Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Item TypeItem Type
-
Is Full-Text AvailableIs Full-Text Available
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersSubjectCountry Of PublicationPublisherSourceLanguagePlace of PublicationContributorsLocation
Done
Filters
Reset
94
result(s) for
"Philbrick, Inigo."
Sort by:
All that glitters : a story of friendship, fraud and fine art
by
Whitfield, Orlando, author
in
Philbrick, Inigo.
,
Whitfield, Orlando.
,
Art dealers History 21st century.
2025
When Orlando Whitfield first meets Inigo Philbrick, they are students dreaming of dealing art for a living. Their friendship lasts for fifteen years until one day, Inigo - by then the most successful dealer of his generation - disappears, accused of a fraud so gigantic and audacious it rocks the art world to its core. A sparklingly sharp memoir of greed, ambition and madness, 'All That Glitters' will take you to the heart of the contemporary art world, a place wilder and wealthier than you could ever imagine.
Theory of an art market scandal: artistic integrity and financial speculation in the Inigo Philbrick case
2022
Focusing on the case of Inigo Philbrick and his alleged fraudulent overselling of artworks by Rudolf Stingel, we offer a new theory of art market scandal that builds upon Alexander’s framework of the pure and impure, and Adut’s concept of transgressive publicity. We argue that the presence of an art market creates latent impurity, according to the Hostile Worlds conception of markets as an impurification of art. The further financialization of an artwork into shares redoubles money’s impurification of art by creating what we term a financial simulacrum. Philbrick’s case allows us to expand Adut’s theory from mapping an art scandal of moral decency to conceptualizing an art market scandal of financial transgression. We argue that financial transgression—as enabled by the increased securitization of art—depends on the persona of the art dealer as intermediary, a projection that is itself a simulacrum. Thus, we frame Philbrick archetypally as hydroponic, validated, novel yet neutral, and self-pardoning. Drawing on interviews of expert insiders and close reading of court documents and press articles, we contribute a model of art market scandal that encompasses the dual artistic and financial nature of traded artworks and the shared art-industry risk of regulation.
Journal Article