Explore the vast range of titles available.

This study aimed to study the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 outcomes across different mental diagnoses and to assess the role of sex in these associations. We used electronic health records from Catalonia to identify adults receiving inpatient/outpatient mental health care between 2017-2019 with diagnosis of non-affective psychosis (NAP), bipolar disorder (BD), depressive disorder (DEP), stress-related disorders, neurotic/somatoform disorders (NSD), and substance misuse (SUB) (exposed). Outcomes included SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19 hospitalization, and COVID-19-related death. Adjusted logistic regression analyses were conducted. 785,378 adults were included (70.3% < 65 years old; 57.1% women). Compared to unexposed, those with NAP [OR (95%CI): 0.84 (0.80-0.88)], BD [0.80 (0.75-0.86)], DEP [0.97 (0.94-1.00)] and SUB [0.81 (0.78-0.84)] had a lower risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, while people with NSD presented an increased risk [1.03 (1.01-1.06)]. Among those infected, people with DEP, NSD, and SUB had a lower risk of COVID-19 hospitalization, but higher risk of COVID-19-related death [1.23 (1.07-1.41); 1.26 (1.07-1.48); 1.48 (1.24-1.71), respectively]. A higher COVID-19-related death was also found in people with NAP and BD [1.68 (1.34-2.12); 2.02 (1.50-2.73)]. Sex-stratified analysis showed that women with NSD were especially vulnerable to infection [1.07 (1.03-1.11)], and women with DEP and NSD to COVID-19-related death [1.24 (1.05-1.47); 1.26 (1.02-1.54)]. These results suggest different vulnerabilities to infection and COVID-19 hospitalization and death across mental disorders. These findings have implications for pandemic preparedness, highlighting the need for specific public health strategies to mitigate the excess of mortality of people with certain mental disorders.

Knowledge of the severity distribution (SD) of certain diseases is crucial for calculating the years lost due to disability (YLD), as the time spent with a disease is explicitly weighted on the health state level. Depending on the disease, different severity levels are considered. In most cases, the SDs vary from mild, moderate, severe to most severe. This is different in the context of diabetes, where an explicit distinction is made according to the sequelae resulting from the disease progression. In general, these include diabetic neuropathy (with foot ulcers or amputations) and (mild or moderate) vision impairments including blindness due to diabetic retinopathy. These complications cause a considerable loss of quality of life for those affected and high costs for the healthcare system. However, the progression of many of the sequelae can be avoided through (secondary) preventive measures. Estimating the degree of severity is therefore an important indicator of the population affected and in need for care. Due to a lack of data, the Global Burden of Disease Study often uses time-invariant and regionally fixed SDs. Important insights as to the temporal variance of SDs thus remain unnoticed. As part of the BURDEN 2020 pilot project in Germany, SD for diabetes-related complications were estimated from routine health insurance data for the year 2017. In a follow-up project (BURDEN 2.0), these results will also be available for the years 2017 to 2022. If there are any changes in the proportion of individual health conditions, implications can be generated from routine healthcare data of those affected. The SDs overall and according to certain sequelae will be presented over time and discussed. Also, the resulting YLD over time for type 2 diabetes will be examined, including changes in the prevalence of the disease. This makes it possible to analyse and interpret the burden of disease due to diabetes during the years 2017 to 2022.

Ireland has coped comparatively well with the COVID-19 pandemic when considering excess mortality. The reasons are likely complex and multifaceted, but it may be, in part, attributable to a comparatively young population and progress on indicators related to premature mortality and preventable mortality on chronic diseases and lifestyle risk factors. “Healthy Ireland” is a national framework in place since 2013 and utilizes a settings based approach to promote health and wellbeing in communities. It aims to improve collaboration between government, institutions, local communities, and individuals. Sláintecare is an all’party long-term health reform initiative developed in 2017 aimed at delivering the right care, at the right time, in the right place by the right team. In addition, in 2018 Ireland embarked on an ambitious public health reform programme with the implementation of the recommendations of the Crowe Horwath review of Public Health. While challenges exist, including access to services and waiting times, the governments has put in place initiatives to address these and is committed to, amongst other things, promo ting the continued integration of services across a variety of domains including primary to quaternary prevention. As Ireland began to emerge from the COVID-19 pandemic it established “The Public Health Reform Expert Advisory Group” to identify learnings from the public health components of the response, with a view towards strengthening public health and health protection generally and, specifically, future public health pandemic preparedness. The group, made up of national and international public health experts, submitted its final report in September 2023 which outlined a series of recommendations focused on potential improvements to public health policy, structures and governance. The WHO analysis of the Essential Public Health Functions provided complementary results. More work is now ahead to consider and implement these recommendations and foster institutional reforms including at the Health Services Executive, the Department of Health, and at the Health Protection Surveillance Centre.