Explore the vast range of titles available.

Assessment of platelet reactivity alone for thienopyridine selection with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been associated with improved outcomes. In TRIAGE, a prospective multicenter observational pilot study we sought to evaluate the benefit of an integrated algorithm combining clinical risk and platelet function testing to select type of thienopyridine in patients undergoing PCI. Patients on chronic clopidogrel therapy underwent platelet function testing prior to PCI using the VerifyNow assay to determine high on treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR, ≥230 P2Y 12 reactivity units or PRU). Based on both PRU and clinical (ischemic and bleeding) risks, patients were switched to prasugrel or continued on clopidogrel per the study algorithm. The primary endpoints were (i) 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) composite of death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or definite or probable stent thrombosis; and (ii) major bleeding, Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2, 3 or 5. Out of 318 clopidogrel treated patients with a mean age of 65.9 ± 9.8 years, HTPR was noted in 33.3 %. Ninety (28.0 %) patients overall were switched to prasugrel and 228 (72.0 %) continued clopidogrel. The prasugrel group had fewer smokers and more patients with heart failure. At 1-year MACE occurred in 4.4 % of majority HTPR patients on prasugrel versus 3.5 % of primarily non-HTPR patients on clopidogrel (p = 0.7). Major bleeding (5.6 vs 7.9 %, p = 0.47) was numerically higher with clopidogrel compared with prasugrel. Use of the study clinical risk algorithm for choice and intensity of thienopyridine prescription following PCI resulted in similar ischemic outcomes in HTPR patients receiving prasugrel and primarily non-HTPR patients on clopidogrel without an untoward increase in bleeding with prasugrel. However, the study was prematurely terminated and these findings are therefore hypothesis generating.

Background: Shear stress-induced hemostatic abnormalities are highly prevalent in patients with aortic valve stenosis. In this study, we determined closure times with a platelet-function analyzer (PFA-100, Dade Behring, Marburg, Germany) in patients admitted for aortic valve replacement to assess the correlation with the severity of aortic valve stenosis, blood loss, perioperative transfusion requirements, and need for re-thoracotomy. Patients and Methods: Fifty consecutive patients (mean age [± SD] 68 ± 9 years) were enrolled. Closure times of epinephrin/collagen and adenosine diphosphate (ADP)/collagen cartridges were determined at least ten days after discontinuation of antiplatelet medication and compared to those of healthy control subjects without medication. Results: Closure times of epinephrin/collagen (210 ± 69 sec vs. 140 ± 50 sec, p < 0.0001) and ADP/collagen (145 ± 58 sec vs. 108 ± 45 sec, p < 0.0001) cartridges were prolonged in patients with aortic valve stenosis. Intraoperative transfusion of red blood cell units was associated with the closure times of epinephrin/collagen (r = 0.28, p = 0.04) and ADP/ collagen cartridges (r = 0.28, p = 0.04). Total transfusion of red blood cell units was associated with ADP/ collagen closure times (r = 0.31, p = 0.02), but not epinephrin/collagen closure times (r = 0.26, p = 0.07). No significant association of closure times with intraoperative, postoperative and total transfusion of fresh frozen plasma units was observed. Conclusions: Prolongation of closure times determined with a platelet-function analyzer is highly prevalent in patients with aortic valve stenosis and appears to reflect shear stress-induced hemostatic abnormalities. Since prolonged closure times are associated with increased perioperative transfusion of red blood cell units, the assay could significantly contribute to the identification of individuals at risk.