Catalogue Search | MBRL
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
{{itemTitle}}
1,634,459
result(s) for
"Publishing"
Sort by:
Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison
Background
The Internet has transformed scholarly publishing, most notably, by the introduction of open access publishing. Recently, there has been a rise of online journals characterized as ‘predatory’, which actively solicit manuscripts and charge publications fees without providing robust peer review and editorial services. We carried out a cross-sectional comparison of characteristics of potential predatory, legitimate open access, and legitimate subscription-based biomedical journals.
Methods
On July 10, 2014, scholarly journals from each of the following groups were identified – potential predatory journals (source: Beall’s List), presumed legitimate, fully open access journals (source: PubMed Central), and presumed legitimate subscription-based (including hybrid) journals (source: Abridged Index Medicus). MEDLINE journal inclusion criteria were used to screen and identify biomedical journals from within the potential predatory journals group. One hundred journals from each group were randomly selected. Journal characteristics (e.g., website integrity, look and feel, editors and staff, editorial/peer review process, instructions to authors, publication model, copyright and licensing, journal location, and contact) were collected by one assessor and verified by a second. Summary statistics were calculated.
Results
Ninety-three predatory journals, 99 open access, and 100 subscription-based journals were analyzed; exclusions were due to website unavailability. Many more predatory journals’ homepages contained spelling errors (61/93, 66%) and distorted or potentially unauthorized images (59/93, 63%) compared to open access journals (6/99, 6% and 5/99, 5%, respectively) and subscription-based journals (3/100, 3% and 1/100, 1%, respectively). Thirty-one (33%) predatory journals promoted a bogus impact metric – the Index Copernicus Value – versus three (3%) open access journals and no subscription-based journals. Nearly three quarters (
n
= 66, 73%) of predatory journals had editors or editorial board members whose affiliation with the journal was unverified versus two (2%) open access journals and one (1%) subscription-based journal in which this was the case. Predatory journals charge a considerably smaller publication fee (median $100 USD, IQR $63–$150) than open access journals ($1865 USD, IQR $800–$2205) and subscription-based hybrid journals ($3000 USD, IQR $2500–$3000).
Conclusions
We identified 13 evidence-based characteristics by which predatory journals may potentially be distinguished from presumed legitimate journals. These may be useful for authors who are assessing journals for possible submission or for others, such as universities evaluating candidates’ publications as part of the hiring process.
Journal Article
International Publishing in the Netherlands, 1933-1945
International publishing in the Netherlands experienced a remarkable revival after 1933, when the German Nazi government forced many prominent writers and researchers into exile. In a series of bio-bibliographical portraits of major participating Dutch publishers, this book documents the impact of German exile and changes in scholarly publishing.
eBook
Athena unbound : why and how scholarly knowledge should be free for all
\"This expansive history of knowledge and its openness makes a strong and nuanced case for opening scholarly knowledge to the public\"-- Provided by publisher.
Book
Planned Obsolescence
Choice's Outstanding Academic Title list for
2013 A bold approach to re-envisioning the future
of academic publishing Academic institutions are facing a
crisis in scholarly publishing at multiple levels: presses are
stressed as never before, library budgets are squeezed, faculty are
having difficulty publishing their work, and promotion and tenure
committees are facing a range of new ways of working without a
clear sense of how to understand and evaluate them. Planned
Obsolescence is both a provocation to think more broadly
about the academy's future and an argument for re-conceiving that
future in more communally-oriented ways. Facing these issues
head-on, Kathleen Fitzpatrick focuses on the technological
changes-especially greater utilization of internet publication
technologies, including digital archives, social networking tools,
and multimedia-necessary to allow academic publishing to thrive
into the future. But she goes further, insisting that the key
issues that must be addressed are social and institutional in
origin. Springing from original research as well as Fitzpatrick's
own hands-on experiments in new modes of scholarly communication
through MediaCommons, the digital scholarly network she co-founded,
Planned Obsolescence explores these aspects of scholarly work, as
well as issues surrounding the preservation of digital scholarship
and the place of publishing within the structure of the
contemporary university. Written in an approachable style designed
to bring administrators and scholars into a conversation, Planned
Obsolescence explores both symptom and cure to ensure that
scholarly communication will remain relevant in the digital future.
Related Articles: \"Do 'the Risky Thing' in Digital
Humanities\"-Chronicle of Higher Education \"Academic Publishing and
Zombies\"-Inside Higher Ed
eBook
The Rise and Fall of Early American Magazine Culture
Between the newly canonized novels of the 1790s and the long-familiar novels of the 1820s, early American literary magazines figured themselves as museums, bringing together a multitude of notable content and enabling readers to choose what to consume. A transatlantic literary form that refused to break with British cultural models and genealogy, the early American magazine had at its center the anonymous authority of the editor and a porous distinction between reader and author. Esteemed subscribers were treated as magnets to attract other subscribers, and subscribers were prompted to become contributors, giving these early American publications the appearance of public forums. The Rise and Fall of Early American Magazine Culture reexamines these publications and their reach to show how magazine culture was multivocal, as opposed to novel culture, which imposed a one-sided authorial voice and restricted the agency of the reader._x000B__x000B_In this first book-length study of the history of American magazine culture in the colonial and early national period, Jared Gardner describes how those who invested considerable energies in this form--including some of the period's most important political and literary figures such as Charles Brockden Brown and Washington Irving--sought to establish a very different model of literary culture than what came to define American literary history and its scholarship. He cautions against privileging novels or authors as the essential touchstones of American literary history and instead encourages an understanding of how the \"editorial function\" favored by magazine culture shaped reading and writing practices._x000B__x000B_Countering assumptions about early American print culture and challenging our scholarly fixation on the novel, Gardner reimagines the early American magazine as a rich literary culture that operated as a model for nation-building by celebrating editorship over authorship and serving as a virtual salon in which citizens were invited to share their different perspectives. This important work revisits largely lost interventions in the forms and politics of literature and sounds a vibrant call to radically revise early American literary history.
eBook