Explore the vast range of titles available.

Heterotrimeric G proteinshave been previously linked to plant defense; however a role for the G[beta][gamma] dimer in defense signaling has not been described to date. Using available Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutants lacking functional G[alpha] or G[beta] subunits, we show that defense against the necrotrophic pathogens Alternaria brassicicola and Fusarium oxysporum is impaired in G[beta]-deficient mutants while G[alpha]-deficient mutants show slightly increased resistance compared to wild-type Columbia ecotype plants. In contrast, responses to virulent (DC3000) and avirulent (JL1065) strains of Pseudomonas syringae appear to be independent of heterotrimeric G proteins. The induction of a number of defense-related genes in G[beta]-deficient mutants were severely reduced in response to A. brassicicola infection. In addition, G[beta]-deficient mutants exhibit decreased sensitivity to a number of methyl jasmonate-induced responses such as induction of the plant defensin gene PDF1.2, inhibition of root elongation, seed germination, and growth of plants in sublethal concentrations of methyl jasmonate. In all cases, the behavior of the G[alpha]-deficient mutants is coherent with the classic heterotrimeric mechanism of action, indicating that jasmonic acid signaling is influenced by the G[beta][gamma] functional subunit but not by G[alpha]. We hypothesize that G[beta][gamma] acts as a direct or indirect enhancer of the jasmonate signaling pathway in plants.

Some 865 genes in man encode G‐protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs). The heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide‐binding proteins (G‐proteins) function to transduce signals from this vast panoply of receptors to effector systems including ion channels and enzymes that alter the rate of production, release or degradation of intracellular second messengers. However, it was not until the 1970s that the existence of such transducing proteins was even seriously suggested. Combinations of bacterial toxins that mediate their effects via covalent modification of the α‐subunit of certain G‐proteins and mutant cell lines that fail to generate cyclic AMP in response to agonists because they either fail to express or express a malfunctional G‐protein allowed their identification and purification. Subsequent to initial cloning efforts, cloning by homology has defined the human G‐proteins to derive from 35 genes, 16 encoding α‐subunits, five β and 14 γ. All function as guanine nucleotide exchange on–off switches and are mechanistically similar to other proteins that are enzymic GTPases. Although not readily accepted initially, it is now well established that β/γ complexes mediate as least as many functions as the α‐subunits. The generation of chimeras between different α‐subunits defined the role of different sections of the primary/secondary sequence and crystal structures and cocrystals with interacting proteins have given detailed understanding of their molecular structure and basis of function. Finally, further modifications of such chimeras have generated a range of G‐protein α‐subunits with greater promiscuity to interact across GPCR classes and initiated the use of such modified G‐proteins in drug discovery programmes. British Journal of Pharmacology (2006) 147, S46–S55. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0706405

The role of heterotrimeric G-proteins in cAMP-dependent germination of conidia was investigated in the filamentous ascomycete Aspergillus nidulans. We demonstrate that the Gα-subunit GanB mediates a rapid and transient activation of cAMP synthesis in response to glucose during the early period of germination. Moreover, deletion of individual G-protein subunits resulted in defective trehalose mobilization and altered germination kinetics, indicating that GanB(α)-SfaD(β)-GpgA(γ) constitutes a functional heterotrimer and controls cAMP/PKA signaling in response to glucose as well as conidial germination. Further genetic analyses suggest that GanB plays a primary role in cAMP/PKA signaling, whereas the SfaD-GpgA (Gβγ) heterodimer is crucial for proper activation of GanB signaling sensitized by glucose. In addition, the RGS protein RgsA is also involved in regulation of the cAMP/PKA pathway and germination via attenuation of GanB signaling. Genetic epistatic analyses led us to conclude that all controls exerted by GanB(α)-SfaD(β)-GpgA(γ) on conidial germination are mediated through the cAMP/PKA pathway. Furthermore, GanB may function in sensing various carbon sources and subsequent activation of downstream signaling for germination.

We present evidence that heterotrimeric G protein signaling is involved in cell death associated with the unfolded protein response (UPR) in Arabidopsis. Seedlings of homozygous agb1-2 (Gβ-null mutation) mutant plants are markedly more resistant to growth inhibition by the protein glycosylation inhibitor tunicamycin (Tm) than either wild-type plants or gpa1-4 (Gα-null mutation) mutants. Leaves of older Gβ mutant plants show much less cell death when infiltrated with Tm than leaves of wild-type plants. The transcriptional response of Gβ mutant plants to Tm is less pronounced than that of wild-type plants, as is the accumulation of BiP chaperone proteins. A majority of the Arabidopsis Gβ protein is associated with the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and cofractionates with membrane-associated ER luminal BiP. Consistent with its ER localization, Gβ protein is degraded during the UPR, whereas Gα protein is not. Taken together, these observations imply that the Gβ protein, which forms a stable heterodimer with the Gγ subunit, is involved in the signaling events that trigger UPR-associated cell death. The different Tm sensitivities of Gα and Gβ mutants, the ER localization of Gβ, and the differential stabilities of Gα and Gβ proteins during the UPR suggest that the Gβγ complex serves a signaling function in the ER independent of its function in the Gαβγ heterotrimer.

Caenorhabditis elegans genome carries two Gγ genes, gpc-1 and gpc-2, and two Gβ genes, gpb-1 and gpb-2. Of these, gpc-2 and gpb-1 are expressed ubiquitously and are essential for viability. Through a genetic screen, we identified gpc-1 as essential for olfactory adaptation. While wild-type animals show decreased chemotaxis to the odorant benzaldehyde after a short preexposure to the odorant, gpc-1 mutants are still attracted to the odorant after the same preexposure. Cell-specific rescue experiments show that gpc-1 acts in the AWC olfactory neurons. Coexpression of GPC-1 and GPB-1, but not GPB-2, caused enhanced adaptation, indicating that GPC-1 may act with GPB-1. On the other hand, knock down of gpc-2 by cell-targeted RNAi caused reduced chemotaxis to the odorant in unadapted animals, indicating that GPC-2 mainly act for olfactory sensation and the two Gγ's have differential functions. Nonetheless, overexpression of gpc-2 in AWC neurons rescued the adaptation defects of gpc-1 mutants, suggesting partially overlapping functions of the two Gγ's. We further tested genetic interaction of gpc-1 with several other genes involved in olfactory adaptation. Our analyses place goa-1 Goα and let-60 Ras in parallel to gpc-1. In contrast, a gain-of-function mutation in egl-30 Gqα was epistatic to gpc-1, suggesting the possibility that gpc-1 Gγ may act upstream of egl-30 Gqα.

Receptor-mediated airway smooth muscle (ASM) contraction via G(alphaq), and relaxation via G(alphas), underlie the bronchospastic features of asthma and its treatment. Asthma models show increased ASM G(alphai) expression, considered the basis for the proasthmatic phenotypes of enhanced bronchial hyperreactivity to contraction mediated by M(3)-muscarinic receptors and diminished relaxation mediated by beta(2)-adrenergic receptors (beta(2)ARs). A causal effect between G(i) expression and phenotype has not been established, nor have mechanisms whereby G(i) modulates G(q)/G(s) signaling. To delineate isolated effects of altered G(i), transgenic mice were generated overexpressing G(alphai2) or a G(alphai2) peptide inhibitor in ASM. Unexpectedly, G(alphai2) overexpression decreased contractility to methacholine, while G(alphai2) inhibition enhanced contraction. These opposite phenotypes resulted from different crosstalk loci within the G(q) signaling network: decreased phospholipase C and increased PKCalpha, respectively. G(alphai2) overexpression decreased beta(2)AR-mediated airway relaxation, while G(alphai2) inhibition increased this response, consistent with physiologically relevant coupling of this receptor to both G(s) and G(i). IL-13 transgenic mice (a model of asthma), which developed increased ASM G(alphai), displayed marked increases in airway hyperresponsiveness when G(alphai) function was inhibited. Increased G(alphai) in asthma is therefore a double-edged sword: a compensatory event mitigating against bronchial hyperreactivity, but a mechanism that evokes beta-agonist resistance. By selective intervention within these multipronged signaling modules, advantageous G(s)/G(q) activities could provide new asthma therapies.

Signaling through heterotrimeric G proteins is conserved in diverse eukaryotes. Compared to vertebrates, the simpler repertoire of G-protein complex and accessory components in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) offers a unique advantage over all other multicellular, genetic-model systems for dissecting the mechanism of G-protein signal transduction. One of several biological processes that the G-protein complex regulates in Arabidopsis is cell division. We determined cell production rate in the primary root and the formation of lateral roots in Arabidopsis to define individually the types of modulatory roles of the respective G-protein α- and β-subunits, as well as the heterotrimer in cell division. The growth rate of the root is in part a consequence of cell cycle maintenance in the root apical meristem (RAM), while lateral root production requires meristem formation by founder pericycle cells. Thus, a comparison of these two parameters in various genetic backgrounds enabled dissection of the role of the G-protein subunits in modulation of cell division, both in maintenance and initiation. Cell production rates were determined for the RAM and lateral root formation in gpa1 (Arabidopsis G-protein α-subunit) and agb1 (Arabidopsis G-protein β-subunit) single and double mutants, and in transgenic lines overexpressing GPA1 or AGB1 in agb1 or gpa1 mutant backgrounds, respectively. We found in the RAM that the heterotrimeric complex acts as an attenuator of cell proliferation, whereas the GTP-bound form of the Gα-subunit's role is a positive modulator. In contrast, for the formation of lateral roots, the Gβγ-dimer acts largely independently of the Gα-subunit to attenuate cell division. These results suggest that Arabidopsis heterotrimeric G-protein subunits have differential and opposing roles in the modulation of cell division in roots.

Abscisic acid (ABA) plays regulatory roles in a host of physiological processes throughout plant growth and development. Seed germination, early seedling development, stomatal guard cell functions, and acclimation to adverse environmental conditions are key processes regulated by ABA. Recent evidence suggests that signaling processes in both seeds and guard cells involve heterotrimeric G proteins. To assess new roles for the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) Gα subunit (GPA1), the Gβ subunit (AGB1), and the candidate G-protein-coupled receptor (GCR1) in ABA signaling during germination and early seedling development, we utilized knockout mutants lacking one or more of these components. Our data show that GPA1, AGB1, and GCR1 each negatively regulates ABA signaling in seed germination and early seedling development. Plants lacking AGB1 have greater ABA hypersensitivity than plants lacking GPA1, suggesting that AGB1 is the predominant regulator of ABA signaling and that GPA1 affects the efficacy of AGB1 execution. GCR1 acts upstream of GPA1 and AGB1 for ABA signaling pathways during germination and early seedling development: gcr1 gpa1 double mutants exhibit a gpa1 phenotype and agb1 gcr1 and agb1 gcr1 gpa1 mutants exhibit an agb1 phenotype. Contrary to the scenario in guard cells, where GCR1 and GPA1 have opposite effects on ABA signaling during stomatal opening, GCR1 acts in concert with GPA1 and AGB1 in ABA signaling during germination and early seedling development. Thus, cell- and tissue-specific functional interaction in response to a given signal such as ABA may determine the distinct pathways regulated by the individual members of the G-protein complex.

Uveal melanoma (UM) is a currently untreatable form of melanoma with a 50% mortality rate. Characterization of the essential signaling pathways driving this cancer is critical to develop target therapies. Activating mutations in the Gαq signaling pathway at the level of GNAQ, GNA11, or rarely CYSLTR2 or PLCβ4 are considered alterations driving proliferation in UM and several other neoplastic disorders. Here, we systematically examined the oncogenic signaling output of various mutations recurrently identified in human tumors. We demonstrate that CYSLTR2 → GNAQ/11 → PLCβ act in a linear signaling cascade that, via protein kinase C (PKC), activates in parallel the MAP-kinase and FAK/Yes-associated protein pathways. Using genetic ablation and pharmacological inhibition, we show that the PKC/RasGRP3/MAPK signaling branch is the essential component that drives the proliferation of UM. Only inhibition of the MAPK branch but not the FAK branch synergizes with inhibition of the proximal cascade, providing a blueprint for combination therapy. All oncogenic signaling could be extinguished by the novel GNAQ/11 inhibitor YM-254890, in all UM cells with driver mutation in the Gαq subunit or the upstream receptor. Our findings highlight the GNAQ/11 → PLCβ → PKC → MAPK pathway as the central signaling axis to be suppressed pharmacologically to treat for neoplastic disorders with Gαq pathway mutations.

Asymmetric cell divisions allow stem cells to balance proliferation and differentiation. During embryogenesis, murine epidermis expands rapidly from a single layer of unspecified basal layer progenitors to a stratified, differentiated epithelium. Morphogenesis involves perpendicular (asymmetric) divisions and the spindle orientation protein LGN, but little is known about how the apical localization of LGN is regulated. Here, we combine conventional genetics and lentiviral-mediated in vivo RNAi to explore the functions of the LGN-interacting proteins Par3, mInsc and Gα i3 . Whereas loss of each gene alone leads to randomized division angles, combined loss of Gnai3 and mInsc causes a phenotype of mostly planar divisions, akin to loss of LGN . These findings lend experimental support for the hitherto untested model that Par3–mInsc and Gα i3 act cooperatively to polarize LGN and promote perpendicular divisions. Finally, we uncover a developmental switch between delamination-driven early stratification and spindle-orientation-dependent differentiation that occurs around E15, revealing a two-step mechanism underlying epidermal maturation. During embryogenesis, the single layer of mouse epidermal progenitors becomes a stratified and differentiated epithelium. Fuchs and colleagues show that the polarity proteins Par3–mInsc and Gα i3 act cooperatively to polarize LGN and promote perpendicular divisions to induce stratification.