Explore the vast range of titles available.

n 2014–2015, the JIKI trial was conducted in Guinea to test favipiravir tolerance and efficacy in patients with Ebola virus disease (EDV). The main results of the trial were previously published without drug concentrations which were not available at the time of publication. The purpose of this study was to report favipiravir concentrations achieved in participants in the JIKI trial and to compare them with the targeted concentrations. We analyzed drug concentrations obtained at Day-2 and Day-4 and compared them to the targeted concentrations. At Day-2, favipiravir concentrations were significantly below but still close to the targeted concentration. At Day-4, a significant and unanticipated drop of concentrations as compared to Day-2 was observed. The origin of the lower-than-targeted concentrations and the unexpected drop could be due to severe sepsis conditions and/or to intrinsic properties of favipiravir metabolism. No significant correlation was found between the drug exposure and the virological response, indicating that it is possible that the favipiravir concentrations in the JIKI trial were not sufficient to strongly inhibit the viral replication. These findings suggest the necessity of performing dose-ranging studies with high doses of favipiravir in healthy volunteers to inform any further development of favipiravir for treatment of EVD.

SKLB1028 is a novel multi‐target protein kinase inhibitor under investigation for the treatment of FLT3‐ITD mutated acute myeloid leukemia. Based on the preclinical characterization of SKLB1028 metabolism, three drug–drug interaction clinical studies were performed to investigate the effects of itraconazole, rifampin (CYP3A4 inhibitor and inducer, respectively), and gemfibrozil (CYP2C8 inhibitor) on the metabolism of SKLB1028. Fourteen healthy Chinese male subjects were enrolled in each study. In Study 1, subjects were administered a single dose of SKLB1028 (100 mg on days 1 and 11) and multiple doses of itraconazole (200 mg twice daily on day 8 and 200 mg once daily from days 9 to 18). Itraconazole was given with a loading dose on Day 8 and the total administration of itraconazole was 11 days. In Study 2, subjects were administered a single dose of SKLB1028 (100 mg on days 1 and 12) and multiple doses of gemfibrozil (600 mg twice daily from days 8 to 19). In Study 3, subjects were administered a single dose of SKLB1028 (150 mg on days 1 and 15) and multiple doses of rifampin (600 mg once daily from day 8 to 22). Itraconazole increased the AUC and Cmax of SKLB1028 by approximately 28% and 41%, respectively. Compared to the single drug, co‐administration with gemfibrozil increased the AUC of SKLB1028 by ~26% and the Cmax by ~21%. Co‐administration with rifampin reduced the AUC of SKLB1028 by ~30%, while the Cmax did not change significantly. All treatments were well tolerated in all three studies.

Selective inhibition of tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) may offer therapeutic promise in inflammatory conditions, with its role in downstream pro‐inflammatory cytokine signaling. In this first‐in‐human study, we evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of a novel TYK2 inhibitor, PF‐06826647, in healthy participants. This phase I, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group study included two treatment periods (single ascending dose (SAD) and multiple ascending dose (MAD)) in healthy participants and a cohort of healthy Japanese participants receiving 400 mg q.d. or placebo in the MAD period (NCT03210961). Participants were randomly assigned to PF‐06826647 or placebo (3:1). Participants received a single oral study drug dose of 3, 10, 30, 100, 200, 400, or 1,600 mg (SAD period), then 30, 100, 400, or 1,200 mg q.d. or 200 mg b.i.d. for 10 days (MAD period). Safety (adverse events (AEs), vital signs, and clinical laboratory parameters), tolerability, and PK were assessed. Overall, 69 participants were randomized to treatment, including six Japanese participants. No deaths, serious AEs, severe AEs, or AEs leading to dose reduction or temporary/permanent discontinuation were observed. All AEs were mild in severity. No clinically relevant laboratory abnormalities or changes in vital signs were detected. PF‐06826647 was rapidly absorbed with a median time to maximum plasma concentration of 2 hours in a fasted state, with modest accumulation (< 1.5‐fold) after multiple dosing and low urinary recovery. PF‐06826647 was well‐tolerated, with an acceptable safety profile for doses up to 1,200 mg q.d. for 10 days, supporting further testing in patients.

Summary LY2603618 is an inhibitor of checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1), an important regulator of the DNA damage checkpoints. Preclinical experiments analyzed NCI-H2122 and NCI-H441 NSCLC cell lines and in vitro/in vivo models treated with pemetrexed and LY2603618 to provide rationale for evaluating this combination in a clinical setting. Combination treatment of LY2603618 with pemetrexed arrested DNA synthesis following initiation of S-phase in cells. Experiments with tumor-bearing mice administered the combination of LY2603618 and pemetrexed demonstrated a significant increase of growth inhibition of NCI-H2122 (H2122) and NCI-H441 (H441) xenograft tumors. These data informed the clinical assessment of LY2603618 in a seamless phase I/II study, which administered pemetrexed (500 mg/m 2 ) and cisplatin (75 mg/m 2 ) and escalating doses of LY2603618: 130–275 mg. Patients were assessed for safety, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics. In phase I, 14 patients were enrolled, and the most frequently reported adverse events included fatigue, nausea, pyrexia, neutropenia, and vomiting. No DLTs were reported at the tested doses. The systemic exposure of LY2603618 increased in a dose-dependent manner. Pharmacokinetic parameters that correlate with the maximal pharmacodynamic effect in nonclinical xenograft models were achieved at doses ≥240 mg. The pharmacokinetics of LY2603618, pemetrexed, and cisplatin were not altered when used in combination. Two patients achieved a confirmed partial response (both non-small cell lung cancer), and 8 patients had stable disease. LY2603618 administered in combination with pemetrexed and cisplatin demonstrated an acceptable safety profile. The recommended phase II dose of LY2603618 was 275 mg.

Purpose In vitro data showed that selexipag and its active metabolite (ACT-333679) have an inductive effect on CYP3A4, CYP2B6, and CYP2C9 at concentrations approximately 100-fold higher than the maximum plasma concentration ( C max ) measured under steady-state conditions. In order to confirm in vivo the lack of induction at the enterocyte level, we assessed the effect of selexipag on midazolam, a substrate of hepatic and intestinal CYP3A4. Methods This study was conducted according to an open-label, randomized, two-way crossover design. A total of 20 subjects received a single oral dose of 7.5 mg midazolam alone (treatment A) or on top of steady-state selexipag (treatment B). Selexipag was administered twice daily using an up-titration scheme consisting of three steps: 400, 600, 1000, and 1600 μg with increments every fourth day. A 24-h pharmacokinetic profile was performed following midazolam administration, and bioequivalence criteria were investigated on an exploratory basis. Results The C max of midazolam and 1-hydroxymidazolam was decreased by approximately 20 and 14%, respectively, following treatment B compared to A. The time to reach C max for midazolam and 1-hydroxymidazolam was similar between treatments. The terminal half-life was reduced in treatment B compared to A for both midazolam (16%) and 1-hydroxymidazolam (20%). Exposure (area under the curve) to midazolam and 1-hydroxymidazolam was similar between treatments, and the 90% confidence intervals of geometric mean ratios were within the bioequivalence interval. Treatment with midazolam, selexipag, and the combination was safe and well tolerated. Conclusion Exposure to midazolam and 1-hydroxymidazolam was not affected by treatment with selexipag.

Background Spinal Cord injury (SCI) is a kind of severe traumatic disease. The inflammatory response is a significant feature after SCI. Tetramethylpyrazine (TMP), a perennial herb of umbelliferae, is an alkaloid extracted from ligustici. TMP can inhibit the production of nitric oxide and reduce the inflammatory response in peripheral tissues. It can be seen that the therapeutic effect of TMP on SCI is worthy of affirmation. TMP has defects such as short half-life and poor water-solubility. In addition, the commonly used dosage forms of TMP include tablets, dropping pills, injections, etc., and its tissue and organ targeting is still a difficult problem to solve. To improve the solubility and targeting of TMP, here, we developed a nanotechnology-based drug delivery system, TMP-loaded nanoparticles modified with HIV trans-activator of transcription (TAT-TMP-NPs). Results The nanoparticles prepared in this study has integrated structure. The hemolysis rate of each group is less than 5%, indicating that the target drug delivery system has good safety. The results of in vivo pharmacokinetic studies show that TAT-TMP-NPs improves the bioavailability of TMP. The quantitative results of drug distribution in vivo show that TAT-TMP-NPs is more distributed in spinal cord tissue and had higher tissue targeting ability compared with other treatment groups. Conclusions The target drug delivery system can overcome the defect of low solubility of TMP, achieve the targeting ability, and show the further clinical application prospect.

Background and Objectives The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib is approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) and, in the US, for the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma following at least one prior therapy; the recommended dose and schedule is 1.3 mg/m 2 on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 of 21-day cycles, and the approved routes of administration in the US prescribing information are by intravenous and, following a recent update, subcutaneous injection. Findings from a phase III study demonstrated that subcutaneous administration of bortezomib, using the same dose and schedule, resulted in similar efficacy with an improved systemic safety profile (including significantly lower rates of peripheral neuropathy) versus intravenous bortezomib in patients with relapsed MM. The objectives of this report were to present a comprehensive analysis of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of subcutaneous versus intravenous bortezomib, and to evaluate the impact of the subcutaneous administration site, subcutaneous injection concentration and demographic characteristics on bortezomib pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Patients and Methods Data were analysed from the pharmacokinetic substudy of the randomized phase III MMY-3021 study and the phase I CAN-1004 study of subcutaneous versus intravenous bortezomib in patients aged ≥18 (MMY-3021) or ≤75 (CAN-1004) years with symptomatic relapsed or refractory MM after 1–3 (MMY-3021) or ≥1 (CAN-1004) prior therapies. Patients received up to eight 21-day cycles of subcutaneous or intravenous bortezomib 1.3 mg/m 2 on days 1, 4, 8 and 11. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (20S proteasome inhibition) parameters of bortezomib following subcutaneous or intravenous administration were evaluated on day 11, cycle 1. Results Bortezomib systemic exposure was equivalent with subcutaneous versus intravenous administration in MMY-3021 [mean area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable timepoint (AUC last ): 155 vs. 151 ng·h/mL; geometric mean ratio 0.992 (90 % CI 80.18, 122.80)] and comparable in CAN-1004 (mean AUC last : 195 vs. 241 ng·h/mL); maximum (peak) plasma drug concentration (C max ) was lower with subcutaneous administration in both MMY-3021 (mean 20.4 vs. 223 ng/mL) and CAN-1004 (mean 22.5 vs. 162 ng/mL), and time to C max (t max ) was longer with subcutaneous administration in both studies (median 30 vs. 2 min). Blood 20S proteasome inhibition pharmacodynamic parameters were also similar with subcutaneous versus intravenous bortezomib: mean maximum effect (E max ) was 63.7 versus 69.3 % in MMY-3021 and 57.0 versus 68.8 % in CAN-1004, and mean area under the effect–time curve from time zero to 72 h was 1,714 versus 1,383 %·h in MMY-3021 and 1,619 versus 1,283 %·h in CAN-1004. Time to E max was longer with subcutaneous administration in MMY-3021 (median 120 vs. 5 min) and CAN-1004 (median 120 vs. 3 min). Concentration of the subcutaneous injected solution had no appreciable effect on pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic parameters. There were no apparent differences in bortezomib pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters between subcutaneous administration in the thigh or abdomen. There were also no apparent differences in bortezomib exposure related to body mass index, body surface area or age. Conclusion Subcutaneous administration results in equivalent bortezomib plasma exposure to intravenous administration, together with comparable blood 20S proteasome inhibition pharmacodynamic effects. These findings, together with the non-inferior efficacy of subcutaneous versus intravenous bortezomib demonstrated in MMY-3021, support the use of bortezomib via the subcutaneous route across the settings of clinical use in which the safety and efficacy of intravenous bortezomib has been established.

Purpose The aim of this single-center, open-label study was to assess the absolute bioavailability of an oral (tablet) versus intravenous (i.v.) formulation of selexipag in healthy subjects. Methods A pilot phase in three healthy male subjects, which preceded the main study, consisted of a single 20-minute i.v. infusion of 50 μg selexipag. Its objectives were to ensure the safety of the i.v. formulation and to select the i.v. dose for the main study. The main study had a randomized, two-way crossover design in 16 healthy male subjects. Subjects received a single oral dose of 400 μg selexipag and a single 80-minute i.v. infusion of 200 μg selexipag. Results Three subjects in the pilot and 15 in the main phase completed the study as planned, whereas one subject of the main study withdrew the consent. A geometric mean total body clearance (95% confidence interval (CI)) of 17.9 L/h (15.0–21.5) and a volume of distribution of 11.7 L (10.6–13.0) were determined. The absolute oral bioavailability of selexipag (90% CI) was 49.4% (42.6–57.2). Selexipag was well-tolerated; no adverse event (AE) occurred during the pilot phase, and the main observed AEs were headache, nausea, and vomiting. Conclusion A single i.v. administration of selexipag in healthy subjects was safe and well-tolerated. The bioavailability of selexipag after oral administration is approximately 50%.

Selexipag is an oral selective prostacyclin receptor agonist approved for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in adults. To date, no treatment targeting the prostacyclin pathway is approved for pediatric patients. Our goal is to identify a pediatric dose regimen that results in comparable exposures to selexipag and its active metabolite JNJ‐68006861 as those shown to be efficacious in adult PAH patients. Extrapolation from the population pharmacokinetic (PK) model developed in adults (GRIPHON study; NCT01106014) resulted in the definition of three different pediatric body weight groups (≥9 to <25 kg, ≥25 to <50 kg, and ≥50 kg) with corresponding starting doses (100, 150, and 200 μg twice daily) and maximum allowed doses (800, 1200, and 1600 μg twice daily). The proposed pediatric dose regimen was subsequently tested in a clinical study (NCT03492177), including 63 pediatric PAH patients ≥2 to <18 years of age and a body weight range of 9.9–93.5 kg. The body weight‐adjusted dose regimen for selexipag resulted in comparable systemic exposures to selexipag and its active metabolite in pediatric patients as previously observed in adult PAH patients. Updating the adult selexipag population PK model provided overall consistent parameters and confirmed that the PK characteristics of selexipag and its active metabolite were comparable between pediatric and adult patients. The presented selexipag dose regimen for pediatric PAH patients is considered appropriate for continuing the clinical evaluation of the safety and efficacy of selexipag in pediatric patients ≥2 years of age.

Objectives The GETAFIX trial will test the hypothesis that favipiravir is a more effective treatment for COVID-19 infection in patients who have early stage disease, compared to current standard of care. This study will also provide an important opportunity to investigate the safety and tolerability of favipiravir, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of this drug and mechanisms of resistance in the context of COVID-19 infection, as well as the effect of favipiravir on hospitalisation duration and the post COVID-19 health and psycho-social wellbeing of patients recruited to the study. Trial design GETAFIX is an open label, parallel group, two arm phase II/III randomised trial with 1:1 treatment allocation ratio. Patients will be randomised to one of two arms and the primary endpoint will assess the superiority of favipiravir plus standard treatment compared to standard treatment alone. Participants This trial will recruit adult patients with confirmed positive valid COVID-19 test, who are not pregnant or breastfeeding and have no prior major co-morbidities. This is a multi-centre trial, patients will be recruited from in-patients and outpatients from three Glasgow hospitals: Royal Alexandra Hospital; Queen Elizabeth University Hospital; and the Glasgow Royal Infirmary. Patients must meet all of the following criteria: 1. Age 16 or over at time of consent 2. Exhibiting symptoms associated with COVID-19 3. Positive for SARS-CoV-2 on valid COVID-19 test 4. Point 1, 2, 3, or 4 on the WHO COVID-19 ordinal severity scale at time of randomisation. (Asymptomatic with positive valid COVID-19 test, Symptomatic Independent, Symptomatic assistance needed, Hospitalized, with no oxygen therapy) 5. Have >=10% risk of death should they be admitted to hospital as defined by the ISARIC4C risk index: https://isaric4c.net/risk 6. Able to provide written informed consent 7. Negative pregnancy test (women of childbearing potential*) 8. Able to swallow oral medication Patients will be excluded from the trial if they meet any of the following criteria: 1. Renal impairment requiring, or likely to require, dialysis or haemofiltration 2. Pregnant or breastfeeding 3. Of child bearing potential (women), or with female partners of child bearing potential (men) who do not agree to use adequate contraceptive measures for the duration of the study and for 3 months after the completion of study treatment 4. History of hereditary xanthinuria 5. Other patients judged unsuitable by the Principal Investigator or sub-Investigator 6. Known hypersensitivity to favipiravir, its metabolites or any excipients 7. Severe co-morbidities including: patients with severe hepatic impairment, defined as:  • greater than Child-Pugh grade A  • AST or ALT > 5 x ULN  • AST or ALT >3 x ULN and Total Bilirubin > 2xULN 8. More than 96 hours since first positive COVID-19 test sample was taken 9. Unable to discontinue contra-indicated concomitant medications This is a multi-centre trial, patients will be recruited from in-patients and outpatients from three Glasgow hospitals: Royal Alexandra Hospital; Queen Elizabeth University Hospital; and the Glasgow Royal Infirmary. Intervention and comparator Patients randomised to the experimental arm of GETAFIX will receive standard treatment for COVID-19 at the discretion of the treating clinician plus favipiravir. These patients will receive a loading dose of favipiravir on day 1 of 3600mg (1800mg 12 hours apart). On days 2-10, patients in the experimental arm will receive a maintenance dose of favipiravir of 800mg 12 hours apart (total of 18 doses). Patients randomised to the control arm of the GETAFIX trial will receive standard treatment for COVID-19 at the discretion of the treating clinician. Main outcomes The primary outcome being assessed in the GETAFIX trial is the efficacy of favipiravir in addition to standard treatment in patients with COVID-19 in reducing the severity of disease compared to standard treatment alone. Disease severity will be assessed using WHO COVID 10 point ordinal severity scale at day 15 +/- 48 hours. All randomised participants will be followed up until death or 60 days post-randomisation (whichever is sooner). Randomisation Patients will be randomised 1:1 to the experimental versus control arm using computer generated random sequence allocation. A minimisation algorithm incorporating a random component will be used to allocate patients. The factors used in the minimisation will be: site, age (16-50/51-70/71+), history of hypertension or currently obsess (BMI>30 or obesity clinically evident; yes/no), 7 days duration of symptoms (yes/no/unknown), sex (male/female), WHO COVID-19 ordinal severity score at baseline (1/2or 3/4). Blinding (masking) No blinding will be used in the GETAFIX trial. Both participants and those assessing outcomes will be aware of treatment allocation. Numbers to be randomised (sample size) In total, 302 patients will be randomised to the GETAFIX trial: 151 to the control arm and 151 to the experimental arm. There will be an optional consent form for patients who may want to contribute to more frequent PK and PD sampling. The maximum number of patients who will undergo this testing will be sixteen, eight males and eight females. This option will be offered to all patients who are being treated in hospital at the time of taking informed consent, however only patients in the experimental arm of the trial will be able to undergo this testing. Trial Status The current GETAFIX protocol is version 4.0 12 th September 2020. GETAFIX opened to recruitment on 26 th October 2020 and will recruit patients over a period of approximately six months. Trial registration GETAFIX was registered on the European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials (EudraCT) Database on 15 th April 2020; Reference number 2020-001904-41 ( https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2020-001904-41/GB ). GETAFIX was registered on ISRCTN on 7 th September 2020; Reference number ISRCTN31062548 ( https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN31062548 ). Full protocol The full protocol is attached as an additional file, accessible from the Trials website (Additional file 1 ). In the interest in expediting dissemination of this material, the familiar formatting has been eliminated; this Letter serves as a summary of the key elements of the full protocol. The study protocol has been reported in accordance with the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Clinical Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) guidelines (see Additional file 2 ).