Explore the vast range of titles available.

In Southeast Asia, treatment is recommended for all patients with post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL). Adherence to the first-line regimen, twelve weeks of miltefosine (MF), is low and ocular toxicity has been observed with this exposure period. We assessed the safety and efficacy of two shorter-course treatments: liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) alone and combined with MF. An open-label, phase II, randomized, parallel-arm, non-comparative trial was conducted in patients with parasitologically confirmed PKDL, 6 to ≤60 years. Patients were assigned to 20 mg/kg LAmB (total dose, in five injections over 15 days) alone or combined with allometric MF (3 weeks). The primary endpoint was definitive cure at 12 months, defined as complete resolution of papular and nodular lesions and >80% re-pigmentation of macular lesions. Definitive cure at 24 months was a secondary efficacy endpoint. 118/126 patients completed the trial. Definitive cure at 12 months was observed in 29% (18/63) patients receiving LAmB and 30% (19/63) receiving LAmB/MF (mITT), increasing to 58% and 66%, respectively, at 24 months. Most lesions had resolved/improved at 12 and 24 months for patients receiving LAmB (90%, 83%) and LAmB/MF (85%, 88%) by qualitative assessment. One death, unrelated to study drugs, was reported; no study drug-related serious adverse events were observed. The most frequent adverse drug reactions were MF-related vomiting and nausea, and LAmB-related hypokalaemia and infusion reactions. Most adverse events were mild; no ocular adverse events occurred. Both regimens are suitably safe and efficacious alternatives to long-course MF for PKDL in South Asia. CTRI/2017/04/008421.

Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infected patients requires special case management. AmBisome monotherapy at 40 mg/kg is recommended by the World Health Organization. The objective of the study was to assess if a combination of a lower dose of AmBisome with miltefosine would show acceptable efficacy at the end of treatment. An open-label, non-comparative randomized trial of AmBisome (30 mg/kg) with miltefosine (100 mg/day for 28 days), and AmBisome monotherapy (40 mg/kg) was conducted in Ethiopian VL patients co-infected with HIV (NCT02011958). A sequential design was used with a triangular continuation region. The primary outcome was parasite clearance at day 29, after the first round of treatment. Patients with clinical improvement but without parasite clearance at day 29 received a second round of the allocated treatment. Efficacy was evaluated again at day 58, after completion of treatment. Recruitment was stopped after inclusion of 19 and 39 patients in monotherapy and combination arms respectively, as per pre-specified stopping rules. At D29, intention-to-treat efficacy in the AmBisome arm was 70% (95% CI 45-87%) in the unadjusted analysis, and 50% (95% CI 27-73%) in the adjusted analysis, while in the combination arm, it was 81% (95% CI 67-90%) and 67% (95% CI 48-82%) respectively. At D58, the adjusted efficacy was 55% (95% CI 32-78%) in the monotherapy arm, and 88% (95% CI 79-98%) in the combination arm. No major safety concerns related to the study medication were identified. Ten SAEs were observed within the treatment period, and 4 deaths unrelated to the study medication. The extended treatment strategy with the combination regimen showed the highest documented efficacy in HIV-VL patients; these results support a recommendation of this regimen as first-line treatment strategy for HIV-VL patients in eastern Africa. www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT02011958.

Purpose Perifosine (PRF) is an oral alkylphospholipid with antineoplastic effects and reasonable tolerability. It inhibits signaling through the PI3/AKT axis and other cascades of biologic importance in glioblastoma, and has promising pre-clinical activity in vitro and in vivo. Therefore, we conducted a phase II open-label single-arm clinical trial of perifosine for patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). Methods We planned to accrue up to 30 adults with recurrent GBM with a minimum Karnofsky Performance Status of 50 following radiotherapy but without other restrictions on the number or types of prior therapy. Concurrent p450 stimulating hepatic enzyme inducing anticonvulsants were prohibited. Patients were treated with a loading dose of 600 mg PRF (in 4 divided doses on day 1) followed by 100 mg daily until either disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the 6-month progression free survival (PFS6) rate, with at least 20% considered promising. Accrual was continuous but if 0 of the first 12 patients with GBM reached PFS6, then further accrual would terminate for futility. Patients with other high grade gliomas were accrued concurrently to an exploratory cohort. Results Treatment was generally well tolerated; gastrointestinal toxicities were the most common side effects, although none resulted in treatment discontinuation. However, there was limited to no efficacy in GBM (n = 16): the PFS6 rate was 0%, median PFS was 1.58 months [95% CI (1.08, 1.84)], median overall survival was 3.68 months [95% CI (2.50, 7.79)], with no radiographic responses. There was a confirmed partial response in one patient with anaplastic astrocytoma (n = 14). Conclusions PRF is tolerable but ineffective as monotherapy for GBM. Preclinical data suggests synergistic effects of PRF in combination with other approaches, and further study is ongoing.

Background. In Bihar, India, home to nearly one-half of the world's burden of visceral leishmaniasis, drug resistance has ended the usefulness of pentavalent antimony, which is the traditional first-line treatment. Although monotherapy with other agents is available, the use of 2 drugs with different modes of action might increase efficacy, shorten treatment duration, enhance compliance, and/or reduce the risk of parasite resistance. To test the feasibility of a new approach to combination therapy in visceral leishmaniasis (also known a kala-azar), we treated Indian patients with a single infusion of liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB), followed 1 day later by short-course oral miltefosine. Methods. We used a randomized, noncomparative, group-sequential, triangular design and assigned 181 subjects to treatment with 5 mg/kg of L-AmB alone (group A; 45 subjects), 5 mg/kg of L-AmB followed by miltefosine for 10 days (group B; 46 subjects) or 14 days (group C; 45 subjects), or 3.75 mg/kg of L-AmB followed by miltefosine for 14 days (group D; 45 subjects). When it became apparent that all regimens were effective, 45 additional, nonrandomized patients were assigned to receive 5 mg/kg of L-AmB followed by miltefosine for 7 days (group E). Results. Each regimen was satisfactorily tolerated, and all 226 subjects showed initial apparent cure responses. Nine months after treatment, final cure rates were similar: group A, 91% (95% confidence interval [CI], 78%–97%]; group B, 98% (95% CI, 87%–100%); group C, 96% (95% CI, 84%–99%]; group D, 96% (95% CI, 84%–99%); and group E, 98% (95% CI, 87%–100%). Conclusions. These results suggest that treatment with single-dose L-AmB followed by 7–14 days of miltefosine is active against Indian kala-azar. This short-course, sequential regimen warrants additional testing in India and in those regions of endemicity where visceral leishmaniasis may be more difficult to treat. Trial registration. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00370825.

Miltefosine has been shown to have activity against Indian visceral leishmaniasis, and this agent can be taken orally. This randomized trial in India compared miltefosine treatment with intravenously administered amphotericin B, the most effective standard treatment. The initial cure rate was 100 percent in both groups. After six months, 94 percent of the 299 patients in the miltefosine group were deemed to be cured. Oral miltefosine was as effective as amphotericin B, which must be administered parenterally. Visceral leishmaniasis is caused by infection of the visceral reticuloendothelial system by leishmania species acquired from sandfly bites. There are approximately 500,000 cases per year, with the majority in northeastern India, Nepal, and Bangladesh. Other areas where visceral leishmaniasis is endemic include East Africa, the littoral region of the Mediterranean, and Brazil. 1 The disease presents with fever, hepatosplenomegaly, and pancytopenia. Almost all untreated patients die, generally because of intercurrent infection. 2 , 3 Both standard treatment and secondary treatment are parenteral. Standard treatment consists of daily injections of pentavalent antimonial compounds for 28 days. In regions of India where there is a . . .

The oral agent miltefosine has demonstrated a >95% cure rate in Indian visceral leishmaniasis. We performed a large, placebo-controlled study of miltefosine therapy (2.5 mg/kg per day orally for 28 days) against cutaneous leishmaniasis in Colombia and Guatemala. In regions in Colombia where Leishmania vianna panamensis is common, the per-protocol cure rates for miltefosine and placebo were 91% (40 of 44 patients) and 38% (9 of 24). These values are similar to historic values for the antimony standard of care and placebo. In regions in Guatemala where L. v. braziliensis and L. mexicana mexicana are common, the per-protocol cure rates were 53% (20 of 38) for miltefosine and 21% (4 of 19) for placebo. The miltefosine rate was lower than historic antimony cure rates of >90%. Miltefosine was well tolerated. Miltefosine is a useful oral agent against cutaneous leishmaniasis due to L. v. panamensis in Colombia but not against leishmaniasis due to L. v. braziliensis in Guatemala.

BackgroundThe host cellular immune response associated with two treatments for post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) - paromomycin plus miltefosine (Arm 1), and liposomal amphotericin B plus miltefosine (Arm 2) - was examined in Sudanese patients before treatment (D0), at the end of treatment (D42), and during the post-treatment period (D180).MethodsWhole blood samples were stimulated with soluble Leishmania antigen for 24 h (whole blood assay [WBA]) and the concentrations of Th1/Th2/Th17-associated cytokines, IP-10, PDL-1 and granzyme B were determined.ResultsThe Arm 1 treatment (98.2% cure rate) induced a Th1/Th2/Th17 response, while the Arm 2 treatment (80% cure rate) induced a Th1/Th2 response. Five Arm 2 patients relapsed and showed lower IFN-γ, TNF and IL-1β concentrations at D0 than non-relapsers in this Arm. In patients with low-IFN-γ-production at D0, Arm 1 treatment led to a better host immune response and clinical outcome than Arm 2 treatment.ConclusionsA Th1/Th2/Th17 response was associated with a higher cure rate. Patients with low IFN-γ, TNF and IL-1β before treatment are more likely to relapse if they undergo Arm 2-type treatment. Determining IFN-γ, TNF and IL-10 levels prior to treatment could help predict patients at higher risk of relapse/recovery from PKDL.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03399955, Registered 17 January 2018, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/ NCT03399955.HighlightsNo blood biomarker can currently predict treatment outcome for patients with PKDL.The cellular response during treatment is key to overcoming leishmaniasis.Patients who relapsed showed low SLA-induced production of IFN-γ, TNF and IL-1β.Treatment effectiveness was related to higher IFN-γ production and absence of IL-10.PKDL treatment can be monitored and relapse predicted by the whole blood assay.

Background. Antimonials are the mainstay of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) treatment in Africa. The increasing incidence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection requires alternative safe and effective drug regimens. Oral miltefosine has been proven to be safe and effective in the treatment of Indian VL but has not been studied in Africa or in persons with HIV and VL coinfection. Methods. We compared the efficacy of miltefosine and sodium stibogluconate (SSG) in the treatment of VL in persons in Ethiopia. A total of 580 men with parasitologically and/or serologically confirmed VL were randomized to receive either oral miltefosine (100 mg per day for 28 days) or intramuscular SSG (20 mg/kg per day for 30 days). Results. The initial cure rate was 88% in both treatment groups. Mortality during treatment was 2% in the miltefosine group, compared with 10% in the SSG group. Initial treatment failure was 8% in the miltefosine group, compared with 1% in the SSG group. Among the 375 patients (65%) who agreed to HIV testing, HIV seroprevalence was 29%. Among patients not infected with HIV, initial cure, mortality, and initial treatment failure rates were not significantly different (94% vs. 95%, 1% vs. 3%, and 5% vs. 1% for the miltefosine and SSG groups, respectively). Initial treatment failure with miltefosine occurred in 18% of HIV-coinfected patients, compared with treatment failure in 5% of non–HIV-infected patients. At 6 months after treatment, 174 (60%) of the 290 miltefosine recipients and 189 (65%) of the 290 SSG recipients experienced cure; 30 (10%) of 290 in the miltefosine group and 7 (2%) of 290 in the SSG group experienced relapse, and the mortality rate was 6% in the miltefosine group, compared with 12% in the SSG group. HIV-infected patients had higher rates of relapse (16 [25%] of 63 patients), compared with non–HIV-infected patients (5 [5%] of 131). Conclusions. Treatment with miltefosine is equally effective as standard SSG treatment in non–HIV-infected men with VL. Among HIV-coinfected patients, miltefosine is safer but less effective than SSG.

Summary Objective Perifosine exhibits anti-tumor activity by inhibiting AKT phosphorylation. The purpose of this phase II basket trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of perifosine monotherapy for ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancers. Methods Recurrent or persistent ovarian, endometrial, or cervical cancer patients were assigned to PIK3CA wild-type or mutant groups. Each patient received 600 mg oral perifosine on day 1 followed by a maintenance dose of 100 mg daily. The primary endpoint was disease control rate; secondary endpoints included response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Immunohistochemical staining and targeted sequencing were used to explore new biomarkers in such patients. Results Sixteen and 5 ovarian, 17 and 7 endometrial, and 18 and 8 cervical cancer patients with PIK3CA wild-type and mutant, respectively, were enrolled. Disease control rates (wild-type/mutant) were 12.5/40.0%, 47.1/14.3%, and 11.1/25.0% in ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancer, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were anemia (22.5%) and anorexia (11.3%). Immunohistochemical staining revealed that the disease control rate in patients with negative phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) expression was 50.0%, and the odds ratio of positive to negative patients was 0.24 in all patients. Conclusions Perifosine monotherapy showed good tolerability but expected efficacy was not achieved. Modest efficacy was demonstrated in ovarian cancer patients with PIK3CA mutations and endometrial cancer patients with PIK3CA wild-type; no difference was observed between PIK3CA wild-type and mutant in cervical cancer. Absence of PTEN expression may be predictive of clinical efficacy with perifosine monotherapy.

Miltefosine has previously been shown to cure 97% of cases of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) in Indian adults. Because approximately one-half of cases of VL occur in children, we evaluated use of the adult dosage of miltefosin (2.5 mg/kg per day for 28 days) in 80 Indian children (age, 2–11 years) with parasitologically confirmed infection in an open-label clinical trial. Clinical and parasitological parameters were reassessed at the end of treatment and 6 months later. One patient died of intercurrent pneumonia on day 6. The other 79 patients demonstrated no parasites after treatment, had marked clinical improvement, and were deemed initially cured. Three patients had relapse, and 1 patient was lost to follow-up. The final cure rate was 94% for all enrolled patients and 95% for evaluable patients. Side effects included mild-to-moderate vomiting or diarrhea (each in ∼25% of patients) and mild-to-moderate, transient elevations in the aspartate aminotransferase level during the early treatment phase (in 55%). This trial indicates that miltefosine is as effective and well tolerated in Indian children with VL as in adults and that it can be recommended as the first choice for treatment of childhood VL in India.