Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
18 result(s) for "Pit crews"
Sort by:
The pit crew card game: a novel gamification exercise to improve EMS performance in critical care scenarios
Background Gamification can be defined as the use of game design elements in non-game contexts, in this case, education. As such, gamification seeks to augment the interactive approach of adult learning theory which promotes ongoing motivation and engagement. The objective of this study was to develop and implement a gamified learning module to teach the pit crew approach to Emergency Medical Services personnel in an interactive, engaging format. We created a game-based simulation scenario, an introductory video, and a post-session survey to assess the effectiveness of our educational innovation. We hypothesized that gamification would strengthen classroom engagement and attitudes toward clinical education as assessed in the post-session survey. Methods This was a pilot study to assess the characteristics of a novel, gamified educational session. We created teams of 5 personnel with various experience and levels of training. Our educational session began with an introductory video and the Pit Crew Card Game, a novel, interactive card game where the facilitator leads teams through a verbal scenario and administers task cards to the team leader based on interventions and other tasks the group verbalizes. After the game, teams were engaged in an interactive critical care simulation scenario where they were expected to perform tasks based on their pre-assigned roles. After the exercise, we administered a brief survey to assess learners’ perceptions about the effectiveness of this novel educational session as well as whether participating in this activity would change their behaviors in future real-life critical care scenarios. Results 96 participants completed the post-session survey. The Pit Crew Card Game was heavily favored over traditional lecture-based learning sessions, with 84% of respondents indicating agreement. 77% agreed that the game improved their understanding of how to utilize the pit crew approach for critical care scenarios and that it was an effective teaching, teamwork, and communication tool. Conclusion Based on these results, we conclude that gamification has potential as a preferential and feasible learning method for critical scenario training among prehospital personnel. Participants reported that the Pit Crew Card Game increased their understanding of pit crew concepts, promoted effective communication and teamwork, and was an overall effective teaching tool. We recommend further expansion of gamified teaching strategies to the prehospital education realm and support for future research in this domain.
Optimizing planning and design of COVID-19 drive-through mass vaccination clinics by simulation
Drive-through clinics have previously been utilized in vaccination efforts and are now being more widely adopted for COVID-19 vaccination in different parts of the world by offering many advantages including utilizing existing infrastructure, large daily throughput and enforcing social distancing by default. Successful, effective, and efficient drive-through facilities require a suitable site and keen focus on layout and process design. To demonstrate the role that high fidelity computer simulation can play in planning and design of drive-through mass vaccination clinics, we used multiple integrated discrete event simulation (DES) and agent-based modelling methods. This method using AnyLogic simulation software to aid in planning, design, and implementation of one of the largest and most successful early COVID-19 mass vaccination clinics operated by UCHealth in Denver, Colorado. Simulations proved to be helpful in aiding the optimization of UCHealth drive through mass vaccination clinic design and operations by exposing potential bottlenecks, overflows, and queueing, and clarifying the necessary number of supporting staff. Simulation results informed the target number of vaccinations and necessary processing times for different drive through station set ups and clinic formats. We found that modern simulation tools with advanced visual and analytical capabilities to be very useful for effective planning, design, and operations management of mass vaccination facilities.
Randomized controlled trial comparing pit crew resuscitation model against standard advanced life support training
AbstractObjectivesPit crew models are designed to improve teamwork in critical medical situations, like advanced life support (ALS). We investigated if a pit crew model training improves performance assessment and ALS skills retention when compared to standard ALS education. MethodsThis was a prospective, blinded, randomized, and controlled, parallel‐group trial. We recruited students to 4‐person resuscitation teams. We video recorded simulated ALS‐situations after the ALS education and after 6‐month follow‐up. We analyzed technical skills (TS) and non‐technical skills (NTS) demonstrated in them with an instrument measuring TS and NTS, and used a linear mixed model to model the difference between the groups in the TS and NTS. Another linear model was used to explore the difference between the groups in hands‐on ratio and hands‐free time. The difference in the total assessment score was analyzed with the Mann‐Whitney U‐test. The primary outcome was the difference in the total assessment score between the groups at follow‐up. ALS skills were considered to be a secondary outcome. ResultsTwenty‐six teams underwent randomization. Twenty‐two teams received the allocated education. Fifteen teams were evaluated at 6‐month follow‐up: 7 in the intervention group and 8 in the control group. At 6‐month follow‐up, the median (Q 1–Q 3) total assessment score for the control group was 6.5 (6–8) and 7 (6.25–8) for the intervention group but the difference was not significant (U = 133, P = 0.373). The intervention group performed better in terms of chest compression quality (interaction term, β3 = 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.01–0.50; P = 0.043) at follow‐up. ConclusionWe found no difference in overall performance between the study arms. However, trends indicate that the pit crew model may help to retain ALS skills in different areas like chest compression quality.