Explore the vast range of titles available.

Most malaria-endemic countries, including Cambodia, use a total dose of 3·5 mg/kg of primaquine to eliminate Plasmodium vivax hypnozoites and prevent relapses. There are, however, indications that the lower dose of 3·5 mg/kg is insufficient for tropical P vivax isolates, particularly in southeast Asia, and WHO now recommends a total dose of 7·0 mg/kg in most countries. We aimed to determine the most effective regimen to eliminate P vivax hypnozoites to support elimination efforts of this malaria parasite. We conducted an open-label, randomised controlled trial in Kampong Speu province, western Cambodia. Patients infected with P vivax aged at least 15 years were offered to participate. Exclusion criteria were severe malaria or other diseases requiring treatment, low haemoglobin (<8·0 g/dL), pregnancy or breastfeeding, sensitivity to study drugs, and use of antimalarials in the preceding month. Enrolled patients were treated with an artesunate regimen of 2 mg/kg per day for 7 days. Patients with normal glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) levels were randomly assigned (2:2:1) to receive 3·5 mg/kg (low dose [0·25 mg/kg per day]), 7·0 mg/kg (high dose [0·5 mg/kg per day]), or no primaquine for 14 days. Patients with deficient G6PD levels were assigned to the no primaquine comparator arm. Patients were relocated to the study site in Aoral town where no malaria transmission occurs to ensure that they were not reinfected during their 90-day follow-up. After 90 days of relocation, G6PD-normal patients in the no primaquine arm were provided 3·5 mg/kg of primaquine for 14 days to be taken unsupervised. At day 90, relocation was terminated, and patients were followed up monthly for 3 months until day 180. The primary outcome was P vivax recurrence within 90 days of relocated follow-up, assessed in all patients who completed treatment and complied with relocation without interruption. All patients enrolled and assigned to an intervention arm were included in the safety analysis. The study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov and recruitment is completed (NCT04706130). Between Nov 10, 2021, and Feb 10, 2024, 160 patients were enrolled and 147 were included in the primary analysis—59 were assigned to the no primaquine arm (37 assigned as G6PD deficient [median age 22 years, IQR 18–28]; 22 randomly assigned [18, 17–25]), 45 to the low-dose primaquine arm (23, 19–30), and 43 to the high-dose primaquine arm (22, 18–25). Participants were mostly male (135 [92%] of 147) and all Cambodian. 48 (81% [95% CI 69·6–89·2]) participants in the no primaquine arm had at least one P vivax recurrence within 90 days, as did 11 (24%, 14·2–38·7) in the low-dose group and two (5%, 0·8–15·5) in the high-dose group (p=0·0141 for high vs low). After imputation for missing data, low-dose primaquine remained associated with more recurrences than high-dose primaquine (hazard ratio 0·17 [95% CI 0·04–0·79], p=0·0229). Both primaquine regimens were well tolerated with no serious adverse events reported. Not providing primaquine to patients led to a considerable rate of P vivax recurrence. The risk of P vivax recurrence was substantially lower for 7·0 mg/kg primaquine treatment compared with 3·5 mg/kg. Tolerability and safety of both primaquine regimens in G6PD normal individuals was comparable. US National Institutes of Health (R01AI146590).

Radical cure of Plasmodium vivax malaria with 8-aminoquinolines (primaquine or tafenoquine) is complicated by haemolysis in individuals with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency. G6PD heterozygous females, because of individual variation in the pattern of X-chromosome inactivation (Lyonisation) in erythroid cells, may have low G6PD activity in the majority of their erythrocytes, yet are usually reported as G6PD \"normal\" by current phenotypic screening tests. Their haemolytic risk when treated with 8-aminoquinolines has not been well characterized. In a cohort study nested within a randomised clinical trial that compared different treatment regimens for P. vivax malaria, patients with a normal standard NADPH fluorescent spot test result (≳30%-40% of normal G6PD activity) were randomised to receive 3 d of chloroquine or dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine in combination with primaquine, either the standard high dose of 0.5 mg base/kg/day for 14 d or a higher dose of 1 mg base/kg/d for 7 d. Patterns of haemolysis were compared between G6PD wild-type and G6PD heterozygous female participants. Between 21 February 2012 and 04 July 2014, 241 female participants were enrolled, of whom 34 were heterozygous for the G6PD Mahidol variant. Haemolysis was substantially greater and a larger proportion of participants reached the threshold of clinically significant haemolysis (fractional haematocrit reduction >25%) in G6PD heterozygotes taking the higher (7 d) primaquine dose (9/17 [53%]) compared with G6PD heterozygotes taking the standard high (14 d) dose (2/16 [13%]; p = 0.022). In heterozygotes, the mean fractional haematocrit reductions were correspondingly greater with the higher primaquine dose (7-d regimen): -20.4% (95% CI -26.0% to -14.8%) (nadir on day 5) compared with the standard high (14 d) dose: -13.1% (95% CI -17.6% to -8.6%) (nadir day 6). Two heterozygotes taking the higher (7 d) primaquine dose required blood transfusion. In wild-type participants, mean haematocrit reductions were clinically insignificant and similar with both doses: -5.8 (95% CI -7.2% to -4.4%) (nadir day 3) compared with -5.5% (95% CI -7.4% to -3.7%) (nadir day 4), respectively. Limitations to this nested cohort study are that the primary objective of the trial was designed to measure efficacy and not haemolysis in relation to G6PD genotype and that the heterozygote groups were small. Higher daily doses of primaquine have the potential to cause clinically significant haemolysis in G6PD heterozygous females who are reported as phenotypically normal with current point of care tests. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01640574.

Primaquine and methylene blue are gametocytocidal compounds that could prevent Plasmodium falciparum transmission to mosquitoes. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of primaquine and methylene blue in preventing human to mosquito transmission of P falciparum among glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD)-normal, gametocytaemic male participants. This was a phase 2, single-blind, randomised controlled trial done at the Clinical Research Centre of the Malaria Research and Training Centre (MRTC) of the University of Bamako (Bamako, Mali). We enrolled male participants aged 5–50 years with asymptomatic P falciparum malaria. G6PD-normal participants with gametocytes detected by blood smear were randomised 1:1:1:1 in block sizes of eight, using a sealed-envelope design, to receive either sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and amodiaquine, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and amodiaquine plus a single dose of 0·25 mg/kg primaquine, dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, or dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine plus 15 mg/kg per day methylene blue for 3 days. Laboratory staff, investigators, and insectary technicians were masked to the treatment group and gametocyte density of study participants. The study pharmacist and treating physician were not masked. Participants could request unmasking. The primary efficacy endpoint, analysed in all infected patients with at least one infectivity measure before and after treatment, was median within-person percentage change in mosquito infectivity 2 and 7 days after treatment, assessed by membrane feeding. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02831023. Between June 27, 2016, and Nov 1, 2016, 80 participants were enrolled and assigned to the sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and amodiaquine (n=20), sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and amodiaquine plus primaquine (n=20), dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (n=20), or dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine plus methylene blue (n=20) groups. Among participants infectious at baseline (54 [68%] of 80), those in the sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and amodiaquine plus primaquine group (n=19) had a median 100% (IQR 100 to 100) within-person reduction in mosquito infectivity on day 2, a larger reduction than was noted with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and amodiaquine alone (n=12; −10·2%, IQR −143·9 to 56·6; p<0·0001). The dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine plus methylene blue (n=11) group had a median 100% (IQR 100 to 100) within-person reduction in mosquito infectivity on day 2, a larger reduction than was noted with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine alone (n=12; −6·0%, IQR −126·1 to 86·9; p<0·0001). Haemoglobin changes were similar between gametocytocidal arms and their respective controls. After exclusion of blue urine, adverse events were similar across all groups (59 [74%] of 80 participants had 162 adverse events overall, 145 [90%] of which were mild). Adding a single dose of 0·25 mg/kg primaquine to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and amodiaquine or 3 days of 15 mg/kg per day methylene blue to dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine was highly efficacious for preventing P falciparum transmission. Both primaquine and methylene blue were well tolerated. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, European Research Council.

Relapses arising from dormant liver-stage Plasmodium vivax parasites (hypnozoites) are a major cause of vivax malaria. However, in endemic areas, a recurrent blood-stage infection following treatment can be hypnozoite-derived (relapse), a blood-stage treatment failure (recrudescence), or a newly acquired infection (reinfection). Each of these requires a different prevention strategy, but it was not previously possible to distinguish between them reliably. We show that individual vivax malaria recurrences can be characterised probabilistically by combined modelling of time-to-event and genetic data within a framework incorporating identity-by-descent. Analysis of pooled patient data on 1441 recurrent P. vivax infections in 1299 patients on the Thailand–Myanmar border observed over 1000 patient follow-up years shows that, without primaquine radical curative treatment, 3 in 4 patients relapse. In contrast, after supervised high-dose primaquine only 1 in 40 relapse. In this region of frequent relapsing P. vivax , failure rates after supervised high-dose primaquine are significantly lower (∼3%) than estimated previously. Relapse, reinfection and recrudescence can all cause recurrent infection after treatment of Plasmodium vivax malaria in endemic areas, but are difficult to distinguish. Here the authors show that they can be differentiated probabilistically and thereby demonstrate the high efficacy of primaquine treatment in preventing relapse.

Recent efforts in malaria control have resulted in great gains in reducing the burden of Plasmodium falciparum, but P. vivax has been more refractory. Its ability to form dormant liver stages confounds control and elimination efforts. To compare the efficacy and safety of primaquine regimens for radical cure, we undertook a randomized controlled trial in Ethiopia. Patients with normal glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase status with symptomatic P. vivax mono-infection were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either chloroquine (CQ) or artemether-lumefantrine (AL), alone or in combination with 14 d of semi-supervised primaquine (PQ) (3.5 mg/kg total). A total of 398 patients (n = 104 in the CQ arm, n = 100 in the AL arm, n = 102 in the CQ+PQ arm, and n = 92 in the AL+PQ arm) were followed for 1 y, and recurrent episodes were treated with the same treatment allocated at enrolment. The primary endpoints were the risk of P. vivax recurrence at day 28 and at day 42. The risk of recurrent P. vivax infection at day 28 was 4.0% (95% CI 1.5%-10.4%) after CQ treatment and 0% (95% CI 0%-4.0%) after CQ+PQ. The corresponding risks were 12.0% (95% CI 6.8%-20.6%) following AL alone and 2.3% (95% CI 0.6%-9.0%) following AL+PQ. On day 42, the risk was 18.7% (95% CI 12.2%-28.0%) after CQ, 1.2% (95% CI 0.2%-8.0%) after CQ+PQ, 29.9% (95% CI 21.6%-40.5%) after AL, and 5.9% (95% CI 2.4%-13.5%) after AL+PQ (overall p < 0.001). In those not prescribed PQ, the risk of recurrence by day 42 appeared greater following AL treatment than CQ treatment (HR = 1.8 [95% CI 1.0-3.2]; p = 0.059). At the end of follow-up, the incidence rate of P. vivax was 2.2 episodes/person-year for patients treated with CQ compared to 0.4 for patients treated with CQ+PQ (rate ratio: 5.1 [95% CI 2.9-9.1]; p < 0.001) and 2.3 episodes/person-year for AL compared to 0.5 for AL+PQ (rate ratio: 6.4 [95% CI 3.6-11.3]; p < 0.001). There was no difference in the occurrence of adverse events between treatment arms. The main limitations of the study were the early termination of the trial and the omission of haemoglobin measurement after day 42, resulting in an inability to estimate the cumulative risk of anaemia. Despite evidence of CQ-resistant P. vivax, the risk of recurrence in this study was greater following treatment with AL unless it was combined with a supervised course of PQ. PQ combined with either CQ or AL was well tolerated and reduced recurrence of vivax malaria by 5-fold at 1 y. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01680406.

Vivax malaria relapses frequently even in low-transmission settings. Chloroquine delays but does not prevent recurrences. Adding primaquine to a slowly eliminated schizonticide significantly reduces recurrences and improves hematocrit, but this advantage is offset by hemolysis in G6PD-deficient females. Abstract Background Chloroquine has been recommended for Plasmodium vivax infections for >60 years, but resistance is increasing. To guide future therapies, the cumulative benefits of using slowly eliminated (chloroquine) vs rapidly eliminated (artesunate) antimalarials, and the risks and benefits of adding radical cure (primaquine) were assessed in a 3-way randomized comparison conducted on the Thailand-Myanmar border. Methods Patients with uncomplicated P. vivax malaria were given artesunate (2 mg/kg/day for 5 days), chloroquine (25 mg base/kg over 3 days), or chloroquine-primaquine (0.5 mg/kg/day for 14 days) and were followed for 1 year. Recurrence rates and their effects on anemia were compared. Results Between May 2010 and October 2012, 644 patients were enrolled. Artesunate cleared parasitemia significantly faster than chloroquine. Day 28 recurrence rates were 50% with artesunate (112/224), 8% with chloroquine (18/222; P < .001), and 0.5% with chloroquine-primaquine (1/198; P < .001). Median times to first recurrence were 28 days (interquartile range [IQR], 21-42) with artesunate, 49 days (IQR, 35-74) with chloroquine, and 195 days (IQR, 82-281) with chloroquine-primaquine. Recurrence by day 28, was associated with a mean absolute reduction in hematocrit of 1% (95% confidence interval [CI], .3%-2.0%; P = .009). Primaquine radical cure reduced the total recurrences by 92.4%. One-year recurrence rates were 4.51 (95% CI, 4.19-4.85) per person-year with artesunate, 3.45 (95% CI, 3.18-3.75) with chloroquine (P = .002), and 0.26 (95% CI, .19-.36) with chloroquine-primaquine (P < .001). Conclusions Vivax malaria relapses are predominantly delayed by chloroquine but prevented by primaquine. Clinical Trials Registration NCT01074905.

In Africa, the scale-up of malaria-control interventions has reduced malaria burden, but progress towards elimination has stalled. Mass drug administration (MDA) is promising as a transmission-reducing strategy, but evidence from low-to-moderate transmission settings is needed. We aimed to assess the safety, coverage, and effect of three cycles of MDA with dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine plus single, low-dose primaquine on Plasmodium falciparum incidence and prevalence in southeast Senegal. We conducted a two-arm, open-label, cluster-randomised controlled trial in villages in the Tambacounda health district of southeast Senegal. Eligible villages had a population size of 200–800, were within a health-post catchment area with an annual malaria incidence of 60–160 cases per 1000 people, and had an established or planned Prise en Charge à Domicile Plus model. We randomly assigned villages (1:1) using a stratified, constrained randomisation approach to receive either three cycles of MDA with oral dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine plus single, low-dose primaquine administered at 6-week intervals (intervention) or to standard of care, which included three cycles of seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) with oral sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine administered at 4-week intervals (control). Participants, the field team, and all investigators, including those who assessed outcomes and analysed data, were unmasked to allocation assignment. Laboratory technicians were masked to intervention assignment. The primary outcome was village-level, P falciparum-confirmed malaria incidence in the post-intervention year (ie, July to December, 2022). Secondary outcomes included malaria incidence during the intervention year (ie, July to December, 2021), coverage and safety of MDA, and adverse events. We conducted analyses using an intention-to-treat approach. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04864444) and is completed. Between Sept 1 and Oct 25, 2020, 523 villages were geolocated and screened for eligibility; 111 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 60 villages were randomly selected and assigned to the intervention arm or control arm. Distribution coverage of all three doses of dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine was 6057 (73·6%) of 8229 participants in the first cycle, 6836 (78·8%) of 8673 participants in the second cycle, and 7065 (81·3%) of 8690 participants in the third cycle. Distribution coverage of single, low-dose primaquine was 6286 (78·6%) of 7999 participants in the first cycle, 6949 (82·1%) of 8462 participants in the second cycle, and 7199 (84·0%) of 8575 participants in the third cycle. Distribution coverage of all three doses of SMC was 3187 (92·2%) of 3457 children aged 3–120 months in the first cycle, 3158 (91·8%) of 3442 children aged 3–120 months in the second cycle, and 3139 (91·4%) of 3434 children aged 3–120 months in the third cycle. In the intervention year (ie, July to December, 2021), the adjusted effect of MDA was 55% (95% CI 28 to 71). In the post-intervention year (ie, July to December 2022), the adjusted MDA effect was 26% (–17 to 53). Malaria incidence during the transmission season of the post-intervention year was 126 cases per 1000 population in the intervention arm and 146 cases per 1000 population in the control arm. No serious adverse events were reported. In southeast Senegal, a low-to-moderate transmission setting where malaria-control measures have been scaled up, three cycles of MDA with dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine plus single, low-dose primaquine was safe and reduced malaria burden during the intervention year. However, its sustained effect was weak and continuation of MDA or another transmission-reducing strategy could be required. US President's Malaria Initiative.

To contain multidrug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum, malaria elimination in the Greater Mekong subregion needs to be accelerated while current antimalarials remain effective. We evaluated the safety, effectiveness, and potential resistance selection of dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine mass drug administration (MDA) in a region with artemisinin resistance in Myanmar. We did a cluster-randomised controlled trial in rural community clusters in Kayin (Karen) state in southeast Myanmar. Malaria prevalence was assessed using ultrasensitive quantitative PCR (uPCR) in villages that were operationally suitable for MDA (villages with community willingness, no other malaria control campaigns, and a population of 50–1200). Villages were eligible to participate if the prevalence of malaria (all species) in adults was greater than 30% or P falciparum prevalence was greater than 10% (or both). Contiguous villages were combined into clusters. Eligible clusters were paired based on P falciparum prevalence (estimates within 10%) and proximity. Community health workers provided routine malaria case management and distributed long-lasting insecticidal bed-nets (LLINs) in all clusters. Randomisation of clusters (1:1) to the MDA intervention group or control group was by public coin-flip. Group allocations were not concealed. Three MDA rounds (3 days of supervised dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine [target total dose 7 mg/kg dihydroartemisinin and 55 mg/kg piperaquine] and single low-dose primaquine [target dose 0·25 mg base per kg]) were delivered to intervention clusters. Parasitaemia prevalence was assessed at 3, 5, 10, 15, 21, 27, and 33 months. The primary outcomes were P falciparum prevalence at months 3 and 10. All clusters were included in the primary analysis. Adverse events were monitored from the first MDA dose until 1 month after the final dose, or until resolution of any adverse event occurring during follow-up. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01872702. Baseline uPCR malaria surveys were done in January, 2015, in 43 villages that were operationally suitable for MDA (2671 individuals). 18 villages met the eligibility criteria. Three villages in close proximity were combined into one cluster because a border between them could not be defined. This gave a total of 16 clusters in eight pairs. In the intervention clusters, MDA was delivered from March 4 to March 17, from March 30 to April 10, and from April 27 to May 10, 2015. The weighted mean absolute difference in P falciparum prevalence in the MDA group relative to the control group was −10·6% (95% CI −15·1 to −6·1; p=0·0008) at month 3 and −4·5% (−10·9 to 1·9; p=0·14) at month 10. At month 3, the weighted P falciparum prevalence was 1·4% (0·6 to 3·6; 12 of 747) in the MDA group and 10·6% (7·0 to 15·6; 56 of 485) in the control group. Corresponding prevalences at month 10 were 3·2% (1·5 to 6·8; 34 of 1013) and 5·8% (2·5 to 12·9; 33 of 515). Adverse events were reported for 151 (3·6%) of 4173 treated individuals. The most common adverse events were dizziness (n=109) and rash or itching (n=20). No treatment-related deaths occurred. In this low-transmission setting, the substantial reduction in P falciparum prevalence resulting from support of community case management was accelerated by MDA. In addition to supporting community health worker case management and LLIN distribution, malaria elimination programmes should consider using MDA to reduce P falciparum prevalence rapidly in foci of higher transmission. The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria.

Clinical effectiveness of previous regimens to treat Plasmodium vivax infection have been hampered by compliance. We aimed to assess the dose–response, safety, and tolerability of single-dose tafenoquine plus 3-day chloroquine for P vivax malaria radical cure. In this double-blind, randomised, dose-ranging phase 2b study, men and women (aged ≥16 years) with microscopically confirmed P vivax monoinfection (parasite density >100 to <100 000 per μL blood) were enrolled from community health centres and hospitals across seven sites in Brazil, Peru, India, and Thailand. Patients with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase enzyme activity of less than 70% were excluded. Eligible patients received chloroquine (days 1–3) and were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1:1) by a computer-generated randomisation schedule to receive single-dose tafenoquine 50 mg, 100 mg, 300 mg, or 600 mg, primaquine 15 mg for 14 days, or chloroquine alone. Randomisation was stratified by baseline parasite count (≤7500 and >7500 per μL blood). The primary efficacy endpoint was relapse-free efficacy at 6 months from initial dose (ie, clearance of initial infection without subsequent microscopically confirmed infection), analysed by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01376167. Between Sept 19, 2011, and March 25, 2013, 329 patients were randomly assigned to a treatment group (chloroquine plus tafenoquine 50 mg [n=55], 100 mg [n=57], 300 mg [n=57], 600 mg [n=56]; or to chloroquine plus primaquine [n=50]; or chloroquine alone [n=54]). Relapse-free efficacy at 6 months was 57·7% (95% CI 43–70) with tafenoquine 50 mg, 54·1% (40–66) with tafenoquine 100 mg, 89·2% (77–95) with tafenoquine 300 mg, 91·9% (80–97) with tafenoquine 600 mg, 77·3% (63–87) with primaquine, and 37·5% (23–52) with chloroquine alone. Tafenoquine 300 mg and 600 mg had better efficacy than chloroquine alone (treatment differences 51·7% [95% CI 35–69], p<0·0001, with tafenoquine 300 mg and 54·5% [38–71], p<0·0001, with tafenoquine 600 mg), as did primaquine (treatment difference 39·9% [21–59], p=0·0004). Adverse events were similar between treatments. 29 serious adverse events occurred in 26 (8%) of 329 patients; QT prolongation was the most common serious adverse event (11 [3%] of 329), occurring in five (2%) of 225 patients receiving tafenoquine, four (8%) of 50 patients receiving primaquine, and two (4%) of 54 patients receiving chloroquine alone, with no evidence of an additional effect on QT of chloroquine plus tafenoquine coadministration. Single-dose tafenoquine 300 mg coadministered with chloroquine for P vivax malaria relapse prevention was more efficacious than chloroquine alone, with a similar safety profile. As a result, it has been selected for further clinical assessment in phase 3. GlaxoSmithKline, Medicines for Malaria Venture.

Background In Colombia, published studies on the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium vivax malaria with chloroquine-primaquine are scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic response to two treatment regimens at the 28-day follow-up and the occurrence of adverse events in patients with P. vivax malaria. Methods A quasi-experimental clinical trial was conducted at 3 sites in the Department of Amazonas. Patients received supervised or unsupervised anti-malarial treatment (chloroquine plus primaquine), and the primary effectiveness endpoint was the clinical and parasitological response. Safety was assessed through adverse event surveillance. Results A total of 103 patients were included: 53 in the 7-day primaquine group (Group I) and 50 in the group receiving primaquine for 14 days (Group II). Among the patients in group I, an adequate treatment response of 100% and 89.5% was found in patients who received supervised and unsupervised treatment, respectively. In Group II, adequate responses of 100% and 95% were reported for patients who received supervised and unsupervised treatment, respectively. No adverse events were detected. Conclusions The response to combined treatment with chloroquine plus primaquine continues to be adequate for treating P. vivax malaria in the Colombian Amazon region; however, a response to unsupervised treatment in the region is recommended.