Explore the vast range of titles available.

AbstractObjectivesTo evaluate the clinical effectiveness of long acting progestogens compared with the combined oral contraceptive pill in preventing recurrence of endometriosis related pain.DesignThe PRE-EMPT (preventing recurrence of endometriosis) pragmatic, parallel group, open label, randomised controlled trial.Setting34 UK hospitals.Participants405 women of reproductive age undergoing conservative surgery for endometriosis.InterventionsParticipants were randomised in a 1:1 ratio using a secure internet facility to a long acting progestogen (depot medroxyprogesterone acetate or levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system) or the combined oral contraceptive pill.Main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was pain measured three years after randomisation using the pain domain of the Endometriosis Health Profile 30 (EHP-30) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes (evaluated at six months, one, two, and three years) included the four core and six modular domains of the EHP-30, and treatment failure (further therapeutic surgery or second line medical treatment).Results405 women were randomised to receive a long acting progestogen (n=205) or combined oral contraceptive pill (n=200). At three years, there was no difference in pain scores between the groups (adjusted mean difference −0.8, 95% confidence interval −5.7 to 4.2, P=0.76), which had improved by around 40% in both groups compared with preoperative values (an average of 24 and 23 points for long acting progestogen and combined oral contraceptive pill groups, respectively). Most of the other domains of the EHP-30 also showed improvement at all time points compared with preoperative scores, without evidence of any differences between groups. Women randomised to a long acting progestogen underwent fewer surgical procedures or second line treatments compared with those randomised to the combined oral contraceptive pill group (73 v 97; hazard ratio 0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.44 to 1.00).ConclusionsPostoperative prescription of a long acting progestogen or the combined oral contraceptive pill results in similar levels of improvement in endometriosis related pain at three years, with both groups showing around a 40% improvement compared with preoperative levels. While women can be reassured that both options are effective, the reduced risk of repeat surgery for endometriosis and hysterectomy might make long acting reversible progestogens preferable for some.Trial registrationISRCTN registry ISRCTN97865475.

Progesterone administration has been shown to reduce the risk of preterm birth and neonatal morbidity in women at high risk, but there is uncertainty about longer term effects on the child. We did a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial of vaginal progesterone, 200 mg daily taken from 22–24 to 34 weeks of gestation, on pregnancy and infant outcomes in women at risk of preterm birth (because of previous spontaneous birth at ≤34 weeks and 0 days of gestation, or a cervical length ≤25 mm, or because of a positive fetal fibronectin test combined with other clinical risk factors for preterm birth [any one of a history in a previous pregnancy of preterm birth, second trimester loss, preterm premature fetal membrane rupture, or a history of a cervical procedure to treat abnormal smears]). The objective of the study was to determine whether vaginal progesterone prophylaxis given to reduce the risk of preterm birth affects neonatal and childhood outcomes. We defined three primary outcomes: fetal death or birth before 34 weeks and 0 days gestation (obstetric), a composite of death, brain injury, or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (neonatal), and a standardised cognitive score at 2 years of age (childhood), imputing values for deaths. Randomisation was done through a web portal, with participants, investigators, and others involved in giving the intervention, assessing outcomes, or analysing data masked to treatment allocation until the end of the study. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered at ISRCTN.com, number ISRCTN14568373. Between Feb 2, 2009, and April 12, 2013, we randomly assigned 1228 women to the placebo group (n=610) and the progesterone group (n=618). In the placebo group, data from 597, 587, and 439 women or babies were available for analysis of obstetric, neonatal, and childhood outcomes, respectively; in the progesterone group the corresponding numbers were 600, 589, and 430. After correction for multiple outcomes, progesterone had no significant effect on the primary obstetric outcome (odds ratio adjusted for multiple comparisons [OR] 0·86, 95% CI 0·61–1·22) or neonatal outcome (OR 0·72, 0·44–1·17), nor on the childhood outcome (cognitive score, progesterone group vs placebo group, 97·3 [SD 17·9] vs 97·7 [17·5]; difference in means –0·48, 95% CI –2·77 to 1·81). Maternal or child serious adverse events were reported in 70 (11%) of 610 patients in the placebo group and 59 (10%) of 616 patients in the progesterone group (p=0·27). Vaginal progesterone was not associated with reduced risk of preterm birth or composite neonatal adverse outcomes, and had no long-term benefit or harm on outcomes in children at 2 years of age. Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME) Programme, a Medical Research Council (MRC) and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) partnership. The EME Programme is funded by the MRC and NIHR, with contributions from the Chief Scientist Office in Scotland and National Institute for Social Care and Research in Wales.

In this pragmatic, randomized trial of women with menorrhagia, the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system was more effective than the usual (oral) medical treatment in reducing the effect of this problem on quality of life. Heavy menstrual bleeding, or menorrhagia, is a common problem that can have a significant effect on women's lives and can burden both patients and health care systems. 1 , 2 Menorrhagia accounts for 18.5% of gynecologist office visits in the United States 3 and for 20% in the United Kingdom 4 ; more than 5% of women who are 30 to 49 years of age consult family physicians each year in the United Kingdom with this problem. 5 Rates of surgical procedures for menorrhagia are 17.8 per 10,000 women 25 to 44 years of age in the United States 6 and 14.3 per 10,000 women 24 . . .

Background Progestins can block endogenous luteinizing hormone secretion from the pituitary gland and have shown similar efficacy in terms of collecting competent oocytes and embryos; however, some inconsistencies have been proposed by the previous papers regarding the quality of oocytes and embryos obtained with the use of progestins. This study aimed to compare the euploidy rate between women treated with progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) and the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol. Methods This is a prospective randomized study of 240 infertile women undergoing PGT-A between August 2021 and July 2023. Infertile women with advanced maternal age (38–45 years), recurrent pregnancy loss (≥ 2 or 3 consecutive miscarriages), and repeated implantation failure (≥ 4 embryos replaced or ≥ 2 blastocysts replaced without success) undergoing PGT-A cycles were included. Women were randomly assigned into the PPOS group ( n  = 120) or the antagonist group ( n  = 120) according to a computer-generated randomization list. Dydrogesterone 20 mg per day was given from the start of ovarian stimulation until the trigger day in the PPOS group. In the antagonist group, an antagonist 0.25 mg was given daily from the sixth day of ovarian stimulation until the trigger day. The primary outcome measure was the euploidy rate, defined as the number of euploid blastocysts per injected oocyte. Results No significant differences were observed in the demographic and ovarian stimulation characteristics between the two groups. The euploidy rate was comparable between the PPOS and antagonist group (12.5% vs. 16.0% respectively, P  > 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in positive pregnancy test, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, or live birth rates per transfer in the first frozen embryo transfer cycles. Conclusion Both PPOS and antagonist protocols had similar euploidy rates in PGT-A cycles. Trial registration Clinicaltrials. gov identifier: NCT04989348 ( https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ ). Trial registration date: Clinicaltrials. gov: 30 July 2021.

ObjectivesTo evaluate the cost-effectiveness of long-acting progestogens (LAP), including levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) and depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA), compared with the combined oral contraceptives pill (COCP) in preventing recurrence of endometriosis-related pain postsurgery.DesignWithin-trial economic evaluation alongside a multicentre, pragmatic, parallel-group, open-label, randomised controlled trial (Preventing Recurrence of Endometriosis by means of Long-Acting Progestogen Therapy trial).SettingThirty-four UK hospitals recruiting participants from November 2015 to March 2019.PatientsFour hundred and five women aged 16–45 years undergoing conservative endometriosis surgery.InterventionsThe ratio of 1:1 randomisation to receive LAPs (LNG-IUS or DMPA) or COCP.Main outcome measuresThe primary evaluation was a cost-utility analysis based on cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained at 3 years. We adopted a UK National Health Service perspective. Secondary analyses in the form of cost-effectiveness analysis based on a range of outcomes were also undertaken.ResultsFor the primary analysis, the COCP group incurred an additional cost of £533 (95% CI £52 to £983) per woman compared with LAPs. Treatment with COCP generated additional QALYs of 0.031 (95% CI −0.079 to 0.139) compared with the LAP group over 36-month follow-up. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for COCP compared with LAPs is therefore approximately £17 193 per QALY. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggested that there was a 54.7% probability that COCP would be cost-effective at the £20 000/QALY threshold. The secondary analyses revealed results more in favour of LAPs.ConclusionAlthough the COCP has a slightly higher probability of being cost-effective at £20 000/QALY threshold, there remains considerable uncertainty, with only marginal differences in outcomes between the two treatments. The lower rates of further surgery and second-line medical treatment for women allocated to LAPs may make this option preferable for some women.Trial registration numberISRCTN 97865475.

Background The use of progestin (P) during ovarian stimulation is effective in blocking the luteinizing hormone (LH) surge in women with normal ovarian reserve, however, its effects have not been determined in poor responders. This study aimed to explore the follicular dynamics in P-primed minimal stimulation in poor responders. Methods A total of 204 infertile women with diminished ovarian reserve were allocated into the medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) group or the natural-cycle control group in an alternating order. MPA (10 mg) was administered daily beginning from the early follicular phase and a low dose of hMG was added in the late follicular phase if the serum FSH level was lower than 8.0mIU/ml. When a dominant follicle reached maturity, triptorelin 100 μg and hCG 1000 IU were used for trigger, and oocytes were retrieved 34-36 h later.All viable embryos were cryopreserved for subsequent frozen embryo transfer. Natural cycle IVF was used as controls. Results Compared with the natural cycle group, the MPA group exhibited a larger pre-ovulatory follicle (18.7 ± 1.8 mm vs 17.2 ± 2.2 mm), a longer follicular phase (13.6 ± 3.6 days vs 12.3 ± 3.2 days), and higher peak oestradiol values (403.88 ± 167.16 vs 265.26 ± 122.16 pg/ml), while maintaining lower LH values ( P  < 0.05). The incidences of spontaneous LH surge and premature ovulation decreased significantly (1.0% vs 50%; 2% vs. 10.8%, respectively; P  < 0.05). A greater number of oocytes and viable embryos were harvested from the MPA group than from the natural cycle group ( P  < 0.05). Moreover,the clinical pregnancy rate was slightly higher in the MPA group than in the natural cycle controls, but the difference was not significant (11.8% vs 5.9%, P  > 0.05). Conclusion This study supported the hypothesis that P-primed minimal stimulation achieved ovulation control of the dominant follicle and did not adversely affect the quality of oocytes in poor responders. Therefore, P-priming is a promising approach to overcome premature ovulation in minimal stimulation for poor responders. Trial registration ChiCTR-OCH-14004176 . Registered on January 8, 2014.

Women with twin pregnancy are at high risk for spontaneous preterm delivery. Progesterone seems to be effective in reducing preterm birth in selected high-risk singleton pregnancies, albeit with no significant reduction in perinatal mortality and little evidence of neonatal benefit. We investigated the use of progesterone for prevention of preterm birth in twin pregnancy. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 500 women with twin pregnancy were recruited from nine UK National Health Service clinics specialising in the management of twin pregnancy. Women were randomised, by permuted blocks of randomly mixed sizes, either to daily vaginal progesterone gel 90 mg (n=250) or to placebo gel (n=250) for 10 weeks from 24 weeks' gestation. All study personnel and participants were masked to treatment assignment for the duration of the study. The primary outcome was delivery or intrauterine death before 34 weeks' gestation. Analysis was by intention to treat. Additionally we undertook a meta-analysis of published and unpublished data to establish the efficacy of progesterone in prevention of early (<34 weeks' gestation) preterm birth or intrauterine death in women with twin pregnancy. This study is registered, number ISRCTN35782581. Three participants in each group were lost to follow-up, leaving 247 analysed per group. The combined proportion of intrauterine death or delivery before 34 weeks of pregnancy was 24·7% (61/247) in the progesterone group and 19·4% (48/247) in the placebo group (odds ratio [OR] 1·36, 95% CI 0·89–2·09; p=0·16). The rate of adverse events did not differ between the two groups. The meta-analysis confirmed that progesterone does not prevent early preterm birth in women with twin pregnancy (pooled OR 1·16, 95% CI 0·89–1·51). Progesterone, administered vaginally, does not prevent preterm birth in women with twin pregnancy. Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health Directorate.

IntroductionTo assess the effects of oral dydrogesterone on the recurrence rate of endometrial polyps (EPs) and abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) symptoms after transcervical resection of polyps (TCRP).Methods and analysisA randomised, parallel, open-label, multicentre study will be conducted across 12 hospitals in China, including general and women’s specialty hospitals. In this study, we will recruit female patients aged 18–46 years diagnosed with EPs using transvaginal ultrasonography during two menstrual cycles. Eligible participants who have not received other oestrogen or progesterone treatments will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either an intervention or control group. All participants will undergo TCRP, with the time between randomisation and surgery not exceeding 14 days. The intervention group will receive oral dydrogesterone for three menstrual cycles, whereas the control group will receive no hormonal treatment. The primary outcome is the recurrence rate of EPs, which will be evaluated using follow-up transvaginal ultrasonography at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months postsurgery. Secondary outcomes include assessment of AUB and menstrual status. For statistical analyses, a multivariate regression will be used to adjust for confounding factors.Ethics and disseminationThis study protocol adheres to the Declaration of Helsinki and has been approved by the Women’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University (IRB-20240077-R). All participants in the trial will provide written informed consent. The study findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at academic conferences.Trial registration numberChiCTR2400083097.

The Women's Health Initiative previously established that therapy with estrogen and progestin does not prevent disease in postmenopausal women. In the same large, randomized, placebo-controlled trial involving postmenopausal women 50 to 79 years of age, estrogen plus progestin did not provide any clinically meaningful benefits in terms of 12 aspects of health-related quality of life, including energy, mood, cognition, sleep, and sexual satisfaction. Few benefits for energy, mood, sleep, or sexual satisfaction. The recent findings of several large-scale randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that protection from cardiovascular disease is not an indication for the use of estrogen plus progestin among postmenopausal women. 1 – 3 The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) found that women taking estrogen (conjugated equine estrogen) plus progestin (medroxyprogesterone acetate) were at increased risk for myocardial infarction, stroke, venous thromboembolism, and breast cancer as compared with women taking placebo. In spite of the decreased risk of osteoporotic fractures and colorectal cancer, there was an unfavorable global risk–benefit profile in the hormone-treatment group, and the planned 8.5-year randomized clinical trial was stopped after . . .

Background Preterm birth (PTB) remains a significant problem in obstetric care. Progesterone supplements are believed to reduce the rate of preterm labor, but formulation, type of administration, and dosage varies in different studies. This study was performed to compare oral Dydrogesterone with intramuscular 17α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17α-OHPC) administration in prevention of PTB. Methods In this randomized clinical trial, we studied 150 women with singleton pregnancy in 28 Th -34 Th  Gestational week, who had received tocolytic treatment for preterm labor. Participants were divided to receive 30 mg oral Dydrogesterone daily, 250 mg intramuscular 17α-OHPC weekly, or no intervention (control group). All treatments were continued until 37 Th  Week or delivery, whichever occurred earlier. Obstetric outcomes, including latency period, gestational age at delivery, birth weight, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, and neonatal mortality were recorded. All patients were monitored biweekly until delivery. Results Baseline gestational age was not significantly different between groups. Latency period was significantly longer in the progesterone group compared with Dydrogesterone and control groups (41.06 ± 17.29 vs. 29.44 ± 15.6 and 22.20 ± 4.51 days, respectively; P  < 0.001). The progesterone group showed significantly better results compared with the other two groups, in terms of gestational age at delivery, birth weight, and Apgar score ( P  < 0.001). None of the participants showed severe complications, stillbirth, or gestational diabetes. Conclusion Progesterone caproate can strongly prolong the latency period and improve neonatal outcomes and therefore, is superior to oral Dydrogesterone in the prevention of PTB.