effects of panobinostat are diarrhea, peripheral neuropathy, asthenia and fatigue; hematologic side effects include neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and lymphocytopenia.
Identifying drug targets in tissues and whole blood with thermal-shift profiling
Monitoring drug–target interactions with methods such as the cellular thermal-shift assay (CETSA) is well established for simple cell systems but remains challenging in vivo. Here we introduce tissue thermal proteome profiling (tissue-TPP), which measures binding of small-molecule drugs to proteins in tissue samples from drug-treated animals by detecting changes in protein thermal stability using quantitative mass spectrometry. We report organ-specific, proteome-wide thermal stability maps and derive target profiles of the non-covalent histone deacetylase inhibitor panobinostat in rat liver, lung, kidney and spleen and of the B-Raf inhibitor vemurafenib in mouse testis. In addition, we devised blood-CETSA and blood-TPP and applied it to measure target and off-target engagement of panobinostat and the BET family inhibitor JQ1 directly in whole blood. Blood-TPP analysis of panobinostat confirmed its binding to known targets and also revealed thermal stabilization of the zinc-finger transcription factor ZNF512. These methods will help to elucidate the mechanisms of drug action in vivo.The targets of small-molecule drugs are detected in tissue and blood using thermal proteome assays.
Characterizing the pharmacokinetics of panobinostat in a non-human primate model for the treatment of diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma
PurposeDiffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is one of the deadliest forms of childhood cancers. To date, no effective treatment options have been developed. Recent drug screening studies identified the HDAC inhibitor panobinostat as an active agent against DIPG cells lines and animal models. To guide in the clinical development of panobinostat, we evaluated the CNS pharmacokinetics of panobinostat using CSF as a surrogate to CNS tissue penetration in a pre-clinical nonhuman primate (NHP) model after oral administration.MethodsPanobinostat was administered orally to NHP (n = 3) at doses 1.0, 1.8, 2.4, and 3.0 mg/kg (human equivalent dose: 20, 36, 48, 60 mg/m2, respectively). The subjects served as their own controls where possible. Serial, paired CSF and plasma samples were collected for 0–48 h. Panobinostat was quantified via a validated uHPLC-MS/MS method. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated using non-compartmental methods.ResultsCSF penetration of panobinostat after systemic delivery was low, with levels detectable in only two subjects.ConclusionThe CSF penetration of panobinostat was low following oral administration in this pre-clinical NHP model predictive of human PK.
Drug prioritization identifies panobinostat as a tailored treatment element for patients with metastatic hepatoblastoma
Background Patients with metastatic hepatoblastoma are treated with severely toxic first-line chemotherapies in combination with surgery. Yet, inadequate response of lung metastases to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy still compromises patient outcomes making new treatment strategies, tailored to more efficient lung clearance, mandatory. Methods We harnessed a comprehensive patient-derived xenograft platform and a variety of in vitro and in vivo assays to establish the preclinical and biological rationale for a new drug for patients with metastatic hepatoblastoma. Results The testing of a library of established drugs on patient-derived xenografts identified histone deacetylase inhibitors, most notably panobinostat, to be highly efficacious on hepatoblastoma cells, as compared to non-cancerous cells. Molecularly, the anti-tumor effect of panobinostat is mediated by posttranslational obstruction of the MYC oncoprotein as a result of dual specificity phosphatase 1 upregulation, thereby leading to growth inhibition and programmed cell death. Of clinical importance, upregulation of the MYC target gene nucleophosmin 1 is indicative of response to panobinostat and associated with metastatic disease in patients with hepatoblastoma. The combination of panobinostat with the current SIOPEL 4 induction protocol, consisting of cisplatin and doxorubicin, revealed high synergies already at low nanomolar levels. The simulation of a clinical trial, with this combination therapy, in patient-derived xenograft models, and ultimately heterotypic lung metastasis mimics clearly underscored the potency of this approach. Conclusion Integrated studies define MYC inhibition by panobinostat as a novel treatment element to be introduced into the therapeutic strategy for patients with metastatic hepatoblastoma.
Inactivation of the Akt/FOXM1 Signaling Pathway by Panobinostat Suppresses the Proliferation and Metastasis of Gastric Cancer Cells
Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors are a new class of cytostatic agents available for the treatment of various cancers and diseases. Although numerous clinical and pre-clinical trials on the anticancer effects of panobinostat have been conducted, only a few reports have investigated its efficacy in gastric cancer. The present study aimed to investigate the effects of panobinostat in gastric cancer cells. Panobinostat significantly inhibited the cell viability and proliferation of the gastric cancer cell lines SNU484 and SNU638 in a dose-dependent manner; it reduced the colony-forming ability of these cells. Moreover, it induced apoptosis as indicated by increased protein levels of cleaved poly ADP-ribose polymerase and cleaved caspase-3. Panobinostat induced the G2/M cell cycle arrest in SNU484 and SNU638 cells and subsequently decreased the G2/M phase regulatory-associated protein expression of p-Wee1, Myt1, and Cdc2. Furthermore, panobinostat significantly inhibited the metastasis of SNU484 and SNU638 cells by regulating the expression of MMP-9 and E-cadherin. Further, it decreased the protein levels of p-Akt and forkhead box protein M1 (FOXM1). These effects were reversed by the Akt agonist SC79 and were accelerated by the Akt inhibitor LY2940002. Moreover, tumor growth in xenograft animal experiments was suppressed by panobinostat. These results indicated that panobinostat inhibits the proliferation, metastasis, and cell cycle progression of gastric cancer cells by promoting apoptosis and inactivating Akt/FOXM1 signaling. Cumulatively, our present study suggests that panobinostat is a potential drug for the treatment of gastric cancer.
Panobinostat Attenuates Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis in Mice via Suppressing Oxidative Stress-Related Neuroinflammation and Mitochondrial Dysfunction
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disease mediated by T helper cells, which is characterized by neuroinflammation, axonal or neuronal loss, demyelination, and astrocytic gliosis. Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis) are noted for their roles in easing inflammatory conditions and suppressing the immune response. Panobinostat, an HDACi, is now being used in treating multiple myeloma. Nevertheless, the effect of panobinostat on autoimmune diseases remains largely unclear. Thus, our research endeavored to determine if the administration of panobinostat could prevent experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) in mice, one of the most commonly used animal models of MS, and further explored the underlying mechanisms. The EAE mice were generated and then administered continuously with panobinostat at a dosage of 30 mg/kg for 16 days. The results indicated that panobinostat markedly alleviated the clinical symptoms of EAE mice, inhibiting demyelination and loss of oligodendrocytes in the central nervous system (CNS). Moreover, panobinostat decreased inflammation and the activation of microglia and astrocytes in the spinal cords of EAE mice. Mechanistically, treatment with panobinosat significantly suppressed M1 microglial polarization by blocking the activation of toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2)/myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88)/interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5) pathway. Additionally, panobinostat inhibited mitochondrial dysfunction and reduced oxidative stress in the spinal cords of EAE mice. In conclusion, our findings reveal that panobinostat significantly ameliorates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in mice by inhibiting oxidative stress-linked neuroinflammation and mitochondrial dysfunction.
Class I-Histone Deacetylase (HDAC) Inhibition is Superior to pan-HDAC Inhibition in Modulating Cisplatin Potency in High Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Cell Lines
High grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is the most common and aggressive ovarian cancer subtype with the worst clinical outcome due to intrinsic or acquired drug resistance. Standard treatment involves platinum compounds. Cancer development and chemoresistance is often associated with an increase in histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity. The purpose of this study was to examine the potential of HDAC inhibitors (HDACi) to increase platinum potency in HGSOC. Four HGSOC cell lines with different cisplatin sensitivity were treated with combinations of cisplatin and entinostat (class I HDACi), panobinostat (pan-HDACi), or nexturastat A (class IIb HDACi), respectively. Inhibition of class I HDACs by entinostat turned out superior in increasing cisplatin potency than pan-HDAC inhibition in cell viability assays (MTT), apoptosis induction (subG1), and caspase 3/7 activation. Entinostat was synergistic with cisplatin in all cell lines in MTT and caspase activation assays. MTT assays gave combination indices (CI values) < 0.9 indicating synergism. The effect of HDAC inhibitors could be attributed to the upregulation of pro-apoptotic genes (CDNK1A, APAF1, PUMA, BAK1) and downregulation of survivin. In conclusion, the combination of entinostat and cisplatin is synergistic in HGSOC and could be an effective strategy for the treatment of aggressive ovarian cancer.
Efficacy and safety of oral panobinostat plus subcutaneous bortezomib and oral dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (PANORAMA 3): an open-label, randomised, phase 2 study
SummaryBackgroundImproved therapeutic options are needed for patients with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Subcutaneous bortezomib has replaced intravenous bortezomib as it is associated with a more favourable toxicity profile. We investigated the activity and safety of three different dosing regimens of oral panobinostat in combination with subcutaneous bortezomib and oral dexamethasone for this indication. MethodsPANORAMA 3 is an open-label, randomised, phase 2 study being done at 71 sites (hospitals and medical centres) across 21 countries. Patients aged 18 years or older with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (as per International Myeloma Working Group 2014 criteria), who had received one to four previous lines of therapy (including an immunomodulatory agent), and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or lower, were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive oral panobinostat 20 mg three times weekly, 20 mg twice weekly, or 10 mg three times weekly, plus subcutaneous bortezomib and oral dexamethasone. All study drugs were administered in 21-day cycles. Randomisation was done by an interactive response technology provider, and stratified by number of previous treatment lines and age. The primary endpoint was overall response rate after up to eight treatment cycles (analysed in all randomly assigned patients by intention to treat). Safety analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of any study drug. No statistical comparisons between groups were planned. This trial is ongoing and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02654990. FindingsBetween April 27, 2016, and Jan 17, 2019, 248 patients were randomly assigned (82 to panobinostat 20 mg three times weekly, 83 to panobinostat 20 mg twice weekly, and 83 to 10 mg panobinostat three times weekly). Median duration of follow-up across all treatment groups was 14·7 months (IQR 7·8–24·1). The overall response rate after up to eight treatment cycles was 62·2% (95% CI 50·8–72·7; 51 of 82 patients) for the 20 mg three times weekly group, 65·1% (53·8–75·2; 54 of 83 patients) for the 20 mg twice weekly group, and 50·6% (39·4–61·8; 42 of 83 patients) for the 10 mg three times weekly group. Grade 3–4 adverse events occurred in 71 (91%) of 78 patients in the 20 mg three times weekly group, 69 (83%) of 83 patients in the 20 mg twice weekly group, and 60 (75%) of 80 patients in the 10 mg three times weekly group; the most common (≥20% patients in any group) grade 3–4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (33 [42%] of 78, 26 [31%] of 83, and 19 [24%] of 83 patients) and neutropenia (18 [23%], 13 [16%], and six [8%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 42 (54%) of 78 patients in the 20 mg three times weekly group, 40 (48%) of 83 patients in the 20 mg twice weekly group, and 35 (44%) of 83 patients in the 10 mg three times weekly group; the most common serious adverse event (≥10% patients in any group) was pneumonia (nine [12%] of 78, ten [12%] of 83, and nine [11%] of 80 patients). There were 14 deaths during the study (five [6%] of 78 patients in the 20 mg three times weekly group, three [4%] of 83 in the 20 mg twice weekly group, and six [8%] of 80 in the 10 mg three times weekly group); none of these deaths was deemed treatment related. InterpretationThe safety profile of panobinostat 20 mg three times weekly was more favourable than in previous trials of this regimen with intravenous bortezomib, suggesting that subcutaneous bortezomib improves the tolerability of the panobinostat plus bortezomib plus dexamethasone regimen. The overall response rate was highest in the 20 mg three times weekly and 20 mg twice weekly groups, with 10 mg three times weekly best tolerated. FundingNovartis Pharmaceuticals and Secura Bio.
Epigenetic-based combination therapy and liposomal codelivery overcomes osimertinib-resistant NSCLC via repolarizing tumor-associated macrophages
Osimertinib (Osi) is widely used as a first-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR mutations. However, the majority of patients treated with Osi eventually relapse within a year. The mechanisms of Osi resistance remain largely unexplored, and efficient strategies to reverse the resistance are urgently needed. Here, we developed a lactoferrin-modified liposomal codelivery system for the combination therapy of Osi and panobinostat (Pan), an epigenetic regulator of histone acetylation. We demonstrated that the codelivery liposomes could efficiently repolarize tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) from the M2 to M1 phenotype and reverse the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-associated drug resistance in the tumor cells, as well as suppress glycolysis, lactic acid production, and angiogenesis. Our results suggested that the combination therapy of Osi and Pan mediated by liposomal codelivery is a promising strategy for overcoming Osi resistance in NSCLC.
Anti-tumour activity of Panobinostat in oesophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma cell lines
Background Oesophageal cancer remains a challenging disease with high mortality rates and few therapeutic options. In view of these difficulties, epigenetic drugs have emerged as potential alternatives for patient care. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect and biological consequences of Panobinostat treatment, an HDAC (histone deacetylase) inhibitor already approved for treatment of patients with multiple myeloma, in oesophageal cell lines of normal and malignant origin, with the latter being representative of the two main histological subtypes: adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Results Panobinostat treatment inhibited growth and hindered proliferation, colony formation and invasion of oesophageal cancer cells. Considering HDAC tissue expression, HDAC1 was significantly upregulated in normal oesophageal epithelium in comparison with tumour tissue, whereas HDAC3 was overexpressed in oesophageal cancer compared to non-malignant mucosa. No differences between normal and tumour tissue were observed for HDAC2 and HDAC8 expression. Conclusions Panobinostat exposure effectively impaired malignant features of oesophageal cancer cells. Because HDAC3 was shown to be overexpressed in oesophageal tumour samples, this epigenetic drug may represent an alternative therapeutic option for oesophageal cancer patients.