Explore the vast range of titles available.

This large, systematic study of prenatal diagnosis shows that chromosomal microarray analysis provided additional, clinically significant cytogenetic information as compared with karyotyping but did not identify triploidies and balanced translocations. The development of array-based molecular cytogenetic techniques has improved the detection of small genomic deletions and duplications (called copy-number variants) that are not routinely seen on karyotyping, the standard cytogenetic analysis performed. Copy-number variants result in a variation from the expected number of copies of a segment of DNA (i.e., the number in a normal genome). Copy-number variants can be either benign or pathogenic, depending on their location and genetic content. They are identified with the use of chromosomal microarray analysis in which a test sample of DNA from the patient is compared directly or indirectly with a reference (normal) . . .

Abstract Context Children born to mothers with gestational hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism may have increased risk of adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes. However, the effects of maternal thyroid status on offspring brain development are unclear. Objective This work aimed to establish whether adolescent brain morphology is affected by suboptimal gestational thyroid function (SGTF). Methods The Controlled Antenatal Thyroid Screening (CATS) study randomly assigned mothers with SGTF to levothyroxine or no supplementation from approximately 12 weeks’ gestation. At age 9, children born to mothers who were overtreated with levothyroxine had a higher risk of conduct and hyperactivity traits. For the current CATS III study, children underwent neuroimaging studies, including T1-weighted structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A total of 85 children aged 11 to 16 years had usable T1-weighted MRI data (exposed to untreated SGTF [n = 21], normal GTF [n = 24], or treated SGTF [optimally treated (n = 21), overtreated (n = 20)]). The primary outcome was to examine the association of SGTF and its treatment with global brain volumes. Secondary and exploratory outcomes were to investigate the association of maternal thyrotropin (TSH) and free thyroxine (FT4) levels with global and subregional brain volumes. Results were adjusted for age, sex, and pubertal scores. Results There were no significant differences in global brain volumetric measures between groups, including total gray matter volume (P = .373). Weak positive correlations were found between maternal TSH, but not FT4, levels and several brain volumes, but these did not survive testing for multiple comparisons. Conclusion We found no evidence that SGTF was associated with differences in adolescent brain morphology, and no effect of levothyroxine supplementation.

Disclaimer: This statement is designed primarily as an educational resource for clinicians to help them provide quality medical services. Adherence to this statement is completely voluntary and does not necessarily assure a successful medical outcome. This statement should not be considered inclusive of all proper procedures and tests or exclusive of other procedures and tests that are reasonably directed toward obtaining the same results. In determining the propriety of any specific procedure or test, the clinician should apply his or her own professional judgment to the specific clinical circumstances presented by the individual patient or specimen. Clinicians are encouraged to document the reasons for the use of a particular procedure or test, whether or not it is in conformance with this statement. Clinicians also are advised to take notice of the date this statement was adopted and to consider other medical and scientific information that becomes available after that date. It also would be prudent to consider whether intellectual property interests may restrict the performance of certain tests and other procedures. Noninvasive prenatal screening using cell-free DNA (NIPS) has been rapidly integrated into prenatal care since the initial American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) statement in 2013. New evidence strongly suggests that NIPS can replace conventional screening for Patau, Edwards, and Down syndromes across the maternal age spectrum, for a continuum of gestational age beginning at 9–10 weeks, and for patients who are not significantly obese. This statement sets forth a new framework for NIPS that is supported by information from validation and clinical utility studies. Pretest counseling for NIPS remains crucial; however, it needs to go beyond discussions of Patau, Edwards, and Down syndromes. The use of NIPS to include sex chromosome aneuploidy screening and screening for selected copy-number variants (CNVs) is becoming commonplace because there are no other screening options to identify these conditions. Providers should have a more thorough understanding of patient preferences and be able to educate about the current drawbacks of NIPS across the prenatal screening spectrum. Laboratories are encouraged to meet the needs of providers and their patients by delivering meaningful screening reports and to engage in education. With health-care-provider guidance, the patient should be able to make an educated decision about the current use of NIPS and the ramifications of a positive, negative, or no-call result. Genet Med 18 10, 1056–1065.

A guide aiming to alleviate the anxiety that many women feel when they obsess over prenatal influences explores how fetuses are shaped in utero, separating the evidence from the hype, and examines the cultural mania that surrounds pregnancy today.

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a leading inherited cause of infant death with a reported incidence of ∼1 in 10 000 live births and is second to cystic fibrosis as a common, life-shortening autosomal recessive disorder. The American College of Medical Genetics has recommended population carrier screening for SMA, regardless of race or ethnicity, to facilitate informed reproductive options, although other organizations have cited the need for additional large-scale studies before widespread implementation. We report our data from carrier testing ( n =72 453) and prenatal diagnosis ( n =121) for this condition. Our analysis of large-scale population carrier screening data ( n =68 471) demonstrates the technical feasibility of high throughput testing and provides mutation carrier and allele frequencies at a level of accuracy afforded by large data sets. In our United States pan-ethnic population, the calculated a priori carrier frequency of SMA is 1/54 with a detection rate of 91.2%, and the pan-ethnic disease incidence is calculated to be 1/11 000. Carrier frequency and detection rates provided for six major ethnic groups in the United States range from 1/47 and 94.8% in the Caucasian population to 1/72 and 70.5% in the African American population, respectively. This collective experience can be utilized to facilitate accurate pre- and post-test counseling in the settings of carrier screening and prenatal diagnosis for SMA.

Evidence on the diagnostic yield of genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing (GW-NIPT) is growing, but its comparative clinical and economic impact as a first-tier screening strategy for fetal chromosomal abnormalities remains unassessed. We compared GW-NIPT with targeted NIPT and first-trimester combined testing (FCT), in a Dutch setting where all pregnancies also undergo a routine second-trimester anomaly ultrasound scan (scan), to guide policymakers on optimal prenatal screening approaches. We developed a decision-analytic model for a cohort of 175,000 pregnancies, reflecting the Dutch obstetric population. All strategies screened for common trisomies 21 (Down syndrome), 18 (Edwards syndrome), and 13 (Patau syndrome); GW-NIPT additionally considered rare autosomal trisomies and structural aberrations. Model inputs were based on the TRIDENT-2 study data and historical FCT data. Base-case unit costs were €166 (scan), €191 (FCT), and €350 (NIPT). Sensitivity analyses were conducted to account for uncertainties in model parameters and potential country-specific variations. Outcomes included total screening costs, number of fetal chromosomal abnormalities diagnosed, number of invasive procedures, and expected procedure-related euploid fetal losses. We summarized economic results as cost per diagnosed case and incremental cost per additional diagnosis across strategies. GW-NIPT yielded the highest number of diagnoses (545) versus targeted NIPT (514) and FCT (452), and the lowest cost per diagnosed case (€152,785), compared with targeted NIPT (€159,852) and FCT (€170,050). Invasive tests required per diagnosis were lower for GW-NIPT and targeted NIPT (both 6) than for FCT (13), implying a lower risk of procedure-related miscarriage (iatrogenic miscarriage). Sensitivity analyses indicated that test uptake and unit costs strongly influenced outcomes. GW-NIPT remained the most favorable in terms of cost per diagnosis for NIPT prices up to €467. Key limitations include the use of a decision-analytic model without quality-of-life outcomes and the lack of comparisons against explicit cost-effectiveness thresholds. Therefore, the results should be interpreted as relative clinical and economic comparisons rather than cost-effectiveness judgements. Among the strategies evaluated, first-tier GW-NIPT had the greatest diagnostic yield and the lowest cost per diagnosis, improving detection rates and supporting reproductive autonomy at lower costs. Implementation decisions should also consider local pricing, laboratory capacity, and counseling resources. Future research that links screening outcomes to long-term health consequences (e.g., quality-adjusted life years or life-years), healthcare utilization, costs, and psychosocial outcomes will enable formal cost-effectiveness evaluations and support further refinement of prenatal screening policy.

This multicenter study compared a prenatal assay of cell-free DNA with a standard method of screening for trisomies among women at average risk. The positive predictive values of cfDNA testing and standard screening for trisomy 21 were 80.9% and 3.4%, respectively. Screening for fetal aneuploidy with the use of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) obtained from maternal plasma was introduced in 2011. Such screening has been reported to have a detection rate for trisomy 21 (Down's syndrome) of more than 99%, with a false positive rate as low as 0.1%. 1 Thus, cfDNA testing appears to represent a substantial improvement over traditional multiple-marker screening. In practice, the use of this test could result in a significant reduction in diagnostic procedures. Although several large proof-of-principle studies have confirmed the high sensitivity and specificity of cfDNA testing for the detection of trisomy 21, most of these . . .