Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Source
    • Language
5,799 result(s) for "Peripheral blood stem cell"
Sort by:
Peripheral-Blood Stem Cells versus Bone Marrow from Unrelated Donors
In this study of unrelated-donor transplantation for hematologic cancers, survival was similar with bone marrow and peripheral-blood stem-cell grafts. However, graft failure was more common with the former, and chronic graft-versus-host disease with the latter. In the early days of allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation, the only graft source available was bone marrow harvested from the pelvis of a donor under anesthesia. When studies showed that an increased dose of bone marrow cells correlated with more robust hematopoietic engraftment and lower mortality from infectious complications, transplantation centers began to use filgrastim-stimulated peripheral blood, which has a much higher content of blood progenitor cells than bone marrow, although there was concern that the higher T-cell content might increase the risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). 1 – 5 Several large, randomized trials of transplantation between HLA-identical siblings showed that peripheral-blood . . .
Feasibility of reduced-dose posttransplant cyclophosphamide and cotransplantation of peripheral blood stem cells and umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells for SAA
Posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis is an effective strategie for patients receiving matched sibling donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (MSD-HSCT) and haploidentical HSCT (haplo-HSCT). We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of reduced-dose cyclophosphamide, 20 mg/kg for 13 patients in MSD-HSCT cohort and 25 mg/kg for 22 patients in haplo-HSCT cohort, on days + 3, + 4 combined with cotransplantation of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) and human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs) for severe aplastic anemia (SAA). In MSD-PTCy cohort, the times to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were significantly shorter than those in the MSD-control cohort (P < 0.05). The cumulative incidence of acute GVHD (aGVHD) at day + 100 (15.4%) was lower than that in the MSD-control cohort (P = 0.050). No patient developed chronic GVHD (cGVHD). The 1-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) rates were 100% and 92.3%. In haplo-PTCy cohort, the times to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were significantly shorter than those in the haplo-control cohort (P < 0.05). The cumulative incidences of aGVHD at day + 100 and 1-year cGVHD were 31.8% and 18.2%, and the 1-year OS and EFS rates were 81.8% and 66.9%. Reduced-dose PTCy and cotransplantation of PBSCs and UC-MSCs is an acceptable alternative to patients with SAA.
Purged versus non-purged peripheral blood stem-cell transplantation for high-risk neuroblastoma (COG A3973): a randomised phase 3 trial
Myeloablative chemoradiotherapy and immunomagnetically purged autologous bone marrow transplantation has been shown to improve outcome for patients with high-risk neuroblastoma. Currently, peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) are infused after myeloablative therapy, but the effect of purging is unknown. We did a randomised study of tumour-selective PBSC purging in stem-cell transplantation for patients with high-risk neuroblastoma. Between March 16, 2001, and Feb 24, 2006, children and young adults (<30 years) with high-risk neuroblastoma were randomly assigned at diagnosis by a web-based system (in a 1:1 ratio) to receive either non-purged or immunomagnetically purged PBSC. Randomisation was done in blocks stratified by International Neuroblastoma Staging System stage, age, MYCN status, and International Neuroblastoma Pathology classification. Patients and treating physicians were not masked to treatment assignment. All patients were treated with six cycles of induction chemotherapy, myeloablative consolidation, and radiation therapy to the primary tumour site plus meta-iodobenzylguanidine avid metastases present before myeloablative therapy, followed by oral isotretinoin. PBSC collection was done after two induction cycles. For purging, PBSC were mixed with carbonyl iron and phagocytic cells removed with samarium cobalt magnets. Remaining cells were mixed with immunomagnetic beads prepared with five monoclonal antibodies targeting neuroblastoma cell surface antigens and attached cells were removed using samarium cobalt magnets. Patients underwent autologous stem-cell transplantation with PBSC as randomly assigned after six cycles of induction therapy. The primary endpoint was event-free survival and was analysed by intention-to-treat. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00004188. 495 patients were enrolled, of whom 486 were randomly assigned to treatment: 243 patients to receive non-purged PBSC and 243 to received purged PBSC. PBSC were collected from 229 patients from the purged group and 236 patients from the non-purged group, and 180 patients from the purged group and 192 from the non-purged group received transplant. 5-year event-free survival was 40% (95% CI 33–46) in the purged group versus 36% (30–42) in the non-purged group (p=0·77); 5-year overall survival was 50% (95% CI 43–56) in the purged group compared with 51% (44–57) in the non-purged group (p=0·81). Toxic deaths occurred in 15 patients during induction (eight in the purged group and seven in the non-purged group) and 12 during consolidation (eight in the purged group and four in the non-purged group). The most common adverse event reported was grade 3 or worse stomatitis during both induction (87 of 242 patients in the purged group and 93 of 243 patients in the non-purged group) and consolidation (131 of 177 in the purged group vs 145 of 191 in the non-purged group). Serious adverse events during induction were grade 3 or higher decreased cardiac function (four of 242 in the purged group and five of 243 in the non-purged group) and elevated creatinine (five of 242 in the purged group and six of 243 non-purged group) and during consolidation were sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (12 of 177 in the purged group and 17 of 191 in the non-purged group), acute vascular leak (11 of 177 in the purged group and nine of 191 in the non-purged group), and decreased cardiac function (one of 177 in the purged group and four of 191 in the non-purged group). Immunomagnetic purging of PBSC for autologous stem-cell transplantation did not improve outcome, perhaps because of incomplete purging or residual tumour in patients. Non-purged PBSC are acceptable for support of myeloablative therapy of high-risk neuroblastoma. National Cancer Institute and Alex's Lemonade Stand Foundation.
Impact of single dose of pegfilgrastim on peripheral blood stem cell harvest in patients with multiple myeloma or malignant lymphoma
This phase 2 study evaluated the impact of pegfilgrastim, a single-dose, long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, on the steady-state mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells into peripheral blood in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) or malignant lymphoma (ML). Efficacy and safety, along with CD34-positive cell mobilization outcomes were assessed in patients with MM, who were randomly assigned to pegfilgrastim ( n  = 30) or daily filgrastim ( n  = 31), and ML (pegfilgrastim only, n  = 13) cohorts. In the MM cohort, CD34-positive cell counts ≥ 2 × 10 6 /kg were achieved in 100% of patients in the pegfilgrastim group and 96.7% in the filgrastim group (difference: 3.3%; 80% confidence interval: −0.9–7.5%), demonstrating the non-inferiority of pegfilgrastim to filgrastim. All patients in the ML cohort achieved ≥ 2 × 10 6 /kg CD34-positive cell counts. The plerixafor administration rates in the MM cohort were 50.0% and 63.3% in the pegfilgrastim and filgrastim groups, respectively, and 91.7% in the ML cohort. There were no major differences in safety measures between the two groups. Although the sample size was small, particularly in the ML cohort, a single dose of pegfilgrastim demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety to daily doses of filgrastim, indicating its potential for clinical use while reducing patient burden. Trial Registration: jRCT2011210029, NCT05007652.
Effects of intracoronary infusion of peripheral blood stem-cells mobilised with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor on left ventricular systolic function and restenosis after coronary stenting in myocardial infarction: the MAGIC cell randomised clinical trial
Bone-marrow stem-cell transplantation has been shown to improve cardiac function in patients with myocardial infarction. We examined the feasibility and efficacy of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) therapy and subsequent intracoronary infusion of collected peripheral blood stem-cells (PBSCs) in such patients. We prospectively randomised 27 patients with myocardial infarction who underwent coronary stenting for the culprit lesion of infarction into three groups; cell infusion (n=10), G-CSF alone (n=10), and control group (n=7). Changes in left ventricular systolic function and perfusion were assessed after 6 months. By December, 2003, seven patients from the cell infusion group, three from the G-CSF group, and one from the control group had been assessed. G-CSF injection and intracoronary infusion of the mobilised PBSC did not aggravate inflammation and ischaemia during the periprocedural period. Exercise capacity (mean treadmill exercise time: 450 s [SD 178] at baseline vs 578 s [168] at 6 months' follow-up, p=0·004), myocardial perfusion (perfusion defect 11·6% [9·6] vs 5·3% [5·0], p=0·020) and systolic function (left ventricular ejection fraction 48·7% [8·3] vs 55·1% [7·4], p=0·005) improved significantly in patients who received cell infusion. However, we noted an unexpectedly high rate of in-stent restenosis at culprit lesion in patients who received G-CSF, and therefore we stopped enrolment. G-CSF therapy with intracoronary infusion of PBSC showed improved cardiac function, and promoted angiogenesis in patients with myocardial infarction. However, aggravation of restenosis could be a serious problem. In future studies with G-CSF based stem-cell therapy, patients should be carefully monitored for unexpected effects. Published online March 2, 2004 http://image.thelancet.com/extras/04art1325web.pdf
Superior GVHD-free, relapse-free survival for G-BM to G-PBSC grafts is associated with higher MDSCs content in allografting for patients with acute leukemia
Background Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (G-PBSC) has largely replaced unstimulated bone marrow (un-BM) for allografting because of accelerated engraftment, but with a higher morbidity and mortality of graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD). Recent studies suggested that G-CSF-primed BM (G-BM) had similar engraftment but lower morbidity and mortality of GVHD comparing to G-PBSC. A prospective, randomized, multicenter study was conducted to compare G-BM with G-PBSC as the grafts in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for acute leukemia in first complete remission (CR1). Methods Totally 101 adult leukemia in CR1 undergoing HLA-identical sibling transplants were randomized into G-BM or G-PBSC group. The primary study endpoint was GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS). Results Both the engraftment of neutrophil and platelet were 2 days later in G-BM than in G-PBSC group ( P  = 0.412, P  = 0.39). G-BM group showed significantly lower II–IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) and similar III–IV aGVHD compared with G-PBSC group (12.2% vs 28.8% for II–IV, P  = 0.048; 4.1% vs 9.6% for III–IV aGVHD, P  = 0.267, respectively). The overall cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) at 3 years were 22.3% ± 6.3% and 44.8% ± 7.6% ( P  = 0.026), respectively, and extensive cGHVD were 4.5% ± 3.1% and 15% ± 5.3% ( P  = 0.08), respectively, in G-BM and G-PBSC groups. Two groups had similar 3-year relapse, transplant-related mortality (TRM), overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) (all P  > 0.05). G-BM group showed significantly higher probability of GRFS than G-PBSC group (73.5% ± 6.3% vs 55.8% ± 6.9% at 1 year, P  = 0.049; 69.0% ± 6.7% vs 49.7% ± 7.0% at 2 and 3 years, P  = 0.03, respectively). Graft content analysis revealed statistically higher frequency of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) in the G-BM than in G-PBSC grafts ( P  < 0.01), and recipients received statistically higher numbers of MDSCs in G-BM than in G-PBSC group ( P  = 0.045). Numbers of MDSCs infused to patients were negatively correlated with the severity of aGVHD ( P  = 0.032, r  = −0.214). Multivariate analysis showed that MDSC cell dose below the median (HR = 3.49, P  < 0.001), recipient age (HR = 2.02, P  = 0.039), and high risk of disease (HR = 2.14, P  = 0.018) were independent risk factors for GRFS. Conclusions G-BM grafts lead a better GRFS and less GVHD associated with a higher MDSCs content compared with G-PBSC grafts.
Pre-infusion single-dose mesenchymal stem cells promote platelet engraftment and decrease severe acute graft versus host disease without relapse in haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation
Background Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) may be used to treat steroid-refractory graft versus host disease (GVHD). However, the effects of MSCs in haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (haplo-PBSCT) have not been confirmed in randomized studies. Methods We conducted a randomized clinical study to investigate the effects of pre-infusion (1 × 106 cells/kg) MSCs on hematopoietic recovery, Epstein–Barr and cytomegalovirus infection, GVHD, and relapse in patients undergoing haplo-PBSCT. Fifty patients with acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome were randomly divided into an MSC group administered 1 × 106 MSCs/kg 4 to 6 hours before infusion of peripheral stem cells and a control group without MSCs. Results Mean platelet engraftment time was significantly faster in the MSC compared with the control group (12.28 vs 13.29 days). The mean neutrophil engraftment time was comparable in both groups (10.76 ± 2.40 vs. 10.29 ± 1.72 days). Grade II or above acute GVHD was significantly decreased in the MSC compared with the control group (12% vs. 36%). There were no significant differences in relapse rate or overall survival between the groups. Conclusion These results suggest that pre-infusion single-dose MSCs promote platelet engraftment and decrease severe acute GVHD without increasing relapse rate.
Severe short-term adverse events in related bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell donors
The incidence of severe adverse events (SAEs) and associated risk factors in hematopoietic cell transplantation donors needs to be clarified for related donors (relatives of the transplant recipient), whose criteria for donation are more lenient than for unrelated donors. Data from related donors registered in the Japanese national data registry database between 2005 and 2021 were evaluated to determine the association of short-term SAE incidence with donor characteristics at registration. Fourteen of 4339 bone marrow (BM) donors (0.32%) and 54 of 10,684 peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) donors (0.51%) experienced confirmed SAEs during the short donation period. No deaths were observed. Past medical history was a common risk factor for SAEs in both BM and PBSC donors. Age of 60 years or older and female sex were identified as risk factors for SAEs in PBSC donors. Female sex was also a risk factor for poor mobilization, which resulted in discontinuation of PBSC collection. Although donors should be selected carefully, a certain level of safety is ensured for related donors in Japan. Donor safety should be further increased by improving the selection method for related donors and extending the follow-up period.
Neuroregenerative potential of intravenous G-CSF and autologous peripheral blood stem cells in children with cerebral palsy: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study
Objective We performed a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study to assess the neuroregenerative potential of intravenous granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) followed by infusion of mobilized peripheral blood mononuclear cells (mPBMCs) in children with cerebral palsy (CP). Methods Children with non-severe CP were enrolled in this study. G-CSF was administered for 5 days, then mPBMCs were collected by apheresis and cryopreserved. One month later (M1), recipients were randomized to receive either mPBMCs or a placebo infusion, and these treatment groups were switched at 7 months (M7) and observed for another 6 months (M13). We assessed the efficacy of treatment by evaluating neurodevelopmental tests, as well as by brain magnetic resonance imaging-diffusion tensor imaging (MRI-DTI) and 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) brain positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scanning to evaluate the anatomical and functional changes in the brain. Results Fifty-seven patients aged 4.3 ± 1.9 (range 2–10) years and weighing 16.6 ± 4.9 (range 11.6–56.0) kg were enrolled in this study. The administration of G-CSF as well as the collection and reinfusion of mPBMCs were safe and tolerable. The yield of mPBMCs was comparable to that reported in studies of pediatric donors without CP and patients with nonhematologic diseases. 42.6% of the patients responded to the treatment with higher neurodevelopmental scores than would normally be expected. In addition, larger changes in neurodevelopment test scores were observed in the 1 month after G-CSF administration (M0–M1) than during the 6 months after reinfusion with mPBMCs or placebo (M1–M7 or M7–M13). Patients who received G-CSF followed by mPBMC infusion at 7 months (T7 group) demonstrated significantly more neurodevelopmental improvement than patients who received G-CSF followed by mPBMC infusion at 1 month (T1 group). In contrast to the results of neurodevelopment tests, the results of MRI-DTI at the end of this study showed greater improvement in the T1 group. Although we observed metabolic changes to the cerebellum, thalamus and cerebral cortex in the 18 F-FDG brain PET-CT scans, there were no significant differences in such changes between the mPBMC and placebo group or between the T1 and T7 group. Conclusions Neurodevelopmental improvement was seen in response to intravenous G-CSF followed by mPBMC reinfusion, particularly to the G-CSF alone even without mPBMC reinfusion. Further studies using a larger number of mPBMCs for the infusion which could be collected by repeated cycles of apheresis or using repeated cycles of G-CSF alone, are needed to clarify the effect of mPBMC reinfusion or G-CSF alone (Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02983708. Registered 5 December, 2016, retrospectively registered).
Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for autoimmune diseases
Experimental data and early phase I/II studies suggest that high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) can arrest progression of severe autoimmune diseases. We have evaluated the toxicity and disease response in 473 patients with severe autoimmune disease treated with autologous HSCT between 1995 and 2003, from 110 centers participating in the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) autoimmune disease working party database. Survival, transplant-related mortality, treatment response and disease progression were assessed. In all, 420 patients (89%; 86+/-4% at 3 years, median follow-up 20 months) were alive, 53 (11%) had died from transplant-related mortality (N=31; 7+/-3% at 3 years) or disease progression (N=22; 9+/-4% at 3 years). Of 370 patients, 299 evaluable for response (81%) showed a treatment response, which was sustained in 213 (71% of responders). Response was associated with disease (P<0.001), was better in patients who received cyclophosphamide during mobilization (relative risk (RR)3.28 (1.57-6.83)) and was worse with increasing age (>40 years, RR0.29 (0.11-0.82)). Disease progression was associated with disease (P<0.001) and conditioning intensity (high intensity, RR1; intermediate intensity, RR1.81 (0.96-3.42)); low intensity, RR2.34 (1.074-5.11)). These data from the collective EBMT experience support the hypothesis that autologous HSCT can alter disease progression in severe autoimmune disease.