Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Item TypeItem Type
-
SubjectSubject
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersSourceLanguage
Done
Filters
Reset
3,113
result(s) for
"Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors - adverse effects"
Sort by:
Rivaroxaban for Stroke Prevention after Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source
by
Czlonkowska, Anna
,
Toni, Danilo
,
Berkowitz, Scott D
in
Aged
,
Anticoagulants
,
antithrombotic therapy
2018
In a randomized trial involving patients who had a first stroke from an embolus of unknown source, rivaroxaban at a daily dose of 15 mg did not result in a lower incidence of recurrent stroke than aspirin at a dose of 100 mg. Bleeding rates were higher with rivaroxaban.
Journal Article
A Controlled Trial of Rivaroxaban after Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement
by
Makkar, Raj R
,
Giustino, Gennaro
,
Zazula, Ana
in
9NDF7JZ4M3 (Rivaroxaban)
,
A74586SNO7 (Clopidogrel)
,
Aged
2020
Patients who had undergone successful TAVR were randomly assigned to receive either a rivaroxaban-based antithrombotic regimen or an antiplatelet-based antithrombotic regimen. At 17 months, the primary outcome of death or thromboembolic complications occurred more frequently with rivaroxaban.
Journal Article
Polymer-based or Polymer-free Stents in Patients at High Bleeding Risk
by
Kirtane, Ajay J
,
Price, Matthew J
,
Kandzari, David E
in
Anticoagulants
,
Antiplatelet therapy
,
Aspirin
2020
In a randomized trial involving patients at high bleeding risk who received 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI, use of polymer-based zotarolimus-eluting stents was noninferior to use of polymer-free drug-coated stents with regard to safety and effectiveness composite outcomes.
Journal Article
Prasugrel versus Clopidogrel for Acute Coronary Syndromes without Revascularization
by
McLendon, R. Craig
,
Leiva-Pons, Jose L
,
Dalby, Anthony J
in
Acute Coronary Syndrome - drug therapy
,
Acute coronary syndromes
,
Aged
2012
This trial compared the efficacy of antiplatelet therapy with prasugrel or clopidogrel in patients with non–ST-segment elevation MI or unstable angina. Although prasugrel provides more intense platelet inhibition, clinical outcomes were similar with the two drugs.
Clinical-practice guidelines for patients with acute coronary syndromes consisting of unstable angina or myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation recommend a strategy of early invasive management (angiography within 48 to 72 hours with provisional revascularization) for patients at moderate to high risk.
1
,
2
However, analyses from clinical trials and national registries have shown that many such patients are treated medically without revascularization and that such patients have poorer long-term cardiovascular outcomes than those who undergo revascularization.
3
–
6
Even though patients with acute coronary syndromes who receive only medical therapy have an increased-risk profile, they have been underrepresented in large-scale, contemporary, randomized . . .
Journal Article
Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes
by
Katus, Hugo
,
Cannon, Christopher P
,
Emanuelsson, Håkan
in
Acute Coronary Syndrome - drug therapy
,
Acute Coronary Syndrome - mortality
,
Acute Coronary Syndrome/drug therapy/mortality
2009
In a multicenter, randomized trial, ticagrelor — a reversible inhibitor of the adenosine diphosphate receptor P2Y12 — was compared with clopidogrel in patients who had an acute coronary syndrome with or without ST-segment elevation. At 12 months, the primary end point of death from vascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke occurred less often with ticagrelor. Ticagrelor was not associated with an increase in the risk of major bleeding.
At 12 months, the primary end point of death from vascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke occurred less often with ticagrelor. Ticagrelor was not associated with an increase in the risk of major bleeding.
In patients who have acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation, current clinical practice guidelines
1
–
4
recommend dual antiplatelet treatment with aspirin and clopidogrel. The efficacy of clopidogrel is hampered by the slow and variable transformation of the prodrug to the active metabolite, modest and variable platelet inhibition,
5
,
6
an increased risk of bleeding,
7
,
8
and an increased risk of stent thrombosis and myocardial infarction in patients with a poor response.
9
As compared with clopidogrel, prasugrel, another thienopyridine prodrug, has a more consistent and pronounced inhibitory effect on platelets,
5
,
6
resulting in a lower risk of myocardial infarction and . . .
Journal Article
Long-Term Use of Ticagrelor in Patients with Prior Myocardial Infarction
by
Bansilal, Sameer
,
Hamm, Christian
,
Nicolau, José Carlos
in
Adenosine - administration & dosage
,
Adenosine - adverse effects
,
Adenosine - analogs & derivatives
2015
Patients with myocardial infarction 1 to 3 years previously were assigned to ticagrelor, 90 or 60 mg twice daily, or to placebo, in addition to low-dose aspirin. At 3 years, ticagrelor reduced the risk of cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke but increased the risk of major bleeding.
Myocardial infarction is a global problem.
1
In the United States alone, nearly 8 million people have a history of myocardial infarction.
2
Patients who have had a myocardial infarction are at heightened risk for recurrent ischemic events,
3
–
5
which suggests that this population may derive particular benefit from intensive secondary prevention.
A key element in the pathobiology of cardiovascular ischemic events is the activated platelet.
6
Aspirin reduces the risk of ischemic events both among patients who present with an acute coronary syndrome and in secondary prevention for patients with a history of myocardial infarction.
7
The addition of a P2Y
12
receptor . . .
Journal Article
Polypill Strategy in Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention
by
Owen, Ruth
,
Ojeda-Fernandez, Luisa
,
Cordero, Alberto
in
Angiotensin
,
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors - adverse effects
,
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors - therapeutic use
2022
Among patients with recent MI, therapy with a polypill containing aspirin, ramipril, and atorvastatin led to a lower incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events at a median of 3 years than usual care.
Journal Article
Reduced Leaflet Motion after Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement
by
Veien, Karsten T
,
Windecker, Stephan
,
Jilaihawi, Hasan
in
Aged
,
Aged, 80 and over
,
Anticoagulants
2020
In a trial, patients who had undergone successful TAVR were assigned to rivaroxaban or antiplatelet therapy. In this substudy in patients who underwent CT, leaflet thickening and reduced leaflet motion at 90 days were less common with rivaroxaban. However, in the main trial, rivaroxaban was associated with a higher risk of death or thromboembolic complications and a higher risk of bleeding.
Journal Article
Rivaroxaban in Peripheral Artery Disease after Revascularization
2020
Patients with peripheral artery disease who underwent revascularization were randomly assigned to receive rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) or placebo. All patients received aspirin. The primary outcome of acute limb ischemia, major amputation for vascular causes, MI, ischemic stroke, or cardiovascular death occurred less frequently with rivaroxaban.
Journal Article
Rivaroxaban with or without aspirin in patients with stable coronary artery disease: an international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
by
FAGGIANO, POMPILIO
,
MERALI, FATIMA
,
SAKU, KEIJIRO
in
Acute coronary syndromes
,
administration & dosage
,
adverse effects
2018
Coronary artery disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and is a consequence of acute thrombotic events involving activation of platelets and coagulation proteins. Factor Xa inhibitors and aspirin each reduce thrombotic events but have not yet been tested in combination or against each other in patients with stable coronary artery disease.
In this multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, outpatient trial, patients with stable coronary artery disease or peripheral artery disease were recruited at 602 hospitals, clinics, or community centres in 33 countries. This paper reports on patients with coronary artery disease. Eligible patients with coronary artery disease had to have had a myocardial infarction in the past 20 years, multi-vessel coronary artery disease, history of stable or unstable angina, previous multi-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention, or previous multi-vessel coronary artery bypass graft surgery. After a 30-day run in period, patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive rivaroxaban (2·5 mg orally twice a day) plus aspirin (100 mg once a day), rivaroxaban alone (5 mg orally twice a day), or aspirin alone (100 mg orally once a day). Randomisation was computer generated. Each treatment group was double dummy, and the patients, investigators, and central study staff were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome of the COMPASS trial was the occurrence of myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01776424, and is closed to new participants.
Between March 12, 2013, and May 10, 2016, 27 395 patients were enrolled to the COMPASS trial, of whom 24 824 patients had stable coronary artery disease from 558 centres. The combination of rivaroxaban plus aspirin reduced the primary outcome more than aspirin alone (347 [4%] of 8313 vs 460 [6%] of 8261; hazard ratio [HR] 0·74, 95% CI 0·65–0·86, p<0·0001). By comparison, treatment with rivaroxaban alone did not significantly improve the primary outcome when compared with treatment with aspirin alone (411 [5%] of 8250 vs 460 [6%] of 8261; HR 0·89, 95% CI 0·78–1·02, p=0·094). Combined rivaroxaban plus aspirin treatment resulted in more major bleeds than treatment with aspirin alone (263 [3%] of 8313 vs 158 [2%] of 8261; HR 1·66, 95% CI 1·37–2·03, p<0·0001), and similarly, more bleeds were seen in the rivaroxaban alone group than in the aspirin alone group (236 [3%] of 8250 vs 158 [2%] of 8261; HR 1·51, 95% CI 1·23–1·84, p<0·0001). The most common site of major bleeding was gastrointestinal, occurring in 130 [2%] patients who received combined rivaroxaban plus aspirin, in 84 [1%] patients who received rivaroxaban alone, and in 61 [1%] patients who received aspirin alone. Rivaroxaban plus aspirin reduced mortality when compared with aspirin alone (262 [3%] of 8313 vs 339 [4%] of 8261; HR 0·77, 95% CI 0·65–0·90, p=0·0012).
In patients with stable coronary artery disease, addition of rivaroxaban to aspirin lowered major vascular events, but increased major bleeding. There was no significant increase in intracranial bleeding or other critical organ bleeding. There was also a significant net benefit in favour of rivaroxaban plus aspirin and deaths were reduced by 23%. Thus, addition of rivaroxaban to aspirin has the potential to substantially reduce morbidity and mortality from coronary artery disease worldwide.
Bayer AG.
Journal Article