Explore the vast range of titles available.

•Brexpiprazole OSF is a novel formulation aimed for the treatment of schizophrenia.•Brexpiprazole OSF can be administered with or without water.•Brexpiprazole OSF 2 mg is bioequivalent to brexpiprazole ODT 2 mg.•Brexpiprazole OSF and ODT 2 mg exhibit comparable safety profiles.•Brexpiprazole OSF may provide a viable treatment option for schizophrenia patients. Brexpiprazole oral soluble film (OSF) is a novel dosage form under clinical development indicated for the treatment of schizophrenia in adults. This study aimed to investigate the bioequivalence, safety and tolerability of brexpiprazole OSF 2 mg compared with brexpiprazole orally disintegrating tablet (ODT) 2 mg (Rexulti®OD) in healthy Chinese adults. A single-center, randomized, open-label, single-dose, crossover study was conducted, including a six-sequence three-period crossover intervention under fasting condition and a two-sequence two-period crossover intervention under postprandial condition. Pharmacokinetic sampling for brexpiprazole was carried out until 72 hours after dosing with a 28-day washout period. Participants were monitored for any adverse events throughout the study. The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to 72 hours (AUC0-72h) were statistically analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model for bioequivalence evaluation. In the fasting trial, 30 eligible individuals were enrolled and completed the study. Compared to brexpiprazole ODT 2 mg administered without water, the geometric mean ratios for Cmax and AUC0-72h of brexpiprazole OSF 2 mg taken without or with water were all close to 100%, and the corresponding 90% confidence intervals were within the established bioequivalence limit of 80.00–125.00%. In the postprandial trial, 26 participants were randomized and 2 participants withdrew from the study during the washout period. The bioequivalence range of Cmax and AUC0-72h for brexpiprazole OSF and ODT 2 mg administered without water were both within 80.00–125.00%. Generally, both formulations of brexpiprazole displayed comparable safety profiles, with no serious or unexpected adverse events reported during the study. Brexpiprazole OSF 2 mg is bioequivalent to brexpiprazole ODT 2 mg with favorable safety, tolerability and acceptability under fasting and postprandial conditions. Due to its ease of administration, brexpiprazole OSF 2 mg may be expected to improve medication adherence, and provide a viable treatment option for patients with schizophrenia.

Objective This phase I study of ZYAN1 was conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics following oral administration in healthy volunteers. Methods The study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase I study carried out in two parts in addition to a third part involving an open-label study to evaluate the food/sex effect. A total of 100 subjects were enrolled into the study as follows: part I—single-dose study with ZYAN1 10, 25, 50, 100, 150, 200, and 300 mg ( n  = 56); part II—multiple-dose study with every other day dosing of ZYAN1 100, 150, 200, and 300 mg ( n  = 32); and part III—sex and food effect study with ZYAN1 150 mg ( n  = 12; open-label). Results ZYAN1 was well-tolerated after single and multiple oral ascending doses. No drug-related serious adverse events were reported. Following a single ascending dose of ZYAN1, the maximum concentration ( C max ) ranged from 566.47 ± 163.03 to 17,858.33 ± 2899.19 ng/mL and the median time to C max ( t max ) was approximately 2.5 h for the studied 30-fold oral doses of ZYAN1. Regardless of single or multiple doses, mean C max and area under the concentration–time curve from time zero to time t (AUC t ) values generally showed a dose-proportional increase. The mean elimination half-life ( t ½ ) of ZYAN1 ranged from 6.9 to 13 h with negligible accumulation. Following a single dose of ZYAN1, the mean serum erythropoietin (EPO) C max values showed dose response (i.e., 6.6 and 79.9 mIU/L for 10 and 300 mg ZYAN1 doses, respectively), while the time to mean maximal serum EPO concentrations ranged from 10 to 72 h. Conclusion Oral single (10–300 mg) and multiple dosing (100–300 mg) of ZYAN1 in healthy subjects was found to be safe and well-tolerated. With increasing ZYAN1 dose, there was almost a proportional increase in mean C max and AUC t . The mean serum EPO concentrations showed a trend of dose response. Based on the t ½ , pharmacodynamic activity, and lack of drug accumulation, a once every 2 days dosing regimen of ZYAN1 was appropriate for phase II study. Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry trial ID ACTRN12614001240639.

Introduction Elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (E/C/F/TAF) was efficacious and well tolerated in children/adolescents with HIV (aged ≥6 years, weighing ≥25 kg) in a Phase 2/3 study. Here, we report data from children aged ≥2 years and weighing ≥14–<25 kg. Methods This is an analysis of data from the youngest cohort in an open‐label, multicentre, multi‐cohort, single‐group, international study of children/adolescents with HIV. Participants in this cohort were children aged ≥2 years, weighing ≥14–<25 kg at screening and able to swallow tablets, on stable antiretroviral therapy with virologic suppression (HIV‐1 RNA <50 copies/ml for ≥6 consecutive months) and a CD4 count ≥400 cells/µl. Eligible participants received low‐dose E/C/F/TAF (90/90/120/6 mg) once daily through Week 48. The study included pharmacokinetic evaluation of the low‐dose E/C/F/TAF tablet at Week 2. Safety, efficacy, palatability and acceptability were also evaluated. Results Between 16 January and 25 November 2019, 27 participants were enrolled with a median (quartile [Q]1, Q3) age of 6 (4, 8) years, body weight of 19.3 (17.0, 20.5) kg, CD4 count of 1061 (895, 1315) cells/µl and CD4 cell percentage of 37.4 (30.6, 40.3). Most (92.6%) participants acquired HIV through vertical transmission. On 6 October 2020 (data‐cut), median (Q1, Q3) exposure to E/C/F/TAF was 48.3 (48.0, 60.1) weeks. Pharmacokinetic parameters were within the safe and efficacious range of previous data in adult and paediatric populations. Drug‐related treatment‐emergent adverse events occurred in 4/27 (15%) participants. There were no Grade 3/4 adverse events, or adverse events leading to E/C/F/TAF discontinuation. One participant experienced a serious treatment‐emergent adverse event (Grade 2 pneumonia not considered E/C/F/TAF related). Virologic suppression (US FDA Snapshot algorithm) was maintained by 26/27 (96%) participants at Weeks 24 and 48. At Week 48, most children reported positive palatability (84.6%) and acceptability (96.2%). Conclusions These data support the use of single‐tablet E/C/F/TAF (90/90/120/6 mg) regimen for the treatment of HIV in children aged ≥2 years and weighing ≥14–<25 kg. Clinical Trial Number NCT01854775

Aripiprazole was initially approved to treat schizophrenia and later approved for bipolar mania, as a monotherapy and an adjunctive therapy (manic or mixed episodes), and for irritability associated with autism. Aripiprazole is a partial agonist at dopamine D 2 and D 3 and serotonin 5-HT 1A receptors, and is an antagonist at 5-HT 2a receptors. This profile, and convincing preliminary data from small-scale studies, provided the rationale for the large-scale exploration of aripiprazole for unipolar depression. Recently, three 6-week, large-scale, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy for aripiprazole as an adjunctive therapy to antidepressants for treating major depressive disorder (MDD). In November 2007, aripiprazole was approved by the US FDA as an adjunctive therapy to antidepressants for treating MDD, with support from two of the above-mentioned trials. In the trials, aripiprazole was demonstrated to be safe and well tolerated, and showed a minimal trend for weight gain over the course of a 6-week treatment. The incidence of akathisia was higher than that reported in studies of patients with schizophrenia; however, most cases were mild to moderate and infrequently lead to discontinuation (5/1090 from all three trials). This comprehensive review provides an overview of the data from all three 6-week studies (including a pooled analysis) and from an unpublished 52-week, open-label extension study, to inform physicians and facilitate reasonable treatment decisions. In addition, specific issues associated with the use of aripiprazole as an adjunctive therapy in patients with MDD, including possible early treatment effect, appropriate timing of therapy initiation, appropriate dosing and duration of treatment, possible differential effect on depressive subgroups and long-term tolerability, are also discussed.

Background A once-daily (o.d.) fixed-dose combination of indacaterol acetate (IND), glycopyrronium bromide (GLY), and mometasone furoate (MF) delivered via the Breezhaler ® device (IND/GLY/MF) is being developed for treatment of asthma. This study compared steady-state pharmacokinetics of IND, GLY and MF between Japanese and Caucasian male subjects after multiple inhalations of IND/GLY/MF o.d. Methods This was a single-center, open-label, 2-treatment crossover study with a 21-day washout period. Japanese and Caucasian subjects received IND/GLY/MF 150/50/80 μg (inhaled corticosteroid [ICS] medium-dose) or 150/50/160 μg o.d. (ICS high-dose) for 14 days in each period. Pharmacokinetics were characterized up to 24 h post-dose on Days 1 and 14. Results In total, 16 Japanese (median age 31 years [range 20–40 years], mean weight 68.3 kg) and 17 Caucasian subjects (median age 27 years [range 21–43 years], mean weight 75.0 kg) were randomized. Geometric mean ratios (Japanese/Caucasian) [90% confidence interval (CI)] for C max for IND, GLY and MF at the high ICS dose on Day 14 were 1.31 [1.13, 1.51] 1.38 [1.13, 1.69] and 1.07 [0.969, 1.18], respectively. Geometric mean ratios (Japanese/Caucasian) [90% CI] for AUC 0–24h on Day 14 for IND, GLY and MF at the high ICS dose were 1.17 [1.01, 1.35], 1.05 [0.920, 1.20] and 1.15 [1.05, 1.27] respectively. Similar trends were noted for all components for the medium ICS dose treatment. IND/GLY/MF was safe and well tolerated; no AEs suspected to be study drug-related were observed. Conclusion Pharmacokinetics of IND, GLY and MF (high and medium dose) when delivered as a fixed-dose combination were comparable between Japanese and Caucasian subjects. The IND/GLY/MF combination at the administrated doses was safe and well tolerated in both ethnic groups. Trial registration Japan Registry of Clinical Trial: jRCT2031200227, retrospectively registered on 04, December, 2020.

Nemonoxacin is a novel C-8-methoxy nonfluorinated quinolone that has been approved for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in adults. The goals of this study were to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) and population PK parameters of nemonoxacin and to provide the appropriate dose adjustment recommendations for patients with hepatic impairment. An open-label, single-dose, parallel group (moderate hepatic impairment group and healthy control group) PK study of nemonoxacin was conducted. Liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was performed to detect the unchanged nemonoxacin concentration in blood and urine samples. The nonlinear mixed effects modeling tool NONMEN (version 7.3) was used to conduct the population PK analysis. The paired-t test was conducted to compare the PK parameters of the hepatic impairment group and the healthy control group by SPSS (Version 17.0). Ten subjects for each group were enrolled into the PK study. The PK parameters as well as the plasma concentration-time and logarithmic concentration-time profiles after taking a 500-mg single dose of nemonoxacin showed few differences between the two groups (P > 0.05). The mean areas under the plasma concentration vs. time curve from 0 to 72 h (AUC0-72 h) of the moderate hepatic impairment group and the healthy control group in the nemonoxacin PK study were 58.50 (17.30) mg·h/mL and 49.74 (10.16) mg·h/mL, respectively, giving a mean (SD) AUC0-72 h ratio of 1.15 (0.42) with a 90% CI of 0.91–1.39. A 3- compartment model was considered to be the best model for the data, especially in fitting the plasma point at low drug concentrations. Covariate analysis indicated that weight affected CL/F, V1/F, and V3/F and that eGFR only affected CL/F in the power function model, while gender affected V3/F in the linear model by forward selection and backward deletion. The population PK parameters of nemonoxacin were evaluated in patients with hepatic impairment. The hepatic function did not have a significant impact on the PK parameters of nemonxacin, but renal function was a meaningful covariate that is consistent with its PK characteristics. In this study, nemonoxacin was well tolerated in the patients with moderate hepatic impairment as well as in the healthy subjects. Based on these data, it is not necessary to consider dose adjustment of nemonoxacin in patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02604498.

Nemonoxacin, a nonfluorinated quinolone, has been approved in Taiwan and mainland China for the treatment of bacterial infection. Whether nemonoxacin is associated with the adverse events of other quinolones, such as the risk for QT-interval prolongation, which has led to the withdrawal of several fluoroquinolones from the market, needs to be elucidated. The effects of nemonoxacin on thorough QT/QTc interval was investigated in this randomized, placebo- and positive-controlled crossover study conducted according to the International Conference on Harmonisation E14 guideline. Forty-eight healthy adults received a single oral dose of nemonoxacin 500 mg (therapeutic dose), nemonoxacin 750 mg (supratherapeutic dose), moxifloxacin 400 mg (positive control), or placebo in 1 of 4 cohorts (Williams Latin square design) in the fasted condition. After a 7-day washout, 6 male and 6 female subjects were orally administered a 500-mg dose of nemonoxacin after high-fat food intake. The primary end point was the change in QT interval corrected for heart rate using the Fridericia formula (QTcF). The secondary end point was the change in QT interval corrected for heart rate using the Bazett formula (QTcB). The study revealed that nemonoxacin was classified as not likely dangerous at the therapeutic dose (500 mg) and as potentially dangerous at the supratherapeutic dose (750 mg). The Tmax of nemonoxacin was 1 to 2 hours after administration, and the elimination half-life was 5 to 7 hours, in the fasted conditions. High-fat food intake had significant effects on the Tmax, Cmax, AUC0–∞, and QT/QTc interval of nemonoxacin compared with these values in the fasted condition. A correlation between QTcF and the plasma drug concentration of nemonoxacin was not observed. Nemonoxacin at the clinically therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses had a prolongation effect on QT/QTc. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03362853.

Purpose To investigate the effects of coadministration of paroxetine or fluvoxamine on the pharmacokinetics of aripiprazole in healthy adult Japanese with different CYP2D6 genotypes. Methods Fourteen CYP2D6 extensive metabolizer (EM) and 14 CYP2D6 intermediate metabolizer (IM) subjects were coadministered a single oral dose of aripiprazole 3 mg after steady-state plasma concentrations of the SSRIs paroxetine (20 mg/day) or fluvoxamine (100 mg/day) were reached by repeated oral doses for 6–7 days. The pharmacokinetics of aripiprazole with and without coadministration of SSRIs were compared according to CYP2D6 genotypes. Results Coadministration of paroxetine, a potent CYP2D6 inhibitor, decreased systemic clearance (CL/F) of aripiprazole by 58 and 23% in CYP2D6 EMs and IMs, respectively, demonstrating that the percentage inhibition of CYP2D6 activity by coadministration of paroxetine was apparently greater in CYP2D6 EMs than in IMs. Coadministration of fluvoxamine, a less potent CYP3A4 inhibitor, decreased the CL/F of aripiprazole by 39% in CYP2D6 EMs and 40% in IMs, indicating the same inhibitory effect on CYP enzymes, regardless of the CYP2D6 genotype. Percent contribution of CYP2D6 to total CL/F (CYP2D6 plus CYP3A4) of aripiprazole estimated as a reduced percentage of CL/F by CYP enzyme inhibition was 62% for CYP2D6 EMs and 24% for IMs in paroxetine coadministration, and 40% for CYP2D6 EMs and 18% for IMs in fluvoxamine coadministration. Conclusions There were marked differences in the degree of influence of paroxetine coadministration on the pharmacokinetics of aripiprazole between CYP2D6 EMs and IMs, but no apparent differences were found between two CYP2D6 genotypes in fluvoxamine coadministration. Aripiprazole can be used safely in combination with SSRIs that have a CYP enzyme-inhibitory action.

New antiviral agents with activity against hepatitis C virus (HCV) are needed to optimize treatment for chronic hepatitis C (CHC). We evaluated the pharmacokinetics of setrobuvir (a non-nucleoside HCV polymerase inhibitor) in healthy volunteers (study 1 & 2) and its antiviral efficacy in patients with genotype 1, noncirrhotic treatment-naive CHC (study 3). Three studies investigated the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of setrobuvir. First, sequential cohorts of volunteers were randomly assigned to receive single oral doses of setrobuvir 400 to 3000 mg or placebo in a double-blind, ascending dose study. In the second study, volunteers were randomly assigned to receive multiple doses of setrobuvir (400 or 800 mg once daily [QD] or 600 mg twice a day [BID]). In the third study, patients with genotype 1 CHC received setrobuvir (200, 400, or 800 mg) or placebo BID for 3 days. After single doses of setrobuvir (400–3000 mg) to volunteers in a fasted state, peak Cmax and AUC0–∞ increased in a less than dose-proportional manner. The mean apparent t½z ranged from 22.0 to 31.3 hours and was not dose related. Cmax and AUC increased significantly (4.3- and 6.3-fold, respectively) in volunteers who received 2000 mg with a high-fat meal versus fasting. After multiple oral doses, steady state was achieved after 7 days of dosing (400 or 800 mg QD and 600 mg BID) and accumulation was dose-independent. Mean day 14 plasma exposure increased in a less than dose-proportional manner in volunteers who received 400 and 800 mg QD, but it was more than dose-proportional in volunteers receiving 600 mg BID. Dose did not affect the mean t½z (range, 24.1–26.6 hours), apparent oral clearance (0.254–0.516 L/h), or apparent volume of distribution (9.60–18.1 L). In patients with CHC, dose-related reductions in HCV RNA concentration were apparent within 24 hours of the start of treatment. Reductions from baseline to the end of treatment (day 3) in patients treated with setrobuvir 200, 400, and 800 mg BID were –2.1, –2.2, and –2.9 log10 IU/mL, respectively (vs ≤0.1 log10 IU/mL with placebo). Reductions in HCV RNA were greater in patients with genotype 1b (range, –2.7 to –3.1 log10 IU/mL) than in patients with genotype 1a (range, –1.3 to –2.7 log10 IU/mL). Setrobuvir was well tolerated, with no serious adverse events. The steady state pharmacokinetics of setrobuvir appear to be dose proportional, and setrobuvir produces a mean reduction of 2.9 log10 IU/mL in HCV RNA over 3 days in patients with genotype 1 (a and b) treated with 800 mg BID. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00782353

In this Phase I open-label study, the systemic absorption, clinical response, safety and tolerability of multiple-dose ozenoxacin 1% cream were evaluated in children (≥2 months of age) and adults with impetigo. A single (evening) dose of ozenoxacin 1% cream on day 1 was followed by twice-daily application for 4 days (every 12 h), and then a final single (morning) dose on day 6. A total of 46 patients were enrolled in the study. The majority of ozenoxacin plasma samples were below the limit of quantification (no systemic absorption). Approximately half (22/45) of the evaluable patients achieved clinical success (skin lesions were cured). No patients were withdrawn from the study because of a lack of healing or worsening of a lesion. Ozenoxacin was well tolerated in all patients.