Explore the vast range of titles available.

In this randomized trial, esketamine nasal spray plus an SSRI or SNRI was superior to quetiapine plus an SSRI or SNRI with respect to remission at week 8 in patients with treatment-resistant depression.

Purpose Lamotrigine was previously reported to reduce serum concentration of quetiapine. The aim of this study was to investigate whether lamotrigine dose or quetiapine formulation was of importance for the drug interaction. Methods Patients combining lamotrigine with quetiapine (cases) were included retrospectively from a routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) service, as were a control group of patients using quetiapine without any interacting drugs. The case and control groups were divided into groups using immediate release (IR) and extended release (XR) quetiapine. The case group was further split into high-dose (> 200 mg/day) and low-dose (≤ 200 mg/day) lamotrigine users. Quetiapine concentration-to-dose (C/D) ratio and metabolite-to-parent ratio (MPR) were compared between the control group and dose-separated case groups using ANOVA test and t -tests. Results In total, 406 patients were included. The mean C/D ratio of IR quetiapine was 46% lower in the high-dose lamotrigine group compared with the control group ( P  < 0.001), while no interaction effect was present in the low dose lamotrigine group ( P  = 0.7). Regardless of lamotrigine dose, there was no difference in quetiapine C/D ratio for patients using the XR formulation ( P  = 0.4). The quetiapine MPR was unaffected regardless of formulation and lamotrigine dose ( P  ≥ 0.06). Conclusion The effect of lamotrigine in reducing quetiapine concentration is only significant for patients using quetiapine IR tablets who are treated with lamotrigine doses > 200 mg/day. Because of high variability in the interaction effect, TDM of quetiapine should be recommended during co-prescription of high-dose lamotrigine.

BackgroundDifferent effectiveness profiles among antipsychotics may be a key point to optimize treatment in patients suffering a first episode of psychosis to impact on long-term outcome. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical effectiveness of olanzapine, risperidone, haloperidol, aripiprazole, ziprasidone, and quetiapine in the treatment of first episode of psychosis at 3-year follow-up.MethodFrom February 2001 to January 2011, 2 phases of a prospective, randomized, open-label study were undertaken. A total of 376 first-episode drug-naïve patients were randomly assigned to olanzapine (n = 55), risperidone (n = 63), haloperidol (n = 56), aripiprazole (n = 78), ziprasidone (n = 62), or quetiapine (n = 62) and followed up for 3 years. The primary effectiveness measure was all cause of treatment discontinuation. In addition, an analysis based on intention-to-treat principle was conducted in the analysis for clinical efficacy.ResultsThe overall dropout rate at 3 years reached 20.75%. Treatment discontinuation rates were significantly different among treatment groups (olanzapine = 69.09, risperidone = 71.43, aripiprazole = 73.08%, ziprasidone = 79.03%, haloperidol = 89.28%, and quetiapine = 95.53%) (χ2 = 79.86; P = .000). Statistically significant differences in terms of lack of efficacy, adherence, and tolerability were observed among treatment groups along the 3-year follow-up, determining significant differences in time to all-cause discontinuation (log-rank = 92.240; P = .000). Significant differences between treatments were found in the categories of sleepiness/sedation, increased sleep duration, akinesia, weight gain, ejaculatory dysfunction, extrapyramidal-symptoms, and amenorrhea.ConclusionsOlanzapine, risperidone, and aripiprazole presented advantages for the first-line treatment of first episode of psychosis in terms of effectiveness. Identifying different discontinuation patterns may contribute to optimize treatment selection after first episode of psychosis.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02526030 https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02526030

Esketamine nasal spray (ESK) is approved in combination with an oral antidepressant (OAD) for the treatment of adults with treatment-resistant depression (TRD); however, direct comparisons with atypical antipsychotics for TRD are limited. This secondary analysis of the ESCAPE-TRD study compared rates of remission and response, and improvements in depressive symptoms over time, between ESK and quetiapine extended-release (XR) in patients with TRD treated in accordance with US prescribing information (USPI). ESCAPE-TRD (NCT04338321) was a randomized, open-label, rater-blinded phase 3b trial investigating ESK versus quetiapine XR for acute and maintenance treatment of patients with TRD. This secondary analysis included patients aged 18-64 years who were treated/dosed according to USPI. The primary endpoint was remission, defined as Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score ≤ 10. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) leading to discontinuation were summarized descriptively. Among 636 patients in this secondary analysis (ESK, n = 316; quetiapine XR, n = 320), significantly more ESK-treated patients achieved remission starting at week 8 (28.3% versus 18.6%;  = 0.005) through week 32 (55.7% versus 36.3%;  < 0.001), compared with quetiapine XR-treated patients. There were clinically and statistically significant improvements in MADRS scores with ESK versus quetiapine XR at each visit from day 8 onwards. Fewer patients discontinued treatment because of TEAEs with ESK (4.5%) versus quetiapine XR (10.1%). Consistent with the primary analysis, this secondary analysis demonstrated that ESK improves short- and long-term outcomes compared with quetiapine XR in patients with TRD treated according to USPI.

Introduction The use of second-generation antipsychotics (SGA) has been associated with metabolic changes. However, there are differences in the metabolic profile between SGAs. We have previously observed that ziprasidone had a more benign early metabolic profile compared to aripiprazole and quetiapine. However, a long-term follow-up is preferred to detect clinically relevant impairment in metabolic parameters. We aimed to compare the effect of aripiprazole, ziprasidone, and quetiapine on metabolic measures in first-episode non-affective psychosis patients after 1 year of treatment. Material and methods One hundred and sixty-five drug-naïve patients, suffering from a first episode of non-affective psychosis, were randomly assigned to receive quetiapine, ziprasidone, or aripiprazole. Weight and glycemic/lipid parameters were recorded at baseline and after 1 year of treatment. Results After 1 year of antipsychotic treatment, we found significant increments in weight, BMI, total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, and the triglyceride/HDL index in the sample as a whole. These changes produced a significant rise in the percentage of patients with obesity, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertriglyceridemia. However, when comparing the differential effect of each antipsychotic medication, we found no significant differences in any of the metabolic parameters between antipsychotics groups after 1 year of treatment. Conclusion We concluded that the antipsychotics studied present similar metabolic profiles. However, the primary exposure to SGAs during the first year of psychosis was associated with significant increases in weight and metabolic parameters, leading to increments in obesity, hypertriglyceridemia, and hypercholesterolemia.

In patients with treatment resistant depression (TRD), the ESCAPE-TRD study showed esketamine nasal spray was superior to quetiapine extended release. To determine the robustness of the ESCAPE-TRD results and confirm the superiority of esketamine nasal spray over quetiapine extended release. ESCAPE-TRD was a randomised, open-label, rater-blinded, active-controlled phase IIIb trial. Patients had TRD (i.e. non-response to two or more antidepressive treatments within a major depressive episode). Patients were randomised 1:1 to flexibly dosed esketamine nasal spray or quetiapine extended release, while continuing an ongoing selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor/serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor. The primary end-point was achieving a Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale score of ≤10 at Week 8, while the key secondary end-point was remaining relapse free through Week 32 after achieving remission at Week 8. Sensitivity analyses were performed on these end-points by varying the definition of remission based on timepoint, threshold and scale. Of 676 patients, 336 were randomised to esketamine nasal spray and 340 to quetiapine extended release. All sensitivity analyses on the primary and key secondary end-point favoured esketamine nasal spray over quetiapine extended release, with relative risks ranging from 1.462 to 1.737 and from 1.417 to 1.838, respectively (all < 0.05). Treatment with esketamine nasal spray shortened time to first and confirmed remission (hazard ratio: 1.711 [95% confidence interval 1.402, 2.087], < 0.001; 1.658 [1.337, 2.055], < 0.001). Esketamine nasal spray consistently demonstrated significant superiority over quetiapine extended release using all pre-specified definitions for remission and relapse. Sensitivity analyses supported the conclusions of the primary ESCAPE-TRD analysis and demonstrated robustness of the results.

The objectives of this study were to explore covariates of plasma quetiapine concentrations after oral administration of quetiapine extended-release formulation (XR), and to examine the exposure–response relationship in Japanese patients with bipolar depression, using population pharmacokinetics (PopPK) modeling. In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of quetiapine XR in patients with bipolar depression, plasma for the measurement of quetiapine concentration was collected at weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 20, 28, and 52 during oral administration of 150 or 300 mg once daily of quetiapine XR before bedtime. A PopPK model of quetiapine XR was developed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling with first-order conditional estimation with interactions. The exposure–response relationship was examined using post-hoc exposures. The post-hoc AUC estimate was plotted against the change in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (ΔMADRS) total score from baseline to 8 weeks following once-daily doses at 300 mg. The final PopPK analysis dataset contained 322 patients and 1162 observations (cutoff data at week 28; cutoff date, February 2016). The plasma quetiapine concentration–time profile in patients with bipolar depression after oral administration of quetiapine XR was represented well using a 1-compartment with first-order absorption model. Covariate analysis led to the selection of γ-glutamyl transpeptidase on apparent oral clearance and body weight on apparent volume of distribution as covariates. The final population mean values of apparent oral clearance and apparent volume of distribution were 87.7 L/h and 277 L, respectively, and the interindividual %CVs were 32.6% and 75.0%, respectively. The effects of covariates on PK parameters were not large compared with the interindividual variability. In addition, there was no clear relationship between the AUC and ΔMADRS. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01725308.

Quetiapine has been reported to prolong the QT interval, and has been used as a positive control in thorough QT studies. The objective of the present study was to evaluate, in the late stages of clinical development, the QT-prolongation effects of the extended-release (XR) formulation of quetiapine at the approved dose in Japanese patients with bipolar disorder, using concentration–QT modeling and simulation. Plasma concentrations of quetiapine and 4 of its metabolites (M1, M2, M4, and M5), and the QT interval corrected using the Fridericia formula (QTcF), were used for the concentration–QT analysis. Data from intensive electrocardiogram monitoring at predose and at 4, 6, 10, and 24 h after the administration of the last dose were pooled from a Phase I trial (6949-CL-0006) and from sparse sampling in late-stage clinical trials (6949-CL-0005, -0021, −0022, and −0023) in Japanese patients (N = 505). The upper limit of 1-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) of the changes from baseline in QTcF (ΔQTcF) at the geometric mean Cmax of a therapeutic dose of 300 mg once daily was predicted using a linear mixed-effects model, with the intercept as a random effect specifying a subject effect. For quetiapine and M2, but not M1, M4, or M5, positive slopes were observed between ΔQTcF and concentration. The predicted upper limits of the 1-sided 95% CIs did not exceed the regulatory threshold of 10 msec. Therefore, QTc prolongation is unlikely to be clinically relevant at the approved dose of quetiapine XR. In this pooled data analysis of the QT-prolongation effects of the quetiapine XR, positive relationships between ΔQTcF and quetiapine and M2 concentrations were observed. However, the predicted upper limits of the 1-sided 95% CIs did not exceed 10 msec. Therefore, QTc prolongation is unlikely to be clinically relevant at the approved dose. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01725282, NCT01919008, NCT01725308, NCT01737268, and NCT02362412.

The Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (DPWG) aims to facilitate pharmacogenetics implementation in clinical practice by developing evidence-based guidelines to optimize pharmacotherapy. A guideline describing the gene-drug interaction between the genes CYP2D6, CYP3A4 and CYP1A2 and antipsychotics is presented here. The DPWG identified gene-drug interactions that require therapy adjustments when respective genotype is known for CYP2D6 with aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, haloperidol, pimozide, risperidone and zuclopenthixol, and for CYP3A4 with quetiapine. Evidence-based dose recommendations were obtained based on a systematic review of published literature. Reduction of the normal dose is recommended for aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, haloperidol, pimozide, risperidone and zuclopenthixol for CYP2D6-predicted PMs, and for pimozide and zuclopenthixol also for CYP2D6 IMs. For CYP2D6 UMs, a dose increase or an alternative drug is recommended for haloperidol and an alternative drug or titration of the dose for risperidone. In addition, in case of no or limited clinical effect, a dose increase is recommended for zuclopenthixol for CYP2D6 UMs. Even though evidence is limited, the DPWG recommends choosing an alternative drug to treat symptoms of depression or a dose reduction for other indications for quetiapine and CYP3A4 PMs. No therapy adjustments are recommended for the other CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 predicted phenotypes. In addition, no action is required for the gene-drug combinations CYP2D6 and clozapine, flupentixol, olanzapine or quetiapine and also not for CYP1A2 and clozapine or olanzapine. For identified gene-drug interactions requiring therapy adjustments, genotyping of CYP2D6 or CYP3A4 prior to treatment should not be considered for all patients, but on an individual patient basis only.

Rationale Quetiapine extended release (XR) has been used to treat various psychiatric disorders, including depressive episodes associated with bipolar I and II disorders. Quetiapine XR is the first approved drug in China for the treatment of bipolar disorder. Objectives The study evaluated the efficacy and safety of short-term quetiapine XR monotherapy in the treatment of depressive episodes of bipolar I and II disorders. Methods This was an 8-week multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose phase 3 study. The primary endpoint was the mean change of the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score. Secondary endpoints included Clinical Global Impressions-Bipolar (CGI-BP) and remission rates. Results The study recruited 279 adult bipolar I or II patients currently experiencing depression from 11 Chinese provinces. Of these, 139 received quetiapine XR (300 mg/day) and 140 received placebo for 8 weeks. The mean change in the MADRS total score was significantly greater in the quetiapine XR group than in the placebo group (−19.00 ± 7.88 vs. −16.20 ± 9.32; p  = 0.004). Adverse events occurred in 96 patients (65.3 %) in the quetiapine XR group and 72 (49.0 %) in the placebo group. The incidence of serious adverse events did not differ significantly between the groups ( p  = 0.247). Conclusions This study, which is the first to evaluate 300 mg/day quetiapine XR monotherapy for depression in Chinese patients with bipolar disorders, found that this drug was superior to the placebo. Quetiapine XR was generally safe and well tolerated (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01256177).