Explore the vast range of titles available.

RNA viruses pose a persistent global threat due to their high mutation rates, zoonotic potential, and rapid adaptability. Emergence events have risen steadily, as demonstrated by major outbreaks caused by Influenza A, Ebola, Zika, and Chikungunya viruses, followed by the coronavirus epidemics of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-1) and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and culminating in the COVID-19 pandemic. These characteristics frequently compromise the durability of existing vaccines and antiviral therapies, highlighting the urgent need for new antiviral agents. Alkaloids, a structurally diverse class of nitrogen-containing natural compounds, have gained attention for their ability to interfere with multiple stages of the viral life cycle, including entry, replication, protein synthesis, and host immune modulation. To our knowledge, this review compiles all currently reported alkaloids with antiviral activity against RNA viruses and summarizes their proposed mechanisms of action, distinguishing evidence from in vitro, in vivo, and in silico studies. Quaternary alkaloids are discussed separately because their permanent ionic charge enables distinctive interactions with membranes and host pathways. Although many findings are promising, clinical translation remains limited by incomplete mechanistic validation, scarce in vivo data, suboptimal bioavailability, narrow therapeutic windows, and inconsistent experimental methodologies. To advance the field, future research should prioritize RT-qPCR–based antiviral evaluation to accurately quantify viral replication, incorporate mechanistic assays to clarify modes of action, apply structure–activity relationship (SAR) approaches for rational optimization, and expand in vivo pharmacokinetic and efficacy studies to assess therapeutic feasibility. Overall, alkaloids represent a promising yet underdeveloped reservoir for next-generation antiviral discovery against rapidly evolving RNA viruses.

Respiratory viral infections present significant global health challenges, causing substantial morbidity and mortality, particularly among highly susceptible components of the population. The emergence of pandemics and epidemics, such as those caused by influenza viruses and coronaviruses, emphasizes the urgent need for effective antiviral therapeutics. In this review, we explore the potential of broad-spectrum antiviral agents targeting respiratory RNA viruses, including influenza viruses, coronaviruses, respiratory syncytial virus, human metapneumovirus, human parainfluenza viruses, and rhinoviruses. Various broad-spectrum direct-acting and host-targeting antivirals are discussed, including monoclonal antibodies targeting conserved regions of viral surface proteins, molecules interfering with host cell receptors or viral replication machinery, viral protease inhibitors, siRNA therapies, ribonuclease, and 3D8 scFv. Advancements in host-targeting approaches to reduce resistance and RNA-based therapeutics offer significant potential for combating respiratory viral threats. Despite challenges, broad-spectrum antiviral agents represent a crucial strategy, particularly when specific viral pathogens are unidentified or rapid intervention is essential, such as during pandemics or outbreaks.

Key Points RNA viruses have extremely high mutation rates that are orders of magnitude greater than those of DNA-based organisms. Although some of these mutations are beneficial, the vast majority are detrimental to fitness. Mutational robustness describes the preservation of phenotype in the face of ongoing mutation. Evolutionary theory suggests that high mutation rates drive the selection of mutational robustness. The relative mutational robustness of an RNA virus can be measured by experiments assessing the accumulation of mutations, the effects of random mutations or mutagen sensitivity. Factors such as a large population size and the ability to infect at high multiplicity can lead to increased robustness. In silico modelling and experimental evolution suggest that viral RNA structures are genotypically diverse but preserve a native fold. Codon usage might also confer mutational robustness at the level of the viral genome. Cellular chaperones might confer mutational robustness to RNA viruses by stabilizing mutant proteins and preventing their misfolding or aggregation. Mutational robustness might favour viral evolvability and increase the ability of a virus to survive in the dynamic host environment. Evolved robustness could complicate efforts to control viral infections through drug-induced increases in the viral mutation rate. RNA viruses have extremely high mutation rates, which are crucial for the ability of these viruses to adapt but can also lead to population extinction. Here, Andino and colleagues describe the mechanisms that RNA viruses use to cope with the high mutational load and discuss the impact of mutational robustness on population dynamics, pathogenicity and antiviral therapies. RNA viruses face dynamic environments and are masters at adaptation. During their short 'lifespans', they must surmount multiple physical, anatomical and immunological challenges. Central to their adaptative capacity is the enormous genetic diversity that characterizes RNA virus populations. Although genetic diversity increases the rate of adaptive evolution, low replication fidelity can present a risk because excess mutations can lead to population extinction. In this Review, we discuss the strategies used by RNA viruses to deal with the increased mutational load and consider how this mutational robustness might influence viral evolution and pathogenesis.

Influenza virus, respiratory syncytial virus, human metapneumovirus, parainfluenza virus, coronaviruses, and rhinoviruses are among the most common viruses causing mild seasonal colds. These RNA viruses can also cause lower respiratory tract infections leading to bronchiolitis and pneumonia. Young children, the elderly, and patients with compromised cardiac, pulmonary, or immune systems are at greatest risk for serious disease associated with these RNA virus respiratory infections. In addition, swine and avian influenza viruses, together with severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated and Middle Eastern respiratory syndrome coronaviruses, represent significant pandemic threats to the general population. In this review, we describe the current medical need resulting from respiratory infections caused by RNA viruses, which justifies drug discovery efforts to identify new therapeutic agents. The RNA polymerase of respiratory viruses represents an attractive target for nucleoside and nucleotide analogs acting as inhibitors of RNA chain synthesis. Here, we present the molecular, biochemical, and structural fundamentals of the polymerase of the four major families of RNA respiratory viruses: Orthomyxoviridae, Pneumoviridae/Paramyxoviridae, Coronaviridae, and Picornaviridae. We summarize past and current efforts to develop nucleoside and nucleotide analogs as antiviral agents against respiratory virus infections. This includes molecules with very broad antiviral spectrum such as ribavirin and T-705 (favipiravir), and others targeting more specifically one or a few virus families. Recent advances in our understanding of the structure(s) and function(s) of respiratory virus polymerases will likely support the discovery and development of novel nucleoside analogs.

RNA viruses, such as SARS-CoV-2 and influenza, pose a persistent threat to global public health. Their high mutation rates undermine the effectiveness of conventional direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) and facilitate drug resistance. As obligate intracellular parasites, RNA viruses rely extensively on host cellular machinery and metabolic pathways throughout their life cycle. This dependency has prompted a strategic shift in antiviral research—from targeting the mutable virus to targeting relatively conserved host dependency factors (HDFs). In this review, we systematically analyze how RNA viruses exploit HDFs at each stage of infection: utilizing host receptors for entry; remodeling endomembrane systems to establish replication organelles; hijacking transcriptional, translational, and metabolic systems for genome replication and protein synthesis; and co-opting trafficking and budding machinery for assembly and egress. By comparing strategies across diverse RNA viruses, we highlight the broad-spectrum potential of HDF-targeting approaches, which offer a higher genetic barrier to resistance, providing a rational framework for developing host-targeting antiviral therapies.

The eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 (eEF1) family exhibits critical roles in RNA viral infection beyond its canonical function in protein synthesis. This review analyzes the structural characteristics of eEF1A and the eEF1B complex, and their regulatory mechanisms during viral infection. eEF1A impacts viral replication by stabilizing viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) complexes, modulating genomic RNA synthesis, and facilitating viral assembly through cytoskeletal regulation. eEF1B subunits contribute through enhancing viral mRNA translation, regulating nuclear transport of viral components, and mediating post-translational modifications. The high conservation of eEF1 proteins across species and their involvement in multiple stages of viral replication establish them as promising broad-spectrum antiviral targets. Current eEF1-targeting compounds like plitidepsin demonstrate efficacy against diverse viral families, though therapeutic development faces challenges in balancing antiviral activity with host toxicity. This review provides a theoretical foundation for developing novel antiviral strategies targeting host–virus interaction interfaces and offers insights into addressing emerging infectious diseases.

Viruses use a limited set of host pathways for infection. These pathways represent bona fide antiviral targets with low likelihood of viral resistance. We identified the salicylanilide niclosamide as a broad range antiviral agent targeting acidified endosomes. Niclosamide is approved for human use against helminthic infections, and has anti-neoplastic and antiviral effects. Its mode of action is unknown. Here, we show that niclosamide, which is a weak lipophilic acid inhibited infection with pH-dependent human rhinoviruses (HRV) and influenza virus. Structure-activity studies showed that antiviral efficacy and endolysosomal pH neutralization co-tracked, and acidification of the extracellular medium bypassed the virus entry block. Niclosamide did not affect the vacuolar H(+)-ATPase, but neutralized coated vesicles or synthetic liposomes, indicating a proton carrier mode-of-action independent of any protein target. This report demonstrates that physico-chemical interference with host pathways has broad range antiviral effects, and provides a proof of concept for the development of host-directed antivirals.

The Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Defense (JPEO-CBRND) began development of a broad-spectrum antiviral countermeasure against deliberate use of high-consequence viral hemorrhagic fevers (VHFs) in 2016. The effort featured comprehensive preclinical research, including laboratory testing and rapid advancement of lead molecules into nonhuman primate (NHP) models of Ebola virus disease (EVD). Remdesivir (GS-5734, Veklury, Gilead Sciences) was the first small molecule therapeutic to successfully emerge from this effort. Remdesivir is an inhibitor of RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, a viral enzyme that is essential for viral replication. Its robust potency and broad-spectrum antiviral activity against certain RNA viruses including Ebola virus and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) led to its clinical evaluation in randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) in human patients during the 2018 EVD outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and the ongoing Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic today. Remdesivir was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of COVID-19 requiring hospitalization. Substantial gaps remain in improving the outcomes of acute viral infections for patients afflicted with both EVD and COVID-19, including how to increase therapeutic breadth and strategies for the prevention and treatment of severe disease. Combination therapy that joins therapeutics with complimentary mechanisms of action appear promising, both preclinically and in RCTs. Importantly, significant programmatic challenges endure pertaining to a clear drug and biological product development pathway for therapeutics targeting biodefense and emerging pathogens when human efficacy studies are not ethical or feasible. For example, remdesivir’s clinical development was facilitated by outbreaks of Ebola and SARS-CoV-2; as such, the development pathway employed for remdesivir is likely to be the exception rather than the rule. The current regulatory licensure pathway for therapeutics targeting rare, weaponizable VHF agents is likely to require use of FDA’s established Animal Rule (21 CFR 314.600–650 for drugs; 21 CFR 601.90–95 for biologics). The FDA may grant marketing approval based on adequate and well-controlled animal efficacy studies when the results of those studies establish that the drug is safe and likely to produce clinical benefit in humans. In practical terms, this is anticipated to include a series of rigorous, well-documented, animal challenge studies, to include aerosol challenge, combined with human safety data. While small clinical studies against naturally occurring, high-consequence pathogens are typically performed where possible, approval for the therapeutics currently under development against biodefense pathogens will likely require the Animal Rule pathway utilizing studies in NHPs. We review the development of remdesivir as illustrative of the effort that will be needed to field future therapeutics against highly lethal, infectious agents.

Type III interferons (lambda IFNs) are a quite new, small family of three closely related cytokines with interferon-like activity. Attention to IFN-λ is mainly focused on direct antiviral activity in which, as with IFN-α, viral genome replication is inhibited without the participation of immune system cells. The heterodimeric receptor for lambda interferons is exposed mainly on epithelial cells, which limits its possible action on other cells, thus reducing the likelihood of developing undesirable side effects compared to type I IFN. In this study, we examined the antiviral potential of exogenous human IFN-λ1 in cellular models of viral infection. To study the protective effects of IFN-λ1, three administration schemes were used: ‘preventive’ (pretreatment); ‘preventive/therapeutic’ (pre/post); and ‘therapeutic’ (post). Three IFN-λ1 concentrations (from 10 to 500 ng/mL) were used. We have shown that human IFN-λ1 restricts SARS-CoV-2 replication in Vero cells with all three treatment schemes. In addition, we have shown a decrease in the viral loads of CHIKV and IVA with the ‘preventive’ and ‘preventive/therapeutic’ regimes. No significant antiviral effect of IFN-λ1 against AdV was detected. Our study highlights the potential for using IFN-λ as a broad-spectrum therapeutic agent against respiratory RNA viruses.

BackgroundFavipiravir is administered orally, even against airborne RNA viruses, in a loading-dose/maintenance dose regimen. We investigated whether—(a) pulmonary delivery of favipiravir would generate high concentrations in the luminal side of the respiratory tract; and (b) avoiding first-pass metabolism by the liver by inhaled drug would generate comparable pharmacokinetics (PK) with doses significantly smaller than the oral maintenance dose.MethodsA dry powder inhalation (DPI) of favipiravir formulated by mixing with Inhalac 400® was prepared and characterized. Inhalations of ~ 120 µg dose strength, with or without a prior oral loading dose were administered to mice. Comparator mice received human-equivalent oral doses (3 mg). Three mice per sampling time point were sacrificed and favipiravir concentrations in the blood plasma, bronchio-alveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and lung tissue homogenate determined by HPLC.ResultsOne-compartment PK modeling of concentration–time data indicated that the area under the curve (AUC0-24 h) generated in the BALF recovered from mice receiving inhalations of ~ 1/25th of the oral dose subsequent to an oral loading dose was 86.72 ± 4.48 µg⋅mL−1⋅h. This was consistently higher than the AUC observed in the BALF of orally-dosed mice (56.71 ± 53.89 µg mL−1⋅h). In blood serum, the respective values of AUC were 321.55 ± 124.91 and 354.71 ± 99.60 µg⋅mL−1⋅h.ConclusionPulmonary delivery of significantly smaller doses of favipiravir generates meaningful drug disposition and pharmacokinetics at the site of respiratory viral infections. We provide the rationale for designing a self-administered, non-invasive, low-cost, targeted drug delivery system against airborne RNA virus infection.