Explore the vast range of titles available.

Primary immune thrombocytopenia is an autoimmune disorder mediated partly by platelet autoantibodies, resulting in thrombocytopenia, bleeding, and constitutional symptoms. Efgartigimod, a first-in-class novel human IgG1 Fc fragment, binds the neonatal Fc receptor with high affinity and thus reduces serum IgG concentrations, including autoantibodies. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of efgartigimod in adults with persistent and chronic primary immune thrombocytopenia. This phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, 24-week study evaluated the efficacy and safety of intravenous efgartigimod in adults aged 18 years or older with chronic or persistent primary immune thrombocytopenia who had an average platelet count of less than 30 000, had responded to at least one previous immune thrombocytopenia therapy, and were on a concurrent therapy at baseline or had received at least a second previous immune thrombocytopenia therapy. The study took place in 71 participating sites from Asia, Europe, and North America. Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive either efgartigimod (10 mg/kg) or placebo intravenously for the first 4 weeks, after which the dosing schedule could be altered to once per week or every other week depending on the patients' platelet count. The primary endpoint, evaluated in the chronic population, was sustained platelet count response (≥50 × 109 for at least 4 of the last 6 weeks). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04188379) and is completed. A total of 205 patients were screened from Dec 9, 2019, to Feb 3, 2022, and 131 (86 in the efgartigimod group; 45 in the placebo group) were randomly assigned. These patients represented a population with long-term disease who had a mean time since diagnosis of 10·6 years and 67% (88/131) of whom had received at least three previous immune thrombocytopenia treatments. 22% (17/78) of patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia receiving efgartigimod reached the primary endpoint compared with 5% (2/40) of those receiving placebo (p=0·032; adjusted difference in response, 16% [95% CI 2·6–26·4]). The median number of weeks of disease control in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia was 2·0 (IQR 0·0–11·0) for efgartigimod versus 0·0 (0·0–1·0) for placebo (p=0·0009). Efgartigimod was well tolerated; most adverse events were mild to moderate in severity. The most common adverse events of interest in both groups were headache (16% in efgartigimod and 13% in placebo), haematuria (16% in efgartigimod and 16% in placebo), and petechiae (15% in efgartigimod and 27% in placebo). Efgartigimod significantly increased sustained platelet count responses compared with placebo in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia, including those who had received multiple previous immune thrombocytopenia therapies. Upon completion of the ADVANCE IV study, patients could enroll in the ongoing open-label extension. Subcutaneous efgartigimod is currently being evaluated in patients with immune thrombocytopenia in the ADVANCE SC+ trial. argenx.

The thrombopoietin receptor agonist romiplostim could be an effective treatment in symptomatic children with persistent or chronic immune thrombocytopenia. We aimed to assess whether romiplostim is safe and effective in children with immune thrombocytopenia of more than 6 months' duration. In this phase 3 double-blind study, eligible participants were children with immune thrombocytopenia aged 1 year to 17 years and mean platelet counts 30 × 109/L or less (mean of two measurements during the screening period) with no single count greater than 35 × 109/L, and were recruited from 27 sites in the USA, Canada, and Australia. Participants were randomly assigned (2:1) through the interactive voice response system to receive weekly romiplostim or placebo for 24 weeks stratified by age (1 year to <6 years, 6 years to <12 years, 12 years to <18 years), adjusting the dose weekly from 1 μg/kg to 10 μg/kg to target platelet counts of 50–200 × 109/L. Patients and investigators were blinded to the treatment assignment. The primary analysis included all randomised patients and the safety analysis included all randomised patients who received at least one dose of investigational product. The primary endpoint, durable platelet response, was defined as achievement of weekly platelet responses (platelet counts ≥50 × 109/L without rescue drug use in the preceding 4 weeks) in 6 or more of the final 8 weeks (weeks 18–25). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT 01444417. Between Jan 24, 2012, and Sept 3, 2014, 62 patients were randomly assigned; 42 to romiplostim and 20 to placebo. Durable platelet response was seen in 22 (52%) patients in the romiplostim group and two (10%) in the placebo group (p=0·002, odds ratio 9·1 [95% CI 1·9–43·2]). Durable platelet response rates with romiplostim by age were 38% (3/8) for 1 year to younger than 6 years, 56% (10/18) for 6 years to younger than 12 years, and 56% (9/16) for 12 years to younger than 18 years. One (5%) of 19 patients in the placebo group had serious adverse events compared with 10 (24%) of 42 patients in the romiplostim group. Of these serious adverse events, headache and thrombocytosis, in one (2%) of 42 patients in the romiplostim group, were considered treatment related. No patients withdrew due to adverse events. In children with chronic immune thrombocytopenia, romiplostim induced a high rate of platelet response with no new safety signals. Ongoing romiplostim studies will provide further information as to long-term efficacy, safety, and remission in children with immune thrombocytopenia. Amgen Inc.

The platelet-stimulating agent romiplostim was compared with standard interventions for chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura. Patients given romiplostim had higher platelet counts, less treatment failure, fewer bleeding episodes, and better quality of life. Immune thrombocytopenia is an autoimmune disease characterized by low platelet counts due to both increased platelet destruction and suboptimal platelet production. 1 After initial treatment with glucocorticoids or intravenous immune globulin or anti-D immune globulin, most adult patients require second-line medical therapy (e.g., azathioprine or rituximab) or surgical therapy (i.e., splenectomy). 2 However, most first- and second-line medical treatments are short-acting, have severe side effects, or are potentially toxic. 2 – 4 These problems can adversely affect the health and quality of life of patients. Splenectomy is used to remove the major site of platelet destruction and increase the platelet count. 5 In approximately two . . .

Chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) is characterised by accelerated platelet destruction and decreased platelet production. Short-term administration of the thrombopoiesis-stimulating protein, romiplostim, has been shown to increase platelet counts in most patients with chronic ITP. We assessed the long-term administration of romiplostim in splenectomised and non-splenectomised patients with ITP. In two parallel trials, 63 splenectomised and 62 non-splenectomised patients with ITP and a mean of three platelet counts 30×109/L or less were randomly assigned 2:1 to subcutaneous injections of romiplostim (n=42 in splenectomised study and n=41 in non-splenectomised study) or placebo (n=21 in both studies) every week for 24 weeks. Doses of study drug were adjusted to maintain platelet counts of 50×109/L to 200×109/L. The primary objectives were to assess the efficacy of romiplostim as measured by a durable platelet response (platelet count ≥50×109/L during 6 or more of the last 8 weeks of treatment) and treatment safety. Analysis was per protocol. These studies are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT00102323 and NCT00102336. A durable platelet response was achieved by 16 of 42 splenectomised patients given romplostim versus none of 21 given placebo (difference in proportion of patients responding 38% [95% CI 23·4–52·8], p=0·0013), and by 25 of 41 non-splenectomised patients given romplostim versus one of 21 given placebo (56% [38·7–73·7], p<0·0001). The overall platelet response rate (either durable or transient platelet response) was noted in 88% (36/41) of non-splenectomised and 79% (33/42) of splenectomised patients given romiplostim compared with 14% (three of 21) of non-splenectomised and no splenectomised patients given placebo (p<0·0001). Patients given romiplostim achieved platelet counts of 50×109/L or more on a mean of 13·8 (SE 0·9) weeks (mean 12·3 [1·2] weeks in splenectomised group vs 15·2 [1·2] weeks in non-splenectomised group) compared with 0·8 (0·4) weeks for those given placebo (0·2 [0·1] weeks vs 1·3 [0·8] weeks). 87% (20/23) of patients given romiplostim (12/12 splenectomised and eight of 11 non-splenectomised patients) reduced or discontinued concurrent therapy compared with 38% (six of 16) of those given placebo (one of six splenectomised and five of ten non-splenectomised patients). Adverse events were much the same in patients given romiplostim and placebo. No antibodies against romiplostim or thrombopoietin were detected. Romiplostim was well tolerated, and increased and maintained platelet counts in splenectomised and non-splenectomised patients with ITP. Many patients were able to reduce or discontinue other ITP medications. Stimulation of platelet production by romiplostim may provide a new therapeutic option for patients with ITP.

Delayed platelet engraftment (DPE) is a prevalent complication following umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT), accompanied by increased transplant-related mortality. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of romiplostim and recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) in enhancing platelet engraftment after UCBT. A total of 19 patients scheduled to receive UCBT were randomly assigned to the romiplostim group (250 µg once weekly from day 5 to platelet engraftment after UCBT, n  = 7) or rhTPO group (300 U/kg once daily from days 5 to 18 after UCBT, n  = 12). The median time of PLT engraftment was no statistical difference between rhTPO and romiplostim group: 29.5 days (range: 13–43 days) compared to 31 days (range: 23–40 days; P  =.269). The median dose of romiplostim was 4 (range: 2–5 doses). Furthermore, the consumption of PLT was equivalent between the Ro group and the rhTPO group: 10 units (range: 7–26 units) and 10 units (range: 3–24 units; P  =.694). All patients survived for one year and remained relapse-free. Romiplostim group had a lower incidence of acute graft versus host disease (aGvHD). No severe adverse effects were observed in any of the patients. This study demonstrated that romiplostim and rhTPO are both effective in promoting platelet engraftment after UCBT. Romiplostim was more practical and tolerable due to its cost and labor-saving benefits.

This observational study aimed to assess real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes for patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) currently being treated with eltrombopag or romiplostim after switching from corticosteroids, rituximab, or the alternate thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA). The study examined the rationale for switching to TPO-RA therapy using aided responses. Dosing patterns were also analyzed before and after switching. Treatment outcomes were assessed through platelet counts at multiple time points including treatment initiation and after switching at the last office visit. A total of 280 patients were enrolled whose active therapy for ITP was replaced with either eltrombopag ( n  = 130) or romiplostim ( n  = 150). Efficacy-related issues (desired platelet count not achieved and/or lack of response to prior therapy) were the main drivers for therapy switching among all patients (54 % for eltrombopag vs. 57 % for romiplostim). Platelet counts at the last office visit showed improvement compared with counts at the initiation of either eltrombopag or romiplostim treatment. No significant differences were noted when comparing clinical outcomes between the eltrombopag and romiplostim treatment cohorts. Our results suggest that switching to the other TPO-RA may be beneficial if there is inadequate response to treatment with the initial TPO-RA.

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a disease which sees one-third of patients failing first and subsequent therapeutic approaches, including splenectomy. Thrombopoietin-receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) are recommended for adults who relapse after splenectomy or who have contraindications for splenectomy. In this multicenter study, a total of 124 patients were retrospectively evaluated: 55 (44.3 %) were treated by romiplostim and 69 (55.6 %) by eltrombopag. Mean age, number of young patients (<60 years), time from primary diagnosis of ITP to TPO-RA treatment, and previous lines of therapy were similar in both groups. The overall response rate was 80 % (44/55) for romiplostim and 94.2 % (65/69) for eltrombopag; the duration of response and the time to response were similar ( p  = NS). The response rate to both drugs in non-splenectomized patients was higher than that of splenectomized patients ( p  < 0.05). The mean duration of response was 30 months for romiplostim and 15 months for eltrombopag, due to later commercialization of eltrombopag. Failure was the most frequent cause of discontinuation. Thrombotic events were the most consistent adverse events and were recorded in 2 and 3 % of patients treated by romiplostim and eltrombopag, respectively. In conclusion, romiplostim and eltrombopag are effective in the majority of patients with chronic ITP who failed several lines of therapy; whether TPO-RAs could substitute splenectomy is under discussion and studies are warranted.

The efficacy and safety of romiplostim, a thrombopoietin-mimetic peptibody, were evaluated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of Japanese patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Thirty-four ITP patients received romiplostim ( n  = 22) or placebo ( n  = 12) for 12 weeks, with a starting romiplostim dose of 3 μg/kg weekly. The primary end point was the number of weeks with platelet response, defined as a platelet count ≥50 × 10 9 /L (not including the 4 weeks after rescue medication administration). Patients received a median of 4 (range 1–19) prior ITP therapies including splenectomy in 44%. On study, 68% also received concomitant ITP therapy. Weekly responses occurred for a median of 11 weeks with romiplostim as compared to 0 weeks with placebo ( p  < 0.0001). Most romiplostim-treated patients (95%) achieved platelet responses; two showed extended responses after the treatment period. The use of rescue medication was required in 9% of romiplostim-treated patients as compared with 17% of placebo-treated patients. Both treatment groups had similar incidences of adverse events (91% romiplostim, 92% placebo). Adverse events that occurred more frequently (>10%) in romiplostim-treated patients included nasopharyngitis, headache, peripheral edema, back pain, and extremity pain. In conclusion, romiplostim significantly increased and maintained platelet counts and was well tolerated in Japanese patients with ITP.

Romiplostim stimulates thrombopoietin receptor to increase platelet production of megakaryocytes in idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of romiplostim in children with chronic ITP. Eighteen patients with chronic ITP, either none responsive or failed to maintain response on two or more therapeutic modalities, were enrolled. Patients were randomized (2:1) to receive romiplostim or placebo for 12 weeks, initiated at 1 μg/kg/week, escalated to 5 μg/kg/week, and then tapered. Median patients' age was 8.5 years, and the median baseline platelet count (PC) was 10.5 × 10 9 /L. The median weekly dose of romiplostim was 2 μg/kg. Fifty percent of patients in both romiplostim and placebo arms had at least one adverse event (AE); none was serious. Ten patients on romiplostim (83.3%) maintained the efficacy endpoint (PC > 50,000). Romiplostim was well-tolerated and efficient in treating the children with chronic refractory ITP with no unexpected AEs.

The thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) romiplostim, eltrombopag, avatrombopag, and lusutrombopag carry unique US Food and Drug Administration (US FDA)- and European Medicines Agency (EMA)-approved indications and may be used to increase platelet counts in a variety of conditions. Current indications for available TPO-RAs include treatment of chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in cases of insufficient response to prior treatment (avatrombopag, eltrombopag, romiplostim), management of thrombocytopenia in adult patients with chronic liver disease who are scheduled to undergo a procedure (avatrombopag, lusutrombopag), management of severe aplastic anemia (eltrombopag), and management of thrombocytopenia associated with interferon-based therapy for hepatitis C (eltrombopag). Across current indications, pharmacists can assist in stabilizing platelet counts and help to reduce large undulations commonly seen when starting, stopping, or transitioning between these agents. If therapy modifications may benefit the patient, pharmacists should discuss possible changes with the patient’s treatment team or treating physician. When used for ITP, romiplostim, eltrombopag, and avatrombopag stimulate TPO receptors on hematopoietic stem cells (also known as c-Mpl , or CD110) to promote platelet production; however, romiplostim is the only TPO-RA that binds at the same site as endogenous TPO. These subtle mechanistic differences may explain why switching TPO-RA may be clinically advantageous in some situations. As pharmacists are called to counsel patients on TPO-RA use, a deep understanding of potential adverse events and management strategies, as well as appropriate monitoring, will increase the likelihood that patients meet their goals of therapy in the shortest timeframe. Other uses of TPO-RAs are also discussed in this review, including use following hematopoietic stem cell transplant, use in myelodysplastic syndrome, and use in chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia.