Explore the vast range of titles available.

In a trial involving patients with primary biliary cholangitis, treatment with elafibranor, a dual PPAR-α and PPAR-δ agonist, led to greater improvements in biochemical indicators of cholestasis than placebo.

Background: This study aimed to determine whether combination S-1 plus cisplatin (CDDP) therapy, the most widely used therapy for Japanese patients with advanced gastric cancer, and the novel oral antiangiogenic agent TSU-68 could contribute to gastric cancer treatment. Methods: Ninety-three patients with chemotherapy-naïve unresectable or recurrent advanced gastric cancers were randomised into two groups: TSU-68 plus S-1/CDDP (group A) and S-1/CDDP (group B) groups. Both patient groups received identical S-1 and CDDP dosages. TSU-68 was orally administered for 35 consecutive days. Group B patients received S-1 orally twice daily for three consecutive weeks, followed by intravenous CDDP on day 8. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Median PFS periods were 208 and 213 days in groups A and B, respectively ( P =0.427). Median survival periods for groups A and B were 497.0 and 463.5 days, respectively ( P =0.219). No statistically significant differences were noted for PFS, survival or the adverse event (AE) incidence rate. All AEs were expected according to previous reports for TSU-68, TS-1, and CDDP. Conclusion: Combination therapy involving TSU-68, S-1, and CDDP was safe and well tolerated in patients with chemotherapy-naïve unresectable or recurrent advanced gastric cancers. However, factors related to therapeutic efficacy should be investigated further.

Verinurad is a selective inhibitor of uric acid transporter 1 (URAT1). Here, we assessed the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of verinurad + allopurinol and verinurad monotherapy in healthy participants. Studies 1 (NCT03836599) and 2 (NCT02608710) were randomized Phase 1 studies. In Study 1, 12 healthy Asian participants received 24 mg verinurad + 300 mg allopurinol or placebo, and 9 healthy Chinese participants received 12 mg verinurad + 300 mg allopurinol. In Study 2, 24 healthy non‐Asian male participants received 12 mg verinurad. Safety analyses included assessment of adverse events (AEs). Pharmacokinetic parameters included maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under plasma concentration‐time curve (AUC) over 24 h (AUCτ). Pharmacodynamic parameters included percentage change from baseline (day –1) in serum uric acid (sUA) and urinary uric acid (uUA). There were no serious AEs or deaths in either study. In Study 1, steady‐state geometric mean (gCV%) Cmax and AUCτ values of verinurad after 7 days’ dosing were 73.6 (29.0) ng/mL and 478 (18.4) ng·h/mL, respectively, in healthy Asian participants, and 42.0 (40.1) ng/mL and 264 (36.1) ng·h/mL, respectively, in healthy Chinese participants; in Study 2, gCV% values were 36.3 (36.5) ng/mL and 271 (31.0) ng·h/mL, respectively. sUA decreased and uUA excretion increased compared with baseline following verinurad + allopurinol (Study 1) or verinurad (Study 2). When accounting for dose, the steady‐state pharmacokinetics of verinurad following multiple dosing were comparable between healthy Asian and Chinese participants and healthy non‐Asian participants. Verinurad treatments were well tolerated, including at higher verinurad exposures than previously evaluated after repeated dosing.

Verinurad (RDEA3170) is a selective uric acid reabsorption inhibitor in clinical development for treatment of gout and asymptomatic hyperuricemia. This study evaluated verinurad pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability in healthy Japanese and non-Asian adult male subjects. This was a Phase I, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled study. Panels of 8 Japanese subjects were randomized to receive oral verinurad (2.5-15 mg) or placebo administered as a single dose in a fasted and fed state and as once-daily doses for 7 days in a fed state. Eight non-Asian subjects received verinurad 10 mg as a single dose (fasted and fed) and multiple doses in the fed state. Serial plasma/serum and urine samples were assayed for verinurad and uric acid. Safety was assessed by adverse events and laboratory data. Of 48 randomized subjects, 46 (Japanese, 39; non-Asian, 7) completed the study. Following single or multiple doses in Japanese subjects, maximum plasma concentration ( ) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) increased in a near dose-proportional manner. Time to ( ) was ~1.25-2.0 hours with fasting. A moderate-fat meal delayed (range 3.0-5.0 hours) and had a variable effect on AUC (0%-97% increase) and (0%-26% increase) across the dose groups. Following multiple verinurad 10 mg doses, and AUC were 38% and 23% higher, respectively, in Japanese vs non-Asian subjects, largely due to body weight differences. Mean reduction of serum urate following multiple verinurad 10 mg doses was 46% and 44% after 24 hours in Japanese and non-Asian subjects, respectively. Verinurad was well tolerated at all doses. Verinurad monotherapy lowered serum urate and was well tolerated in both healthy Japanese and non-Asian males, while small differences in plasma pharmacokinetics were observed. These data support further evaluation of once-daily verinurad as a treatment for gout and asymptomatic hyperuricemia.

Background: Ischemic stroke is the leading cause of mortality worldwide and a major contributor to neurological disability and dementia. Terutroban is a specific TP receptor antagonist with antithrombotic, antivasoconstrictive, and antiatherosclerotic properties, which may be of interest for the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke. This article describes the rationale and design of the Prevention of cerebrovascular and cardiovascular Events of ischemic origin with teRutroban in patients with a history oF ischemic strOke or tRansient ischeMic Attack (PERFORM) Study, which aims to demonstrate the superiority of the efficacy of terutroban versus aspirin in secondary prevention of cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events. Methods and Results: The PERFORM Study is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study being carried out in 802 centers in 46 countries. The study population includes patients aged ≥55 years, having suffered an ischemic stroke (≤3 months) or a transient ischemic attack (≤8 days). Participants are randomly allocated to terutroban (30 mg/day) or aspirin (100 mg/day). The primary efficacy endpoint is a composite of ischemic stroke (fatal or nonfatal), myocardial infarction (fatal or nonfatal), or other vascular death (excluding hemorrhagic death of any origin). Safety is being evaluated by assessing hemorrhagic events. Follow-up is expected to last for 2–4 years. Assuming a relative risk reduction of 13%, the expected number of primary events is 2,340. To obtain statistical power of 90%, this requires inclusion of at least 18,000 patients in this event-driven trial. The first patient was randomized in February 2006. Conclusions: The PERFORM Study will explore the benefits and safety of terutroban in secondary cardiovascular prevention after a cerebral ischemic event.

Summary The novel oral antiangiogenic agent TSU-68 was investigated in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Patients with anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive either TSU-68 400 mg twice daily on days 1–21 plus docetaxel 60 mg/m 2 on day 1 every 3 weeks, or docetaxel 60 mg/m 2 on day 1 every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Between November 2006 and December 2007, 81 patients were included in this study (41 for TSU-68 plus docetaxel and 40 for docetaxel alone). Median progression-free survival was 6.8 months (95 % confidence interval [CI] = 5.4–12.5 months) in the TSU-68 plus docetaxel group and 8.1 months (95 % CI = 4.0–13.7 months) in the docetaxel-alone group (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.0; 95 % CI = 0.6–1.8; p  = 0.95). There were no significant differences in the overall response rates and overall survival between groups ( p  = 0.29 and p  = 0.42, respectively). In subgroup analysis, TSU-68 plus docetaxel was associated with better overall survival than docetaxel alone in anthracycline-resistant patients (HR = 0.3; 95 % CI = 0.1–0.8; p  = 0.02). The most frequent adverse events were neutropenia and anorexia in both arms. Although both regimens were well tolerated, grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity was more frequently observed in the TSU-68 plus docetaxel group. Combination of TSU-68 and docetaxel is well tolerated but failed to demonstrate superior efficacy over docetaxel alone in anthracycline-pretreated breast cancer patients. As TSU-68 was associated with better survival in the anthracycline-resistant subgroup, it should be further explored in this subgroup.

Summary Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The combination of oxaliplatin-based treatments (oxaliplatin plus infusional 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin [FOLFOX] or oxaliplatin plus capecitabine [CapeOX]) and bevacizumab is a standard chemotherapy regimen for metastatic CRC (mCRC). However, several clinical studies that tested S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) indicate that SOX is also a treatment option for mCRC. TSU-68 is an oral compound that inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and platelet-derived growth factor receptor. The recommended dose of TSU-68 + SOX was previously determined in a phase I study of mCRC patients. The goal of this trial was to evaluate the efficacy of TSU-68 in combination with SOX. Methods This open-label multicenter randomized phase II trial was performed in Korea. Treatment-naive mCRC patients with a performance status of 0 or 1 were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either TSU-68 + SOX or SOX alone. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results A total of 105 patients (TSU-68 + SOX, 52 patients; SOX alone, 53 patients) were randomized. The median PFS was 7.0 months in the TSU-68 + SOX group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.057) and 7.2 months in the SOX group ( p  = 0.8401). The most frequent grade 3 and 4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (9.6 % [TSU-68 + SOX] vs. 26.4 % [SOX]), neutropenia (13.5 % [TSU-68 + SOX] vs. 15.1 % [SOX]), and anemia (3.8 % [TSU-68 + SOX] vs. 13.2 % [SOX]). We observed a difference between the 2 groups for all grades of anemia (15.4 % [TSU-68 + SOX] vs. 32.1 % [SOX]), diarrhea (30.8 % [TSU-68 + SOX] vs. 47.2 % [SOX]), vomiting (50.0 % [TSU-68 + SOX] vs. 26.4 % [SOX]), and chromaturia (23.1 % [TSU-68 + SOX] vs. 0.0 % [SOX]). Analysis using a Cox proportional hazard model showed that baseline interleukin 6 (IL-6) levels were associated with a survival benefit of TSU-68 ( p  = 0.012). Conclusion TSU-68 + SOX had a favorable safety profile. However, TSU-68 did not have a synergistic effect on the efficacy of SOX. The baseline serum IL-6 level could be a prognostic factor for TSU-68 efficacy.

Background: The antithrombotic, antiplatelet and endothelial activity of terutroban, a specific thromboxane prostaglandin receptor antagonist, was assessed in patients previously treated with aspirin for the prevention of ischemic stroke. Methods: This double-blind, parallel-group, 10-day study included 48 patients (age = 70.5 ± 9.5 years) with cerebral ischemic event and/or carotid stenosis in 4 groups: terutroban 10 mg/day (n = 13), aspirin 300 mg/day (n = 12), terutroban 10 mg/day + aspirin 300 mg/day (n = 11) or clopidogrel 75 mg/day + aspirin 300 mg/day (n = 12). The measurements included parameters from an ex vivo model of thrombosis, platelet aggregation in platelet-rich plasma and plasma biomarkers of endothelial/platelet activation. Results: Between days 0 and 10, the mean cross-sectional surface of dense thrombus significantly decreased with terutroban (58%, p = 0.001), terutroban + aspirin (63%, p = 0.005) and clopidogrel + aspirin (61%, p < 0.05). On day 10, the value for terutroban was significantly lower than that for aspirin (p < 0.01) and was comparable to the dual therapy terutroban + aspirin or clopidogrel + aspirin. Similar results were found for total thrombus surface and platelet adhesion. Platelet aggregation induced by the specific thromboxane prostaglandin receptor agonist U46619 was almost completely inhibited on day 10 in both terutroban groups but not in the others. As regards markers of endothelial/platelet activation or lesions, thrombomodulin significantly increased and plasma soluble P selectin significantly decreased by day 10 in both terutroban groups, whereas the von Willebrand factor did not change significantly. Terutroban was found to be safe and well tolerated. Conclusions: Terutroban has demonstrated an antithrombotic activity that is superior to aspirin and similar to clopidogrel + aspirin; it induces a significant in vivo reduction in endothelial/platelet activation.

Abstract Context Combining a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor with a xanthine oxidase inhibitor (XOI) and a urate transporter 1 (URAT1) inhibitor may enhance serum uric acid (sUA) lowering. However, concerns exist regarding high urinary UA (uUA) excretion rates and subsequent crystallization in renal tubules. Objective To assess whether dapagliflozin added to verinurad, a selective URAT1 inhibitor, and febuxostat, an XOI, increases uUA excretion. Design Randomized, placebo-controlled, 2-way crossover study (NCT03316131). Patients Adults with asymptomatic hyperuricemia. Interventions Subjects (N = 36) were randomized to oral once-daily 9 mg verinurad plus 80 mg febuxostat plus 10 mg dapagliflozin for 7 days and 7 days of oral once-daily 9 mg verinurad plus 80 mg febuxostat plus placebo with an intervening 7- to 21-day washout period. Main Outcome Measure Difference in peak uUA excretion between groups from baseline to day 7. Secondary outcomes included changes in sUA levels and 24-h uUA excretion. Results Both regimens lowered mean peak uUA excretion (least squares mean changes from baseline: −12.9 mg/h [95% confidence interval (CI): −21.0 to −4.7], dapagliflozin; −13.2 mg/h [95% CI −21.3 to –5.0], placebo). sUA concentrations were lower with dapagliflozin (mean treatment difference –62.3 µmol/L [95% CI −82.8 to −41.8]). Dapagliflozin did not impact verinurad pharmacokinetics, its main metabolites, or febuxostat or fasting plasma glucose levels vs verinurad plus febuxostat. There were no clinically relevant changes in safety parameters. Conclusions Dapagliflozin further reduced sUA without influencing uUA excretion, suggesting that its combination with verinurad and febuxostat at the doses tested does not adversely affect kidney function. Clinical trial registration number NCT03316131.

Purpose A single-agent dose-escalating phase I and pharmacokinetic study on TSU-68, a novel multiple receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, was performed to determine the safety profile, maximum-tolerated dose for Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors and to define the recommended dose of phase II studies. Methods Study design was a dose escalation method on a three-patient cohort. TSU-68 was given orally twice daily (bid) between meals without interruption; the estimation of dose escalation was based on the toxicity within 4 week administration at each dose level. Results Fifteen patients were enrolled into the study. Dose levels studied were 200, 400, 800, and 1,200 mg/m 2 bid. Grade 3 arrhythmia and anemia/thrombocytopenia were observed in 1 patient each at 800 mg/m 2 bid. Three patients discontinued continuous oral administration for 4 weeks at 400 and 800 mg/m 2 bid. At 1,200 mg/m 2 bid, 2 patients discontinued the treatment over 4 weeks for intolerable fatigue and abdominal pain, respectively. No serious drug-related toxicities have been observed. Grade 1–2 toxicity included urinary/feces discoloration, diarrhea, fatigue, anorexia, abdominal/chest pain, and edema. Tumor shrinkage was observed in 1 patient of NSCLC. In the pharmacokinetics, at any dose levels, C max and AUC 0–t after repeated administration of TSU-68 on days 8 and 29 were ~2-fold lower that those after the first administration on day 1; these parameters are similar between days 8 and 28. In addition, no obvious dose-dependent increase in plasma exposure to TSU-68 repeatedly administered was observed over the four dose levels, including the higher dose levels. Conclusions The tolerable dose in this administration schedule for continuing treatment is thought to be 800 mg/m 2 or less bid.