Explore the vast range of titles available.

Yes‐associated protein (YAP) is a main mediator of the Hippo pathway and promotes cancer development and progression in human lung cancer. We sought to determine whether inhibition of YAP suppresses metastasis of human lung adenocarcinoma in a murine model. We found that metastatic NSCLC cell lines H2030‐BrM3(K‐rasG12C mutation) and PC9‐BrM3 (EGFRΔexon19 mutation) had a significantly decreased p‐YAP(S127)/YAP ratio compared to parental H2030 (K‐rasG12C mutation) and PC9 (EGFRΔexon19 mutation) cells (P < .05). H2030‐BrM3 cells had significantly increased YAP mRNA and expression of Hippo downstream genes CTGF and CYR61 compared to parental H2030 cells (P < .05). Inhibition of YAP by short hairpin RNA (shRNA) and small interfering RNA (siRNA) significantly decreased mRNA expression in downstream genes CTGF and CYR61 in H2030‐BrM3 cells (P < .05). In addition, inhibiting YAP by YAP shRNA significantly decreased migration and invasion abilities of H2030‐BrM3 cells (P < .05). We are first to show that mice inoculated with YAP shRNA‐transfected H2030‐BrM3 cells had significantly decreased metastatic tumour burden and survived longer than control mice (P < .05). Collectively, our results suggest that YAP plays an important role in promoting lung adenocarcinoma brain metastasis and that direct inhibition of YAP by shRNA suppresses H2030‐BrM3 cell brain metastasis in a murine model.

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) presents notable therapeutic challenges. Rat sarcoma virus (RAS) mutations, including those in KRAS exon 2, are critical for treatment decisions; however, the role of minor RAS mutations (KRAS exons 3 and 4, and NRAS) remains underexplored. Because these mutations are increasingly identified in routine practice due to advances in RAS mutation testing that now routinely includes KRAS exons 3 and 4, and NRAS, clarifying their clinical relevance has become important for ensuring appropriate treatment selection. The present study aimed to compare the clinical and prognostic characteristics of patients with mCRC with minor RAS mutations to those with KRAS exon 2 mutations. To this end, data were retrospectively collected from patients with mCRC and RAS mutations between August 2018 and December 2023. Patients were grouped based on RAS mutation subtype: KRAS exon 2 or minor RAS mutations. RAS mutation testing was performed using the MEBGEN RASKET™-B kit. Clinical characteristics, tumor location, metastatic patterns and survival outcomes were analyzed. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards regression models. Of 202 patients with RAS mutations, 170 had KRAS exon 2 mutations, whereas 32 exhibited minor RAS mutations (20 with non-exon 2 KRAS mutations and 12 with NRAS mutations). Minor RAS mutations were more common in left-sided CRC. No significant differences in background were observed between the two groups. Log-rank OS was comparable for patients with KRAS exon 2 and minor RAS mutations. OS and PFS with first-line bevacizumab-containing therapy were also similar between the two groups. In conclusion, the prognostic impact of minor RAS mutations appears to be comparable to that of KRAS exon 2 mutations, suggesting that the current treatment strategies for RAS-mutant CRC may not require modification based on these findings.

Differentiated thyroid tumors (DTTs) are characterized by significant molecular variability in both spatial and temporal intra-tumoral heterogeneity (ITH), that could influence the therapeutic management. ITH phenomenon appears to have a relevant role in tumor growth, aggressive behavior and drug resistance. Accordingly, characteristics and consequences of ITH in DTTs should be better analyzed and understood in order to guide clinical practice, improving survival. Consequently, in the present review, we investigated morphological and molecular ITH of DTTs in benign, borderline neoplasms and in malignant entities, summarizing the most significant data. Molecular testing in DTTs documents a high risk for recurrence of cancer associated with BRAFV600E, RET/PTC 1/3, ALK and NTRK fusions, while the intermediate risk may be related to BRAFK601E, H/K/N RAS and PAX8/PPARγ. In addition, it may be suggested that tumor genotype is associated with peculiar phenotype.

There are 5 main histological types of thyroid cancers (TCs): papillary, follicular (also known as differentiated), poorly differentiated, anaplastic (the most aggressive form), and medullary TC, and only the latter arises from thyroid C cells. These different forms of TCs show significant variability, both among and within tumours. This great variation is particularly notable among the first 4 types, which all originate from thyroid follicular cells. Importantly, this heterogeneity is not limited to histopathological diversity only but is also manifested as variation in several genetic and/or epigenetic alterations, the numbers of interactions between the tumour and surrounding microenvironment, and interpatient differences, for example. All these factors contribute to the great complexity in the development of a tumour from cancer cells. In the present review, we summarise the knowledge accumulated about the heterogeneity of TCs. Further research in this direction should help to gain a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms contributing to the development and diversity of TCs, paving the way toward more effective treatment strategies.

RAS mutations ( HRAS , NRAS , and KRAS ) are among the most common oncogenes, and around 19% of patients with cancer harbor RAS mutations. Cells harboring RAS mutations tend to undergo malignant transformation and exhibit malignant phenotypes. The mutational status of RAS correlates with the clinicopathological features of patients, such as mucinous type and poor differentiation, as well as response to anti-EGFR therapies in certain types of human cancers. Although RAS protein had been considered as a potential target for tumors with RAS mutations, it was once referred to as a undruggable target due to the consecutive failure in the discovery of RAS protein inhibitors. However, recent studies on the structure, signaling, and function of RAS have shed light on the development of RAS-targeting drugs, especially with the approval of Lumakras (sotorasib, AMG510) in treatment of KRAS G12C -mutant NSCLC patients. Therefore, here we fully review RAS mutations in human cancer and especially focus on emerging strategies that have been recently developed for RAS-targeting therapy.

Three rat sarcoma (RAS) gene isoforms, KRAS, NRAS, and HRAS, constitute the most mutated family of small GTPases in cancer. While the development of targeted immunotherapies has led to a substantial improvement in the overall survival of patients with non-KRAS-mutant cancer, patients with RAS-mutant cancers have an overall poorer prognosis owing to the high aggressiveness of RAS-mutant tumors. KRAS mutations are strongly implicated in lung, pancreatic, and colorectal cancers. However, RAS mutations exhibit diverse patterns of isoforms, substitutions, and positions in different types of cancers. Despite being considered “undruggable”, recent advances in the use of allele-specific covalent inhibitors against the most common mutant form of RAS in non-small-cell lung cancer have led to the development of effective pharmacological interventions against RAS-mutant cancer. Sotorasib (AMG510) has been approved by the FDA as a second-line treatment for patients with KRAS-G12C mutant NSCLC who have received at least one prior systemic therapy. Other KRAS inhibitors are on the way to block KRAS-mutant cancers. In this review, we summarize the progress and promise of small-molecule inhibitors in clinical trials, including direct inhibitors of KRAS, pan-RAS inhibitors, inhibitors of RAS effector signaling, and immune checkpoint inhibitors or combinations with RAS inhibitors, to improve the prognosis of tumors with RAS mutations.

The classification of thyroid nodules, particularly those with a follicular growth pattern, has significantly evolved. These tumors, enriched with RAS or RAS-like mutations, remain challenging for pathologists due to variables such as nuclear atypia, invasion, mitotic activity, and tumor necrosis. This review addresses the histological correlates of benign, low-risk, and malignant RAS-mutant thyroid tumors, as well as some difficult-to-classify follicular nodules with worrisome features. One prototypical RAS-mutant nodule is non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP). The assessment of nuclear characteristics in encapsulated/well-demarcated non-invasive RAS-mutant follicular-patterned tumors helps distinguish between follicular thyroid adenoma (FTA) and NIFTP. Despite this straightforward concept, questions about the degree of nuclear atypia necessary for the diagnosis of NIFTP are common in clinical practice. The nomenclature of follicular nodules lacking clear invasive features with increased mitotic activity, tumor necrosis, and/or high-risk mutations (e.g., TERT promoter or TP53) remains debated. Invasion, particularly angioinvasion, is the current hallmark of malignancy in RAS-mutant follicular-patterned neoplasms, with follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC) as the model. Assessing the tumor interface is critical, though full capsule evaluation can be challenging. Multiple levels and NRASQ61R-specific immunohistochemistry can aid in identifying invasion. Controversies around vascular invasion persist, with ancillary stains like CD31, ERG, and CD61 aiding in its evaluation. Moreover, the review highlights that invasive encapsulated follicular variant papillary thyroid carcinoma (IEFVPTC) is closely associated with FTC, suggesting the need for better nomenclature. The concept of “high-grade” differentiated carcinomas, applicable to FTC or IEFVPTC with necrosis and/or high mitotic activity, is also discussed.

Purpose: To assess the association of RAS mutation status and radiomics-derived data by Contrast Enhanced-Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CE-MRI) in liver metastases. Materials and Methods: 76 patients (36 women and 40 men; 59 years of mean age and 36–80 years as range) were included in this retrospective study. Texture metrics and parameters based on lesion morphology were calculated. Per-patient univariate and multivariate analysis were made. Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U test, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, pattern recognition approaches with features selection approaches were considered. Results: Significant results were obtained for texture features while morphological parameters had not significant results to classify RAS mutation. The results showed that using a univariate analysis was not possible to discriminate accurately the RAS mutation status. Instead, considering a multivariate analysis and classification approaches, a KNN exclusively with texture parameters as predictors reached the best results (AUC of 0.84 and an accuracy of 76.9% with 90.0% of sensitivity and 67.8% of specificity on training set and an accuracy of 87.5% with 91.7% of sensitivity and 83.3% of specificity on external validation cohort). Conclusions: Texture parameters derived by CE-MRI and combined using multivariate analysis and patter recognition approaches could allow stratifying the patients according to RAS mutation status.

RAS mutations play an important role in thyroid tumorigenesis. Considerable effort has been made in the last decade to apply RAS mutations as molecular markers to the clinical management of thyroid nodules and thyroid cancer. Yet, for the low diagnostic sensitivities and specificities of RAS mutations, when used alone, and for their uncertain role in the clinical outcomes of thyroid cancer, it has been unclear how to appropriately use them to assist the management of thyroid nodules and thyroid cancer. Studies from recent years, now added from the Alexander group, have shed light on this issue, making a blurred clinical picture now emerge clearer— RAS mutations, when combined with other genetic markers, have high diagnostic negative predictive values for thyroid cancer; cytologically benign thyroid nodules, including those positive for RAS mutations, have long-term clinical stability when non-surgically managed; and differentiated thyroid cancers harboring RAS mutations alone have an excellent prognosis. This progress in understanding RAS mutations in thyroid cancer is showing a major impact on molecular-based practice in the management of thyroid cancer. Please see related research articles: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-016-0554-1 and http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0419-z

Purpose Microsatellite high instability/deficient mismatch repair (MSI-H/dMMR) colorectal cancer (CRC) has an active tumor microenvironment, rendering it more sensitive to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Given that studies involving patients with MSI-H colorectal cancer with RAS mutations are scarce, we explored the effect of RAS mutations on the TME in patients with MSI-H/dMMR cancer and identified potential prognostic factors. Methods Seventy-five patients diagnosed with MSI-H/dMMR colorectal cancer were retrospectively enrolled and divided into RAS-mutant and -wild-type groups. The expression levels of CD11c + dendritic cells, CD4 + T cells, CD8 + T cells, and regulatory T cell (Treg) markers were detected, and prognostic factors were analyzed. Results RAS-mutant MSI-H colorectal patients were more likely to have: (1) higher platelet values; (2) shorter disease-free survival (DFS); (3) lower infiltrated numbers of CD11c + dendritic cells, CD4 + T lymphocytes, and CD8 + T lymphocytes, and higher infiltrated numbers of Foxp3 + Treg cells. In MSI-H/dMMR CRC patients: (1) the high CD11c + , CD4 +,  and CD8 +  cells infiltration group had longer DFS than the low-infiltration group, and Foxp3 + cells infiltration was not significantly correlated with DFS; (2) the RAS mutation status, number of CD11c + cells infiltrated, and carbohydrate antigen 19–9 (CA19–9) level were the potential prognostic factors. Conclusion RAS mutations in patients with MSI-H/dMMR CRC may reduce the infiltration of CD11c + dendritic cells, CD4 + T cells, and CD8 + T cells, and increase the infiltration of Foxp3 + Treg cells to affect the tumor microenvironment of patients. RAS gene status, CD11c + cells infiltration, and CA19–9 level were potential prognostic factors for MSI-H/dMMR CRC.