Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Source
    • Language
2,213 result(s) for "Polyadenylation - genetics"
Sort by:
Transcriptome Analyses of FY Mutants Reveal Its Role in mRNA Alternative Polyadenylation
A crucial step for mRNA polyadenylation is poly(A) signal recognition by trans-acting factors. The mammalian cleavage and polyadenylation specificity factor (CPSF) complex components CPSF30 and WD repeat-containing protein33 (WDR33) recognize the canonical AAUAAA for polyadenylation. In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), the flowering time regulator FY is the homolog of WDR33. However, its role in mRNA polyadenylation is poorly understood. Using poly(A) tag sequencing, we found that >50% of alternative polyadenylation (APA) events are altered in fy single mutants or double mutants with oxt6 (a null mutant of AtCPSF30), but mutation of the FY WD40-repeat has a stronger effect than deletion of the plant-unique Pro-Pro-Leu-Pro-Pro (PPLPP) domain. fy mutations disrupt AAUAAA or AAUAAA-like poly(A) signal recognition. Notably, A-rich signal usage is suppressed in the WD40-repeat mutation but promoted in PPLPP-domain deficiency. However, fy mutations do not aggravate the altered signal usage in oxt6. Furthermore, the WD40-repeat mutation shows a preference for 3′ untranslated region shortening, but the PPLPP-domain deficiency shows a preference for lengthening. Interestingly, the WD40-repeat mutant exhibits shortened primary roots and late flowering with alteration of APA of related genes. Importantly, the long transcripts of two APA genes affected in fy are related to abiotic stress responses. These results reveal a conserved and specific role of FY in mRNA polyadenylation.
Cleavage and polyadenylation specificity factor 30
Cleavage and polyadenylation specificity factor 30 (CPSF30) is a key protein involved in pre-mRNA processing. CPSF30 contains five Cys₃His domains (annotated as “zinc-finger” domains). Using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, X-ray absorption spectroscopy, and UV-visible spectroscopy, we report that CPSF30 is isolated with iron, in addition to zinc. Iron is present in CPSF30 as a 2Fe–2S cluster and uses one of the Cys₃His domains; 2Fe–2S clusters with a Cys₃His ligand set are rare and notably have also been identified in MitoNEET, a protein that was also annotated as a zinc finger. These findings support a role for iron in some zinc-finger proteins. Using electrophoretic mobility shift assays and fluorescence anisotropy, we report that CPSF30 selectively recognizes the AU-rich hexamer (AAUAAA) sequence present in pre-mRNA, providing the first molecular-based evidence to our knowledge for CPSF30/RNA binding. Removal of zinc, or both zinc and iron, abrogates binding, whereas removal of just iron significantly lessens binding. From these data we propose a model for RNA recognition that involves a metaldependent cooperative binding mechanism.
Nudt21 regulates the alternative polyadenylation of Pak1 and is predictive in the prognosis of glioblastoma patients
Alternative polyadenylation (APA) has emerged as a prevalent feature associated with cancer development and progression. The advantage of APA to tumor progression is to induce oncogenes through 3′-UTR shortening, and to inactivate tumor suppressor genes via the re-routing of microRNA competition. We previously identified the Mammalian Cleavage Factor I-25 (CFIm25) (encoded by Nudt21 gene ) as a master APA regulator whose expression levels directly impact the tumorigenicity of glioblastoma (GBM) in vitro and in vivo. Despite its importance, the role of Nudt21 in GBM development is not known and the genes subject to Nudt21 APA regulation that contribute to GBM progression have not been identified. Here, we find that Nudt21 is reduced in low grade glioma (LGG) and all four subtypes of high grade glioma (GBM). Reduced expression of Nudt21 associates with worse survival in TCGA LGG cohorts and two TCGA GBM cohorts. Moreover, although CFIm25 was initially identified as biochemically associated with both CFIm59 and CFIm68, we observed three CFIm distinct subcomplexes exist and CFIm59 protein level is dependent on Nudt21 expression in GBM cells, but CFIm68 is not, and that only CFIm59 predicts prognosis of GBM patients similar to Nudt21 . Through the use of Poly(A)-Click-Seq to characterize APA, we define the mRNAs subject to 3′-UTR shortening upon Nudt21 depletion in GBM cells and observed enrichment in genes important in the Ras signaling pathway, including Pak1 . Remarkably, we find that Pak1 expression is regulated by Nudt21 through its 3′-UTR APA, and the combination of Pak1 and Nudt21 expression generates an even stronger prognostic indicator of GBM survival versus either value used alone. Collectively, our data uncover Nudt21 and its downstream target Pak1 as a potential “combination biomarker” for predicting prognosis of GBM patients.
Integrative genome-wide analysis reveals HLP1, a novel RNA-binding protein, regulates plant flowering by targeting alternative polyadenylation
Alternative polyadenylation (APA) is a widespread mechanism for gene regulation and has been implicated in flowering, but the molecular basis governing the choice of a specific poly(A) site during the vegetative-to-reproductive growth transition remains unclear. Here we characterize HLPI, an hnRNP A/B protein as a novel regulator for pre-mRNA 3'-end processing in Arabidopsis. Genetic analysis reveals that HLP1 suppresses Flowering Locus C (FLC), a key repressor of flowering in Arabidopsis. Genome-wide mapping of HLP1-RNA interactions indicates that HLP1 binds preferentially to A-rich and U-rich elements around cleavage and polyadenylation sites, implicating its role in 3'-end formation. We show HLP1 is significantly enriched at transcripts involved in RNA metabolism and flowering. Comprehensive profiling of the poly(A) site usage reveals that HLP1 mutations cause thousands of poly(A) site shifts. A distal-to-proximal poly(A) site shift in the flowering regulator FCA, a direct target of HLP1, leads to upregulation of FLC and delayed flowering. Our results elucidate that HLP1 is a novel factor involved in 3'-end processing and controls reproductive timing via targeting APA.
Epidermal progenitors suppress GRHL3-mediated differentiation through intronic polyadenylation promoted by CPSF-HNRNPA3 collaboration
In self-renewing somatic tissue such as skin epidermis, terminal differentiation genes must be suppressed in progenitors to sustain regenerative capacity. Here we show that hundreds of intronic polyadenylation (IpA) sites are differentially used during keratinocyte differentiation, which is accompanied by downregulation of the Cleavage and Polyadenylation Specificity Factor (CPSF) complex. Sustained CPSF expression in undifferentiated keratinocytes requires the contribution from the transcription factor MYC. In keratinocytes cultured in undifferentiation condition, CSPF knockdown induces premature differentiation and partially affects dynamically used IpA sites. These sites include an IpA site located in the first intron of the differentiation activator GRHL3. CRISPR knockout of GRHL3 IpA increased full-length GRHL3 mRNA expression. Using a targeted genetic screen, we identify that HNRNPA3 interacts with CPSF and enhances GRHL3 IpA. Our data suggest a model where the interaction between CPSF and RNA-binding proteins, such as HNRNPA3, promotes site-specific IpA and suppresses premature differentiation in progenitors. Suppression of terminal differentiation is essential for epidermal progenitor maintenance. Here, the authors show that intronic polyadenylation is dynamically regulated by the cooperation between CPSF and RNA-binding proteins to influence epidermal differentiation gene expression.
Genome-Wide Control of Polyadenylation Site Choice by CPSF30 in Arabidopsis
The Arabidopsis thaliana ortholog of the 30-kD subunit of the mammalian Cleavage and Polyadenylation Specificity Factor (CPSF30) has been implicated in the responses of plants to oxidative stress, suggesting a role for alternative polyadenylation. To better understand this, poly(A) site choice was studied in a mutant (oxt6) deficient in CPSF30 expression using a genome-scale approach. The results indicate that poly(A) site choice in a large majority of Arabidopsis genes is altered in the oxt6 mutant. A number of poly(A) sites were identified that are seen only in the wild type or oxt6 mutant. Interestingly, putative polyadenylation signals associated with sites that are seen only in the oxt6 mutant are decidedly different from the canonical plant polyadenylation signal, lacking the characteristic A-rich near-upstream element (where AAUAAA can be found); this suggests that CPSF30 functions in the handling of the near-upstream element. The sets of genes that possess sites seen only in the wild type or mutant were enriched for those involved in stress and defense responses, a result consistent with the properties of the oxt6 mutant. Taken together, these studies provide new insights into the mechanisms and consequences of CPSF30-mediated alternative polyadenylation.
Single‐cell polyadenylation site mapping reveals 3′ isoform choice variability
Cell‐to‐cell variability in gene expression is important for many processes in biology, including embryonic development and stem cell homeostasis. While heterogeneity of gene expression levels has been extensively studied, less attention has been paid to mRNA polyadenylation isoform choice. 3′ untranslated regions regulate mRNA fate, and their choice is tightly controlled during development, but how 3′ isoform usage varies within genetically and developmentally homogeneous cell populations has not been explored. Here, we perform genome‐wide quantification of polyadenylation site usage in single mouse embryonic and neural stem cells using a novel single‐cell transcriptomic method, BATSeq. By applying BATBayes, a statistical framework for analyzing single‐cell isoform data, we find that while the developmental state of the cell globally determines isoform usage, single cells from the same state differ in the choice of isoforms. Notably this variation exceeds random selection with equal preference in all cells, a finding that was confirmed by RNA FISH data. Variability in 3′ isoform choice has potential implications on functional cell‐to‐cell heterogeneity as well as utility in resolving cell populations. Synopsis BATSeq, the first transcriptomic method to quantify polyadenylation site use in single cells, reveals that stem cells from homogeneous populations differ in their preference for 3′ mRNA isoforms. We introduce BATBayes, a Bayesian framework that accounts for technical and biological sources of noise to quantify underlying variability in isoform preference 3′ isoform usage is sufficient to distinguish between cells from different stem cell populations Within homogeneous cell populations, cells differ in their use of isoforms more than expected from random choice An intrinsic mechanism acting at the level of individual genes is likely to contribute to isoform choice variability Graphical Abstract BATSeq, the first transcriptomic method to quantify polyadenylation site use in single cells, reveals that stem cells from homogeneous populations differ in their preference for 3′ mRNA isoforms.
Involved microRNAs in alternative polyadenylation intervene in breast cancer via regulation of cleavage factor “CFIm25”
Cleavage factor “CFIm25”, as a key repressor at proximal poly (A) site, negatively correlates to cell proliferation and tumorigenicity in various cancers. Hence, understanding CFIm25 mechanism of action in breast cancer would be a great benefit. To this aim four steps were designed. First, potential miRNAs that target 3′-UTR of CFIm25 mRNA, retrieved from Targetscan web server. Second, screened miRNAs were profiled in 100 breast cancer and 100 normal adjacent samples. Third, miRNAs that their expression was inversely correlated to the CFIm25, overexpressed in MDA-MB-231 cell line, and their effect on proliferation and migration monitored via MTT and wound healing assays, respectively. Fourth, interaction of miRNAs of interest with 3′-UTR of CFIm25 confirmed via luciferase assay and western blot. Our results indicate that CFIm25 considerably down-regulates in human breast cancer tissue. qRT-PCR assay, luciferase test, and western blotting confirm that CFIm25 itself could be directly regulated by oncomiRs such as miR-23 , -24, -27, -135, -182 and -374 . Besides, according to MTT and wound healing assays of cell lines, CFIm25 knockdown intensifies cell growth, proliferation and migration. Our results also confirm indirect impact of CFIm25 on regulation of mRNA’s 3′–UTR length, which then control corresponding miRNAs’ action. miRNAs directly control CFIm25 expression level, which then tunes expression of the oncogenes and tumor proliferation. Therefore, regulation of CFIm25 expression level via miRNAs is expected to improve treatment responses in breast cancer.
Alternative cleavage and polyadenylation in health and disease
Most human genes have multiple sites at which RNA 3ʹ end cleavage and polyadenylation can occur, enabling the expression of distinct transcript isoforms under different conditions. Novel methods to sequence RNA 3′ ends have generated comprehensive catalogues of polyadenylation (poly(A)) sites; their analysis using innovative computational methods has revealed how poly(A) site choice is regulated by core RNA 3ʹ end processing factors, such as cleavage factor I and cleavage and polyadenylation specificity factor, as well as by other RNA-binding proteins, particularly splicing factors. Here, we review the experimental and computational methods that have enabled the global mapping of mRNA and of long non-coding RNA 3ʹ ends, quantification of the resulting isoforms and the discovery of regulators of alternative cleavage and polyadenylation (APA). We highlight the different types of APA-derived isoforms and their functional differences, and illustrate how APA contributes to human diseases, including cancer and haematological, immunological and neurological diseases.
Treatment of Patients with the Hypereosinophilic Syndrome with Mepolizumab
The hypereosinophilic syndrome, although uncommon, is difficult to treat, and the treatment has substantial toxic effects. This proof-of concept trial shows that treatment of patients with the hypereosinophilic syndrome with an anti–interleukin-5 monoclonal antibody, mepolizumab, improves clinical and laboratory outcomes. This proof-of concept trial shows that treatment of patients with the hypereosinophilic syndrome with an anti–interleukin-5 monoclonal antibody, mepolizumab, improves clinical and laboratory outcomes. The hypereosinophilic syndrome consists of several heterogeneous disorders characterized by sustained blood eosinophilia and eosinophil-related end-organ damage, with no identifiable cause, such as parasitic infection. 1 The objective of treatment is long-term reduction of blood and tissue eosinophil levels to prevent end-organ damage and thromboembolic events. Except for the myeloproliferative variant of the hypereosinophilic syndrome (associated with the Fip1-like 1–platelet-derived growth factor receptor α fusion gene [ FIP1L1–PDGFRA ]), for which imatinib mesylate is considered first-line therapy, current management is based on long-term systemic corticosteroids. 1 – 4 Eosinophil development from hematopoietic progenitors is regulated mainly by interleukin-5, 5 which has a selective role . . .