Explore the vast range of titles available.

IntroductionAntibiotics are time-critical in the management of sepsis. When infectious organisms are unknown, patients are treated with empiric antibiotics to include coverage for gram-negative organisms, such as antipseudomonal cephalosporins and penicillins. However, in observational studies, some antipseudomonal cephalosporins (eg, cefepime) are associated with neurologic dysfunction while the most common antipseudomonal penicillin (piperacillin–tazobactam) is associated with acute kidney injury (AKI). No randomised control trials have compared these regimens. This manuscript describes the protocol and analysis plan for a trial designed to compare the effects of antipseudomonal cephalosporins and antipseudomonal penicillins among acutely ill patients receiving empiric antibiotics.Methods and analysisThe Antibiotic Choice On ReNal outcomes trial is a prospective, single-centre, non-blinded randomised trial being conducted at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. The trial will enrol 2500 acutely ill adults receiving gram-negative coverage for treatment of infection. Eligible patients are randomised 1:1 to receive cefepime or piperacillin–tazobactam on first order entry of a broad-spectrum antibiotic covering gram-negative organisms. The primary outcome is the highest stage of AKI and death occurring between enrolment and 14 days after enrolment. This will be compared between patients randomised to cefepime and randomised to piperacillin–tazobactam using an unadjusted proportional odds regression model. The secondary outcomes are major adverse kidney events through day 14 and number of days alive and free of delirium and coma in 14 days after enrolment. Enrolment began on 10 November 2021 and is expected to be completed in December 2022.Ethics and disseminationThe trial was approved by the Vanderbilt University Medical Center institutional review board (IRB#210591) with a waiver of informed consent. Results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and presented at scientific conferences.Trial registration numberNCT05094154.

Background and Objective The effectiveness of antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) in the prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) following thyroid and parathyroid surgery remains uncertain. The objective of this prospective randomized controlled trial (Ito-RCT1) was to assess the effectiveness of AMP in clean neck surgery performed to treat thyroid and parathyroid disease. Methods Participants comprised patients scheduled for clean neck surgery for thyroid and parathyroid disease at Ito Hospital. Patients whose surgery included sternotomy or resection of the trachea, larynx, pharynx, or esophagus were excluded. AMP consisted of 2 g of piperacillin (PIPC) (group A, n  = 541) or 1 g of cefazolin (CEZ) (group B, n  = 541) administered intravenously immediately after endotracheal intubation. Patients in the control group (Group C, n  = 1,082) did not receive AMP. Results Statistical analysis was performed to compare the AMP group (Group A + Group B) with the control group (Group C). Drug-induced acute reactions correlated to PIPC or CEZ did not occur in the AMP group. No significant differences in the postoperative incidence of liver or renal dysfunction were seen between the AMP and control groups. Postoperative incidence of urinary tract infection was significantly higher in the control group ( p  = 0.002). The incidence of SSI events was very low, with only 1 event (0.09 %) in the AMP group and 3 events (0.28 %) in the control group, and this difference between groups was not significant ( p  = 0.371). Conclusions AMP is not necessary to prevent SSI after clean thyroid or parathyroid surgery.

Background There is lack of information on the efficacy and safety of piperacillin–tazobactam administered by continuous infusion. Objective The aim of this study was to investigate whether continuous infusion of piperacillin–tazobactam is superior in terms of efficacy to a 30 % higher dose administered by intermittent infusion to treat suspected or confirmed infection due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa . Setting Multicenter clinical trial with 11 third level Spanish hospitals. Method Randomized, double-blind parallel-group clinical trial, controlled by conventional administration of the drug. Patients randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive piperacillin–tazobactam as continuous infusion (CI) or intermittent (II). Main outcome measure Primary efficacy endpoint was percentage of patients having a satisfactory clinical response at completion of treatment, defined as clinical cure or clinical improvement. Adverse events were reported. Results 78 patients were included, 40 in the CI group and 38 in the II group. Mean (standard deviation) duration of treatment was 7 (±4.44) days. 58 patients (74.4 %) experienced cure or improvement at the end of the treatment. There were no statistical differences in cure rates between the two treatment arms and no adverse events were reported. Conclusion Continuous infusion of piperacillin–tazobactam is an alternative administration drug method at least similar in efficacy and safety to conventional intermittent infusion. Multivariate analysis is needed to determine whether continuous administration might be more beneficial than intermittent in certain patient subgroups.

The risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) associated with concomitant vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam in the intensive care unit (ICU) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the AKI incidence associated with concomitant vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam compared to either cefepime or meropenem with vancomycin in the ICU. A multicenter, retrospective, propensity score-matched cohort study was conducted in adult ICU patients administered vancomycin in combination with either piperacillin/tazobactam, cefepime, or meropenem were included. Patients developing AKI ≤48 h following combination therapy initiation were excluded. The primary endpoint was to compare the incidence of AKI associated with concomitant antimicrobial therapy. Multivariable Cox regression modeling in predicting AKI was also conducted. A total of 1044 patients were matched. The AKI incidence in vancomycin- piperacillin/tazobactam and vancomycin-cefepime/meropenem groups were 21.9% and 16.8%, respectively (p = 0.068). Multivariable prediction models showed concomitant vancomycin-piperacillin/tazobactam was an independent risk factor of AKI using serum creatinine only (HR 1.52, 1.10–2.10, p = 0.011) and serum creatinine with urine output-based KDIGO criteria (HR 1.77, 1.18–2.67, p = 0.006). No significant differences between groups were observed for AKI recovery patterns or mortality. Concomitant vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam administration in adult ICU patients was independently associated with an increased risk of AKI. •Concomitant vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam was an independent risk factor of developing AKI in ICU patients.•Final prediction models corroborated these findings using serum creatinine with or without urine output-based AKI criteria.•Majority of AKI observed was considered mild (Stage I KDIGO) and resolved <3 days.

This prospective, double-blind trial assessed whether the addition of a glycopeptide would be able to reduce the time to defervescence in neutropenic patients with cancer who had persistent fever 48-60 h after the initiation of empirical piperacillin-tazobactam monotherapy. Of 763 eligible patients, 165 with persistent fever were randomized to receive piperacillin-tazobactam therapy plus either vancomycin therapy or placebo. Defervescence was observed in 82 (95%) of 86 patients in the vancomycin group and in 73 (92%) of 79 patients in the placebo group (P = .52). The distributions of the time to defervescence were not statistically significant between the 2 groups (estimated hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-1.43; P = .75). The number of additional episodes of gram-positive bacteremia and the percentage of patients for whom amphotericin B was empirically added to their therapy regimen were also similar in both groups. This study failed to demonstrate that the empirical addition of vancomycin therapy to the treatment regimen is of benefit to persistently febrile neutropenic patients with cancer.

Tazobactam/piperacillin is a first-line treatment option for hospital-acquired pneumonia; however, drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is relatively frequently observed with tazobactam/piperacillin in clinical practice. This study aimed to verify the usefulness of available patient data for predicting DILI prior to tazobactam/piperacillin administration. Tazobactam/piperacillin-treated patients were retrospectively selected and divided into patients with and without DILI. Comparative analysis was performed regarding age, gender, dose, duration of treatment, clinical laboratory values prior to treatment initiation, and the types of organ-specific infections in both groups. Multiple logistic regression analyses indicated that elevated C-reactive protein (odds ratio (OR), 1.284; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.172 - 1.406; p < 0.001) and high hemoglobin (OR, 1.697; 95% CI, 1.259 - 2.286; p < 0.001) levels prior to the administration of tazobactam/piperacillin were risk factors for DILI in males who received a 4.5-g dose. A predictive model for DILI risk was constructed by combining these test values and analyzed using receiver operating characteristic curves, obtaining 0.910 for the model construction set and 0.845 for the validation set. The development of DILI was predicted with good accuracy in males who received a 4.5-g dose with elevated C-reactive protein and hemoglobin.

Abstract Background ZTI-01 (fosfomycin for injection) is an epoxide antibiotic with a differentiated mechanism of action (MOA) inhibiting an early step in bacterial cell wall synthesis. ZTI-01 has broad in vitro spectrum of activity, including multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens, and is being developed for treatment of complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI) and acute pyelonephritis (AP) in the United States. Methods Hospitalized adults with suspected or microbiologically confirmed cUTI/AP were randomized 1:1 to 6 g ZTI-01 q8h or 4.5 g intravenous (IV) piperacillin-tazobactam (PIP-TAZ) q8h for a fixed 7-day course (no oral switch); patients with concomitant bacteremia could receive up to 14 days. Results Of 465 randomized patients, 233 and 231 were treated with ZTI-01 and PIP-TAZ, respectively. In the microbiologic modified intent-to-treat (m-MITT) population, ZTI-01 met the primary objective of noninferiority compared with PIP-TAZ with overall success rates of 64.7% (119/184 patients) vs 54.5% (97/178 patients), respectively; treatment difference was 10.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.4, 20.8). Clinical cure rates at test of cure (TOC, day 19–21) were high and similar between treatments (90.8% [167/184] vs 91.6% [163/178], respectively). In post hoc analysis using unique pathogens typed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, overall success rates at TOC in m-MITT were 69.0% (127/184) for ZTI-01 versus 57.3% (102/178) for PIP-TAZ (difference 11.7% 95% CI: 1.3, 22.1). ZTI-01 was well tolerated. Most treatment-emergent adverse events, including hypokalemia and elevated serum aminotransferases, were mild and transient. Conclusions ZTI-01 was effective for treatment of cUTI including AP and offers a new IV therapeutic option with a differentiated MOA for patients with serious Gram-negative infections. Clinical Trial Registration NCT02753946 ZEUS, a Phase 2/3 trial, studied ZTI-01 (fosfomycin for injection) in the treatment of hospitalized adults with complicated urinary tract infection and acute pyelonephritis versus piperacillin-tazobactam. ZTI-01 was non-inferior to piperacillin-tazobactam and was well tolerated.

We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial comparing ertapenem (1 g once daily) with piperacillin-tazobactam (3.375 g every 6 h) as parenteral treatment for 540 adults with complicated skin and skin-structure infections. The most common diagnoses were skin or soft-tissue abscesses and lower-extremity infections associated with diabetes. The mean duration (± standard deviation) of therapy was 9.1 ± 3.1 days for ertapenem and 9.8 ± 3.3 days for piperacillin-tazobactam. At the assessment of primary efficacy end point, 10-21 days after treatment, 82.4% of those who received ertapenem and 84.4% of those who received piperacillin-tazobactam were cured. The difference in response rates, adjusting for the patients' assigned strata, was -2.0% (95% confidence interval, -10.2% to 6.2%), indicating that the response rates in the 2 treatment groups were equivalent. Cure rates for the 2 treatment groups were similar when compared by stratum, diagnosis, and severity of infection. The frequency and severity of drug-related adverse events were similar in the treatment groups.

Vancomycin plus piperacillin–tazobactam (VPT) is a commonly used antimicrobial regimen for septic patients. VPT is more nephrotoxic than other regimens such as vancomycin plus cefepime (VC) when given over several days. This risk of nephrotoxicity is less clear when VPT is given for initial empiric therapy in sepsis and de-escalated quickly based on evolving clinical information. The objective of this study was to assess nephrotoxicity among septic patients empirically treated with either VPT or VC at initial clinical presentation. We conducted a retrospective study of septic patients who received VPT or VC within 12 h of presentation to the emergency department. The primary outcomes were acute kidney injury (AKI) and renal recovery 72 h after presentation. For the total of 418 patients, 306 received VPT and 112 received VC. Rates of AKI at 72 h were 15.2% for VPT patients and 11.0% for VC patients [p = 0.44]. Among patients with AKI at presentation, 16.3% of VPT patients had AKI at 72 h compared to 8.9% of VC patients [p = 0.19]. Among those without AKI at presentation, 14.2% VPT patients and 16.7% VC patients had AKI at 72 h [p = 0.71]. Renal recovery rates for patients with AKI at presentation were 42.3% for VPT patients versus 40.3% for VC patients [p = 0.78]. In-hospital renal replacement therapy occurred in 6.2% VPT patients and 0.9% VC patients [p = 0.024]. Therefore, initial empiric therapy with VPT in sepsis may not confer increased risk of AKI when de-escalated appropriately.