Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background Carry Life UF is a novel peritoneal dialysis (PD) technology for improved fluid management using steady concentration PD (SCPD). The Carry Life UF treatment starts with a manual peritoneal fill of 1.36% glucose PD fluid, followed by a 5-hour treatment where small amounts of glucose are continuously added to maintain a stable intraperitoneal glucose concentration. A recent in-center clinical study using the Carry Life UF system demonstrated higher ultrafiltration (UF) rates, more efficient use of glucose (increased UF volume/gram of glucose absorbed), and greater sodium removal with the Carry Life UF treatments compared with a 2.27% glucose continuous ambulatory PD (CAPD) dwell. The aim of this study is to compare efficacy and safety of the Carry Life UF system with a standard CAPD prescription in the home setting. Methods A prospective, multicenter, randomized, crossover study of 19 adult subjects at up to 12 sites in Italy, Sweden and the UK will complete the investigation. End-stage kidney disease patients with a CAPD prescription of 2–4 exchanges per day, including at least one 2.27% glucose dwell, will be included. After a Carry Life UF glucose dose determination phase performed in-clinic, subjects will be randomized to start the home treatment part of the study with either the control arm (2.27% glucose CAPD dwell) or the Carry Life UF arm (11 or 15 g/h glucose dose), each for four weeks. The primary endpoint is UF volume comparing the control CAPD 2.27% glucose dwell with the Carry Life UF treatment. Secondary endpoints include adverse event rates, peritoneal sodium removal, glucose UF efficiency, and peak dialysate glucose concentration. Discussion This study will evaluate a novel PD technology in the home environment. Challenging aspects include the need to accurately measure UF volumes at home and to support subjects in using a novel technology. The study design considers important parameters for precise UF volume measurements and provides detailed weighing instructions to the study team to ensure consistency between study centers. Research nursing support will be provided for training of subjects and to support endpoint data collection in the subjects’ home. Due to the significant burden associated with the study, subjects will be offered a fair compensation, in accordance with local regulations. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05874804 Registration date: 18th of April 2023.

Peritonitis remains a common clinical problem for patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD). There are, however, retrospective studies with historical controls that suggest that biocompatible PD solutions may reduce the rates of peritonitis. We conducted a randomized controlled study comparing the use of biocompatible and conventional solutions, accumulating over 7000 patient-months experience. We included peritonitis episodes from patients who discontinued PD during the follow-up period. The study was powered to detect a reduction in the peritonitis rate of over half in the 267 randomized patients in demographically similar groups. There were no intergroup differences in PD technique survival irrespective of whether the outcome was censored for death. Peritonitis-free survival was 26.7 months using conventional compared to 23.1 months using biocompatible PD solutions. The peritonitis rates were also not statistically different when measured in patient-months. Thus, despite the finding of non-randomized studies suggesting benefits of the biocompatible PD solutions, we could not detect any clinically significant advantages in terms of technique survival or peritonitis. Although our study is the largest randomized study comparing different PD solutions to date, we do not exclude the possibility that our results are a consequence of the lack of statistical power. Meta-analysis of randomized control trials in this field is essential.

IntroductionPeritonitis is a major complication of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), the risk of which is significantly influenced by the type of PD transfer system. Although the Y-disconnect and double-bag system is more efficient in preventing peritonitis compared with the spike system, little information is available to differentiate risks between different brands of the Y-disconnect double-bag system. A randomised controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a newly introduced system is needed to provide the necessary clinical evidence to guide policy decision-making.Methods and analysisThe study is an open-label randomised controlled trial. A total of 434 patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing CAPD will be enrolled and randomised to either the intervention group, Stay Safe Link, or the control group, Stay Safe. All study subjects will be followed up and monitored for 1 year. The primary safety outcome is the rate of peritonitis while the primary efficacy outcomes are the delivered dialysis dose and ultrafiltration volume.Ethics and disseminationThe study was approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee, National Institute of Health Malaysia. A written informed consent will be obtained from all participating subjects prior to any trial-related procedure and the study conduct will adhere strictly to Good Clinical Practice. The findings will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal.Trial registration numberNCT03177031; Pre-results.

Background Peritoneal dialysis is an important type of renal replacement therapy for uremic patients. In peritoneal dialysis, fluids fill in and flow out of the abdominal cavity three to five times per day. Usually, the fluid is packed in a polyvinyl chloride (PVC) bag. Safety concerns have arisen over di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, which is essential in the formation of PVC materials. In 2011, the National Development and Reform Commission of China released a catalog of industrial structural adjustments, mandating the elimination of PVC bags for intravenous infusion and food containers. Although bags for peritoneal dialysis fluid were not included in the elimination list, several manufacturers began to develop new materials for fluid bags. HUAREN peritoneal dialysis fluid consists of the same electrolytes and buffer agent as in Baxter fluid, but is packed in bags that do not contain PVC. This multicenter randomized controlled trial was designed to compare peritoneal dialysis fluid packed in non-PVC-containing and PVC-containing bags. Further, the study sought to determine the proper dose of peritoneal dialysis fluid and the actual survival rates of Chinese patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis. Methods/Design The study participants are adults undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis for 30 days to 6 months. All eligible patients are randomized (1:1) to peritoneal dialysis with Baxter and HUAREN dialysis fluids (initial dose, 6 l/day), with dosages adjusted according to a unified protocol. The primary outcomes are the 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year overall survival rates. Secondary outcome measures include technique survival rates, reductions in estimated glomerular filtration rate, nutritional status, quality of life, cardiovascular events, medical costs and drop-out rates. Safety outcome measures include adverse events, changes in vital signs and laboratory parameters, peritonitis, allergies, and quality of products. Discussion This study is the first to evaluate the long-term safety and effectiveness of a non-PVC packed peritoneal dialysis fluid. The effects of plasticizer on patient long-term survival will be determined. The characteristics of Chinese patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis will be determined, including proper dose, technique survival rates, patient survival rates, and medical costs. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01779557 .

Background We report here two new peritoneal dialysis fluids (PDFs) for Japan [BLR 250, BLR 350 (Baxter Limited, Japan)]. The PDFs use two-chamber systems, and have bicarbonate and lactate buffer to a total of 35 mmol/L. In separate trials, the new PDFs were compared to two “standard” systems [PD-4, PD-2 (Baxter Limited, Japan)]. The trials aimed to demonstrate non-inferiority of peritoneal creatinine clearance (pCcr), peritoneal urea clearance (pCurea) and ultrafiltration volume (UF), and compare acid–base and electrolyte balance. Methods We performed randomized, multicenter, parallel group, controlled, open-label clinical trials in stable continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients. The primary endpoints were pCcr and UF. The secondary endpoints were serum bicarbonate and peritoneal urea clearance. The active phase was 8 weeks. These trials were performed as non-inferiority studies, with the lower limit of non-inferiority for pCcr and UF set at 3.2 L/week/1.73 m 2 and 0.12 L/day, respectively. Results 108 patients (28 centers) and 103 patients (29 centers) took part in the two trials. Groups were well balanced at baseline. The investigative PDFs were non-inferior to the “standard” ones in terms of primary endpoints, comparable in terms of pCurea, and superior in terms acid–base balance, especially correcting those with over-alkalinization at baseline. Conclusions We demonstrated fundamental functionality of two new PDFs and showed superior acid–base balance. Given the propensity of Japanese CAPD patients for alkalosis, it is important to avoid metabolic alkalosis which is associated with increased cardiovascular mortality risk and accelerated vascular calcification. The new PDFs are important progress of CAPD treatment for Japanese patients.

Background The most appropriate time to initiate dialysis after surgical insertion of Tenckhoff catheters is not clear in the literature. There is the possibility of peritoneal dialysis (PD) complications such as leakage and infection if dialysis is started too soon after insertion. However, much morbidity and expense could be saved by reducing dependency on haemodialysis (HD) by earlier initiation of PD post catheter insertion. Previous studies are observational and mostly compare immediate with delayed use. The primary objective is to determine the safest and shortest time interval between surgical placement of a Tenckhoff catheter and starting PD. Methods/Design This is a randomised controlled trial of patients who will start PD after insertion of Tenckhoff catheter at Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (RBWH) or Rockhampton Base Hospital (RBH) who meet the inclusion criteria. Patients will be stratified by site and diabetic status. The patients will be randomised to one of three treatment groups. Group 1 will start PD one week after Tenckhoff catheter insertion, group 2 at two weeks and group 3 at four weeks. Nurses and physicians will be blinded to the randomised allocation. The primary end point is the complication rate (leaks and infection) after initiation of PD. Discussion The study will determine the most appropriate time to initiate PD after placement of a Tenckhoff catheter. Trial Registration ACTRN12610000076077

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of nitrates on left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in hypertensive patients on chronic peritoneal dialysis (PD). Sixty-four PD patients with hypertension were enrolled in this study. All patients accepted antihypertensive drugs at baseline. Thirty-two patients (nitrate group) took isosorbide mononitrate for 24 weeks. The remaining 32 patients (non-nitrate group) took other antihypertensive drugs. Blood pressure (BP), left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and plasma asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) were monitored. Subjects with normal renal function were included as the control group (n = 30). At baseline, plasma ADMA levels in PD patients were significantly higher than the control group, but there was no significant difference in plasma ADMA levels between the two groups. At the end of the 24-week period, BP, LVMI, LVH prevalence and plasma ADMA levels in the nitrate group were significantly lower than those in the non-nitrate group. BP did not show a significant difference between 12 and 24 weeks in the nitrate group with a reduced need for other medication. Logistic regression analysis showed that nitrate supplementation and SBP reduction were independent risk factors of LVMI change in PD patients after adjusting for age, gender, diabetes history and CCB supplementation. It was concluded that organic nitrates favor regression of LVH in hypertensive patients on chronic peritoneal dialysis, and nitrates may be considered for use before employing the five other antihypertensive agents other than nitrates.

Given the lack of cost-effectiveness information, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) with icodextrin (CAPD+ICO) has not yet been included in the Universal Health Coverage (UHC) scheme. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-utility of dialysis treatments for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients with fluid and sodium overload, comparing CAPD+ICO and automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) against glucose-based CAPD. A Markov model was applied to evaluate lifetime costs and health outcomes from a societal perspective. Data, including transitional probabilities, direct medical and non-medical costs, and utilities, were collected from randomized controlled trials conducted across 16 hospitals in various regions of Thailand. Compared to glucose-based CAPD, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for CAPD+ICO was 908,440 THB (26,082 USD) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained, while APD was dominated, incurring higher costs and yielding fewer QALYs. The results indicated that glucose-based CAPD had a 90% probability of being the most cost-effective option from a societal perspective, based on Thailand’s willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of 160,000 THB (4,603 USD) per QALY gained. Therefore, CAPD+ICO is not considered a good value for money, requiring an additional annual budget of approximately 58 million THB (2 million USD). These findings provide important economic evaluation evidence to support policy decision-making alongside clinical effectiveness and equity considerations in guiding future UHC benefit package decisions for dialysis modalities among ESRD patients with fluid and sodium overload in Thailand.

   Background The standard rate of sodium removal in adult anuric patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) is 7.5 g/L of ultrafiltration volume (UFV). Although automated PD (APD) is widely used in pediatric patients, no attempt has yet been made to estimate sodium removal in APD. Methods The present, retrospective cohort study included pediatric patients with APD who were managed at Tokyo Metropolitan Children’s Medical Center between July 2010 and November 2017. The patients underwent a peritoneal equilibrium test (PET) at our hospital. Sodium removal per UFV was calculated by peritoneal function and dwell time using samples from patients on APD with 1- and 2-h dwell effluent within three months of PET and 4- and 10-h dwell effluent at PET. Results In total, 217 samples from 18 patients were included, with 63, 81, and 73 of the samples corresponding to the High [H], High-average [HA], and Low-average [LA] PET category, respectively. Sodium removal per UFV (g/L in salt equivalent) for dwell times of one, two, four, and ten hours was 5.2, 8.8, 8.0, and 11.5 for PET [H], 5.3, 5.8, 5.6, and 8.1 for PET [HA], and 4.6, 5.1, 5.1, and 7.1 for PET [LA], respectively. Conclusions Sodium removal per UFV in pediatric APD was less than the standard adult CAPD and tended to be lower with shorter dwell times, leading to sodium accumulation. Therefore, salt intake should be restricted in combination with one or more long daytime dwells, especially in anuric patients. Graphical Abstract A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information

Background/Aims: The long-term effects of biocompatible peritoneal dialysis (PD) solution on residual renal function (RRF), inflammation, adipokines and metabolic acidosis are controversial. We evaluated the effects of biocompatible PD solution in continuous ambulatory PD (CAPD) patients for an additional 12-month period. Method: Among 91 incident patients who started CAPD with either biocompatible PD solution (Balance®, Fresenius; LS, n = 48) or conventional PD solution (CAPD/DPCA®, Fresenius; CS, n = 43), 63 patients, who were followed for 12 months, were enrolled and followed for an additional 12 months. Results: After 24 months of treatment, the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of the LS group was twofold higher compared to the CS group (33.5 ± 30.7 vs. 16.3 ± 17.9 l/week/1.73 m 2 , respectively, p = 0.021). In a subgroup of patients with an initial GFR >2 ml/min/1.73 m 2 , the GFR of the LS group was significantly higher than the rate of the CS group after 24 months (43.7 ± 30.5 vs. 18.6 ± 19.0 l/week/1.73 m 2 , respectively, p = 0.042). Over a 24-month period, effluent cancer antigen-125 levels were significantly increased in the LS group compared to the CS group, while effluent interleukin-6 levels did not differ between the two groups. The serum tCO 2 levels were consistently higher in the LS group compared to the CS group. Conclusions: We found that the effect of LS on preserving RRF may be maintained over a 24-month treatment period in CAPD patients, and LS use may have other benefits, such as the correction of metabolic acidosis.