Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Series TitleSeries Title
-
Reading LevelReading Level
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersContent TypeItem TypeIs Full-Text AvailableSubjectCountry Of PublicationPublisherSourceTarget AudienceDonorLanguagePlace of PublicationContributorsLocation
Done
Filters
Reset
26
result(s) for
"Preemptive attack (Military science)"
Sort by:
The Ethiopian Campaign and French Political Thought
2009
Yves Simon was one of the preeminent Thomistic philosophers and
political theorists of the twentieth century. He saw it as a moral
duty to understand human reality and to use philosophical analysis
to examine contemporary politics when they embodied philosophical
errors or vicious ideologies. In The Ethiopian Campaign and
French Political Thought , Simon extracts principles from the
1894 Dreyfus Affair in France and applies them to Italy's 1935
invasion of Ethopia. As Simon's analysis shows, the relatively
obscure events leading up to the Italian invasion had larger
implications for Europe and the world, perhaps even paving the way
for Vichy France's collaboration with Hitler's German New
Order.
This book, available for the first time in English, offers an
interesting case study of such ethical concerns as just war theory
and pre-emptive war, and is of particular relevance in our modern
political climate.
Striking first : preemption and prevention in international conflict
by
Doyle, Michael W., 1948-
,
Macedo, Stephen, 1957-
,
Koh, Harold Hongju, 1954-
in
Intervention (International law)
,
Sanctions (International law)
,
Preemptive attack (Military science)
2008
Taking a close look at the Iraq war, the 1998 attack against Al Qaeda in Afghanistan, and the Cuban Missile Crisis, among other conflicts, this text argues that neither the Bush Doctrine nor customary international law is capable of adequately responding to the pressing security threats of our times.
Eve of Destruction
2011,2008,2013
In an age of new threats to international security, the old rules of war are rapidly being discarded. The great powers are moving toward norms less restrictive of intervention, preemption, and preventive war. This evolution is taking place not only in the United States but also in many of the world's most powerful nations, including Russia, France, and Japan, among others. As centuries of tradition and law are overturned, will preventive warfare push the world into chaos?Eve of Destructionis a provocative contribution to a growing international debate over the acceptance of preventive military action. In the first work to identify the trends that have led to a coming age of preventive war, Thomas M. Nichols uses historical analysis as well as interviews with military officials from around the world to trace the anticipatory use of force from the early 1990s-when the international community responded to a string of humanitarian crises in Somalia, Bosnia, and Kosovo-to today's current and potential actions against rogue states and terrorists. He makes a case for a bold reform of U.S. foreign policy, and of the United Nations Security Council itself, in order to avert outright anarchy.
The Best Defense?
2013,2010
The Stanford Task Force Report on Preventive Force, by Abraham D. Sofaer, offers a practical guide to identifying and considering the issues relevant to preventive uses of force. The report seeks to ensure that such uses of force, if undertaken, will advance national and international security and the purposes of the United Nations Charter. The report examines the legitimacy, dangers, and limitations of preventive force and concludes by encouraging states and decision makers to undertake a systematic appraisal of the merits of any threat or use of preventive force based, not only on legal standards, which have proved an ineffective guide, but also on standards related to legitimacy, such as the consistency of proposed actions with the U.N. Charter and established norms of conduct.
Preventive Force
by
Ramos, Jennifer M.
,
Fisk, Kerstin
in
Air warfare
,
Air warfare - Government policy - Western countries
,
Drone aircraft
2016
More so than in the past, the US is now embracing the logic of preventive force: using military force to counter potential threats around the globe before they have fully materialized. While popular with individuals who seek to avoid too many \"boots on the ground,\" preventive force is controversial because of its potential for unnecessary collateral damage. Who decides what threats are 'imminent'? Is there an international legal basis to kill or harm individuals who have a connection to that threat? Do the benefits of preventive force justify the costs? And, perhaps most importantly, is the US setting a dangerous international precedent?
InPreventive Force, editors Kerstin Fisk and Jennifer Ramos bring together legal scholars, political scientists, international relations scholars, and prominent defense specialists to examine these questions, whether in the context of full-scale preventive war or preventive drone strikes. In particular, the volume highlights preventive drones strikes, as they mark a complete transformation of how the US understands international norms regarding the use of force, and could potentially lead to a 'slippery slope' for the US and other nations in terms of engaging in preventive warfare as a matter of course. A comprehensive resource that speaks to the contours of preventive force as a security strategy as well as to the practical, legal, and ethical considerations of its implementation,Preventive Forceis a useful guide for political scientists, international relations scholars, and policymakers who seek a thorough and current overview of this essential topic.
Nuclear first strike : consequences of a broken taboo
2006
This provocative and timely work examines various scenarios in which the deployment of nuclear weapons could occur, the probable consequences of such an escalation, the likely world reactions, and the plausible policy ramifications. Rather than projecting the physical damage that would result from nuclear attacks, George H. Quester offers an exploration of the political, psychological, and social aftermath of nuclear conflict.
The prospect of nuclear attack—sixty years after atomic bombs destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki—is difficult to confront on many levels. We may avoid the discussion for emotional reasons, for fear of generating a self-confirming hypothesis, or simply because of the general \"nuclear taboo.\" But there are also self-denying propositions to be harnessed here: if the world gives some advance thought to how nuclear weapons might be used again, such attacks may be headed off.
If the world avoids nuclear weapons use until the year 2045, it will be able to celebrate one hundred years of nuclear concord. Quester suggests that this may be achieved through the careful consideration of possible nuclear deployment scenarios and their consequences. In this insightful analysis, he provides a starting point for informed and focused reflection and preparation.