Explore the vast range of titles available.

In three phase 3 trials involving patients with ulcerative colitis, tofacitinib (an oral, small-molecule Janus kinase inhibitor) was more effective as induction and maintenance therapy than placebo. Infections were more common with tofacitinib. Ulcerative colitis is characterized by an increased frequency of bowel movements and bloody diarrhea, which has a negative effect on quality of life. 1 Current therapies for ulcerative colitis include mesalamine, glucocorticoids, thiopurines, and antagonists to tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and α4β7 integrin. 1 – 5 Many patients do not have a response to these therapies or have a response that is not sustained. Additional treatment options with new mechanisms of action are needed to increase efficacy rates. The Janus kinase (JAK) family comprises four intracellular tyrosine kinases — JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, and nonreceptor tyrosine-protein kinase 2 — that activate signal transducers and . . .

Pimodivir, a first-in-class inhibitor of influenza virus polymerase basic protein 2, is being developed for hospitalized and high-risk patients with influenza A. In this double-blinded phase 2b study, adults with acute uncomplicated influenza A were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive one of the following treatments twice daily for 5 days: placebo, pimodivir 300 mg or 600 mg, or pimodivir 600 mg plus oseltamivir 75 mg. Antiviral activity, safety, and pharmacokinetics of pimodivir alone or in combination were evaluated. Of 292 patients randomized, 223 were treated and had confirmed influenza A virus infection. The trial was stopped early because the primary end point was met; the area under the curve of the viral load, determined by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analysis, in nasal secretions from baseline to day 8 significantly decreased in the active treatment groups, compared with the placebo group (300 mg group, -3.6 day*log10 copies/mL [95% confidence interval {CI}, -7.1 to -0.1]; 600 mg group, -4.5 [95%CI -8.0 to -1.0]; and combination group, -8.6 [95% CI, -12.0 to -5.1]). Pimodivir plus oseltamivir yielded a significantly lower viral load titer over time than placebo and a trend for a shorter time to symptom resolution than placebo. Pimodivir plasma concentrations increased in a dose-proportional manner. The most commonly reported adverse event was mild or moderate diarrhea. Pimodivir (with or without oseltamivir) resulted in significant virologic improvements over placebo, demonstrated trends in clinical improvement, and was well tolerated. Pimodivir 600 mg twice daily is in further development. NCT02342249, 2014-004068-39, and CR107745.

This was a phase 2, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, open-label comparator study to investigate the efficacy and safety of esaxerenone (CS-3150), a novel non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor blocker, in Japanese patients with essential hypertension. Eligible patients (n = 426) received esaxerenone (1.25, 2.5, or 5 mg/day), placebo, or eplerenone (50–100 mg/day) for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline in sitting systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP). Safety endpoints included adverse events and serum K+ elevation. There were significant dose–response reductions in the 2.5 and 5 mg/day esaxerenone groups for sitting BP (both p < 0.001) and 24-h BP (both p < 0.0001) compared with placebo, with a mean (95% confidence interval) change in sitting BP of −7.0 (−9.5 to −4.6)/−3.8 (−5.2 to −2.4) mmHg in the placebo group, and −10.7 (−13.2 to −8.2)/−5.0 (−6.4 to −3.6) mmHg, −14.3 (−16.8 to −11.9)/−7.6 (−9.1 to −6.2) mmHg, and −20.6 (−23.0 to −18.2)/ −10.4 (−11.8 to −9.0) mmHg for the 1.25, 2.5, and 5 mg/day esaxerenone groups, respectively, while the change was −17.4 (−19.9 to −15.0)/−8.5 (−9.9 to −7.1) mmHg for eplerenone. The incidence of adverse events was similar in all treatment groups. Serum K+ levels initially increased in proportion with esaxerenone dose but were stable from week 2 until week 12. Plasma esaxerenone concentration increased in proportion with the dose. In conclusion, esaxerenone is an effective and tolerable treatment option for patients with essential hypertension.

Summary Purpose. This phase II, open-label, multicenter study assessed the oral, multitargeted, tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib in patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who had received prior chemotherapy. Experimental design . Patients received sunitinib 50 mg/day on Schedule 4/2 (4 weeks on treatment, followed by 2 weeks off treatment). The primary endpoint was objective response rate; secondary endpoints included clinical benefit rate, duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability, and quality of life. Results . Of 78 patients enrolled, most had gastric adenocarcinoma (93.6%) and metastatic disease (93.6%). All were evaluable for safety and efficacy. Two patients (2.6%) had partial responses and 25 patients (32.1%) had a best response of stable disease for ≥6 weeks. Median PFS was 2.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6–2.6 months) and median OS was 6.8 months (95% CI, 4.4–9.6 months). Grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were reported in 34.6% and 29.4% of patients, respectively, and the most common non-hematologic adverse events were fatigue, anorexia, nausea, diarrhea, and stomatitis. Pharmacokinetics of sunitinib and its active metabolite were consistent with previous reports. There were no marked associations between baseline soluble protein levels, or changes from baseline, and measures of clinical outcome. Conclusions . The progression-delaying effect and manageable toxicity observed with sunitinib in this study suggest that although single-agent sunitinib has insufficient clinical value as second-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer, its role in combination with chemotherapy merits further study.

We evaluated safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PKs), and pharmacodynamics of AZD4831, a novel oral myeloperoxidase (MPO) inhibitor, in a randomized, single‐blind, placebo‐controlled study, following once‐daily multiple ascending dosing to steady‐state in healthy subjects. Target engagement was measured as specific MPO activity in plasma following ex vivo zymosan stimulation of whole blood. Except for generalized maculopapular rash in 4 of 13 subjects receiving the 2 highest doses, 15 and 45 mg AZD4831, no clinically relevant safety and tolerability findings were observed. AZD4831 was rapidly absorbed and plasma concentrations declined slowly with an elimination half‐life of ~ 60 hours. A dose/concentration‐effect relationship between MPO inhibition vs. AZD4831 exposure was established with > 50% MPO inhibition in plasma at concentrations in the low nanomolar range. Steady‐state levels were achieved within 10 days. Taken together, the PK profile, the sustained dose/concentration‐dependent MPO inhibition, and available clinical data support further clinical development of AZD4831 in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Purpose Interactions between ticagrelor and atorvastatin or simvastatin were investigated in two-way crossover studies. Methods Both studies were open-label for statin; the atorvastatin study was placebo-controlled for ticagrelor. For atorvastatin, volunteers ( n  = 24) received ticagrelor (loading dose 270 mg; 90 mg twice daily, 7 days) or placebo, plus atorvastatin calcium (80 mg; day 5). For simvastatin, volunteers ( n  = 24) received simvastatin 80 mg, or ticagrelor (loading dose 270 mg; 180 mg twice daily, 7 days) plus simvastatin (80 mg; day 5). In each study, volunteers received the alternate treatment after washout (≥7 days). Results Ticagrelor increased mean atorvastatin maximum plasma concentration (C max ) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC) by 23 % and 36 %, respectively. Simvastatin C max and AUC were increased by 81 % and 56 % with ticagrelor. Ticagrelor also increased C max and AUC of analysed atorvastatin metabolites by 13–55 % and 32–67 %, respectively, and simvastatin acid by 64 % and 52 %, respectively. Co-administration of ticagrelor with each statin was well tolerated. Conclusions Exposure to ticagrelor and its active metabolite, AR-C124910XX, was generally unchanged by a single dose of either statin, except for a minor increase in ticagrelor C max in the presence of simvastatin. Effects of ticagrelor on atorvastatin pharmacokinetics were modest and unlikely clinically relevant, while with simvastatin, changes were slightly larger, and simvastatin doses >40 mg with ticagrelor should be avoided.

ObjectiveRenal insufficiency may influence the pharmacokinetics of drugs. We have investigated the pharmacokinetic parameters of imrecoxib and its two main metabolites in individuals with osteoarthritis (OA) with normal renal function and renal insufficiency, respectively.MethodsThis was a prospective, parallel, open, matched-group study in which 24 subjects were enrolled (renal insufficiency group, n = 12; healthy control group, n = 12). Blood samples of subjects administered 100 mg imrecoxib were collected at different time points and analyzed. Plasma concentrations of imrecoxib and its two metabolites (M1 and M2) were determined by the liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method, and pharmacokinetic parameters (clearance [CL], apparent volume of distribution [Vd], maximum (or peak) serum concentration [Cmax], amount of time drug is present in serum at Cmax [Tmax], area under the curve [AUC; total drug exposure across time], mean residence time [MRT] and elimination half-life [t1/2]) were calculated.ResultsThe demographic characteristics of the two groups were not significantly different, with the exception of renal function. The mean Cmax and AUC0-t (AUC from time 0 to the last measurable concentration) of imrecoxib in the renal insufficiency group were 59 and 70%, respectively, of those of the healthy control volunteers with normal renal function, indicating a significant decline in the former group (P < 0. 05). The mean pharmacokinetic parameters of Ml in the renal insufficiency and healthy control groups did not significantly differ. In contrast, the mean Cmax and AUC0-t of M2 in the renal insufficiency group were 233 and 367%, respectively, of those of the normal renal function group, indicating a significant increase in the former group (P < 0.05). The mean CL/F (clearance/bioavailability) of M2 of the renal insufficiency group was 37% of that of the normal renal function group, indicating a notable reduction in the former group (P < 0.05).ConclusionThe exposure of imrecoxib in OA patients with renal insufficiency showed a decline compared to that in healthy subjects. However, in patients with renal insufficiency the exposure of M2 was markedly increased and the CL was noticeably reduced. These results indicate that the dosage of imrecoxib should be reduced appropriately in patients with renal insufficiency.

Purpose Sunitinib is a first-line advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) standard of care. In a randomized phase II trial comparing sunitinib treatment schedules, separate exploratory biomarker analyses investigated the correlations of efficacy with selected serum, germ line single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), or tumor markers. Methods Advanced RCC patients received first-line sunitinib 50 mg/day on the approved 4-week-on-2-week-off schedule ( n  = 146) or 37.5 mg/day continuous dosing ( n  = 146). The following correlation analyses were performed: (1) response evaluation criteria in solid tumors-defined tumor response with serum soluble protein levels via two distinct multiplex ( n  < 1,000) platforms; (2) response and time-to-event outcomes with germ line SNPs in vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) - A and VEGF receptor ( VEGFR ) 3 genes; and (3) response and time-to-event outcomes with tumor immunohistochemistry status for hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF-1α) and carbonic anhydrase-IX or tumor Von Hippel – Lindau ( VHL ) gene inactivation status. Results Lower baseline angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) and higher baseline matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) levels were identified by both platforms as statistically significantly associated with tumor response. There were no significant correlations between VEGF - A or VEGFR3 SNPs and outcomes. Progression-free survival was longer for HIF-1α percent of tumor expression groups 0–2 (HIF-1α low) versus 3–4 (HIF-1α high; p  = 0.034). There were no significant correlations between outcomes and each VHL inactivation mechanism [mutation (86 % of VHL -inactive patients), methylation (14 %), and large deletion (7 %)] or mechanisms combined. Conclusions Serum Ang-2 and MMP-2 and tumor HIF-1α were identified as relevant baseline biomarkers of sunitinib activity in advanced RCC, warranting further research into their prognostic versus predictive value.

Purpose To evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and antitumor activities of famitinib (famitinib l -malate), a novel oral multitargeting tyrosine kinase inhibitor that acts against vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, stem cell factor receptor (c-kit), FMS-like tyrosine kinase-3 receptor and protooncogene tyrosine kinase receptor in patients with advanced solid cancer. Methods Patients received once daily oral famitinib. Doses were increased from 4 to 8, 13, 20, 27, 24, 25 and eventually 30 mg. Each cycle was defined as 28 days. The pharmacokinetic profile and various biomarkers were evaluated during the first cycle. Antitumor efficacy was evaluated every 8 weeks. Results Fifty-four patients were evaluable for safety and efficacy. Dose-limiting toxicities were observed in 2 of 3 patients at 30 mg. The dose-limiting toxicities observed in the first cycle of famitinib treatment included hypertension, hand-foot skin reaction and diarrhea. Grade 3 hypertriglyceridemia/hypercholesterolemia and proteinuria were notable side effects in the subsequent treatment cycles. Other common side effects included bone marrow suppression, oral mucositis, fatigue, pain, elevated transaminase or bilirubin, peripheral sensory disturbance and hypothyroidism, most of which were mild to moderate in severity. Pharmacokinetic studies revealed no significant accumulation of famitinib or its major metabolite, M3. The half-lives of famitinib and M3 were approximately 28.7–33.8 and 41.3–47.7 h, respectively. Food demonstrated a minimal effect on the pharmacokinetics of famitinib. Eight partial responses were determined, including 6 cases of renal cell carcinoma, 1 case of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) and 1 case of alveolar soft part sarcoma. Fourteen patients demonstrated stable disease with various degrees of tumor shrinkage. Conclusions Famitinib is generally well tolerated. Famitinib demonstrates a wide spectrum of antitumor activities, which warrants further study in renal cell carcinoma, GIST, hepatocellular carcinoma and soft tissue sarcoma. The recommended dose for future phase II clinical trials is 25 mg.

Background and Objective Circadian rhythms may influence the pharmacokinetics of drugs. This study aimed to elucidate whether the pharmacokinetics of the orally administered drug sunitinib are subject to circadian variation. Methods We performed studies in male FVB-mice aged 8–12 weeks, treated with single-dose sunitinib at six dosing times. Plasma and tissue samples were obtained for pharmacokinetic analysis and to monitor messenger RNA (mRNA) expression of metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters. A prospective randomized crossover study was performed in which patients took sunitinib once daily at 8 a.m., 1 p.m., and 6 p.m at three subsequent courses. Patients were blindly randomized into two groups, which determined the sequence of the sunitinib dosing time. The primary endpoint in both studies was the difference in plasma area under the concentration–time curve (AUC) of sunitinib and its active metabolite SU12662 between dosing times. Results Sunitinib and SU12662 plasma AUC in mice followed an ~12-h rhythm as a function of administration time ( p  ≤ 0.04). The combined AUC from time zero to 10 h (AUC 10 ) was 14–27 % higher when sunitinib was administered at 4 a.m. and 4 p.m. than at 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Twenty-four-hour rhythms were seen in the mRNA levels of drug transporters and metabolizing enzymes. In 12 patients, sunitinib trough concentrations ( C trough ) were higher when the drug was taken at 1 p.m. or 6 p.m. than when taken at 8 a.m. ( C trough-1 p.m . 66.0 ng/mL; C trough-6 p.m. 58.9 ng/mL; C trough-8 a.m. 50.7 ng/mL; p  = 0.006). The AUC was not significantly different between dosing times. Conclusions Our results indicate that sunitinib pharmacokinetics follow an ~12-h rhythm in mice. In humans, morning dosing resulted in lower C trough values, probably resulting from differences in elimination. This can have implications for therapeutic drug monitoring.