Explore the vast range of titles available.

Purpose To evaluate the effects of rotator cuff tear (RCT) and its severity on shoulder proprioception. Methods We studied 132 consecutive patients (67 M-65 F; mean age ± SD, 66.03 ± 9.04; range, 43–78) who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Tear size was determined intra-operatively. The control group included 82 subjects (38 M-44 F; mean age ± SD, 65.87 ± 8.06; range, 41–75) with no RCT. All participants, wearing an eye mask, were submitted to the evaluation of the joint position sense (JPS) at 30°, 60°, 90°, 120°, and 150° of shoulder forward flexion during the sitting position, using a digital inclinometer securely attached to the subject’s arm using hook-and-loop straps. The passive placement and active replacement method was used; the order of the tested angles was randomly selected. The entire test was repeated three times. The error score, by averaging the three trials, was measured as the absolute difference between the target angle and the observed angle. Statistics were performed. Results The intraclass correlation coefficient for all degrees of flexion movement measured was > 0.90, exhibiting a very high correlation. We found significant differences between cases and controls regarding the results of joint position sense error at all measurements ( p  < 0.05). According to RCT size, we found significant differences between groups at 30° (F = 27.27, p  < 0.001), 90° (F = 5.37, p  = 0.006), 120° (F = 10.76, p  < 0.001), and 150° (F = 30.93, p  < 0.001) of shoulder flexion; in details, patients with massive RCT showed greater absolute error value than those with both small and large RCT at 30°, 90°, 120°, and 150° of shoulder flexion ( p  < 0.05). Conclusions RCT provokes an alteration of shoulder proprioception, evaluated as the loss of joint position sense, and the impairment is related to tear severity.

Numerous reports advocate that training of the proprioceptive sense is a viable behavioral therapy for improving impaired motor function. However, there is little agreement of what constitutes proprioceptive training and how effective it is. We therefore conducted a comprehensive, systematic review of the available literature in order to provide clarity to the notion of training the proprioceptive system. Four major scientific databases were searched. The following criteria were subsequently applied: (1) A quantified pre- and post-treatment measure of proprioceptive function. (2) An intervention or training program believed to influence or enhance proprioceptive function. (3) Contained at least one form of treatment or outcome measure that is indicative of somatosensory function. From a total of 1284 articles, 51 studies fulfilled all criteria and were selected for further review. Overall, proprioceptive training resulted in an average improvement of 52% across all outcome measures. Applying muscle vibration above 30 Hz for longer durations (i.e., min vs. s) induced outcome improvements of up to 60%. Joint position and target reaching training consistently enhanced joint position sense (up to 109%) showing an average improvement of 48%. Cortical stroke was the most studied disease entity but no clear evidence indicated that proprioceptive training is differentially beneficial across the reported diseases. There is converging evidence that proprioceptive training can yield meaningful improvements in somatosensory and sensorimotor function. However, there is a clear need for further work. Those forms of training utilizing both passive and active movements with and without visual feedback tended to be most beneficial. There is also initial evidence suggesting that proprioceptive training induces cortical reorganization, reinforcing the notion that proprioceptive training is a viable method for improving sensorimotor function.

In the past, the peripheral sense organs responsible for generating human position sense were thought to be the slowly adapting receptors in joints. More recently, our views have changed and the principal position sensor is now believed to be the muscle spindle. Joint receptors have been relegated to the lesser role of acting as limit detectors when movements approach the anatomical limit of a joint. In a recent experiment concerned with position sense at the elbow joint, measured in a pointing task over a range of forearm angles, we have observed falls in position errors as the forearm was moved closer to the limit of extension. We considered the possibility that as the arm approached full extension, a population of joint receptors became engaged and that they were responsible for the changes in position errors. Muscle vibration selectively engages signals of muscle spindles. Vibration of elbow muscles undergoing stretch has been reported to lead to perception of elbow angles beyond the anatomical limit of the joint. The result suggests that spindles, by themselves, cannot signal the limit of joint movement. We hypothesise that over the portion of the elbow angle range where joint receptors become active, their signals are combined with those of spindles to produce a composite that contains joint limit information. As the arm is extended, the growing influence of the joint receptor signal is evidenced by the fall in position errors.

Proprioception encompasses the submodalities of joint position sense (JPS), kinesthesia, sense of force, and velocity. Owing to the vast mobility of the shoulder, it heavily relies on an intact sense of proprioception. Moreover, shoulder injuries are associated with a decreased sense of proprioception. What remains unclear is how shoulder proprioception is affected by pain and competing nociceptive senses. To summarize the literature evaluating the relationship between pain and shoulder proprioception. A literature review was conducted from inception until 22 October 2018, using electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, EBSCO, CINAHL, and Embase). Retrieved citations were screened for eligibility, and methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Eleven studies were included (n = 447 participants with shoulder pain, n = 20 with experimentally induced pain [EIP]/n = 600 painful shoulders and n = 20 [EIP]). The mean methodological quality of the studies was good (76%). Five studies investigated active JPS, four investigated passive JPS, six investigated kinesthesia, sense of force was measured in one study, and no study investigated sense of velocity. There is moderate evidence for impaired kinesthesia and low evidence for reduced sense of force among painful shoulders. Conflicting evidence is seen for the other proprioceptive submodalities. The overall impact of pain on shoulder JPS remains unclear, while moderate evidence for an affected sense of kinesthesia is possible. There is low evidence for an impaired sense of force among painful shoulders. Standardization between studies is lacking, limiting the range of our conclusions. Further investigation is required into well-controlled and pain-induced studies to better understand the influence of pain on shoulder proprioception. •Proprioception is an overarching somatosensory theme, comprised of the subcategories of joint position sense, kinesthesia (sense of movement), sense of force, and sense of joint velocity.•It is well known that proprioceptive deficits are present among populations with shoulder disorders. What is presently unclear, are the mechanisms that are responsible for a decreased sense of shoulder proprioception after an injury. The relation between proprioception and pain is unknown at this time.•Our preliminary findings suggest that there is a possibility that pain decreases our sense of kinesthesia and our sense of force at the shoulder. There is no clear evidence regarding AJPS, PJPS or sense of velocity of the shoulder complex, in the presence of pain.•Because of the complex underlying physiological mechanisms of both pain and the sense of proprioception, we cannot disregard the possibility of a centralized disturbance of the somatosensory pathways after an injury.•Further research regarding the effects of experimentally induced pain on our proprioceptive sense is strongly encouraged to clarify if proprioception is altered by the presence of pain or rather the second-order effects of an injury (tissue damage, swelling, altered joint mechanics), or a combination thereof.

This is an account of experiments carried out in my laboratory over more than 20 years, exploring the influence of exercise on human limb position sense. It is known that after intense exercise we are clumsy in the execution of skilled movements. The first question we posed concerned eccentric exercise, where the contracting muscle is forcibly lengthened. Such exercise produces muscle damage, and the damage might extend to the muscle’s proprioceptors, the muscle spindles, producing a disturbance of limb position sense. However, provided the exercise was sufficiently severe (20–30% fall in muscle force), comparing eccentric exercise with concentric exercise, where no damage ensues, there was no difference in the effects on position sense. After exercise of elbow muscles, the forearm was always perceived as more extended than its actual position. It led to a new hypothesis: after exercise, did the extra effort required to lift the fatigued arm provide a position signal? Findings based on spindles’ thixotropic behaviour did not support such a proposition for the elbow joint, although at the wrist an effort signal may contribute. Spindle thixotropy has also been proposed to explain the poor proprioception experienced under conditions of weightlessness. After exercise of elbow extensors or flexors, the position errors were always in the direction of forearm extension. At the knee, after exercise the lower leg was always perceived as more flexed. These findings led to the conclusion that disturbances to position sense, post-exercise, did not involve peripheral receptors, and that the effect arose within the brain.

The sense of position of the body and its limbs is a proprioceptive sense. Proprioceptors are concerned with monitoring the body’s own actions. Position sense is important because it is believed to contribute to our self-awareness. This review discusses recent developments in the debate about the sources of peripheral afferent signals contributing to position sense and describes different methods of measurement of position sense under conditions where vision does not participate. These include pointing to or verbal reporting of the perceived position of a hidden body part, alignment of one body part with the perceived position of another, or using memory-based repositioning tasks. The evidence suggests that there are at least two different mechanisms involved in the generation of position sense, mechanisms using different central processing pathways. The principal sensory receptor responsible for position sense is believed to be the muscle spindle. One criterion for identifying mechanism is whether position sense can be manipulated by controlled changes in spindle discharge rates. Position sense measured in two-limb matching is altered in a predictable way by such changes, while values for pointing and verbal reporting remain unresponsive. It is proposed that in two-limb matching the sensation generated is limb position in postural space. In pointing or verbal reporting, information is provided about limb position in extrapersonal space. Here vision is believed to play a role. The evidence suggests that we are aware, at the same time, of sensations of limb position in postural space as well as in extrapersonal space.

Introduction Proprioception can be impaired in people with neck pain. The cervical joint position sense test, which measures joint position error (JPE), is the most common test used to assess neck proprioception. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the measurement properties of this test for the assessment of people with and without neck pain. Methods This systematic review was registered prospectively on Prospero (CRD42020188715). It was designed using the COSMIN guidelines and reported in line with the PRISMA checklist. Two reviewers independently searched Medline, Embase, SportDiscus, and CINAHL Plus databases from inception to the 24th July 2022 with an update of the search conducted until 14th of October 2023. The COSMIN risk of bias checklist was used to assess the risk of bias in each study. The updated criteria for good measurement properties were used to rate individual studies and then the overall pooled results. The level of evidence was rated by two reviewers independently using a modified GRADE approach. Results Fifteen studies were included in this review, 13 reporting absolute JPE and 2 reporting constant JPE. The measurement properties assessed were reliability, measurement error, and validity. The measurement of JPE showed sufficient reliability and validity, however, the level of evidence was low/very low for both measurement properties, apart from convergent validity of the constant JPE, which was high. Conclusion The measure of cervical JPE showed sufficient reliability and validity but with low/very low levels of evidence. Further studies are required to investigate the reliability and validity of this test as well as the responsiveness of the measure.

This study aimed to investigate trunk position sense, postural stability, and spine posture in women with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS). Fifteen (15) women with FMS and age- and gender-matched fifteen (15) healthy controls were included. Trunk position sense as indicated by trunk reposition errors (TRE) and spine posture (thoracic and lumbar curvature) was measured with a digital inclinometer. Postural stability [eyes open (EO) and eyes closed (EC) on bipedal stance (BS), EO on monopedal stance (MS), and limits of stability (LOS)] was assessed with a computerized stabilometer (Prokin, TecnoBody S.R.L., Dalmine, 24044 Bergamo, Italy). TRE (p = 0.002) and the angle of thoracic curvature (p = 0.009) were found higher in women with FMS compared to healthy controls; however, the angle of lumbar curvature was similar (p = 0.467). It was seen that women with FMS had higher anterior–posterior sway in EO-BS (p = 0.009) and EC-BS (p = 0.001), ellipse area in EC-BS (p = 0.015), EO-MS of the dominant side (p = 0.021), and EO-MS of the non-dominant side (p = 0.007), and medial–lateral sway in EO-MS of the dominant (DM) side (p = 0.004) and the non-dominant (NDM) side (p = 0.002). Ellipse area in EO-BS (p = 0.054), medial–lateral sway in EO-BS (p = 0.983) and EC-BS (p = 0.290), anterior–posterior sway in EO-MS of the DM (p = 0.059) and the NDM side (p = 0.065), and LOS did not differ between groups (p = 0.274). Women with FMS had poor trunk position sense and postural instability, and alterations in spine posture. Therefore, the training of trunk position sense, postural stability, and posture might be beneficial and, thus, should be considered while planning an optimal treatment.

Functional ankle instability (FAI) is a condition that causes mechanical alterations to the ankle joint and leads to disability. Fear of movement can significantly influence physical factors, and understanding their relationship is crucial in assessing and managing individuals with FAI. The present study aimed to (1) assess the impact of kinesiophobia on ankle joint position sense (JPS) and postural control and (2) evaluate if kinesiophobia can predict JPS and postural control in FAI individuals. This cross-sectional study included 55 FAI individuals. The Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) score was used to measure kinesiophobia. The ankle JPS was evaluated using a digital inclinometer. The individuals were asked to actively reposition to the target position of 10° and 15° of dorsiflexion and plantarflexion. The reposition accuracy is measured in degrees. The static postural control was evaluated in unilateral stance using a stabilometric force platform, including assessments for the ellipse area, anterior to posterior sway, and medial to lateral sway in mm2. Kinesiophobia showed a significant positive correlation (moderate) with the ankle JPS errors in dorsiflexion (10°: r = 0.51, p < 0.001; at 15°: = r = 0.52, p < 0.001) and plantarflexion (10°: r = 0.35, p = 0.009; at 15°: = r = 0.37, p = 0.005). Kinesiophobia also showed significant positive (moderate) correlation with postural control variables (ellipse area: r = 0.44, p = 0.001; Anterior–Posterior sway: r = 0.32, p = 0.015; Medial–Lateral sway: r = 0.60, p < 0.001). Kinesiophobia significantly predicted ankle JPS (p < 0.05) and postural control (p < 0.05). Increased fear of movement is associated with increased ankle JPS errors and postural sway in FAI individuals. Therefore, assessment of these factors is critical in FAI individuals.

Background & purpose Afferent input from the sole affects postural stability. Cutaneous reflexes from the foot are important to posture and gait. Lower-limb afferents alone provide enough information to maintain upright stance and are critical in perceiving postural sway. Altered feedback from propreoceptive receptors alters gait and patterns of muscle activation. The position and posture of the foot and ankle may also play an important role in proprioceptive input.Therefore, the current research aims to compare static balance and ankle and knee proprioception in people with and without flexible flatfeet. Methodology 91 female students between the ages of 18 and 25 voluntarily participated in this study, of which 24 were in the flexible flatfoot group and 67 were in the regular foot group after evaluating the longitudinal arch of the foot. The position sense of ankle and knee joints were measured using the active reconstruction test of the ankle and knee angle; Static balance was measured using the Sharpened Romberg test. Data were non-normally distributed. Accordingly, non-parametric tests were applied. The Kruskal-Wallis test was applied to compare differences between groups in variables. Result Kruskal-Wallis test showed a significant difference between two groups of flat feet and normal feet in the variables of static balance and position sense of ankle plantarflexion, ankle dorsiflexion, and knee flexion (p ≤ 0.05). A significant correlation was found between static balance and sense of ankle and knee position in the group with normal feet. The analysis of the regression line also showed that ankle and knee position sense could predict the static balance score in the regular foot group (ankle dorsiflexion position sense 17% (R 2  = 0.17), ankle plantarflexion position sense 17% (R 2  = 0.17) and knee flexion position sense 46% (R 2  = 0.46) explain of changes in static balance). Discussion & conclusion Flexible flatfoot soles can cause loss of balance and sense of joint position; therefore, according to this preliminary study, clinicians must be aware and should take into account this possible deficit in the management of these patients.