Explore the vast range of titles available.

The soybean aphid ( Aphis glycines ) continues to threaten soybean production in the United States. A suite of management strategies, such as planting aphid-resistant cultivars, has been successful in controlling soybean aphids. Several Rag genes (resistance against A. glycines ) have been identified, and two are currently being deployed in commercial soybean cultivars. However, the mechanisms underlying Rag -mediated resistance are yet to be identified. In this study, we sought to determine the nature of resistance conferred by the Rag5 gene using behavioral, molecular biology, physiological, and biochemical approaches. We confirmed previous findings that plants carrying the Rag5 gene were resistant to soybean aphids in whole plant assays, and this resistance was absent in detached leaf assays. Analysis of aphid feeding behaviors using the electrical penetration graph technique on whole plants and detached leaves did not reveal differences between the Rag5 plants and Williams 82, a susceptible cultivar. In reciprocal grafting experiments, aphid populations were lower in the Rag5/rag5 (Scion/Root stock) chimera, suggesting that Rag5- mediated resistance is derived from the shoots. Further evidence for the role of stems comes from poor aphid performance in detached stem plus leaf assays. Gene expression analysis revealed that biosynthesis of the isoflavone kaempferol is upregulated in both leaves and stems in resistant Rag5 plants. Moreover, supplementing with kaempferol restored resistance in detached stems of plants carrying Rag5 . This study demonstrates for the first time that Rag5 -mediated resistance against soybean aphids is likely derived from stems.

To analyze the glucose repression mechanism in the thermotolerant yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus , disrupted mutants of genes for Mig1 and Rag5 as orthologs of Mig1 and Hxk2, respectively, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae were constructed, and their characteristics were compared with those of the corresponding mutants of S. cerevisiae . MIG1 mutants of both yeasts exhibited more resistance than the corresponding parental strains to 2-deoxyglucose (2-DOG). Histidine was found to be essential for the growth of Kmmig1 , but not that of Kmrag5 , suggesting that MIG1 is required for histidine biosynthesis in K. marxianus . Moreover, Kmrag5 and Schxk2 were more resistant than the corresponding MIG1 mutant to 2-DOG, and only the latter increased the utilization speed of sucrose in the presence of glucose. Kmrag5 exhibited very low activities for gluco-hexokinase and hexokinase and, unlike Schxk2 , showed very slow growth and a low level of ethanol production in a glucose medium. Furthermore, Kmrag5 , but not Kmmig1 , exhibited high inulinase activity in a glucose medium and exhibited greatly delayed utilization of accumulated fructose in the medium containing both glucose and sucrose. Transcription analysis revealed that the expression levels of INU1 for inulinase and GLK1 for glucokinase in Kmrag5 were higher than those in the parental strain; the expression level of INU1 in Kmmig1 was higher, but the expression levels of RAG1 for a low-affinity glucose transporter in Kmmig1 and Kmrag5 were lower. These findings suggest that except for regulation of histidine biosynthesis, Mig1 and Rag5 of K. marxianus play similar roles in the regulation of gene expression and share some functions with Mig1 and Hxk2, respectively, in S. cerevisiae .

Background Genetic resistance of soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr] against Aphis glycines provides effective management of this invasive pest, though the underlying molecular mechanisms are largely unknown. This study aimed to investigate genome-wide changes in gene expressions of soybean near-isogenic lines (NILs) either with the Rag 5 allele for resistance or the rag 5 allele for susceptibility to the aphid following infestation with soybean aphid biotype 2. Results The resistant (R)-NIL responded more rapidly to aphid infestation than the susceptible (S)-NIL, with differential expressions of 2496 genes during first 12 h of infestation (hai), compared to the aphid-free control. Although the majority of the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the R-NIL also responded to aphid infestation in S-NIL, overall the response time was longer and/or the magnitude of change was smaller in the S-NIL. In addition, 915 DEGs in R-NIL continued to be regulated at all time points (0, 6, 12, and 48 hai), while only 20 DEGs did so in S-NIL. Enriched gene ontology of the 2496 DEGs involved in plant defense responses including primary metabolite catalysis, oxidative stress reduction, and phytohormone-related signaling. By comparing R- vs. S-NIL, a total of 556 DEGs were identified. Of the 13 genes annotated in a 120-kb window of the Rag 5 locus, two genes (Glyma.13 g190200 and Glyma.13 g190600) were differentially expressed (upregulated in S- or R-NIL), and another gene (Glyma.13 g190500) was induced up to 4-fold in the R-NIL at 6 and 12 h following aphid infestation. Conclusions This study strengthens our understanding of the defense dynamics in compatible and incompatible interactions of soybean and soybean aphid biotype 2. Several DEGs (e.g., Glyma.13 g190200, Glyma.13 g190500, and Glyma.13 g190600) near the Rag 5 locus are strong candidate genes for further investigations.