Explore the vast range of titles available.

In Canada, anesthesia/paresthesia were the most frequently reported adverse events following immunization (AEFI) against SARS-CoV-2. This study aims to describe the frequency and characteristics of anesthesia/paresthesia cases temporally associated with a first or second dose of COVID-19 vaccines administered in Quebec, Canada. Cases were extracted among AEFI reports submitted to the passive surveillance system. Sociodemographic, vaccination and AEFI information were obtained from the immunization registry. Signs, symptoms and anatomical location were manually extracted from clinical narratives. From December 13, 2020 to December 31, 2022, 15.2 million doses of vaccines were administered in Quebec. By July 1, 2022, 1024 cases of anesthesia/paresthesia following COVID-19 vaccination had been reported. The global reporting rate was 7.7 per 100,000 doses administered. Rates were higher with the first than the second dose (11.4 vs. 3.8 per 100,000 doses), and higher with ChAdOx1 than with mRNA vaccines Comirnaty™ (BNT-162b2, Pfizer BioNTech) or Spikevax™ (mRNA-1273, Moderna) (28.7 vs. 6.1 and 7.9, respectively). Rates were 3- to 4-times higher in women, with the highest rate ratios among those 18–49 years of age. Median time to onset was 24 h (IQR: 3–96). Paresthesia, hypoesthesia/anesthesia (83 %) were more common than dysesthesias (13 %). Symptoms were reported mostly in upper limbs (62 %), but also frequently in lower limbs (47 %) or the face (42 %). Most reported mild (41 %) or moderate (48 %) symptoms, with a median duration of 5 days (IQR: 2–15), although symptoms lasting 1–5 months (12 %) or over 6 months (1 %) were also reported. Symptoms of anesthesia/paresthesia are commonly reported following the administration of several vaccines, including those against COVID-19. In most instances, symptoms occur shortly after vaccination, have a limited impact on daily activities, and resolve spontaneously within a month of onset. A small proportion of cases report sensory and/or motor symptom of longer duration, which remain undiagnosed following neurological investigations. Despite being a common occurrence, post-vaccination sensory disturbances remain a poorly understood phenomenon that warrants further study.

PurposeTo investigate prevalence and risk factors associated with self-reported chronic pain, and other symptoms related to breast cancer or its treatment among breast cancer survivors (BCS).MethodsA cross-sectional study of a random sample of 410 female BCS, members of “Leumit” healthcare fund, diagnosed with primary nonmetastatic invasive breast cancer in the years 2002–2012. The study questionnaire included questions on health-related quality of life, pain symptoms, and was completed by all women contacted.ResultsA total of 305 BCS (74%), with a median of 7.4 years since diagnosis reported chronic pain, of whom 84% had moderate pain, and 97% experienced pain at least 1–3 days/week. Other symptoms were paresthesia (63%), allodynia (48%), and phantom sensations (15%). Report of pain symptoms, alone or combined, was significantly associated with poorer quality of life. In multivariable analyses, chronic pain was positively associated with mastectomy compared to breast-conserving surgery [Odds ratio (OR), 3.54; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.46–8.59; P = 0.005], radiotherapy compared to non-radiotherapy (OR 2.96; 95% CI 1.43–6.12; P = 0.003), breast cancer stage at diagnosis—regional versus localized (OR 3.63; 95% CI 2.00–6.57; P < 0.001), and inversely with age (OR per one-year increment, 0.96; 95% CI 0.94–0.99; P = 0.002), and with time since diagnosis (OR per one-year increment, 0.82; 95% CI 0.75–0.90; P < 0.001).ConclusionsWith the increasing incidence of detected breast cancer and the improvements in treatment and consequently survival, knowledge about prevalence, and factors related to treatment late effects of chronic pain is highly relevant for potential prevention or management without negatively impacting quality of life.

BACKGROUND:Pain relief with spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has focused historically on paresthesias overlapping chronically painful areas. A higher level evidence supports the use of SCS in treating leg pain than supports back pain, as it is difficult to achieve adequate paresthesia coverage, and then pain relief, in the low back region. In comparison, 10-kHz high-frequency (HF10 therapy) SCS therapy does not rely on intraoperative paresthesia mapping and remains paresthesia-free during therapy. OBJECTIVE:To compare long-term results of HF10 therapy and traditional low-frequency SCS. METHODS:A pragmatic randomized, controlled, pivotal trial with 24-month follow-up was conducted across 11 comprehensive pain treatment centers. Subjects had Visual Analog Scale scores of ≥5.0/10.0 cm for both back and leg pain, and were assigned randomly (1:1) to receive HF10 therapy or low-frequency SCS. The primary end point was a responder rate, defined as ≥50% back pain reduction from baseline at 3 months with a secondary end point at 12 months (previously reported). In this article, 24-month secondary results are presented. Non-inferiority was first assessed, and if demonstrated the results were tested for superiority. RESULTS:In the study, 198 subjects were randomized (101 HF10 therapy, 97 traditional SCS). One hundred seventy-one subjects (90 HF10 therapy, 81 traditional SCS) successfully completed a short-term trial and were implanted. Subjects averaged 54.9 ± 12.9 years old, 13.6 ± 11.3 years since diagnosis, 86.6% had back surgery, 88.3% were taking opioid analgesics. At 3 months, 84.5% of implanted HF10 therapy subjects were responders for back pain and 83.1% for leg pain, and 43.8% of traditional SCS subjects were responders for back pain and 55.5% for leg pain (P < .001 for both back and leg pain comparisons, non-inferiority and superiority). At 24 months, more subjects were responders to HF10 therapy than traditional SCS (back pain76.5% vs 49.3%; 27.2% difference, 95% CI, 10.1%-41.8%; P < .001 for non-inferiority and superiority; leg pain72.9% vs 49.3%; 23.6% difference, 95% CI, 5.9%-38.6%; P < .001 for non-inferiority and P = .003 for superiority). Also at 24 months, back pain decreased to a greater degree with HF10 therapy (66.9% ± 31.8%) than traditional SCS (41.1% ± 36.8%, P < .001 for non-inferiority and superiority). Leg pain also decreased to a greater degree with HF10 therapy (65.1% ± 36.0%) than traditional SCS (46.0% ± 40.4%, P < .001 for non-inferiority and P = .002 for superiority). CONCLUSION:This study demonstrates long-term superiority of HF10 therapy compared with traditional SCS in treating both back and leg pain. The advantages of HF10 therapy are anticipated to impact the management of chronic pain patients substantially. ABBREVIATIONS:IPG, implantable pulse generatorMCID, minimal clinically important differencePI, permanent implantODI, Oswestry Disability IndexSCS, spinal cord stimulationVAS, Visual Analog Scale

PurposeRegarding surgical indications for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), the hypothesis that the recovery processes of subjective symptoms differ among pain, sensory, and motor symptoms and correlate with recovery in objective nerve conduction studies was examined in the present study.MethodsThe global symptom score (GSS) is a method used to assess clinical outcomes and covers subjective symptoms, including pain (pain and nocturnal awakening), sensory (numbness and paresthesia), and motor (weakness/clumsiness) symptoms. The relationships between long-term changes in GSS and recovery in nerve conduction studies were investigated.ResultsForty patients (40 hands) were included (mean age 65 years; 80% female; 68% with moderate CTS: sensory nerve conduction velocity < 45 m/s and motor nerve distal latency > 4.5 ms). Pain and nocturnal awakening rapidly subsided within 1 month after surgery and did not recur in the long term (median 5.6 years). Paresthesia significantly decreased 3 months after surgery and in the long term thereafter. Weakness/clumsiness significantly decreased at 1 year. Sensory nerve distal latency, conduction velocity, and amplitude significantly improved 3 months and 1 year after surgery, and correlated with nocturnal awakening in the short term (3 months) in moderate CTS cases. The patient satisfaction rate was 91%.ConclusionRapid recovery was observed in pain and nocturnal awakening, of which nocturnal awakening correlated with the recovery of sensory nerve conduction velocity. Patients with pain symptoms due to moderate CTS may benefit from surgical release.

The ongoing pandemic of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has infected more than 27 million confirmed cases and 8,90,000 deaths all around the world. Verity of viral infections can infect the nervous system; these viral infections can present a wide range of manifestation. The aim of the current study was to systematically review the COVID-19 associated central nervous system manifestations, mental and neurological symptoms. For that we conducted a comprehensive systematic literature review of four online databases, including Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus and Embase. All relevant articles that reported psychiatric/psychological symptoms or disorders in COVID-19 without considering time and language restrictions were assessed. All the study procedures were performed based on the PRISMA criteria. Due to the screening, 14 studies were included. The current study result indicated that, the pooled prevalence of CNS or mental associated disorders with 95% CI was 50.68% (6.68–93.88). The most prevalence symptoms were hyposmia/anosmia/olfactory dysfunction (number of study: 10) with 36.20% (14.99–60.51). Only one study reported numbness/paresthesia and dysphonia. Pooled prevalence of numbness/paresthesia and dysphonia was 5.83% (2.17–12.25) and 2.39% (10.75–14.22). The pooled prevalence of depression and anxiety was 3.52% (2.62–4.54) and 13.92% (9.44–19.08). Our findings demonstrate that COVID-19 has a certain relation with neurological symptoms. The hypsomia, anosmia or olfactory dysfunction was most frequent symptom. Other symptoms were headache or dizziness, dysgeusia or ageusia, dysphonia and fatigue. Depression, anxiety, and confusion were less frequent symptoms.

Objective Currently, there are limited reports, both nationally and internationally, regarding Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) that manifests solely with isolated sensory impairment. This study aims to explore the epidemiological and clinical features of GBS patients experiencing only paresthesia in southern China. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of the medical records of GBS patients admitted to 31 hospitals across 14 provinces in southern China from January 1, 2013, to September 30, 2016. Results A total of 1,056 patients diagnosed with GBS were identified from medical records, of whom 276 had paresthesia as their first symptom. Among these 276 patients, a total of 41 patients with GBS who exhibited only paresthesia were analyzed. Among them, 19 patients served as a control group and showed abnormal compound muscle action potential (CMAP). We identified 22 cases of pure sensory disturbances in GBS patients and named them “pure sensory GBS”, characterized by normal CMAP. Comparative analysis revealed no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of age at onset, gender, residence, or antecedent events; however, the pure sensory GBS group demonstrated a higher incidence of onset during the spring. Electrophysiological evaluations revealed that the pure sensory GBS group had a lower likelihood of reduced amplitude in sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) compared to the control group. However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in sensory conduction latency, velocity, H-reflex, or F-wave detection. Additionally, no significant differences were observed in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) studies, treatment modalities, discharge Hughes scores, or peak time. Notably, patients in the pure sensory GBS group had lower Hughes scores at admission and a shorter hospital stay, with these differences reaching statistical significance. Conclusion Among GBS patients, those presenting solely with sensory disturbances are relatively uncommon, with only 22 cases. Compared to the control group, those patients are more frequently diagnosed in the spring, demonstrate a milder degree of reduction in amplitude of SNAP, present with milder symptoms at admission, and have shorter hospital stays.

In childhood and adolescent migraine, amitriptyline and topiramate were no better than placebo and not significantly different from each other in achieving a 50% or greater reduction in days with headache. The trial was stopped early for futility. More than 6 million children and adolescents in the United States have migraines. 1 – 3 The majority continue to have headaches into adulthood, taking a toll on the U.S. economy of approximately $36 billion and resulting in substantial effects on quality of life. 4 – 7 Pediatric clinical practice guidelines for migraine treatment are consensus based rather than evidence based, 8 , 9 with no Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved migraine prevention medication for children younger than 12 years of age. The Childhood and Adolescent Migraine Prevention (CHAMP) trial tested the effects of amitriptyline and topiramate in comparison with each other and with placebo in . . .

Bilateral facial palsy with paresthesia (FDP) is a rare variant of GBS, characterized by simultaneous bilateral facial palsy and paresthesia of the distal limbs. Mounting evidence indicates that the presence of anti-GT1a IgG has a pathogenic role as an effector molecule in the development of cranial nerve palsies in certain patients with GBS, whereas anti-GT1a antibody is rarely presented positive in FDP. Here, we report the case of a 33-year-old male diagnosed with FDP presented with acute onset of bilateral facial palsy and slight paresthesias at the feet as the only neurological manifestation. An antecedent infection with no identifiable reason for the fever or skin eruptions was noted in the patient. He also exhibited cerebrospinal fluid albuminocytologic dissociation and abnormal nerve conduction studies. Notably, the testing of specific serum anti-gangliosides showed positive anti-GT1a IgG/IgM Ab. The patient responded well to intravenous immunoglobulin therapy. This case brings awareness to a rare variant of GBS, and provides the first indication that anti-GT1a antibodies play a causative role in the development of FDP. The case also suggests that prompt management with IVIG should be implemented if FDP is diagnosed.

Neurological adverse events have been reported rarely following COVID-19 vaccination. This study describes the characteristics of adolescents and adults assessed in the Canadian Special Immunization Clinic (SIC) Network for neurological adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) and outcomes of revaccination. Among 60 participants enrolled from January 2021 to February 2023, paresthesia/anesthesia was the most common diagnosis (15/60; 25.0 %), followed by Bell's Palsy (6/60; 10.0 %). Twenty-eight percent (17/60) of participants were hospitalized for their AEFI. Revaccination was recommended to 32/46 (69.6 %) participants due for subsequent doses when assessed in the SIC. Twenty-three participants were revaccinated and 4/23 (17.4 %) had recurrent symptoms of the AEFI; three were milder than the first event and none required hospitalization. Revaccination was generally safe in selected patients after a neurological AEFI. Expert assessment of patients with neurological AEFIs may help to support further vaccination.