Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Source
    • Language
2,110 result(s) for "Pituitary Neoplasms - therapy"
Sort by:
Hypopituitarism
Hypopituitarism refers to deficiency of one or more hormones produced by the anterior pituitary or released from the posterior pituitary. Hypopituitarism is associated with excess mortality, a key risk factor being cortisol deficiency due to adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) deficiency. Onset can be acute or insidious, and the most common cause in adulthood is a pituitary adenoma, or treatment with pituitary surgery or radiotherapy. Hypopituitarism is diagnosed based on baseline blood sampling for thyroid stimulating hormone, gonadotropin, and prolactin deficiencies, whereas for ACTH, growth hormone, and antidiuretic hormone deficiency dynamic stimulation tests are usually needed. Repeated pituitary function assessment at regular intervals is needed for diagnosis of the predictable but slowly evolving forms of hypopituitarism. Replacement treatment exists in the form of thyroxine, hydrocortisone, sex steroids, growth hormone, and desmopressin. If onset is acute, cortisol deficiency should be replaced first. Modifications in replacement treatment are needed during the transition from paediatric to adult endocrine care, and during pregnancy.
Long-term Follow-up of 84 Patients With Giant Prolactinomas—A Swedish Nationwide Study
Abstract Purpose To describe the clinical presentation and treatment outcomes in a nationwide cohort of patients with giant prolactinomas. Methods Register-based study of patients with giant prolactinomas [serum prolactin (PRL) > 1000 µg/L, tumor diameter ≥40 mm] identified in the Swedish Pituitary Register 1991-2018. Results Eighty-four patients [mean age 47 (SD ±16) years, 89% men] were included in the study. At diagnosis, the median PRL was 6305 µg/L (range 1450-253 000), the median tumor diameter was 47 mm (range 40-85), 84% of the patients had hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, and 71% visual field defects. All patients were treated with a dopamine agonist (DA) at some point. Twenty-three (27%) received 1 or more additional therapies, including surgery (n = 19), radiotherapy (n = 6), other medical treatments (n = 4), and chemotherapy (n = 2). Ki-67 was ≥10% in 4/14 tumors. At the last follow-up [median 9 years (interquartile range (IQR) 4-15)], the median PRL was 12 µg/L (IQR 4-126), and the median tumor diameter was 22 mm (IQR 3-40). Normalized PRL was achieved in 55%, significant tumor reduction in 69%, and combined response (normalized PRL and significant tumor reduction) in 43%. In the primary DA-treated patients (n = 79), the reduction in PRL or tumor size after the first year predicted the combined response at the last follow-up (P < .001 and P = .012, respectively). Conclusion DAs effectively reduced PRL and tumor size, but approximately 1 patient out of 4 needed multimodal treatment. Our results suggest that the response to DA after 1 year is useful for identifying patients who need more careful monitoring and, in some cases, additional treatment.
Analyses of Treatment Variables for Patients with Childhood Craniopharyngioma – Results of the Multicenter Prospective Trial KRANIOPHARYNGEOM 2000 after Three Years of Follow-Up
Background: Controversies surround various treatment variables for patients with childhood craniopharyngioma such as growth hormone (GH) replacement, which some believe can exacerbate recurrence/progression. We prospectively assessed the risk of tumor recurrence/progression in survivors of childhood craniopharyngioma. Methods: Multivariable analyses of risk factors (age at diagnosis, degree of resection, irradiation, GH treatment and gender) and descriptive analyses of overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) rates were performed in 117 patients, recruited prospectively and evaluated after 3 years of follow-up in the German, Austrian and Swiss multicenter trial KRANIOPHARYNGEOM 2000. Results: We observed a 3-year OS of 0.97 and a 3-year EFS of 0.46, indicating high recurrence rates after complete resection (CR) (n = 47; 3-year-EFS: 0.64) and high progression rates after incomplete resection (IR) (n = 64; 3-year EFS: 0.31). The risk of an event decreased by 80% after CR compared to IR (hazard ratio = 0.20; p < 0.001). Irradiation had protective effects on EFS: irradiated patients had an 88% lower risk of recurrence/progression compared to patients without/before irradiation (hazard ratio = 0.12; p < 0.001). GH treatment had no impact on 3-year EFS rates. Conclusions: Tumor recurrences/progressions are frequent and occur early after initial treatment of childhood craniopharyngioma. A radical resection preserving the integrity of hypothalamic structures appears optimal at original diagnosis. Irradiation was efficient in preventing recurrences/progressions. GH treatment had no impact on the low 3-year EFS observed in our study. However, further conclusions on the influence of GH on recurrence rates have to be refined to long-term follow-up studies of patients with childhood craniopharyngioma.
Standards of care for medical management of acromegaly in pituitary tumor centers of excellence (PTCOE)
Purpose A series of consensus guidelines on medical treatment of acromegaly have been produced in the last two decades. However, little information is available on their application in clinical practice. Furthermore, international standards of acromegaly care have not been published. The aim of our study was to report current standards of care for medical therapy of acromegaly, using results collected through an audit performed to validate criteria for definition of Pituitary Tumor Centers of Excellence (PTCOE). Methods Details of medical treatment approaches to acromegaly were voluntarily provided by nine renowned international centers that participated in this audit. For the period 2018–2020, we assessed overall number of acromegaly patients under medical treatment, distribution of patients on different treatment modalities, overall biochemical control rate with medical therapy, and specific control rates for different medical treatment options. Results Median number of total patients and median number of new patients with acromegaly managed annually in the endocrinology units of the centers were 206 and 16.3, respectively. Median percentage of acromegaly patients on medical treatment was 48.9%. Among the patients on medical treatment, first-generation somatostatin receptor ligand (SRL) monotherapy was used with a median rate of 48.7%, followed by combination therapies with a median rate of 29.3%. Cabergoline monotherapy was used in 6.9% of patients. Pegvisomant monotherapy was used in 7 centers and pasireotide monotherapy in 5 centers, with median rates of 7.9% and 6.3%, respectively. Conclusions Current standards of care in PTCOEs include use of first-generation SRLs as the first medical option in about 50% of patients, as recommended by consensus guidelines. However, some patients are kept on this treatment despite inadequate control suggesting that cost-effectiveness, availability, patient preference, side effects, and therapeutic inertia may play a possible role also in PTCOE. Moreover, at odds with consensus guidelines, other monotherapies for acromegaly appear to have a marginal role as compared to combination therapies as extrapolated from PTCOE practice data. Presence of uncontrolled patients in each treatment category suggest that further optimization of medical therapy, as well as use of other therapeutic tools such as radiosurgery may be needed.
Management outcomes of prolactinoma: a retrospective study from Southern Iraq
Prolactinoma is the most common pituitary adenoma. This study aims to assess the clinical presentation, treatment modalities, and outcomes of patients with prolactinomas and to identify factors that predict remission. We conducted a retrospective single-center study including patients with prolactinoma. Data from medical records were analyzed to correlate patient demographics, clinical presentation, serum prolactin (PRL) levels, and adenoma size on MRI, both at diagnosis and after initiation of dopamine agonist (DA) therapy, with treatment outcomes. A total of 205 patients were included in the study. The mean age of the cohort was 34.8 ± 12.4 years, with a female-to-male ratio of 1.5:1. Oligomenorrhea/amenorrhea was the most common presenting symptom, occurring in 112 of 122 women (91.8%). Macroadenomas accounted for 117 of 176 adenomas (66.4%). Initial treatment consisted of DA therapy in 149 patients, transsphenoidal pituitary surgery in 41 patients, and gamma knife radiosurgery in five patients. A total of 148 patients continued DA therapy at our center. After one year of DA treatment, significant adenoma shrinkage (>30%) was observed in 23 patients (34.3%), while complete adenoma disappearance occurred in six patients (8.9%). At 24 months, 25 of 88 patients (28.4%) achieved remission. Baseline PRL <10,638.2 mIU/L (500 ng/mL) and the presence of microadenoma independently predicted remission. DA therapy remains the cornerstone of prolactinoma treatment in our region and is very effective in normalizing PRL levels, shrinking adenomas, and improving clinical symptoms; DA can be used even in cases of giant prolactinomas.
Management of resistant prolactinomas
This Review details treatment of prolactinomas that do not respond to dopamine agonists. Cabergoline is the most effective agonist and options include maximizing the dose and changing agonists. Trans-sphenoidal surgery is an option if medical therapy is ineffective. Radiation therapy is reserved for invasive tumors that do not respond to medical or surgical therapy. Resistance to dopamine agonists occurs in a subset of patients with prolactin-secreting pituitary tumors. The resistance is mediated by loss of pituitary D 2 receptors and occurs in both microadenomas and macroadenomas. Cabergoline is the most effective dopamine agonist and tumors that do not respond to bromocriptine or quinagolide frequently respond to cabergoline. Treatment options include maximizing the dose of the dopamine agonist, changing agonists, trans-sphenoidal surgery and radiation therapy. The goal of therapy is to restore and maintain gonadal and neurologic function, and this might occur in the absence of a normal prolactin level or a significant change in tumor size. Trans-sphenoidal pituitary surgery should be reserved for patients who are intolerant of medical therapy, or in whom this has failed. Radiation therapy has a limited role in treatment of resistant prolactinomas and should be reserved for patients in whom medical and surgical therapy has failed. Key Points 10–20% of patients with microprolactinomas and 20–30% of patients with macroadenomas demonstrate resistance to a dopamine agonist Treatment might restore and maintain gonadal and neurologic function without normalization of prolactin levels or a change in tumor size Tumors resistant to bromocriptine or quinagolide frequently respond to cabergoline Trans-sphenoidal surgery should be reserved for treatment of patients who are intolerant of medical therapy, or in whom this has failed
Clinical and Pathological Aspects of Silent Pituitary Adenomas
Abstract Context Silent pituitary adenomas are anterior pituitary tumors with hormone synthesis but without signs or symptoms of hormone hypersecretion. They have been increasingly recognized and represent challenging diagnostic issues. Evidence Acquisition A comprehensive literature search was performed using MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from January 2000 to March 2018 with the following key words: (i) pituitary adenoma/tumor and nonfunctioning; or (ii) pituitary adenoma/tumor and silent. All titles and abstracts of the retrieved articles were reviewed, and recent advances in the field of silent pituitary adenomas were summarized. Evidence Synthesis The clinical and biochemical picture of pituitary adenomas reflects a continuum between functional and silent adenomas. Although some adenomas are truly silent, others will show some evidence of biochemical hypersecretion or could have subtle clinical signs and, therefore, can be referred to as clinically silent or “whispering” adenomas. Silent tumors seem to be more aggressive than their secreting counterparts, with a greater recurrence rate. Transcription factors for pituitary cell lineages have been introduced into the 2017 World Health Organization guidelines: steroidogenic factor 1 staining for gonadotroph lineage; PIT1 (pituitary-specific positive transcription factor 1) for growth hormone, prolactin, and TSH lineage, and TPIT for the corticotroph lineage. Prospective studies applying these criteria will establish the value of the new classification. Conclusions A concise review of the clinical and pathological aspects of silent pituitary adenomas was conducted in view of the new World Health Organization classification of pituitary adenomas. New classifications, novel prognostics markers, and emerging imaging and therapeutic approaches need to be evaluated to better serve this unique group of patients. We present a concise review of the clinical and pathological aspects of silent pituitary adenomas in view of the new World Health Organization classification of pituitary adenomas.
Diagnosis and management of prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas: a Pituitary Society international Consensus Statement
This Consensus Statement from an international, multidisciplinary workshop sponsored by the Pituitary Society offers evidence-based graded consensus recommendations and key summary points for clinical practice on the diagnosis and management of prolactinomas. Epidemiology and pathogenesis, clinical presentation of disordered pituitary hormone secretion, assessment of hyperprolactinaemia and biochemical evaluation, optimal use of imaging strategies and disease-related complications are addressed. In-depth discussions present the latest evidence on treatment of prolactinoma, including efficacy, adverse effects and options for withdrawal of dopamine agonist therapy, as well as indications for surgery, preoperative medical therapy and radiation therapy. Management of prolactinoma in special situations is discussed, including cystic lesions, mixed growth hormone-secreting and prolactin-secreting adenomas and giant and aggressive prolactinomas. Furthermore, considerations for pregnancy and fertility are outlined, as well as management of prolactinomas in children and adolescents, patients with an underlying psychiatric disorder, postmenopausal women, transgender individuals and patients with chronic kidney disease. The workshop concluded that, although treatment resistance is rare, there is a need for additional therapeutic options to address clinical challenges in treating these patients and a need to facilitate international registries to enable risk stratification and optimization of therapeutic strategies.This Consensus Statement, which is endorsed by the Pituitary Society, offers evidence-based graded consensus recommendations and key summary points for clinical practice on the diagnosis and management of prolactinomas.
Management of aggressive pituitary adenomas and pituitary carcinomas
Pituitary tumors are benign but not uncommonly invade locally into adjacent tissues such as the cavernous sinus and dura. Some of these invasive tumors exhibit varying degrees of resistance to standard therapy and tend to recur. Early prediction of which pituitary tumors will recur and/or exhibit an invasive phenotype remains difficult despite introduction of several tissue-based molecular markers. Management of these recurrent invasive pituitary tumors usually comprises combination medical, surgical and radiation therapy but in some instances is suboptimal. Earlier diagnosis of invasive/recurrent pituitary tumor and application of aggressive multi-modal therapy at presentation may be advantageous in some cases. Clinical trials to develop additional therapeutic options are needed for this subgroup of pituitary tumors. Although it is not yet possible to diagnose at presentation, the subset of pituitary tumors that will become invasive and/or recurrent pituitary tumors, broader use of molecular markers and standardization of histopathological criteria for “atypical” pituitary tumor features have assisted earlier diagnosis. Aggressive therapy early in disease may be warranted and exploration of recently available targeted therapies may improve disease management.