Explore the vast range of titles available.

•Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) is a chronic and economically devastating disease of pigs since the late 1980s.•Although modified live-attenuated PRRSV (PRRSV-MLV) vaccines have been used since 1995, control of PRRS globally is still a challenge.•PRRSV-MLV provides incomplete protection against existing and emerging genetically variant field isolates.•Promising approaches to improve PRRSV-MLV efficacy, are under experimental study.•This review highlights the current status and future directions of infectious PRRSV vaccine. Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) caused by PRRS virus (PRRSV) was reported in the late 1980s. PRRS still is a huge economic concern to the global pig industry with a current annual loss estimated at one billion US dollars in North America alone. It has been 20 years since the first modified live-attenuated PRRSV vaccine (PRRSV-MLV) became commercially available. PRRSV-MLVs provide homologous protection and help in reducing shedding of heterologous viruses, but they do not completely protect pigs against heterologous field strains. There have been many advances in understanding the biology and ecology of PRRSV; however, the complexities of virus-host interaction and PRRSV vaccinology are not yet completely understood leaving a significant gap for improving breadth of immunity against diverse PRRS isolates. This review provides insights on immunization efforts using infectious PRRSV-based vaccines since the 1990s, beginning with live PRRSV immunization, development and commercialization of PRRSV-MLV, and strategies to overcome the deficiencies of PRRSV-MLV through use of replicating viral vectors expressing multiple PRRSV membrane proteins. Finally, powerful reverse genetics systems (infectious cDNA clones) generated from more than 20 PRRSV isolates of both genotypes 1 and 2 viruses have provided a great resource for exploring many innovative strategies to improve the safety and cross-protective efficacy of live PRRSV vaccines. Examples include vaccines with diminished ability to down-regulate the immune system, positive and negative marker vaccines, multivalent vaccines incorporating antigens from other porcine pathogens, vaccines that carry their own cytokine adjuvants, and chimeric vaccine viruses with the potential for broad cross-protection against heterologous strains. To combat this devastating pig disease in the future, evaluation and commercialization of such improved live PRRSV vaccines is a shared goal among PRRSV researchers, pork producers and biologics companies.

Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) is a panzootic infectious disease of pigs, causing major economic losses to the world-wide pig industry. PRRS manifests differently in pigs of all ages but primarily causes late-term abortions and stillbirths in sows and respiratory disease in piglets. The causative agent of the disease is the positive-strand RNA PRRS virus (PRRSV). PRRSV has a narrow host cell tropism, limited to cells of the monocyte/macrophage lineage. CD163 has been described as a fusion receptor for PRRSV, whereby the scavenger receptor cysteine-rich domain 5 (SRCR5) region was shown to be an interaction site for the virus in vitro. CD163 is expressed at high levels on the surface of macrophages, particularly in the respiratory system. Here we describe the application of CRISPR/Cas9 to pig zygotes, resulting in the generation of pigs with a deletion of Exon 7 of the CD163 gene, encoding SRCR5. Deletion of SRCR5 showed no adverse effects in pigs maintained under standard husbandry conditions with normal growth rates and complete blood counts observed. Pulmonary alveolar macrophages (PAMs) and peripheral blood monocytes (PBMCs) were isolated from the animals and assessed in vitro. Both PAMs and macrophages obtained from PBMCs by CSF1 stimulation (PMMs) show the characteristic differentiation and cell surface marker expression of macrophages of the respective origin. Expression and correct folding of the SRCR5 deletion CD163 on the surface of macrophages and biological activity of the protein as hemoglobin-haptoglobin scavenger was confirmed. Challenge of both PAMs and PMMs with PRRSV genotype 1, subtypes 1, 2, and 3 and PMMs with PRRSV genotype 2 showed complete resistance to viral infections assessed by replication. Confocal microscopy revealed the absence of replication structures in the SRCR5 CD163 deletion macrophages, indicating an inhibition of infection prior to gene expression, i.e. at entry/fusion or unpacking stages.

•Five PRRSV vaccines have been tested for the efficacy to NADC30-like PRRSV challenge.•Vaccinated pigs had improved clinical manifestations compared to unvaccinated ones.•However, vaccinated pigs developed similar viremia and suffered pathological lesions.•PRRSV vaccines could not provide complete protection to NADC30-like PRRSV infection. NADC30-like PRRSV has been recently reported and became endemic in vaccinated pig herds in China. The outbreaks of disease in vaccinated pigs indicated the inefficacy of commercial PRRSV vaccines. In this study, five commercial PRRSV vaccines that have been widely used in China were used to evaluate the efficacy to a NADC30-like PRRSV infection. The vaccinated pigs were challenged with HNjz15, a NADC30-like PRRSV at 28days post vaccination. Compared to unvaccinated pigs, the vaccinated pigs clinically shortened the period of fever with less pig numbers of clinical manifestations and had improved body weight gain at the end of the study. However, the vaccinated pigs developed viremia with similar kinetics and suffered pathological lesions in lung and lymphoid tissues as the unvaccinated pigs. The virus load in tonsil, lung and lymph nodes detected by immunohistochemistry staining in vaccinated pigs was also similar to that in unvaccinated pigs which indicated the inability of vaccination to eradicate the virus from tissues of vaccinated pigs. Therefore, the above results suggested current commercial PRRSV vaccines could not provide complete protection to the NADC30-like PRRSV infection.

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) causes significant economic losses in the global swine industry due to its high genetic diversity and different virulence levels, which complicate disease management and vaccine development. This study evaluated longitudinal changes in the immune cell composition of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and the clinical outcomes across PRRSV strains with varying virulence, using techniques including single-cell transcriptomics. In highly virulent infection, faster viral replication results in an earlier peak lung-damage time point, marked by significant interstitial pneumonia, a significant decrease in macrophages, and an influx of lymphocytes. Viral tracking reveals less than 5% of macrophages are directly infected, and further analysis indicates bystander cell death, likely regulated by exosomal microRNAs as a significant factor. In contrast, the peak intermediate infection shows a delayed lung-damage time point with fewer cell population modifications. Furthermore, anti-inflammatory M2-like macrophages (SPP1-CXCL14 high ) are identified and their counts increase during the peak lung-damage time point, likely contributing to local defense and lung recovery, which is not observed in high virulent infection. These findings provide a comprehensive description of the immune cellular landscape and differential PRRSV virulence mechanisms, which will help build new hypotheses to understand PRRSV pathogenesis and other respiratory infections. Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus strains can have markedly different virulence in pigs. Here, the authors describe differences in the immune response to infection with varying virulence and suggest that M2-like macrophages may aid in recovery and lung health.

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) is one of the most significant swine viral infectious diseases worldwide. Vaccination is a key strategy for the control and prevention of PRRS. At present, the NADC30-like PRRSV strain has become the predominant epidemic strain in China, superseding the HP-PRRSV strain. The existing commercial vaccines offer substantial protection against HP-PRRSV, but their efficacy against NADC30-like PRRSV is limited. The development of a novel vaccine that can provide valuable cross-protection against both NADC30-like PRRSV and HP-PRRSV is highly important. In this study, an infectious clone of a commercial MLV vaccine strain, GD (HP-PRRSV), was first generated (named rGD). A recombinant chimeric PRRSV strain, rGD-SX-5U2, was subsequently constructed by using rGD as a backbone and embedding several dominant immune genes, including the NSP2, ORF5, ORF6, and ORF7 genes, from an NADC30-like PRRSV isolate. In vitro experiments demonstrated that chimeric PRRSV rGD-SX-5U2 exhibited high tropism for MARC-145 cells, which is of paramount importance in the production of PRRSV vaccines. Moreover, subsequent in vivo inoculation and challenge experiments demonstrated that rGD-SX-5U2 confers cross-protection against both HP-PRRSV and NADC30-like PRRSV, including an improvement in ADG levels and a reduction in viremia and lung tissue lesions. In conclusion, our research demonstrated that the chimeric PRRSV strain rGD-SX-5U2 is a novel approach that can provide broad-spectrum protection against both HP-PRRSV and NADC30-like PRRSV. This may be a significant improvement over previous MLV vaccinations.

The NLRP3 inflammasome is a fundamental component of the innate immune system, yet its excessive activation is intricately associated with viral pathogenesis. Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus type 2 (PRRSV-2), belonging to the family Arteriviridae , triggers dysregulated cytokine release and interstitial pneumonia, which can quickly escalate to acute respiratory distress and death. However, a mechanistic understanding of PRRSV-2 progression remains unclear. Here, we screen that PRRSV-2 nsp2 activates the NLRP3 inflammasome, thereby instigating a state of hyperinflammation. Mechanistically, PRRSV-2 nsp2 interacts with the nucleotide-binding and oligomerization (NACHT) domain of NLRP3, augmenting IKKβ recruitment to driving NLRP3 translocation to the dispersed trans -Golgi network (dTGN) for oligomerization. This process facilitates ASC polymerization, culminating in the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. In addition, the IKKβ-dependent NLRP3 translocation to the dTGN is pivotal for pseudorabies virus (PRV) and encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV)-induced inflammatory responses. Collectively, these results elucidate a novel mechanism of NLRP3 inflammasome activation during PRRSV-2 infection, providing valuable insights into PRRSV-2 pathogenesis.

► PRRS is a devastating disease of pigs despite availability of vaccines since 1994. ► Mechanisms of protective immunity are poorly understood. ► Correlates of immune protection are not known. ► Viral diversity complicates disease control and research interpretations. ► Understanding the limitations will help improve research efforts. Vaccination is the principal means used to control and treat porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) infection. An array of PRRS vaccine products is available in various regions of the world. However, despite extensive efforts, little progress has been made to improve efficacy since the first introduction of a live, attenuated vaccine in 1994 in the USA. Key limitations include: (a) uncertainty about the viral targets of protective immunity that prevents a research focus on individual viral structures and proteins, and frustrates efforts to design novel vaccines; (b) inability to establish clear immunological correlates of protection that requires laborious in vivo challenge models for evaluation of protection against challenge; and (c) the great genetic diversity of PRRSV which requires that challenge experiments be interpreted cautiously since it is not possible to predict how immunological protection against one isolate will translate to broadly cross-protective immunity. Economically significant levels of cross-protection that are provided to a variety of field isolates still cannot assure that effective protection will be conferred to isolates that might emerge in the future. In addition to these substantial barriers to new PRRSV vaccine development, there are enormous gaps in our understanding of porcine immunological mechanisms and processes that provide immunity to PRRSV infection and memory responses for long-term protection. Despite these impediments, we should be confident that progress will be made. Sequencing of the swine genome is providing a rich source of primary knowledge of gene structure and transcriptional regulation that is certain to reveal important insights about the mechanisms of anti-PRRSV immunity, and continued efforts to unravel the details of the interaction of PRRSV with pigs will lead to new insights that overcome the current limitations in the field.

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) continues to be a threat for the pig industry. Vaccines have been developed, but these failed to provide sustainable disease control, in particular against genetically unrelated strains. Here we give an overview of current knowledge and gaps in our knowledge that may be relevant for the development of a future generation of more effective vaccines. PRRSV replicates in cells of the monocyte/macrophage lineage, induces apoptosis and necrosis, interferes with the induction of a proinflammatory response, only slowly induces a specific antiviral response, and may cause persistent infections. The virus appears to use several evasion strategies to circumvent both innate and acquired immunity, including interference with antigen presentation, antibody-mediated enhancement, reduced cell surface expression of viral proteins, and shielding of neutralizing epitopes. In particular the downregulation of type I interferon-α production appears to interfere with the induction of acquired immunity. Current vaccines are ineffective because they suffer both from the immune evasion strategies of the virus and the antigenic heterogeneity of field strains. Future vaccines therefore must “uncouple” the immune evasion and apoptogenic/necrotic properties of the virus from its immunogenic properties, and they should induce a broad immune response covering the plasticity of its major antigenic sites. Alternatively, the composition of the vaccine should be changed regularly to reflect presently and locally circulating strains. Preferably new vaccines should also allow discriminating infected from vaccinated pigs to support a virus elimination strategy. Challenges in vaccine development are the incompletely known mechanisms of immune evasion and immunity, lack of knowledge of viral sequences that are responsible for the pathogenic and immunosuppressive properties of the virus, lack of knowledge of the forces that drive antigenic heterogeneity and its consequences for immunogenicity, and a viral genome that is relatively intolerant for subtle changes at functional sites.

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) and classical swine fever virus (CSFV) are among the most economically devastating viral pathogens in the global swine industry, causing substantial and often incalculable economic losses. In field vaccination programs, the mutual interference between the immune responses elicited by CSFV and PRRSV vaccines markedly restricts the flexibility of immunization schedules, while the limited cross-protective capacity of current PRRSV vaccines remains an inherent and unavoidable challenge in swine disease management. To address these limitations, the present study aimed to develop a recombinant PRRSV-based live vector vaccine co-expressing two exogenous components: the protective E2 antigen of CSFV and porcine interleukin-18 (IL-18), with the objective of enhancing immunogenicity beyond that achievable with conventional monovalent formulations. Using a reverse genetics system derived from the attenuated PRRSV strain rHuN4-F112, the CSFV E2 gene was inserted between open reading frame 1b (ORF1b) and ORF2a, while a codon-optimized porcine IL-18 gene was integrated between ORF7 and the 3′ untranslated region. The resulting recombinant virus, designated rPRRSV-E2-N-IL18, was validated through dual restriction endonuclease digestion, plaque assays, indirect immunofluorescence assay, and Western blotting. Genetic stability was maintained for at least 25 serial passages, with persistent exogenous protein expression confirmed in the F25 generation. For immunogenicity assessment, fifteen PRRSV/CSFV double-negative piglets were randomly allocated into three groups: recombinant vaccine, parental virus, and unvaccinated control. Humoral and cellular immune responses were quantified by ELISA. During the 35-day post-vaccination period, no pyrexia associated with PRRSV infection was observed in the vaccine group, and histopathological examination of the lungs, lymph nodes, and kidneys showed no significant inflammatory lesions. Vaccinated pigs produced specific antibodies against both PRRSV and CSFV E2 within 35 days, and exhibited significantly elevated serum IL-18, IL-4, and IFN-γ levels, indicative of a potentiated Th1/Th2 response. These results confirm that IL-18 may indirectly enhance E2 immunogenicity by promoting Th1/Th2 responses, inducing robust humoral and cell-mediated immunity. This recombinant PRRSV platform represents a promising multivalent live vector vaccination strategy for the simultaneous prevention of PRRSV and CSFV in swine.

Cell-mediated immunity (CMI), IL-10, and the protective efficacy of modified-live porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) vaccines (MLV) against co-challenge with PRRSV-1 and PRRSV-2 (HP-PRRSV) were investigated. Seventy, PRRSV-free, 3-week old, pigs were allocated into 7 groups. Six groups were intramuscularly vaccinated with MLV, including Porcilis (PRRSV-1 MLV, MSD Animal Health, The Netherlands), Amervac (PRRSV-1 MLV, Laboratorios Hipra, Spain), Fostera (PRRSV-2 MLV, Zoetis, USA), Ingelvac PRRS MLV and Ingelvac PRRS ATP (PRRSV-2, Boehringer Ingelheim, USA), and Prime Pac PRRS (PRRSV-2 MLV, MSD Animal Health, The Netherlands). Unvaccinated pigs were left as control. Lymphocyte proliferative response, IL-10 and IFN-γ production were determined. At 35 days post-vaccination (DPV), all pigs were inoculated intranasally with 2 ml of each PRRSV-1 (10 5.4 TCID 50 /ml) and PRRSV-2 (10 5.2 TCID 50 /ml, HP-PRRSV). Following challenge, sera were quantitatively assayed for PRRSV RNA. Pigs were necropsied at 7 days post-challenge. Viremia, macro- and microscopic lung lesion together with PRRSV antigen presence were evaluated in lung tissues. The results demonstrated that, regardless of vaccine genotype, CMI induced by all MLVs was relatively slow. Increased production of IL-10 in all vaccinated groups was observed at 7 and 14 DPV. Pigs in Amervac, Ingelvac MLV and Ingelvac ATP groups had significantly higher levels of IL-10 compared to Porcilis, Fostera and Prime Pac groups at 7 and 14 DPV. Following challenge, regardless to vaccine genotype, vaccinated pigs had significantly lower lung lesion scores and PRRSV antigens than those in the control group. Both PRRSV-1 and PRRSV-2 RNA were significantly reduced. Prime Pac pigs had lowest PRRSV-1 and PRRSV-2 RNA in serum, and micro- and macroscopic lung lesion scores ( p  < 0.05) compared to other vaccinated groups. In conclusion, PRRSV MLVs, regardless of vaccine genotype, can reduce viremia and lung lesions following co-challenge with PRRSV-1 and PRRSV-2 (HP-PRRSV). The main difference between PRRSV MLV is the production of IL-10 following vaccination.