Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Item TypeItem Type
-
SubjectSubject
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersSourceLanguage
Done
Filters
Reset
224
result(s) for
"Pyoderma Gangrenosum - drug therapy"
Sort by:
Comparison of the two most commonly used treatments for pyoderma gangrenosum: results of the STOP GAP randomised controlled trial
by
Mitchell, Eleanor
,
Walton, Shernaz
,
Johnston, Graham A
in
Biopsy
,
Clinical trials
,
Cyclosporine - administration & dosage
2015
Objective To determine whether ciclosporin is superior to prednisolone for the treatment of pyoderma gangrenosum, a painful, ulcerating skin disease with a poor evidence base for management.Design Multicentre, parallel group, observer blind, randomised controlled trial. Setting 39 UK hospitals, recruiting from June 2009 to November 2012.Participants 121 patients (73 women, mean age 54 years) with clinician diagnosed pyoderma gangrenosum. Clinical diagnosis was revised in nine participants after randomisation, leaving 112 participants in the analysis set (59 ciclosporin; 53 prednisolone).Intervention Oral prednisolone 0.75 mg/kg/day compared with ciclosporin 4 mg/kg/day, to a maximum dose of 75 and 400 mg/day, respectively.Main outcome measures The primary outcome was speed of healing over six weeks, captured using digital images and assessed by blinded investigators. Secondary outcomes were time to healing, global treatment response, resolution of inflammation, self reported pain, quality of life, number of treatment failures, adverse reactions, and time to recurrence. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and six weeks and when the ulcer had healed (to a maximum of six months).Results Of the 112 participants, 108 had complete primary outcome data at baseline and six weeks (57 ciclosporin; 51 prednisolone). Groups were balanced at baseline. The mean (SD) speed of healing at six weeks was −0.21 (1.00) cm2/day in the ciclosporin group compared with −0.14 (0.42) cm2/day in the prednisolone group. The adjusted mean difference showed no between group difference (0.003 cm2/day, 95% confidence interval −0.20 to 0.21; P=0.97). By six months, ulcers had healed in 28/59 (47%) participants in the ciclosporin group compared with 25/53 (47%) in the prednisolone group. In those with healed ulcers, eight (30%) receiving ciclosporin and seven (28%) receiving prednisolone had a recurrence. Adverse reactions were similar for the two groups (68% ciclosporin and 66% prednisolone), but serious adverse reactions, especially infections, were more common in the prednisolone group.Conclusion Prednisolone and ciclosporin did not differ across a range of objective and patient reported outcomes. Treatment decisions for individual patients may be guided by the different side effect profiles of the two drugs and patient preference. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN35898459.
Journal Article
Infliximab for the treatment of pyoderma gangrenosum: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial
2006
Background: Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a chronic ulcerating skin condition that often occurs in association with inflammatory bowel disease. There have been a number of reports of PG responding to infliximab, a monoclonal antibody against tumour necrosis factor α. Aim: In the first randomised placebo controlled trial of any drug for the treatment of PG, we have studied the role of infliximab in this disorder. Subjects: Patients 18 years of age or older with a clinical diagnosis of PG were invited to take part. Methods: Patients were randomised to receive an infusion of infliximab at 5 mg/kg or placebo at week 0. Patients were then assessed at week 2 and non-responders were offered open labelled infliximab. The primary end point was clinical improvement at week 2, with secondary end points being remission and improvement at week 6. Results: Thirty patients were entered into the study. After randomisation, 13 patients received infliximab and 17 patients received placebo. At week 2, significantly more patients in the infliximab group had improved (46% (6/13)) compared with the placebo group (6% (1/17); p = 0.025). Overall, 29 patients received infliximab with 69% (20/29) demonstrating a beneficial clinical response. Remission rate at week 6 was 21% (6/29). There was no response in 31% (9/29) of patients. Conclusions: This study has demonstrated that infliximab at a dose of 5 mg/kg is superior to placebo in the treatment of PG. Open label treatment with infliximab also produced promising results. Infliximab treatment should be considered in patients with PG.
Journal Article
The impact of ustekinumab on extraintestinal manifestations of Crohn's disease: A post hoc analysis of the UNITI studies
by
Alshahrani, Abdul‐Aziz
,
Aruljothy, Achuthan
,
Homenauth, Ravi
in
Adult
,
Anemia
,
Arthralgia - drug therapy
2021
Summary This post hoc analysis of the UNITI studies found ustekinumab (UST) did not significantly improve overall extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs) of Crohn's disease compared to placebo‐treated patients at weeks 6 and 52. Background and Aims The UNITI trials demonstrated that UST was effective in inducing and maintaining clinical remission in Crohn's disease (CD). However, limited data exists regarding its effectiveness for treatment of EIMs. This post hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy of UST in treatment of EIMs. Methods Data from UNITI‐1/2 and IM‐UNITI (NCT01369329, NCT01369342, NCT01369355) were obtained from the Yale Open Data Access Project (2019‐4104). Nine hundred and fourty‐one patients eligible for UST induction and 263 patients eligible for maintenance UST were included. The primary outcome of interest was EIM resolution at Week 6 in UST and placebo‐treated patients using the chi‐square test. EIM resolution at Week 52 was also assessed. McNemar's test was used to compare the proportion of patients who reported active EIMs at weeks 6 and 52 versus baseline. Results From 941 UST‐treated patients in UNITI‐1/2, 504 had 527 EIMs at baseline. Overall, there was no significant difference in EIM resolution observed in UST‐treated patients (186/504, 36.9%) compared to placebo (90/230, 39.1%; p = 0.564) at Week 6. Patients treated with continuous UST (91/119, 76.4%) had no significant difference in overall EIMs resolved at Week 52 compared to placebo (72/90, 80.0%; p = 0.542). Although many EIMs demonstrated reduction in prevalence compared to baseline at initiation of UST, only erythema nodosum was more likely to improve at Week 52 on treatment versus placebo. Conclusion Overall, UST did not lead to significant resolution of EIMs for CD compared to placebo at weeks 6 and 52. Key Summary Summarise the established knowledge on this subject Summarise the established knowledge on this subject In a systematic review, ustekinumab was found to be effective in treating dermatologic manifestations such as psoriasis, pyoderma gangrenosum and erythema nodosum, and rheumatologic manifestations such as arthralgias and psoriatic arthritis in IBD However, existing evidence is limited due to retrospective evaluations, small sample sizes and lack of comparator groups Overall, there is a paucity of data regarding the effectiveness of ustekinumab for treatment of extraintestinal manifestations in Crohn's disease What are the significant and/or new findings of this study? Patients with Crohn's disease treated with ustekinumab had overall no significant resolution of EIMs as compared to those treated with placebo at week 6 and week 52 Among individual EIMs, only erythema nodosum was significantly reduced in patients treated with ustekinumab at week 52 compared to placebo‐treated patients
Journal Article
UK Dermatology Clinical Trials Network’s STOP GAP trial (a multicentre trial of prednisolone versus ciclosporin for pyoderma gangrenosum): protocol for a randomised controlled trial
by
Mitchell, Eleanor J
,
Mason, James M
,
Craig, Fiona F
in
Administration, Oral
,
Arthritis
,
Biomedicine
2012
Background
Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a rare inflammatory skin disorder characterised by painful and rapidly progressing skin ulceration. PG can be extremely difficult to treat and patients often require systemic immunosuppression. Recurrent lesions of PG are common, but the relative rarity of this condition means that there is a lack of published evidence regarding its treatment. A systematic review published in 2005 found no randomised controlled trials (RCTs) relating to the treatment of PG. Since this time, one small RCT has been published comparing infliximab to placebo, but none of the commonly used systemic treatments for PG have been formally assessed. The UK Dermatology Clinical Trials Network’s STOP GAP Trial has been designed to address this lack of trial evidence.
Methods
The objective is to assess whether oral ciclosporin is more effective than oral prednisolone for the treatment of PG. The trial design is a two-arm, observer-blind, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial comparing ciclosporin (4 mg/kg/day) to prednisolone (0.75 mg/kg/day). A total of 140 participants are to be recruited over a period of 4 years, from up to 50 hospitals in the UK and Eire. Primary outcome of velocity of healing at 6 weeks is assessed blinded to treatment allocation (using digital images of the ulcers). Secondary outcomes include: (i) time to healing; (ii) global assessment of improvement; (iii) PG inflammation assessment scale score; (iv) self-reported pain; (v) health-related quality of life; (vi) time to recurrence; (vii) treatment failures; (viii) adverse reactions to study medications; and (ix) cost effectiveness/utility. Patients with a clinical diagnosis of PG (excluding granulomatous PG); measurable ulceration (that is, not pustular PG); and patients aged over 18 years old who are able to give informed consent are included in the trial. Randomisation is by computer generated code using permuted blocks of randomly varying size, stratified by lesion size, and presence or absence of underlying systemic disease (for example, rheumatoid arthritis).
Patients who require topical therapy are asked to enter a parallel observational study (case series). If topical therapy fails and systemic therapy is required, participants are then considered for inclusion in the randomised trial.
Trial registration
Current controlled trials: ISRCTN35898459. Eudract No.2008-008291-14.
Journal Article
Pyoderma Gangrenosum: Treatment Options
by
Ortega-Loayza, Alex G.
,
Hampton, Philip J.
,
Marzano, Angelo V.
in
Biological effects
,
Biological Products - therapeutic use
,
Biopsy
2023
Pyoderma gangrenosum is a rare neutrophilic dermatosis that leads to exceedingly painful ulcerations of the skin. Although the exact pathogenesis is not yet fully understood, various auto-inflammatory phenomena with increased neutrophil granulocyte activity have been demonstrated. Despite the limited understanding of the pathogenesis, it is no longer a diagnosis of exclusion, as it can now be made on the basis of validated scoring systems. However, therapy remains a major multidisciplinary challenge. Various immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory therapies are available for the treatment of affected patients. In addition, concomitant topical pharmacologic therapy, wound management and pain control should always be addressed. Corticosteroids and/or cyclosporine remain the systemic therapeutics of choice for most patients. However, in recent years, there has been an increasing number of studies on the positive effects of biologic therapies such as inhibitors of tumour necrosis factor-α; interleukin-1, interleukin-17, interleukin-23 or complement factor C5a. Biologics have now become the drug of choice in certain scenarios, particularly in patients with underlying inflammatory comorbidities, and are increasingly used at an early stage in the disease rather than in therapy refractory patients.
Journal Article
Investigating the effect of independent, blinded digital image assessment on the STOP GAP trial
2017
Background
Blinding is the process of keeping treatment assignment hidden and is used to minimise the possibility of bias. Trials at high risk of bias have been shown to report larger treatment effects than low-risk studies. In dermatology, one popular method of blinding is to have independent outcome assessors who are unaware of treatment allocation assessing the endpoint using digital photographs. However, this can be complex, expensive and time-consuming. The objective of this study was to compare the effect of blinded and unblinded outcome assessment on the results of the STOP GAP trial.
Methods
The STOP GAP trial compared prednisolone to ciclosporin in treating pyoderma gangrenosum. Participants’ lesions were measured at baseline and at 6 weeks to calculate the primary outcome, speed of healing. Independent blinded assessors obtained measurements from digital photographs using specialist software. In addition, unblinded treating clinicians estimated lesion area by measuring length and width. The primary outcome was determined using blinded measurements where available, otherwise unblinded measurements were used (method referred to as trial measurements).
In this study, agreement between the trial and unblinded measurements was determined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The STOP GAP trial’s primary analysis was repeated using unblinded measurements only. We introduced differential and nondifferential error in unblinded measurements and investigated the effect on the STOP GAP trial’s primary analysis.
Results
Eighty-six (80%) of the 108 patients were assessed using digital images. Agreement between trial and unblinded measurements was excellent (ICC = 0.92 at baseline; 0.83 at 6 weeks). There was no evidence that the results of the trial primary analysis differed according to how the primary outcome was assessed (
p
value for homogeneity = 1.00).
Conclusions
Blinded digital image assessment in the STOP GAP trial did not meaningfully alter trial conclusions compared with unblinded assessment. However, as the process brought added accuracy and credibility to the trial it was considered worthwhile.
These findings question the usefulness of digital image assessment in a trial with an objective outcome and where bias is not expected to be excessive. Further research should investigate if there are alternative, less complex ways of incorporating blinding in clinical trials.
Trial registration
Current Controlled Trials,
www.isrctn.com
ISRCTN35898459. Registered on 26 May 2009.
Journal Article
PAPA, PASH and PAPASH Syndromes: Pathophysiology, Presentation and Treatment
by
Cugno, Massimo
,
Marzano, Angelo V.
,
Borghi, Alessandro
in
Acne
,
Acne Vulgaris - diagnosis
,
Acne Vulgaris - drug therapy
2017
Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a neutrophilic dermatosis usually manifesting as skin ulcers with undermined erythematous-violaceous borders. It may be isolated, associated with systemic conditions or occurring in the context of autoinflammatory syndromes such as PAPA (pyogenic arthritis, PG and acne), PASH (PG, acne and suppurative hidradenitis) or PAPASH (pyogenic arthritis, acne, PG and suppurative hidradenitis). From a physiopathological point of view, all these conditions share common mechanisms consisting of over-activation of the innate immune system leading to increased production of the interleukin (IL)-1 family and ‘sterile’ neutrophil-rich cutaneous inflammation. From a genetic point of view, a number of mutations affecting the proteins of the inflammasome complex (the molecular platform responsible for triggering autoinflammation) or the proteins that regulate inflammasome function have been described in these disorders. As these debilitating entities are all associated with the over-expression of IL-1 and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, biological drugs specifically targeting these cytokines are currently the most effective treatments but, given the emerging role of IL-17 in the pathogenesis of these syndromes, IL-17 antagonists may represent the future management of these conditions.
Journal Article
Postoperative Pyoderma Gangrenosum: A Clinical Review of Published Cases
2016
Postoperative pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a neutrophilic dermatosis characterized by PG at surgical incisions. It is often misdiagnosed as wound infection, and pathergy may complicate wound debridement. From September 1, 2013, through November 30, 2013, a literature search was conducted of articles published from January 1, 1978, through December 31, 2012. We referenced PubMed, MEDLINE, and Mayo Clinic Libraries using the keywords pyoderma gangrenosum, postoperative pyoderma gangrenosum, postsurgical pyoderma gangrenosum, superficial granulomatous pyoderma, pathergic pyoderma, and pyoderma gangrenosum associated with surgery, incision, breast, and wound dehiscence. In addition, all titles from PubMed with the words pyoderma gangrenosum were reviewed manually for postoperative cases. Of 136 patients, 90 (66%) did not have associated systemic diseases. If a comorbidity was present, hematologic disorders were most common. In addition, 29% (28) of women had predisposing disease vs 53% (19) of men. Women had more frequent breast involvement (P<.001); chest involvement was more common in men (P=.005). Girls and women aged 13 to 64 years had more frequent breast involvement (P=.01). Sites were distributed equally for men regardless of age (P=.40). Antibiotic drug therapy was begun and debridement occurred in 90% (110 of 122 treated patients) and 73% (90 of 123 available patients), respectively. Postoperative PG has less association with systemic disease than its nonpostoperative counterpart. Antibiotic drug therapy is routinely initiated. Affected sites are often debrided, causing additional wound breakdown. Early diagnosis may prevent complications.
Journal Article
Case Report: Spesolimab for pyoderma gangrenosum in an undifferentiated oligoarthritis patient receiving anti-IL-17 therapy
2025
Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a classic neutrophilic dermatosis often associated with inflammatory conditions, frequently leading to misdiagnosis and delayed treatment. Drug-induced and postoperative are two potential triggers of PG. A 70-year-old woman, who had been treated with Ixekizumab for undifferentiated oligoarthritis, presented with cribriform violaceous ulcers on her right posterior ankle after 8 months of debridement. A skin biopsy revealed a predominant neutrophilic infiltrate with no signs of infection after extensive microbiology investigation. The patient was diagnosed with pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) and achieved remission after receiving three doses of 900 mg intravenous Spesolimab every 4 weeks, along with discontinuation of Ixekizumab. The case highlights the successful use of Spesolimab (anti-IL36R) in treating PG and explores the potential “paradoxical phenomenon” linked to anti-IL-17 therapy, providing novel insights into immune dysregulation and therapeutic strategies.
Journal Article
Serum Dysregulation of IL-36, IL-37, and IL-38 in Pyoderma Gangrenosum: Clinical Correlations and Implications for IL-36R-Targeted Therapy
2025
Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a rare neutrophilic dermatosis characterized by chronic, painful ulcerations. Despite increasing evidence suggesting immunological dysregulation, the role of IL-36 cytokines in PG remains poorly defined. To evaluate serum levels of IL-36α, IL-36β, IL-36γ, IL-36Ra, IL-37, and IL-38 in PG patients compared to healthy controls, and to assess their correlation with selected clinical parameters and cytokine ratios. 44 PG patients and 40 healthy controls were included in this case–control study. Serum cytokine levels were measured using ELISA. Correlations between cytokine levels and clinical features were analyzed using nonparametric tests. PG patients showed significantly lower serum levels of IL-36α and IL-36γ (p = 0.0003 and p = 0.02, respectively), with no difference in IL-36β. Conversely, levels of IL-36Ra, IL-37, and IL-38 were significantly higher in PG patients (p < 0.0001 for all). In the PG group, significant positive correlations were observed between IL-36α and IL-36β, and between IL-36β and IL-36γ, while IL-37 correlated negatively with IL-38. IL-36α was inversely associated with serum IgA levels and total ulcer surface area, and IL-36γ correlated negatively with white blood cell count. Our findings reveal a dysregulated IL-36 cytokine profile in pyoderma gangrenosum, marked by reduced serum levels of IL-36α and IL-36γ and elevated levels of IL-36Ra, IL-37, and IL-38. This may reflect a compensatory response to chronic inflammation. The inverse correlation between IL-36α and ulcer size suggests its potential involvement in wound healing. Despite lower serum levels of agonists, local biological activity of IL-36 cytokines may remain elevated due to tissue-level activation and consumption. These results highlight the therapeutic relevance of targeting the IL-36 pathway—particularly in treatment-resistant cases—and support further research into cytokine activity beyond serum concentration to guide novel therapeutic strategies.
Journal Article