Explore the vast range of titles available.

Abstract Background Iron-deficiency anemia is common in inflammatory bowel disease, requiring oral or intravenous iron replacement therapy. Treatment with standard oral irons is limited by poor absorption and gastrointestinal toxicity. Ferric maltol is an oral iron designed for improved absorption and tolerability. Methods In this open-label, phase 3b trial (EudraCT 2015-002496-26 and NCT02680756), adults with nonseverely active inflammatory bowel disease and iron-deficiency anemia (hemoglobin, 8.0-11.0/12.0 g/dL [women/men]; ferritin, <30 ng/mL/<100 ng/mL with transferrin saturation <20%) were randomized to oral ferric maltol 30 mg twice daily or intravenous ferric carboxymaltose given according to each center’s standard practice. The primary endpoint was a hemoglobin responder rate (≥2 g/dL increase or normalization) at week 12, with a 20% noninferiority limit in the intent-to-treat and per-protocol populations. Results For the intent-to-treat (ferric maltol, n = 125/ferric carboxymaltose, n = 125) and per-protocol (n = 78/88) analyses, week 12 responder rates were 67% and 68%, respectively, for ferric maltol vs 84% and 85%, respectively, for ferric carboxymaltose. As the confidence intervals crossed the noninferiority margin, the primary endpoint was not met. Mean hemoglobin increases at weeks 12, 24, and 52 were 2.5 vs 3.0 g/dL, 2.9 vs 2.8 g/dL, and 2.7 vs 2.8 g/dL with ferric maltol vs ferric carboxymaltose. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 59% and 36% of patients, respectively, and resulted in treatment discontinuation in 10% and 3% of patients, respectively. Conclusions Ferric maltol achieved clinically relevant increases in hemoglobin but did not show noninferiority vs ferric carboxymaltose at week 12. Both treatments had comparable long-term effectiveness for hemoglobin and ferritin over 52 weeks and were well tolerated. Graphical Abstract Graphical Abstract

Background While the gold standard treatment for melasma is triple combination cream (TCC), arbutin and kojic acid demonstrate their benefits and may be used as an alternative. Aims To investigate the efficacy of cream containing alpha‐arbutin 5% and kojic acid 2% (AAK) compared with TCC for melasma treatment. Patients/Methods A split‐faced, randomized study was conducted among 30 participants with melasma, and all were randomized to receive AAK or TCC on each side of their face for 12‐week along with 4‐week follow‐up period. The melanin index (MI), modified Melasma Area Severity Index (mMASI), and physician global assessment (PGA) scores were used to measure the effectiveness of interventions. Recurrence of melasma after treatment discontinuation was evaluated by MI and mMASI. Patient satisfactions and adverse effects were also evaluated. In the analysis, the mean difference (MD) was used for MI and mMASI, while Wilcoxon signed‐rank test was for the PGA scores, adverse effects, and patient satisfaction. Results The MD of MI and mMASI scores were not different between groups (mMASI [p = 0.344] and MI [p = 0.268]). The PGA scores only showed improvement on the TCC‐treated side (p = 0.032). Compared to the AKK group, the subjects with TCC showed higher severity of recurrence (MI [p = 0.004] and mMASI [p = 0.045]). No difference in patient satisfaction score between the groups, but erythema and stinging were higher in the TCC group. Conclusions The AAK cream appeared to be effective for melasma treatment, highlighting a lower recurrent rate and fewer adverse events than standard therapy. Trial Registration: thaiclinicaltrials.org: TCTR20230124004

Treatment options for HIV-1 infected individuals who have received extensive previous antiretroviral therapy are limited. We compared efficacy and safety of the novel non-peptidic protease inhibitor tipranavir co-administered with ritonavir plus an optimised background regimen with that of an investigator-selected ritonavir-boosted comparator protease inhibitor (CPI-ritonavir) in such patients. We did a combined analysis of 48-week data from two ongoing, randomised, open-label, multinational, phase III, RESIST studies. HIV-1-infected adults with 3 months or longer previous triple antiretroviral class experience, two or more previous protease inhibitor regimens, HIV-1 RNA 1000 copies per mL or greater, and genotypically demonstrated primary resistance to protease inhibitor, were eligible. Primary endpoints were proportion of treatment responders (with reduction in viral load of 1 log 10 copies per mL or greater below baseline without treatment change) at 48 weeks and time to treatment failure through 48 weeks (intention-to-treat analysis). The RESIST studies are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT00054717 (RESIST-1) and NCT00144170 (RESIST-2). 3324 patients were screened; 746 received tipranavir-ritonavir and 737 CPI-ritonavir. 486 (65·1%) patients on tipranavir-ritonavir and 192 (26·1%) on CPI-ritonavir remained on assigned treatment until week 48. At week 48, more patients achieved and maintained treatment response in the tipranavir-ritonavir group than in the CPI-ritonavir group (251 [33·6%] vs 113 [15·3%]; p<0·0001). Median time to treatment failure was significantly longer in the tipranavir-ritonavir group than in the CPI-ritonavir group (113 days vs 0 days; p<0·0001). Gastrointestinal system disorders and raised transaminase, cholesterol, and triglycerides were more frequent in the tipranavir-ritonavir group than in the CPI-ritonavir group. Compared with CPI-ritonavir, tipranavir-ritonavir with an optimised background regimen provides better virological and immunological responses over 48 weeks in patients who have received extensive previous antiretroviral treatment.

Purpose Dolutegravir (DTG) is an unboosted, integrase inhibitor for the treatment of HIV infection. Two studies evaluated the effects of efavirenz (EFV) and tipranavir/ritonavir (TPV/r) on DTG pharmacokinetics (PK) in healthy subjects. Methods The first study was an open-label crossover where 12 subjects received DTG 50 mg every 24 hours (q24h) for 5 days, followed by DTG 50 mg and EFV 600 mg q24h for 14 days. The second study was an open-label crossover where 18 subjects received DTG 50 mg q24h for 5 days followed by TPV/r 500/200 mg every 12 hours (q12h) for 7 days and then DTG 50 mg q24h and TPV/r 500/200 mg q12h for a further 5 days. Safety assessments and serial PK samples were collected. Non-compartmental PK analysis and geometric mean ratios and 90 % confidence intervals were generated. Results The combination of DTG with EFV or TPV/r was generally well tolerated. Four subjects discontinued the TPV/r study due to increases in alanine aminotransferase that were considered related to TPV/r. Co-administration with EFV resulted in decreases of 57, 39 and 75 % in DTG AUC (0– τ ) , C max and C τ , respectively. Co-administration with TPV/r resulted in decreases of 59, 46 and 76 % in DTG AUC (0– τ ) , C max and C τ , respectively. Conclusions Given the reductions in exposure and PK/pharmacodynamic relationships in phase II/III trials, DTG should be given at an increased dose of 50 mg twice daily when co-administered with EFV or TPV/r, and alternative regimens without inducers should be considered in integrase inhibitor-resistant patients.

Ritonavir-boosted tipranavir (TPV/r) was evaluated as initial therapy in treatment-naïve HIV-1-infected patients because of its potency, unique resistance profile, and high genetic barrier. Trial 1182.33, an open-label, randomized trial, compared two TPV/r dose combinations versus ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r). Eligible adults, who had no prior antiretroviral therapy were randomized to twice daily (BID) 500/100 mg TPV/r, 500/200 mg TPV/r, or 400/100 mg LPV/r. Each treatment group also received Tenofovir 300 mg + Lamivudine 300 mg QD. The primary endpoint was a confirmed viral load (VL) <50 copies/mL at week 48 without prior antiretroviral regimen changes. Primary analyses examined CD4-adjusted response rates for non-inferiority, using a 15% non-inferiority margin. At week 48, VL<50 copies/mL was 68.4%, 69.9%, and 72.4% in TPV/r100, TPV/r200, and LPV/r groups, respectively, and TPV/r groups showed non-inferiority to LPV/r. Discontinuation due to adverse events was higher in TPV/r100 (10.3%) and TPV/r200 (15.3%) recipients versus LPV/r (3.2%) recipients. The frequency of grade ≥3 transaminase elevations was higher in the TPV/r200 group than the other groups, leading to closure of this group. However, upon continued treatment or following re-introduction after treatment interruption, transaminase elevations returned to grade ≤2 in >65% of patients receiving either TPV/r200 or TPV/r100. The trial was subsequently discontinued; primary objectives were achieved and continuing TPV/r100 was less tolerable than standard of care for initial highly active antiretroviral therapy. All treatment groups had similar 48-week treatment responses. TPV/r100 and TPV/r200 regimens resulted in sustained treatment responses, which were non-inferior to LPV/r at 48 weeks. When compared with the LPV/r regimen and examined in the light of more current regimens, these TPV/r regimens do not appear to be the best options for treatment-naïve patients based on their safety profiles.

AFN-1252 is a novel inhibitor of FabI, an essential enzyme in spp. This study was undertaken to assess the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic properties of AFN-1252, following oral administration in an ascending dose trial. This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, two-part study. In Part I, single doses (QD) of 100, 200, 300, or 400 mg AFN-1252 were administered. In Part II, subjects received 200, 400, 600, or 800 mg (total daily dose) where 100, 200 and 400-mg doses were given twice in one day. AFN-1252 was well-absorbed with Cmax at 3-4 h when given once per day and 2.5-9 h when dosed twice in a single dosing day. T½ ranged from 8 to 11 h. Total and peak exposures of AFN-1252 increased nonlinearly. Adverse events were primarily mild and resolved promptly. Oral doses of AFN-1252 were safe and well tolerated. AFN-1252 has the potential for once or twice-a-day dosing for treatment of staphylococcal infections.

BackgroundIron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a common complication of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Oral ferric maltol improves and normalizes hemoglobin (Hb) in patients with IBD.AimThis open-label, randomized Phase 1 study evaluated the pharmacokinetics of ferric maltol and its effect on iron indices in IBD patients with iron deficiency (with or without anemia).MethodsIron deficient adult IBD patients received ferric maltol 30, 60, or 90 mg twice daily during an 8-day period. Pharmacokinetics and iron uptake were assessed on days 1 and 8.ResultsTwenty-four patients were included: 13 with Crohn’s disease and 11 with ulcerative colitis (mean age 39 years; 67 % female, mean Hb 13.0 g/dL; mean reticulocyte Hb content (CHr) 31.9 pg; mean ferritin 13.9 µg/L). Plasma maltol and maltol glucuronide increased rapidly at all doses, reaching maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) 1.0–1.5 h post-dose and declining to baseline after 3–6 h. Maltol and maltol glucuronide exposure (area under the concentration–time curve; AUC) appeared dose proportional with twice-daily dosing, with higher exposure to maltol glucuronide vs. maltol. Mean day 8/day 1 ratios for Cmax and AUC0–t indicated no accumulation after 7 days of twice-daily dosing. Serum iron and transferrin saturation (TSAT) increased with all doses (maximum values at 1.5–3.0 h post-dose). Serum ferritin and CHr increased by day 8, with greater improvements with 60 and 90 mg twice-daily doses than with 30 mg twice-daily doses.ConclusionsThe key constituents of ferric maltol showed predictable pharmacokinetics, with no accumulation over 7 days and increased iron uptake and storage over time at 30–90 mg twice-daily doses.

Objective This study assessed the single-dose pharmacokinetics of the herpes antiviral acyclovir (administered as the pro-drug valacyclovir) alone and in combination with twice-daily 200 mg ritonavir-boosted tipranavir (500 mg) at steady state. Methods The study was an open label, one-sequence cross-over pharmacokinetic study in HIV-negative adults. Plasma drug concentrations were measured by validated LC/MS/MS assays; pharmacokinetics (AUC, Cmax) were determined using noncompartmental methods. The geometric mean ratio and 90% confidence interval [GMR, 90% CI] were used to evaluate the drug interaction. Results Twenty-six of 29 subjects completed the trial. With steady-state tipranavir/ritonavir, acyclovir Cmax decreased 4.9% [0.95, 0.88-1.02] and AUC increased 6.6% [1.07, 1.04-1.09]. The majority of subjects experienced at least one adverse event, most of which were mild gastrointestinal disorders. Three subjects discontinued tipranavir/ritonavir treatment as a result of drug-related increases in ALT/AST, including one subject who experienced mild upper abdominal pain. All subjects recovered without sequelae. Conclusions When administered as a single dose of valacyclovir with steady-state tipranavir/ritonavir, there were no clinically important changes in acyclovir pharmacokinetics. This result indicates that valacyclovir can be co-administered safely with no dose adjustments.

Kojic acid (KA) is a fungal metabolite used as a topical treatment skin-whitening cosmetic agent for melasma in humans; however its potential as an anti-leishmanial agent is unknown. Chemotherapy is one of the most effective treatments for Leishmaniasis. However, the drugs available are expensive, invasive, require long-term treatment and have severe side effects. Thus, the development of new effective leishmanicidal agents is a necessity. In this study we investigated the anti-leishmanial effect of KA on L. amazonensis, following in vitro and in vivo infections. KA (50 μg/mL) was found to decrease the growth by 62% (IC50 34 μg/mL) and 79% (IC50 27.84 μg/mL) of promastigotes and amastigotes in vitro, respectively. Ultrastructural analysis of KA-treated amastigotes showed the presence of vesicles bodies into the flagellar pocket, and an intense intracellular vacuolization and swelling of the mitochondrion. During the in vitro interaction of parasites and the host cell, KA reverses the superoxide anions (O2-) inhibitory mechanism promoted by parasite. In addition, 4 weeks after KA-topical formulation treatment of infected animals, a healing process was observed with a high production of collagen fibers and a decrease in parasite burden. Thus, these results demonstrated the great potential of KA as an anti-leishmanial compound.

Background: The POTENT trial compared the safety and efficacy of tipranavir/ritonavir (TPV/r) to darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r), each with an optimized background regimen (OBR) in triple-class experienced HIV-1-infected patients with resistance to more than one protease inhibitor (PI). Methodology/Principal Findings: POTENT was a prospective, open-label study of triple-class (PI, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors [NNRTI], nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors [NRTI]), treatment-experienced, HIVpositive patients. Subjects were randomized to either TPV/r (500/200mg twice daily) or DRV/r (600/100mg twice daily) on a genotype-guided, investigatorselected OBR. CD4+ counts andHIV viral loads were assayed at key timepoints. The primary endpoint was time to virologic failure (viral load >-500 copies/mL). POTENT was prematurely terminated due to slow enrollment. Thirty-nine patients were treated with either TPV/r (n= 19) or DRV/r (n= 20); 82% were male, 77%White, with mean age of 43.6 years. Mean baselineHIV RNA was 3.9 log10 copies/mL.Median prior antiretrovirals was 11, with no prior raltegravir or maraviroc exposure. Raltegravir was the most common novel class agent in the OBRs (n = 14 TPV/r; n = 12DRV/r). In both groups, patients achieved mean viral load decreases >-2 log10 copies/mL by week 8, and by week 12 mean CD4+ counts rose by 40–50 cells/mm 3 . Total observation time was 32 weeks. Drug-related adverse events were reported in 21% (TPV/r) and 25% (DRV/r) of patients. Conclusions/Significance: TPV/r- and DRV/r-based regimens showed similar short-term safety and efficacy. These data support the use of next-generation PIs such as tipranavir or darunavir with novel class antiretroviral agents (integrase inhibitors, CCR5 antagonists, or fusion inhibitors). Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00517192