Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
338 result(s) for "Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome - prevention "
Sort by:
The prevalent status and genetic diversity of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in China: a molecular epidemiological perspective
Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) has been epidemic more than 30 years in America and 20 years in China. It is still one of the most important causative agents to the worldwide swine industry. Here, we systematically analyzed the prevalence status of PRRSV in China by a molecular epidemiological perspective. Now both PRRSV-1 and PRRSV-2 are circulating and approximately more than 80% of pig farms are seropositive for PRRSV. For PRRSV-2, there are four lineages (lineage 1, lineage 3, lineage 5, lineage 8) circulating in the fields. Lineage 8 (CH-1a-like) and lineage 5 (BJ-4-like) appeared almost at the same time during 1995-1996. Notably, BJ-4 shares 99.6% and 99.8% identity with VR2332 and RespPRRS MLV, respectively. It means that lineage 5 is likely to be imported from America. Now highly pathogenic PRRSV (HP-PRRSV) which was considered to be evolved from local diversity of lineage 8 strains is predominant with different variants. Lineage 3 appeared in 2010 which is mainly sporadic in south of China. Lineage 1, also known as NADC30-like strains in China, has been prevalent since 2013 and leads to PRRS pandemic again. For PRRSV-1, although sporadic at present, more than 9 provinces/regions have been reported. All the circulating strains belong to subtype I. It should be paid more attention since there are no vaccines available. Our analysis would help to deeply understand the prevalent status of PRRSV in China and provide useful information for prevention and control of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS).
Live porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus vaccines: Current status and future direction
•Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) is a chronic and economically devastating disease of pigs since the late 1980s.•Although modified live-attenuated PRRSV (PRRSV-MLV) vaccines have been used since 1995, control of PRRS globally is still a challenge.•PRRSV-MLV provides incomplete protection against existing and emerging genetically variant field isolates.•Promising approaches to improve PRRSV-MLV efficacy, are under experimental study.•This review highlights the current status and future directions of infectious PRRSV vaccine. Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) caused by PRRS virus (PRRSV) was reported in the late 1980s. PRRS still is a huge economic concern to the global pig industry with a current annual loss estimated at one billion US dollars in North America alone. It has been 20 years since the first modified live-attenuated PRRSV vaccine (PRRSV-MLV) became commercially available. PRRSV-MLVs provide homologous protection and help in reducing shedding of heterologous viruses, but they do not completely protect pigs against heterologous field strains. There have been many advances in understanding the biology and ecology of PRRSV; however, the complexities of virus-host interaction and PRRSV vaccinology are not yet completely understood leaving a significant gap for improving breadth of immunity against diverse PRRS isolates. This review provides insights on immunization efforts using infectious PRRSV-based vaccines since the 1990s, beginning with live PRRSV immunization, development and commercialization of PRRSV-MLV, and strategies to overcome the deficiencies of PRRSV-MLV through use of replicating viral vectors expressing multiple PRRSV membrane proteins. Finally, powerful reverse genetics systems (infectious cDNA clones) generated from more than 20 PRRSV isolates of both genotypes 1 and 2 viruses have provided a great resource for exploring many innovative strategies to improve the safety and cross-protective efficacy of live PRRSV vaccines. Examples include vaccines with diminished ability to down-regulate the immune system, positive and negative marker vaccines, multivalent vaccines incorporating antigens from other porcine pathogens, vaccines that carry their own cytokine adjuvants, and chimeric vaccine viruses with the potential for broad cross-protection against heterologous strains. To combat this devastating pig disease in the future, evaluation and commercialization of such improved live PRRSV vaccines is a shared goal among PRRSV researchers, pork producers and biologics companies.
Commercial vaccines provide limited protection to NADC30-like PRRSV infection
•Five PRRSV vaccines have been tested for the efficacy to NADC30-like PRRSV challenge.•Vaccinated pigs had improved clinical manifestations compared to unvaccinated ones.•However, vaccinated pigs developed similar viremia and suffered pathological lesions.•PRRSV vaccines could not provide complete protection to NADC30-like PRRSV infection. NADC30-like PRRSV has been recently reported and became endemic in vaccinated pig herds in China. The outbreaks of disease in vaccinated pigs indicated the inefficacy of commercial PRRSV vaccines. In this study, five commercial PRRSV vaccines that have been widely used in China were used to evaluate the efficacy to a NADC30-like PRRSV infection. The vaccinated pigs were challenged with HNjz15, a NADC30-like PRRSV at 28days post vaccination. Compared to unvaccinated pigs, the vaccinated pigs clinically shortened the period of fever with less pig numbers of clinical manifestations and had improved body weight gain at the end of the study. However, the vaccinated pigs developed viremia with similar kinetics and suffered pathological lesions in lung and lymphoid tissues as the unvaccinated pigs. The virus load in tonsil, lung and lymph nodes detected by immunohistochemistry staining in vaccinated pigs was also similar to that in unvaccinated pigs which indicated the inability of vaccination to eradicate the virus from tissues of vaccinated pigs. Therefore, the above results suggested current commercial PRRSV vaccines could not provide complete protection to the NADC30-like PRRSV infection.
Review on the transmission porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus between pigs and farms and impact on vaccination
Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) is considered to be one of the most costly diseases affecting intensive pig production worldwide. Control of PRRS is a complex issue and involves a combination of measures including monitoring, diagnosis, biosecurity, herd management, and immunization. In spite of the numerous studies dealing with PRRS virus epidemiology, transmission of the infection is still not fully understood. The present article reviews the current knowledge on PRRSV transmission between and within farm, and the impact of vaccination on virus transmission.
A chimeric strain of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus 2 derived from HP-PRRSV and NADC30-like PRRSV confers cross-protection against both strains
Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) is one of the most significant swine viral infectious diseases worldwide. Vaccination is a key strategy for the control and prevention of PRRS. At present, the NADC30-like PRRSV strain has become the predominant epidemic strain in China, superseding the HP-PRRSV strain. The existing commercial vaccines offer substantial protection against HP-PRRSV, but their efficacy against NADC30-like PRRSV is limited. The development of a novel vaccine that can provide valuable cross-protection against both NADC30-like PRRSV and HP-PRRSV is highly important. In this study, an infectious clone of a commercial MLV vaccine strain, GD (HP-PRRSV), was first generated (named rGD). A recombinant chimeric PRRSV strain, rGD-SX-5U2, was subsequently constructed by using rGD as a backbone and embedding several dominant immune genes, including the NSP2, ORF5, ORF6, and ORF7 genes, from an NADC30-like PRRSV isolate. In vitro experiments demonstrated that chimeric PRRSV rGD-SX-5U2 exhibited high tropism for MARC-145 cells, which is of paramount importance in the production of PRRSV vaccines. Moreover, subsequent in vivo inoculation and challenge experiments demonstrated that rGD-SX-5U2 confers cross-protection against both HP-PRRSV and NADC30-like PRRSV, including an improvement in ADG levels and a reduction in viremia and lung tissue lesions. In conclusion, our research demonstrated that the chimeric PRRSV strain rGD-SX-5U2 is a novel approach that can provide broad-spectrum protection against both HP-PRRSV and NADC30-like PRRSV. This may be a significant improvement over previous MLV vaccinations.
Immunological solutions for treatment and prevention of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS)
► PRRS is a devastating disease of pigs despite availability of vaccines since 1994. ► Mechanisms of protective immunity are poorly understood. ► Correlates of immune protection are not known. ► Viral diversity complicates disease control and research interpretations. ► Understanding the limitations will help improve research efforts. Vaccination is the principal means used to control and treat porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) infection. An array of PRRS vaccine products is available in various regions of the world. However, despite extensive efforts, little progress has been made to improve efficacy since the first introduction of a live, attenuated vaccine in 1994 in the USA. Key limitations include: (a) uncertainty about the viral targets of protective immunity that prevents a research focus on individual viral structures and proteins, and frustrates efforts to design novel vaccines; (b) inability to establish clear immunological correlates of protection that requires laborious in vivo challenge models for evaluation of protection against challenge; and (c) the great genetic diversity of PRRSV which requires that challenge experiments be interpreted cautiously since it is not possible to predict how immunological protection against one isolate will translate to broadly cross-protective immunity. Economically significant levels of cross-protection that are provided to a variety of field isolates still cannot assure that effective protection will be conferred to isolates that might emerge in the future. In addition to these substantial barriers to new PRRSV vaccine development, there are enormous gaps in our understanding of porcine immunological mechanisms and processes that provide immunity to PRRSV infection and memory responses for long-term protection. Despite these impediments, we should be confident that progress will be made. Sequencing of the swine genome is providing a rich source of primary knowledge of gene structure and transcriptional regulation that is certain to reveal important insights about the mechanisms of anti-PRRSV immunity, and continued efforts to unravel the details of the interaction of PRRSV with pigs will lead to new insights that overcome the current limitations in the field.
Cell-mediated immune response and protective efficacy of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus modified-live vaccines against co-challenge with PRRSV-1 and PRRSV-2
Cell-mediated immunity (CMI), IL-10, and the protective efficacy of modified-live porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) vaccines (MLV) against co-challenge with PRRSV-1 and PRRSV-2 (HP-PRRSV) were investigated. Seventy, PRRSV-free, 3-week old, pigs were allocated into 7 groups. Six groups were intramuscularly vaccinated with MLV, including Porcilis (PRRSV-1 MLV, MSD Animal Health, The Netherlands), Amervac (PRRSV-1 MLV, Laboratorios Hipra, Spain), Fostera (PRRSV-2 MLV, Zoetis, USA), Ingelvac PRRS MLV and Ingelvac PRRS ATP (PRRSV-2, Boehringer Ingelheim, USA), and Prime Pac PRRS (PRRSV-2 MLV, MSD Animal Health, The Netherlands). Unvaccinated pigs were left as control. Lymphocyte proliferative response, IL-10 and IFN-γ production were determined. At 35 days post-vaccination (DPV), all pigs were inoculated intranasally with 2 ml of each PRRSV-1 (10 5.4 TCID 50 /ml) and PRRSV-2 (10 5.2 TCID 50 /ml, HP-PRRSV). Following challenge, sera were quantitatively assayed for PRRSV RNA. Pigs were necropsied at 7 days post-challenge. Viremia, macro- and microscopic lung lesion together with PRRSV antigen presence were evaluated in lung tissues. The results demonstrated that, regardless of vaccine genotype, CMI induced by all MLVs was relatively slow. Increased production of IL-10 in all vaccinated groups was observed at 7 and 14 DPV. Pigs in Amervac, Ingelvac MLV and Ingelvac ATP groups had significantly higher levels of IL-10 compared to Porcilis, Fostera and Prime Pac groups at 7 and 14 DPV. Following challenge, regardless to vaccine genotype, vaccinated pigs had significantly lower lung lesion scores and PRRSV antigens than those in the control group. Both PRRSV-1 and PRRSV-2 RNA were significantly reduced. Prime Pac pigs had lowest PRRSV-1 and PRRSV-2 RNA in serum, and micro- and macroscopic lung lesion scores ( p  < 0.05) compared to other vaccinated groups. In conclusion, PRRSV MLVs, regardless of vaccine genotype, can reduce viremia and lung lesions following co-challenge with PRRSV-1 and PRRSV-2 (HP-PRRSV). The main difference between PRRSV MLV is the production of IL-10 following vaccination.
Comparative evaluation of PRRSV MLV vaccine efficacy administered via intranasal and intramuscular routes in early age of piglets
Early porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) infections in suckling pigs are commonly observed, emphasizing the need for early vaccination strategies. However, the effectiveness of early vaccination in suckling pigs remains debated due to potential interference from maternally derived antibodies (MDA) and the immature immune system of piglets. This study evaluated and compared protective efficacy and immune responses of intranasal (IN) and intramuscular (IM) administration of a commercial PRRSV-2 modified live virus (MLV) vaccine in 3-day-old piglets against a Thai highly pathogenic (HP)-PRRSV strain. Piglets from PRRSV-seropositive sows were randomly allocated to four groups: unvaccinated, unchallenged control (A-NEG); unvaccinated, HP-PRRSV-challenged control (B-POS); intramuscular vaccination with PRRSV-2 MLV (C-IM); intranasal vaccination with PRRSV-2 MLV (D-IN). At five weeks of age, piglets in the B-POS, C-IM, and D-IN groups were challenged with HP-PRRSV. Following challenge with HP-PRRSV, both C-IM and D-IN groups demonstrated significant reductions in fever and improved growth performance compared to the B-POS group. Notably, the C-IM group exhibited lower viral loads in the tracheobronchial lymph nodes (TBLN), while the D-IN group showed significantly reduced viral loads in the tonsils. As expected, neutralizing antibody against HP-PRRSV was low across all groups. Interestingly, the D-IN group exhibited enhanced systemic T lymphocyte responses, characterized by increased numbers of PRRSV-specific IFN-γ+-producing CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes following viral challenge. Early vaccination of piglets with PRRSV-2 MLV effectively reduced clinical signs and improved growth performance during HP-PRRSV infection, regardless of the administration route. Notably, intranasal vaccination induced higher PRRSV-specific T lymphocytes responses, highlighting its potential as an alternative strategy for early vaccination in piglets. These findings underscore the importance of optimizing vaccination protocols to improve PRRSV control measures in swine farms, particularly against early PRRSV infections. •Early intranasal and intramuscular PRRSV-2 MLV vaccination reduced clinical signs and improved growth performance following HP-PRRSV infection.•Early intranasal vaccination reduced viral loads in the tonsils, whereas early intramuscular vaccination decreased viral loads in the tracheobronchial lymph nodes.•Early intranasal vaccination induced high systemic PRRSV-specific T lymphocytes responses.
Recombinant characterization and pathogenicity of a novel L1C RFLP-1-4-4 variant of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in China
Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) is one of the most significant diseases affecting the pig industry worldwide and is caused by the PRRS virus (PRRSV), which has complex genetic variation due to frequent mutations, indels, and recombination. The emergence of PRRSV L1C.5 in 2020 in the United States has raised worldwide concerns about PRRSV with the RFLP 1-4-4 pattern and lineage 1C. However, studies on the pathogenic characteristics, epidemiological distribution, and effectiveness of vaccines against PRRSV with L1C and RFLP1-4-4 pattern in China are still insufficient. In this study, a novel recombinant variant of PRRSV with RFLP 1-4-4 and lineage 1C features, different from L1C.5 in the United States, was isolated in China in 2021. In pathogenicity experiments in specific pathogen-free piglets or farm piglets, 60–100% of artificially infected experimental piglets died with high fever and respiratory symptoms. Inflammatory cytokine and chemokine levels were upregulated in infected piglets. A commercially modified live vaccine against highly pathogenic PRRSV did not provide effective protection when the vaccinated piglets were challenged with the novel L1C-1-4-4 variant. Therefore, this strain merits special attention when devising control and vaccine strategies. These findings suggest that extensive joint surveillance is urgently needed and that vaccine strategies should be updated to prevent the disease from spreading further.