Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background The Radixact treatment system is equipped with a delivery analysis feature. This feature enables dose reconstruction using the patient's treatment‐planning computed tomography scans and allows verification of the multileaf collimator (MLC) performance before and during treatment. In the Radixact system, the opening time of the MLC leaves is determined based on the treatment plan. Purpose This study aimed to evaluate MLC driving accuracy by assessing the MLC leaf open time (LOT) during treatment. Methods Using Delivery Analysis version 2.3, we compared the treatment plan LOT with the LOT measured during treatment to determine the average and one standard deviation (%) of the LOT attainment rate. The analysis included comparisons of treated sites across 39 cases: nine prostate, eight pelvic, seven head, six chest, five head and neck (H&N), and four stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatment plans. Results The average and one standard deviation (%) of the LOT attainment rate for all patients on treatment was 94.56 ± 2.37. The values of each site were as follows: prostate, 95.93 ± 0.68; pelvis, 93.37 ± 2.16; head, 95.05 ± 1.99; chest, 97.61 ± 0.78; H&N, 92.44 ± 1.32; and SBRT, 98.39 ± 0.57. The treatment plans with the lowest attainment rates for each site were as follows: prostate, 95.19 ± 0.39; pelvis, 90.59 ± 0.16; head, 92.20 ± 0.15; chest, 95.76 ± 0.04; H&N, 90.55 ± 0.30; and SBRT, 97.32 ± 0.07. The plans with the largest one standard deviation (%) per site were as follows: prostate, ± 0.97; pelvis, ± 0.26; head, ± 0.57; chest, ± 0.23; H&N, ± 0.30; and SBRT, ± 0.07. Conclusions We proposed a simple method for quantitatively analyzing the LOT of an MLC. The average LOT attainment rate and its standard deviation varied by treatment site. Since the standard deviation differed by plan, the LOT attainment rate during treatment should be carefully monitored.

Kilovoltage radiographs are acquired during motion‐synchronized treatments on Radixact to localize the tumor during the treatment. Several previous publications have provided estimates of patient dose from these planar radiographs. However, a recent hardware update changed several aspects of the kV imaging system, including a new X‐ray tube, an extended source‐to‐axis distance (SAD), and a larger field size. This is denoted the extended configuration. The purpose of this work was to assess the impact of the configuration change on patient dose from these procedures. Point doses in water were measured using the TG‐61 protocol for tube potentials between 100 and 140 kVp for both the standard and extended configurations under the same water tank setup. Comparisons were made for equal mAs since the same protocols (kVp, mAs) will be used for both configurations. In comparison to the standard configuration, doses per mAs from the extended configuration were found to be ~66% less and falloff less steep due to the increased SAD. However, a larger volume of tissue is irradiated due to the larger field size. Beam quality for a given tube potential was the same as determined by half‐value layer measurements. Both kV configurations are available from the vendor, therefore, the values in this work can be used to compare values previously published in the literature for the standard configuration or to intercompare doses from these two system configurations.