Catalogue Search | MBRL
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
{{itemTitle}}
45
result(s) for
"Political participation United States Psychological aspects."
Sort by:
Open versus closed : personality, identity, and the politics of redistribution
\"Debates over redistribution, social welfare, and market regulation are central to American politics. Why do some of us prefer a large role for government in the economic life of the nation while others prefer a smaller role? In Open Versus Closed, the authors argue that these preferences are not always what they seem. They show how deep-seated personality traits underpinning the culture wars over race and immigration, sexuality, gender roles, and religion influence debates about economics, binding cultural and economic preferences together in unexpected ways. Integrating insights from both psychology and political science - and twenty years of observational and experimental data - the authors reveal the deeper motivations driving attitudes toward government. The book concludes that for the politically engaged these attitudes are not primarily driven by self-interest but by a desire to express the traits and cultural commitments that define their identities\"-- Provided by publisher.
Book
Changing Minds, If Not Hearts
Americans preach egalitarianism, but democracy makes it hard for minorities to win.Changing Minds, If Not Heartsexplores political strategies that counteract the impulse of racial majorities to think about racial issues as a zero-sum game, in which a win for one group means a loss for another. James M. Glaser and Timothy J. Ryan argue that, although political processes often inflame racial tensions, the tools of politics also can alleviate conflict. Through randomized experiments conducted in South Carolina, California, Michigan, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and New Jersey, Glaser and Ryan uncover the racial underpinnings of disputes over affirmative action, public school funding initiatives, Confederate flag displays on government buildings, reparations, and racial profiling. The authors examine whether communities rife with conflict endorse different outcomes when issues are cast in different terms-for example, by calling attention to double standards, evoking alternate conceptions of fairness and justice, or restructuring electoral choices to offer voters greater control. Their studies identify a host of tools that can help overcome opposition to minority interests that are due to racial hostility. Even in communities averse to accommodation, even where antipathy and prejudice linger, minorities can win. With clearly presented data and compelling prose,Changing Minds, If Not Heartsprovides a vivid and practical illustration of how academic theory can help resolve conflicts on the ground.
eBook
Friends, relatives, sanity, and health: The costs of politics
Political scientists have long known that political involvement exacts costs but they have typically defined these costs in relatively narrow, largely economic terms. Though anecdotal evidence suggests that the costs of politics may in fact extend beyond economics to frayed personal relationships, compromised emotional stability, and even physical problems, no systematic evidence on these broader costs exists. We construct and validate batteries of survey items that delineate the physical, social, and emotional costs of political engagement and administer these items to a demographically representative sample of U.S. adults. The results suggest that a large number of Americans believe their physical health has been harmed by their exposure to politics and even more report that politics has resulted in emotional costs and lost friendships.
Journal Article
Abortion after Roe
Abortion is - and always has been - an arena for contesting power relations between women and men. When in 1973 the Supreme Court made the procedure legal throughout the United States, it seemed that women were at last able to make decisions about their own bodies. In the four decades that followed, however, abortion became ever more politicized and stigmatized. Abortion after Roe chronicles and analyzes what the new legal status and changing political environment have meant for abortion providers and their patients. Johanna Schoen sheds light on the little-studied experience of performing and receiving abortion care from the 1970s - a period of optimism - to the rise of the antiabortion movement and the escalation of antiabortion tactics in the 1980s to the 1990s and beyond, when violent attacks on clinics and abortion providers led to a new articulation of abortion care as moral work. As Schoen demonstrates, more than four decades after the legalization of abortion, the abortion provider community has powerfully asserted that abortion care is a moral good.
eBook
Tyranny of the Minority
Why do politicians frequently heed the preferences of small groups of citizens over those of the majority? Breaking new theoretical ground, Benjamin Bishin explains how the desires of small groups, which he calls \"subconstituencies,\" often trump the preferences of much larger groups.
Demonstrating the wide applicability of his \"unified theory of representation,\" Bishin traces politicians' behavior in connection with a wide range of issues, including the Cuban trade embargo, the extension of hate-crimes legislation to protect gay men and lesbians, the renewal of the assault-weapons ban, and abortion politics. In the process, he offers a unique explanation of when, why, and how special interests dominate American national politics.
eBook
The I-ACTED study (investigating action civics training through an experimental design): a cluster randomized controlled trial of a school-based action civics education intervention on adolescent wellbeing
Background
Observational studies have found that youth civic engagement is associated with positive mental health, education, and socioeconomic outcomes. However, access to civic opportunities is not evenly distributed. Many classrooms in the United States of America (USA) do not have access to high-quality civics education. Action civics approaches to civic education prepare students for civic engagement by developing the necessary civic skills, knowledge, and character. Through action civics, classes take action on a real-world issue students choose together. Some evidence suggests that action civics may positively affect participants’ wellbeing through the feelings of civic connection and empowerment. The aim of this study is to investigate, through a randomized controlled trial, the impact of a school-based action civics education intervention on civic and wellbeing outcomes, and the mechanisms of any impact observed, among middle and high school students in the USA.
Methods
This study uses a cluster-randomized trial with a waitlist-control design. We are randomizing at the school level, implementing the intervention at the teacher/classroom level, and measuring outcomes at the student level. We are recruiting social studies, civics, government, and related subject teachers, across both middle and high schools, from across the USA, leveraging network ties and referrals to invite teachers/schools to participate. We aim to recruit a sample of around 1,500 students. Intervention group teachers will receive action civics curricular resources they can incorporate into their regular teaching, while the control group will not receive the curricular resources until 12 months later and will continue with their teaching as planned. Students will fill out surveys at the beginning and end of the semester, and will be invited to complete a survey six months later. Surveys will assess civic, wellbeing, demographic, and other related variables.
Discussion
This study is one of the first randomized controlled trials to assess the impacts of action civics curricular materials on civic and wellbeing outcomes. The study will strengthen our understanding of the impacts of action civics education, with implications for the quality and adoption of civic curricula nationwide.
Trial registration
NCT04514133 (date of registration September 25, 2020).
Journal Article
Integrating Paths: Enhancing Deliberative Democracy Through Collective Intelligence Insights
This literature review critically examines the potential of collective intelligence (CI) to enhance theories of deliberative democracy and participatory governance through academic discourse. We employed PRISMA guidelines for systematic article selection, complemented by a narrative approach for in-depth thematic analysis and supplemented by quantitative methodologies such as Sankey diagrams and keyness analysis. Reviewing 61 scholarly articles focusing on CI within the public sector, this study identifies theoretical insights that could significantly impact the field of democratic innovations and participatory governance. Our analysis reveals that CI methodologies can make governance more inclusive and dynamic by integrating advanced digital tools that foster broader and more effective citizen participation. We conclude that integrating CI with deliberative democracy and participatory governance theories holds substantial promise for developing more responsive and adaptive governance models. Future research should focus on measuring deliberative quality in real time, deploying CI tools to empower underrepresented groups and address specific governance challenges, and examining CI’s ethical and social implications, especially concerning privacy, security, and power dynamics in technology-driven public decision-making.
Journal Article
No is not enough resisting Trump's shock politics and winning the world we need
A road map to resistance in the Trump era from internationally acclaimed activist and bestselling author Naomi Klein.
\"This book is a toolkit to help understand how we arrived at this surreal political moment, how to keep it from getting a lot worse, and how, if we keep our heads, we can flip the script and seize the opportunity to make things a whole lot better in a time of urgent need. A toolkit for shock-resistance.\" --Naomi Klein, from the Preface
The election of Donald Trump is a dangerous escalation in a world of cascading crises. Trump's vision--a radical deregulation of the U.S. economy in the interest of corporations, an all-out war on \"radical Islamic terrorism,\" and a sweeping aside of climate science to unleash a domestic fossil fuel frenzy--will generate wave after wave of crises and shocks, to the economy, to national security, to the environment.
In No Is Not Enough, Naomi Klein explains that Trump, extreme as he is, is not an aberration but a logical extension of the worst and most dangerous trends of the past half-century. In exposing the malignant forces behind Trump's rise, she puts forward a bold vision for a mass movement to counter rising militarism, nationalism, and corporatism in the U.S. and around the world.
Naomi Klein is an award-winning journalist, syndicated columnist and author of the international bestsellers No Logo, The Shock Doctrine, and most recently This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate. In 2017 she joined The Intercept as Senior Correspondent.
eBook
Direct Democracy and Subjective Well-Being
This paper considers the effect of direct democracy on quality of life in the American States. Specifically, it seeks to determine to what extent the use of the initiative affects satisfaction with life. The theoretical discussion draws upon traditional arguments over direct democracy, along with contemporary research on the quality of representation in the United States. The empirical results suggest that satisfaction varies positively with the extent to which initiatives are used. We also find that this relationship is mediated by income, such that the positive effects of direct democracy are most pronounced for those with the lowest income. The consequences for our understanding of direct democracy, public policy, and the study of life satisfaction are discussed.
Journal Article