Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Source
    • Language
574 result(s) for "Pterygium - surgery"
Sort by:
Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Different Pterygium Surgeries: A Review of the Literature
The search for the “gold standard” in the surgical treatment of pterygium has been ongoing for over two decades. Despite the development of various surgical techniques, recurrence rates range from 6.7% to 88% depending on the method used. This review discusses the latest and most commonly used methods for the surgical removal of pterygium, primarily focusing on efficacy and safety. Moreover, this review includes articles that either evaluated or compared surgical methods and clinical trials for primary and recurrent pterygium. Limited data are available on combined methods as well as on the efficacy of adjuvant treatment. The use of adjuvant intraoperative mitomycin C (MMC) and conjunctival autografting (CAU) are the two most highly recommended options, as they have the lowest rates of postoperative recurrence.
Comparison of mini-simple limbal epithelial transplantation and conjunctival–limbal autograft for the treatment of primary pterygium: a randomised controlled trial
PurposeThe purpose of this double-masked, parallel randomised controlled trial was to compare the recurrence rate and other outcomes between conjunctival–limbal autograft (CLAu) and mini-simple limbal epithelial transplantation (mini-SLET) after excision of pterygium.MethodsEligibility criteria for participants was the presence of a primary nasal pterygium extending equally to or greater than two millimetres on the cornea on its horizontal axis from the nasal limbus. The participants were allocated into two groups (CLAu and mini-SLET) using simple randomisation with a table of random numbers. Participants and the outcome assessor were masked to the intervention. The study protocol is listed and available on https://clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT03363282).ResultsA total of 61 eyes were enrolled in the study, 33 underwent CLAu (group 1) and 28 mini-SLET (group 2), all eyes were analysed in each group. At 2, 3, 6 and 12 months the CLAu group exhibited a recurrence of 0%, 6.1%, 8.1% and 8.1%, while the mini-SLET exhibited a recurrence of 0%, 17.9%, 50% and 53.5% (p<0.05). There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications in either of the two groups.ConclusionThe findings of this study suggest that mini-SLET has a higher recurrence rate and provides no advantage over CLAu in the treatment of primary pterygium.
Comparison of postoperative topical interferon-α2b versus intraoperative mitomycin C for pterygium recurrence prevention: a randomized clinical trial
Purpose To evaluate the effect of postoperative interferon-alpha 2b (IFN-α2b) ophthalmic drops versus intraoperative mitomycin-c (MMC) on preventing pterygium recurrence. Methods This prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted on patients who were candidates for pterygium surgery. A total of 75 patients were included in the study from December 2021 to December 2022, of which 64 patients (one eye each) were examined and analyzed based on the inclusion criteria. Then the patients were randomly assigned to control groups, intra-operative MMC (32 patients) and the intervention group, IFN-α2b drops after the operation (32 patients). All patients underwent pterygium surgery using the rotational conjunctival flap method. Results In terms of pterygium grading, 8 (12.5%), 25 (39.06%), and 31 (48.44%) eyes were in grades 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The average size of the pterygium was 3.6 ± 0.7 mm. The grade and size of pterygium had the same distribution in the two groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the level of post-operative clinical inflammation. The present study showed no significant difference in complications between the two groups ( p  = 0.999). The recurrence rate in the control group was 9.4% (3 eyes), and 0% (no recurrence) in the intervention group ( p  = 0.119). Conclusions interferon-alpha 2b group did not show a statistically significant difference in preventing pterygium recurrence compared to the mitomycin C group. The post-surgery administration of IFN-α 2b drops can effectively prevent pterygium recurrence with a comparable and even more compelling effect than MMC during surgery. Key message What is known: • Mitomycin-C is applied intra-operatively to reduce the recurrence risk of pterygium. What is new: • Interferon alpha-2b drops after pterygium surgery can prevent pterygium recurrence with a comparable effect and maybe even more effective than MMC during surgery. • There was no statistically significant difference between the intraoperative MMC and postoperative IF alpha-2b groups in the level of post-operative clinical inflammation and complications.
Pterygium surgery using inferior rotational conjunctival autograft versus conventional conjunctival autograft with sutures - A comparative study
Purpose: To compare the outcomes of pterygium surgery by using an inferior rotational autograft and a conventional superior conjunctival autograft. Methods: This was a prospective interventional comparative study of 85 eyes of patients who were divided into two groups of 45 and 40. Standard techniques of both procedures were performed by a single surgeon. Astigmatism, recurrence rates, time taken, and other complications were compared. Results: All the subjects were in the age group 53 ± 7.56 (40-74) years. Demographic data and type of pterygium were comparable in the two groups. In the rotational group, the preoperative astigmatism was − 2.14 ± 1.36 D, which decreased in 1 week to 1.42 ± 1.11 D, in 1 month to − 1.13 ± 0.99 D, in 3 months to 0.91 ± 0.72 D, and in 6 months to 0.81 ± 0.85 D (P < 0.05 each). Preoperative astigmatism in the conventional group was − 2.63 ± 1.47 D, which decreased to − 1.43 ± 1.04 D in 1 week, −1.18 ± 0.85 D in 1 month, −1.07 ± 0.81 D in 3 months, and − 1.01 ± 0.78 D in 6 months (P < 0.05 each). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of astigmatism at any follow-up visit (P < 0.05). Complications like dellen, graft edema, and superficial vascularization were seen in both groups. The rotational group had one recurrence (2.86%). No recurrence was noted in the conventional group. None of the complication rates was significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Inferior rotational conjunctival autografting is a good technique for management of pterygium. It has a profile similar to that of conventional conjunctival autograft.
The effect of different pterygium surgery techniques on the ocular surface parameters in different durations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Purpose To evaluate the effects of different pterygium surgery techniques on ocular surface (OS) in different follow-up periods. Methods PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wan Fang, and China Biology Medicine disc were searched for studies reporting pre- and post-operative OS parameters in pterygium. Results A total of 33 articles were finally included. Three OS parameters showed relatively consistent changing trends after surgery including ocular surface disease index (OSDI), tear film break-up time (BUT), and score of corneal fluorescein staining (SCFS). They worsened significantly at 1w post-operation and then gradually improved: OSDI and BUT showed obvious improvement in 1 m post-operation (SMD =  − 0.58, 95%CI = [− 1.04, − 0.13]; SMD = 0.42, 95%CI = [0.06, 0.78]); SCFS was restored to preoperative levels in 3 m after surgery (SMD =  − 0.54, 95%CI = [− 1.16, 0.07]). Another parameter, Schirmer test without anesthesia (SIT), presented transient increase at 1w post-operation (SMD = 0.87, 95%CI = [0.27, 1.47]) and presented a relatively stable improvement after 1 m post-operation (SMD = 0.52, 95%CI = [0.16, 0.89]). All parameters in amniotic membrane graft (AMT) showed better improvement in early stage and they showed non-inferior improvements in the long term compared with conjunctival autograft (CAG). Limbal-conjunctival autograft (LCAG) made excellent improvement to OS in the long term while pterygium excision (PE) showed the worst OS. The type of pterygium (primary and secondary), diabetes mellitus (DM) status, and fixation method had certain effects on the results. Conclusions OS of pterygium is deteriorated at 1w post-operation then gradually improved to preoperative levels after 1 m post-operation. Among various surgery techniques, LCAG had the best improvement to OS which especially displayed in the long-term outcomes.
Application of autologous serum eye drops after pterygium surgery: a prospective study
PurposeThe study aims to determine the effect of 50% autologous serum drops (ASD) on corneal healing and patient comfort following pterygium surgery.MethodsFifty eyes of 50 patients who underwent pterygium excision combined with autologous conjunctival graft were included in this prospective randomized study: in 25 eyes, 50% ASD. In the remaining 25 eyes, conventional artificial tears (CAT) were applied postoperatively until corneal epithelium had completely epithelialized. Corneal epithelium healing speed, visual analog scale (VAS) for postoperative pain assessment, conjunctival inflammation, and recurrences were evaluated. Patients were followed up for 6 months.ResultsMean corneal epithelium closure time was 3.16 ± 0.37 days (range 3 and 4 days) in ASD group and 4.96 ± 0.84 days in CAT group (range 4 and 6 days), and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). VAS scores were significantly lower in ASD group than CAT group in the first 5 days after surgery. In 9 of 50 eyes, moderate conjunctival inflammation continued 1 month: 4 (16%) in ASD group and 5 (20%) in CAT group (p = 0.713). In total, pterygium recurrence was seen in 5 (10%) eyes: 2 eyes (8%) in ASD group and 3 eyes (12%) in CAT group (p = 0.637).ConclusionASD accelerated corneal epithelial healing following pterygium surgery. ASD group had lesser pain that was seem to be related with accelerated corneal epithelial healing.
Prevention of Recurrent Pterygium with Topical Bevacizumab 0.05% Eye Drops: A Randomized Controlled Trial
We assessed the efficacy and tolerability of topical bevacizumab 0.05% when used as an adjunctive therapy after excision of primary pterygia. This randomized double-masked study included 22 patients (22 eyes) with primary pterygia who underwent pterygium surgery with the use of the bare sclera technique. After pterygium excision, 22 patients were randomized to receive the topical bevacizumab 0.05% (12 eyes) or the placebo (10 eyes) with the use of the block of four randomization method. Topical bevacizumab and placebo were applied in the respective groups 4 times daily for 3 months. Follow-up evaluations for recurrence by slit-lamp photography were conducted once monthly. Ocular and systemic adverse events were assessed every 2 weeks during the 3 months of treatment. The slit-lamp photographs were masked and analyzed. The primary and secondary outcomes were the differences in the pterygial recurrence rates between the groups and adverse events at 3 months, respectively. Corneal recurrence was defined as recurrent fibrovascular tissue invading the cornea; conjunctival recurrence was defined as either recurrent vessels or fibrous tissue in the excised area without corneal invasion. All 22 patients completed follow-up at 3 months after the start of the trial medications. After 3 months of treatment, 1 patient (8.33%) and 3 patients (30.00%) from the bevacizumab and placebo groups, respectively, had a corneal recurrence. No significant (P = 0.293) differences were found between the groups as determined by Fisher’s exact test. However, conjunctival and corneal recurrences were found in 4 (33.33%) and 9 (90.00%) patients, respectively, in the bevacizumab and placebo groups, a difference that reached significance (P = 0.01). No significant adverse events developed. Topical bevacizumab, as an adjunctive treatment after pterygium excision, was well tolerated. The trend for recurrence was lower in the topical bevacizumab group. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01311960.
The Effect of Conjunctival Flap Transplantation, Pterygium Excision, and Scleral Fixation Surgery in Treating Pterygium Combined with Conjunctival Laxity and Its Impact on Postoperative Complications
Pterygium and conjunctival laxity are common ocular conditions that can significantly affect visual comfort and quality of life. Therefore, it is essential to investigate ways to treat these problems. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of same-stage trapezoidal conjunctival flap transplantation, pterygium excision, and scleral fixation surgery versus staged pterygium excision, crescentic conjunctiva excision, and scleral fixation surgery in treating pterygium combined with conjunctival laxity. The study also aimed to evaluate the impact of these surgical techniques on postoperative complications. From June 2019 to May 2021, 90 patients (90 eyes) with pterygium combined with conjunctival laxity were included in this study and were randomly divided into two groups (A and B) using a simple number table method. Group A underwent same-stage trapezoidal conjunctival flap transplantation, pterygium excision, and scleral fixation surgery, while group B underwent staged pterygium excision, crescentic conjunctiva excision, and scleral fixation surgery. The International Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), degree of conjunctival laxity excision, changes in ocular tear film dynamics, recurrence rate, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. The results showed that different surgical methods for pterygium and conjunctivochalasis did not significantly improve the symptoms and quality of life of patients. This suggests that more intensive research is needed to find more effective treatments. Therefore, the risks and benefits should be carefully considered when selecting ophthalmologic surgery, OSDI scores and fluorescein staining results of both groups were trending downward after surgery, while the breakup time of the tear film and height of the tear meniscus was increasing but there was no significant difference in the above indicators (P > .05). However, there was no significant difference in the above indicators between the two groups before surgery, at 1, 3, and 6 months, and at 1 year after surgery (P > .05). There was also no significant difference in the degree of conjunctival laxity excision between the two groups at 1 and 3 months after surgery (P > .05). Finally, there was no significant difference in the healing time of the conjunctiva and recurrence rates between the two groups (P > .05). The results showed that different surgical methods for pterygium and conjunctivochalasis did not significantly improve the symptoms and quality of life of patients. This suggests that more intensive research is needed to find more effective treatments. Therefore, the risks and benefits should be carefully considered when selecting ophthalmologic surgery. The results of this study showed no significant differences between surgical techniques, making monitoring and management of complications after surgery even more critical. Patients need to be carefully watched for possible complications such as infection, discomfort, and inflammation. Doctors and medical teams should be alert in advance and take appropriate measures to deal with these problems in a timely manner to ensure the success of the operation and the comfort of the patient. By monitoring and proactively managing potential complications, unnecessary pain and complexity can be reduced, thereby improving patient experience and outcomes. Additionally, the study had several limitations, including a small sample size, a limited study period, and failure to consider other potential factors. These limitations need to be addressed in future studies to validate and extend the results of this study. In conclusion, same-stage trapezoidal conjunctival flap transplantation, pterygium excision, and scleral fixation surgery is an effective treatment for patients with pterygium combined with conjunctival laxity, which can improve their visual function and ocular tear film dynamics. However, careful monitoring and management of postoperative complications are necessary.
Therapeutic contact lenses vs. tight bandage patching and pain following pterygium excision: a prospective randomized controlled study
PurposeThe immediate postoperative management of patients undergoing pterygium excision usually includes eye patching in order to alleviate pain and prevent accidental tissue damage. Commonly applied tight patching with gauze bandages results in decreased field of monocular vision and discomfort. The aim of this study was to evaluate the patient-centered outcome of pterygium surgery when therapeutic contact lenses (TCL) are used instead of tight bandage patching in the first 24 postoperative hours.MethodsProspective randomized controlled study. Sixty patients with primary pterygium who underwent pterygium surgery consisting of conjunctival autografting with 10–0 Vicryl sutures were randomized into two groups, bandaged with TCLs and tight bandage patching.Main outcome measures: Degree of pain on an 0–10 scale, use of pain killers, level of patient discomfort, sleep quality, and visual acuity (VA).ResultsSixty patients were studied. The pain level and pain duration during the first postoperative day was significantly lower in the tight bandage patching group compared with the TCL group (P = 0.034, P = 0.04 respectively). Sleep quality was significantly poorer in the TCL group (P = 0.004). The VA on the first postoperative day was similar for the two groups.ConclusionsThe application of TCL in the first 24 h after pterygium surgery resulted in more discomfort and pain and decreased quality of sleep compared with tight bandage patching. Despite the limitation in monocular vision and the inconvenience of gauze bandages, they are preferred over TCL for alleviating pain following pterygium surgery.
Effect of multiple subconjunctival conbercept injections as an adjuvant to the surgical treatment of pterygium: a prospective randomised comparative 6-month follow-up study
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of multiple subconjunctival injections of conbercept for pterygium patients after surgery.MethodsAs a prospective randomised interventional trial, 96 eyes from 96 patients with a tendency to recur were collected and divided randomly into conbercept and 5-fluorouracil groups on the 5th day after pterygium. All patients received three subconjunctival injections of conbercept (0.2 ml) or 5-fluorouracil (0.2 ml) on the 5th day (baseline), and 2 and 4 weeks post-operatively. The pterygium morphology, colour intensity, recurrence, and complications were recorded and analysed pre-1st injection and 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-3rd injection. Moreover, no patient was drop-out.ResultsThere were striking differences between the two groups on post-3rd injections 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months (p = 0.001, 0.002, 0.000, 0.000, and 0.002, respectively) with respect to colour intensity: the eyes in conbercept group were lighter than the 5-Fu group. On post-3rd injection 6 months, prominent disparities existed between the two groups with respect to pterygium morphology (p = 0.006) and recurrence (p = 0.002), occurred in the conbercept group prior to the 5-Fu group. Moreover, corneal abrasions were not noted in the conbercept group, which was significantly less than the 5-Fu group (17/48; p = 0.000). There was no conspicuous discrepancy between the two groups with respect to subconjunctival haemorrhage (p = 0.789) and persistent epithelial defects (p = 0.078).ConclusionMultiple subconjunctival conbercept injections as an adjunct therapy for pterygium surgery was shown to be safe, effective, and well-tolerated.