Explore the vast range of titles available.

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought new challenges to the health care community. Many of the super-speciality practices are planning to re-open after the lockdown is lifted. However there is lot of apprehension in everyone's mind about conforming practices that would safeguard the patients, ophthalmologists, healthcare workers as well as taking adequate care of the equipment to minimize the damage. The aim of this article is to develop preferred practice patterns, by developing a consensus amongst the lead experts, that would help the institutes as well as individual vitreo-retina and uveitis experts to restart their practices with confidence. As the situation remains volatile, we would like to mention that these suggestions are evolving and likely to change as our understanding and experience gets better. Further, the suggestions are for routine patients as COVID-19 positive patients may be managed in designated hospitals as per local protocols. Also these suggestions have to be implemented keeping in compliance with local rules and regulations.

Phakic intraocular lenses (IOL) are a boon for patients who want spectacle independence but are unable to get refractive correction through laser platforms due to high refractive error or certain corneal contraindications. Phakic IOL's (PIOL) have their own set of complications and challenges, the most important being getting the sizing right. This paper attempts to solve the problem of accurate sizing of PIOL's. Parameters needed for calculating the ideal size of PIOL's have been studied in a step by step manner using all possible tools depending upon the availability and preference of the surgeon. The pros and cons of using a particular tool for measurements have been highlighted along with illustrative case examples to help surgeons who are starting PIOL implantation surgery.

Over the past two decades, excimer laser-based refractive surgery procedures have been successfully established for their safety and satisfactory visual outcomes. Surface ablation procedures or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) are practised commonly for the correction of refractive errors including myopia, astigmatism and hyperopia. Satisfactory visual outcomes are achieved in majority of cases, although a very small percentage have issues related to corneal haze, regression, and its associated visual disturbances. To ensure optimal outcomes and to minimize complications, certain keys to success have been designed on the basis of the current review of literature on surface ablation procedures.

The COVID-19 pandemic has threatened the humanity at a global level to a large extent by the burden of the disease with significant mortality and to a certain extent as a byproduct of the necessary efforts to contain the same. There is a significant impact on the health care system, as we not only have to contain pandemic, but continue to treat our non-COVID-19 patients in a safe and responsible manner. Ophthalmology practice in general and glaucoma in particular needs certain modifications and additional precautions while examining as well as managing these patients keeping their and our safety in mind. As the lockdown relaxations are in vogue we need to learn how to deal with our regular patients as well in addition to emergency care. This paper presents the consensus-based guidelines by an expert panel on how to restart glaucoma practice during this COVID-19 time. These guidelines will be applicable across the country and should help ophthalmologists and glaucoma specialist to restart their practices while safeguarding the patients and their own selves from getting infected.

Coronavirus pandemic has strained the healthcare system with mortality and morbidity. A number of elective surgeries have come to standstill due to lockdown and movement restrictions. Refractive surgery being a purely elective procedure and quite a fresh subset of ophthalmology, there is a lack of unanimity as to what precautions should be followed to resume the practice of same. This article attempts to highlight simple guidelines in accordance with an expert panel, which can be followed by all those involved directly or indirectly in refractive surgery services while addressing safety of doctors, supporting staff as well as patients as a primary concern.

Refractive surgeries are one of most commonly performed surgeries for correcting visual impairment due to refractive errors. With the increase in demand for refractive surgeries, there is an enormous strain on the operating surgeon for delivering ideal outcomes i.e 20/20 visual acuity. Regression, under-correction and ectasia are the most dreaded complications post-refractive correction, for the surgeon as well as the patient. They have significant effects on the quantity of the vision and most importantly on the quality of life of the patient. With the advent of digital era and jobs requiring the eyes being glued to the screen for hours there has been a surge in the patients presenting with complaints of asthenopia, glare, halos, and difficulty in focusing; pointing towards diagnosis of non-strabismic binocular vision anomalies (NSBVA). NSBVA in a postrefractive surgery patient may masquerade as regression or under-correction. However, timely diagnosis of NSBVA in such patients would prevent the greater harm caused by wrongful re-correction. Home- and office-based vision therapy results in improvement in visual acuity in a large majority of these patients. This preferred practice pattern intends to guide the refractive surgeons to diagnose and treat the postrefractive surgery NSBVA following a case-based and algorithmic approach. It also emphasizes the inclusion of the binocular vision assessment as a part of the pre-operative workup for patients undergoing refractive procedures.

The COVID-19 pandemic has taken tragic proportions and has disrupted lives globally. In the wake of governmental lockdowns, ophthalmologists need practical and actionable guidelines based on advisories from national health departments on how to conduct their duties during nationwide lockdowns and after these are lifted. In this paper, we present a preferred practice pattern (PPP) based on consensus discussions between leading ophthalmologists and health care professionals in India including representatives from major governmental and private institutions as well as the All India Ophthalmological Society leadership. In this document, the expert panel clearly defines the range of activities for Indian ophthalmologists during the ongoing lockdown phase and precautions to be taken once the lockdown is lifted. Guidelines for triage, governmental guidelines for use of personal protective equipment from ophthalmologists' point of view, precautions to be taken in the OPD and operating room as well as care of various ophthalmic equipment have been described in detail. These guidelines will be applicable to all practice settings including tertiary institutions, corporate and group practices and individual eye clinics and should help Indian ophthalmologists in performing their professional responsibilities without being foci of disease transmission.

Evaporative dry eye (EDE) due to meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is one of the common clinical problems encountered in ophthalmology. It is a major cause of dry eye disease (DED) and of ocular morbidity. In EDE, inadequate quantity or quality of lipids produced by the meibomian glands leads to faster evaporation of the preocular tear film and symptoms and signs of DED. Although the diagnosis is made using a combination of clinical features and special diagnostic test results, the management of the disease might be challenging as it is often difficult to distinguish EDE from other subtypes of DED. This is critical because the approach to the treatment of DED is guided by identifying the underlying subtype and cause. The traditional treatment of MGD consists of warm compresses, lid massage, and improving lid hygiene, all measures aimed at relieving glandular obstruction and facilitating meibum outflow. In recent years, newer diagnostic imaging modalities and therapies for EDE like vectored thermal pulsation and intense pulsed light therapy have emerged. However, the multitude of management options may confuse the treating ophthalmologist, and a customized rather than a generalized approach is necessary for these patients. This review aims to provide a simplified approach to diagnose EDE due to MGD and to individualize treatment for each patient. The review also emphasizes the role of lifestyle modifications and appropriate counseling so that patients can have realistic expectations and enjoy a better quality of life.

Autologous serum eye drops provide lubrication and promote epithelial healing. They have been successfully used in the management of ocular surface disorders such as dry eye disease, persistent epithelial defects and neurotrophic keratopathy for many decades. A great deal of variation in the methods of preparation of autologous serum eye drops, the end concentration and the duration of use exists in published literature. In this review, simplified recommendations for preparation, transport, storage and use of autologous serum are described. Evidence for the use of this modality in aqueous deficient dry eye disease is summarized, along with expertise-based rationale.

To evaluate the agreement of LLMs with the Preferred Practice Patterns ® (PPP) guidelines developed by the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO). Open questions based on the AAO PPP were submitted to five LLMs: GPT-o1 and GPT-4o by OpenAI, Claude 3.5 Sonnet by Anthropic, Gemini 1.5 Pro by Google, and DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview. Questions were classified as “open” or “confirmatory with positive/negative ground-truth answer”. Three blinded investigators classified responses as “concordant”, “undetermined”, or “discordant” compared to the AAO PPP. Undetermined and discordant answers were analyzed to assess harming potential for patients. Responses referencing peer-reviewed articles were reported. In total, 147 questions were submitted to the LLMs. Concordant answers were 135 (91.8%) for GPT-o1, 133 (90.5%) for GPT-4o, 136 (92.5%) for Claude 3.5 Sonnet, 124 (84.4%) for Gemini 1.5 Pro, and 119 (81.0%) for DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview ( P = 0.006). The highest number of harmful answers was reported for Gemini 1.5 Pro ( n = 6, 4.1%), followed by DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview ( n = 5, 3.4%). Gemini 1.5 Pro was the most transparent model (86 references, 58.5%). Other LLMs referenced papers in 9.5–15.6% of their responses. LLMs can provide discordant answers compared to ophthalmology guidelines, potentially harming patients by delaying diagnosis or recommending suboptimal treatments.