Explore the vast range of titles available.

A randomised trial designed to compare three and two doses of quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine in adolescent girls in India was converted to a cohort study after suspension of HPV vaccination in trials by the Indian Government. In this Article, the revised aim of the cohort study was to compare vaccine efficacy of single dose to that of three and two doses in protecting against persistent HPV 16 and 18 infection at 10 years post vaccination. In the randomised trial, unmarried girls aged 10–18 years were recruited from nine centres across India and randomly assigned to either two doses or three doses of the quadrivalent HPV vaccine (Gardasil [Merck Sharp & Dohme, Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA]; 0·5 mL administered intramuscularly). After suspension of recruitment and vaccination, the study became a longitudinal, prospective cohort study by default, and participants were allocated to four cohorts on the basis of the number vaccine doses received per protocol: the two-dose cohort (received vaccine on days 1 and 180 or later), three-dose cohort (days 1, 60, and 180 or later), two-dose default cohort (days 1 and 60 or later), and the single-dose default cohort. Participants were followed up yearly. Cervical specimens were collected from participants 18 months after marriage or 6 months after first childbirth, whichever was earlier, to assess incident and persistent HPV infections. Married participants were screened for cervical cancer as they reached 25 years of age. Unvaccinated women age-matched to the married vaccinated participants were recruited to serve as controls. Vaccine efficacy against persistent HPV 16 and 18 infections (the primary endpoint) was analysed for single-dose recipients and compared with that in two-dose and three-dose recipients after adjusting for imbalance in the distribution of potential confounders between the unvaccinated and vaccinated cohorts. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN98283094, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00923702. Vaccinated participants were recruited between Sept 1, 2009, and April 8, 2010 (date of vaccination suspension), and followed up over a median duration of 9·0 years (IQR 8·2–9·6). 4348 participants had three doses, 4980 had two doses (0 and 6 months), and 4949 had a single dose. Vaccine efficacy against persistent HPV 16 and 18 infection among participants evaluable for the endpoint was 95·4% (95% CI 85·0–99·9) in the single-dose default cohort (2135 women assessed), 93·1% (77·3–99·8) in the two-dose cohort (1452 women assessed), and 93·3% (77·5–99·7) in three-dose recipients (1460 women assessed). A single dose of HPV vaccine provides similar protection against persistent infection from HPV 16 and 18, the genotypes responsible for nearly 70% of cervical cancers, to that provided by two or three doses. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Primary analyses of a study in young women aged 16–26 years showed efficacy of the nine-valent human papillomavirus (9vHPV; HPV 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58) vaccine against infections and disease related to HPV 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58, and non-inferior HPV 6, 11, 16, and 18 antibody responses when compared with quadrivalent HPV (qHPV; HPV 6, 11, 16, and 18) vaccine. We aimed to report efficacy of the 9vHPV vaccine for up to 6 years following first administration and antibody responses over 5 years. We undertook this randomised, double-blind, efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety study of the 9vHPV vaccine study at 105 study sites in 18 countries. Women aged 16–26 years old who were healthy, with no history of abnormal cervical cytology, no previous abnormal cervical biopsy results, and no more than four lifetime sexual partners were randomly assigned (1:1) by central randomisation and block sizes of 2 and 2 to receive three intramuscular injections over 6 months of 9vHPV or qHPV (control) vaccine. All participants, study investigators, and study site personnel, laboratory staff, members of the sponsor's study team, and members of the adjudication pathology panel were masked to vaccination groups. The primary outcomes were incidence of high-grade cervical disease (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3, adenocarcinoma in situ, invasive cervical carcinoma), vulvar disease (vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2/3, vulvar cancer), and vaginal disease (vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2/3, vaginal cancer) related to HPV 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58 and non-inferiority (excluding a decrease of 1·5 times) of anti-HPV 6, 11, 16, and 18 geometric mean titres (GMT). Tissue samples were adjudicated for histopathology diagnosis and tested for HPV DNA. Serum antibody responses were assessed by competitive Luminex immunoassay. The primary evaluation of efficacy was a superiority analysis in the per-protocol efficacy population, supportive efficacy was analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population, and the primary evaluation of immunogenicity was a non-inferiority analysis. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00543543. Between Sept 26, 2007, and Dec 18, 2009, we recruited and randomly assigned 14 215 participants to receive 9vHPV (n=7106) or qHPV (n=7109) vaccine. In the per-protocol population, the incidence of high-grade cervical, vulvar and vaginal disease related to HPV 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58 was 0·5 cases per 10 000 person-years in the 9vHPV and 19·0 cases per 10 000 person-years in the qHPV groups, representing 97·4% efficacy (95% CI 85·0–99·9). HPV 6, 11, 16, and 18 GMTs were non-inferior in the 9vHPV versus qHPV group from month 1 to 3 years after vaccination. No clinically meaningful differences in serious adverse events were noted between the study groups. 11 participants died during the study follow-up period (six in the 9vHPV vaccine group and five in the qHPV vaccine group); none of the deaths were considered vaccine-related. The 9vHPV vaccine prevents infection, cytological abnormalities, high-grade lesions, and cervical procedures related to HPV 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58. Both the 9vHPV vaccine and qHPV vaccine had a similar immunogenicity profile with respect to HPV 6, 11, 16, and 18. Vaccine efficacy was sustained for up to 6 years. The 9vHPV vaccine could potentially provide broader coverage and prevent 90% of cervical cancer cases worldwide. Merck & Co, Inc.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination is a major strategy for preventing cervical and other ano-genital cancers. Worldwide HPV vaccination introduction and coverage will be facilitated if a single dose of vaccine is as effective as two or three doses or demonstrates significant protective effect compared to ‘no vaccination’. In a multi-centre cluster randomized trial of two vs three doses of quadrivalent HPV vaccination (Gardasil™) in India, suspension of the vaccination due to events unrelated to the study led to per protocol and partial vaccination of unmarried 10–18 year old girls leading to four study groups, two by design and two by default. They were followed up for the primary outcomes of immunogenicity in terms of L1 genotype-specific binding antibody titres, neutralising antibody titres, and antibody avidity for the vaccine-targeted HPV types and HPV infections. Analysis was per actual number of vaccine doses received. This study is registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN98283094; and with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00923702. Of the 17,729 vaccinated girls, 4348 (25%) received three doses on days 1, 60, 180 or later, 4979 (28%) received two doses on days 1 and 180 or later, 3452 (19%) received two doses on days 1 and 60, and 4950 (28%) received one dose. One dose recipients demonstrated a robust and sustained immune response against HPV 16 and 18, albeit inferior to that of 3- or 2-doses and the antibody levels were stable over a 4 year period. The frequencies of cumulative incident and persistent HPV 16 and 18 infections up to 7 years of follow-up were similar and uniformly low in all the vaccinated study groups; the frequency of HPV 16 and 18 infections were significantly higher in unvaccinated age-matched control women than among vaccine recipients. The frequency of vaccine non-targeted HPV types was similar in the vaccinated groups but higher in the unvaccinated control women. Our results indicate that a single dose of quadrivalent HPV vaccine is immunogenic and provides lasting protection against HPV 16 and 18 infections similar to the three- and two-dose vaccine schedules, although the study suffer from some limitations. Data on long term protection beyond 7 years against HPV infection and cervical precancerous lesions are needed before policy guidelines regarding a single dose can be formulated and implemented. Significant and long-lasting protective effect of a single dose can be a strong argument to introduce one dose of the HPV vaccine in many low income countries where the current standard of care for cervical cancer prevention is ‘no intervention’.

The quadrivalent (q) human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine protects against infection and disease related to HPV types 6, 11, 16, and 18. We report efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of qHPV vaccine in a Phase 3 study in Japanese men. In this randomized, double-blind trial (NCT01862874), Japanese men (aged 16–26 years) were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive three doses of qHPV vaccine or placebo (Day 1, Month 2, Month 6). The primary efficacy endpoint was the combined incidence of HPV6/11/16/18-related persistent anogenital infection (detected at ≥2 consecutive visits ≥6 months apart), assessed in the per-protocol population of men who received all three vaccinations, and were seronegative at Day 1 and PCR negative from Day 1 to Month 7 to the relevant HPV type. Results are from the interim and final analyses. In total, 1124 participants were randomized. The vaccine demonstrated 83.3% (95% confidence interval: 24.9, 98.2; p = 0.007) and 85.9% (95% confidence interval: 52.7, 97.3; p < 0.001) efficacy against HPV6/11/16/18-related persistent infection in the interim and final analyses, respectively. Two cases of HPV6/11/16/18-related external genital lesions (condyloma and PIN 1) were observed in the placebo group and none in the qHPV vaccine group at study end. At Month 7, >97% of participants who received qHPV vaccine seroconverted to each of the vaccine HPV types. Most participants remained seropositive at Month 36, although the seropositivity rate declined between Months 7 and 36. Vaccination-related adverse events were reported in 60.8% and 56.5% of participants in the qHPV vaccine and placebo groups, respectively; most commonly mild to moderate injection-site pain, erythema, and swelling. Injection-site pain and swelling were more common with qHPV vaccine than placebo (each p < 0.05). Results suggest qHPV vaccine is efficacious against HPV6/11/16/18-related persistent infections, immunogenic, and well-tolerated in Japanese men. Clinical trial registration identifier: NCT01862874.

Anal cancer is common in human immunodeficiency virus-infected adults. This randomized trial did not find a benefit from human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination to prevent anal HPV infection or anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. There may be a benefit for prevention of oral HPV infections. Abstract Background Adults living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are at increased risk for anal and oropharyngeal cancer caused by human papillomavirus (HPV). The efficacy of HPV vaccines in this population is unknown. Methods In this phase 3, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial, we assigned HIV-infected adults aged ≥27 years to the quadrivalent HPV (types 6, 11, 16, 18) vaccine or placebo (1:1) stratified by sex and presence of anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions on biopsy (bHSIL). The primary endpoint was vaccine efficacy against incident persistent anal infection with quadrivalent vaccine types or single detection at the final visit that were not present at baseline. Secondary endpoints included vaccine efficacy for anal bHSIL after week 52, persistent oral HPV infection. Results A total of 575 participants were randomized. The Data and Safety Monitoring Board stopped the study early due to futility. Vaccine efficacy was 22% (95.1% confidence interval [CI], −31%, 53%) for prevention of persistent anal infection or single detection at the final visit, 0% (95% CI −44%, 31%) for improving bHSIL outcomes and 88% (95.1% CI 2%, 98%) for preventing persistent oral HPV infection, but was 32% (95.1% CI −80%, 74%) for 6-month persistent oral HPV infection or single detection at the final visit. Conclusions These results do not support HPV vaccination of HIV-infected adults aged ≥27 years to prevent new anal HPV infections or to improve anal HSIL outcomes. However, our data suggest a role for prevention of oral HPV infections, but this finding should be confirmed in future studies. Clinical Trials Registration NCT01461096.

The World Health Organization (WHO) urges global administration of at least one dose of the HPV vaccine, particularly for girls aged 9–14, to work towards the elimination of cervical cancer. However, data on the efficacy of a single dose of Cecolin®, a bivalent HPV vaccine, remain quite limited. Therefore, it is crucial to design studies investigating the protective effects of a single dose of Cecolin® in Chinese girls. The randomized clinical trial began on February 23, 2023 (NCT06345885). 198 Chinese girls aged 9–14 received a single dose of Cecolin® or Gardasil®. Seroconversion rates and geometric mean titers (GMTs) for HPV16 and HPV18 were assessed at one and two months post-vaccination. Non-inferiority was declared if the lower limit of the 95 % confidence interval (CI) exceeded −5 %. Safety of vaccine was evaluated in all vaccinated participants. At one month post-vaccination, both the Cecolin® and Gardasil® groups achieved 100 % seroconversion for HPV16 antibodies. The seroconversion rates for HPV18 were 97.9 % (95 % CI: 92.5 %, 99.7 %) in the Cecolin® group and 95.6 % (95 % CI: 89.1 %, 98.8 %) in the Gardasil® group. The GMTs in the Cecolin® group were significantly higher than those in the Gardasil® group for both HPV types, with GMT ratios of 1.5 (1.1, 2.1) for HPV16 and 2.84 (2.0, 4.1) for HPV18. The seroconversion rates and GMT ratios one month after a single dose of Cecolin® were non-inferior to those of Gardasil®, with results remaining consistent at two months. The incidence of adverse events was similar between the two groups throughout the study, with no statistically significant differences. The immunogenicity and safety of a single dose of Cecolin® in Chinese girls aged 9–14 years were comparable to those of Gardasil. These findings support the use of single-dose Cecolin® to enhance HPV vaccination coverage for cervical cancer prevention.

In 2022, WHO recommended single-dose human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination as an alternative schedule to multidose regimens. To provide evidence to support approval of a single-dose indication for the AS04-adjuvanted bivalent HPV vaccine (Cervarix, GlaxoSmithKline), we investigated whether the immune response to a single dose of the bivalent vaccine in girls aged 9–14 years was non-inferior to the immune response to three doses of the quadrivalent HPV vaccine (Gardasil-4, Merck) in women aged 18–25 years, a dose and population combination with demonstrated efficacy. This non-randomised, open-label, immunobridging trial enrolled girls aged 9–14 years and women aged 18–25 years in Guanacaste Province, Costa Rica. Healthy girls aged 9–14 years received one dose of bivalent HPV vaccine, whereas healthy women aged 18–25 years received three doses of quadrivalent HPV vaccine at 0, 2, and 6 months. The primary endpoint was geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) of HPV-specific serum antibodies measured by a validated virus-like-particle-based ELISA assay at 36 months. The per-protocol cohort included participants who received the correct number of doses within the predefined vaccination windows, had blood collected at the 36-month study visit for the final analysis, were seronegative at baseline for the specified HPV type, and did not receive additional HPV vaccine doses outside the study. Non-inferiority was declared when the lower bound of the 96% CI for the GMC ratio was greater than or equal to 0·67 for HPV-16 and HPV-18. Seropositivity was a secondary objective. Safety was analysed in the total vaccinated population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03728881, and is complete. Between April 1 and Aug 16, 2019, 620 girls and 620 women were enrolled and received their first HPV vaccination. After exclusions, 539 girls and 366 women were HPV-16 seronegative at enrolment and were included in the HPV-16 per-protocol cohort; 523 girls and 373 women were HPV-18 seronegative at enrolment and were included in the HPV-18 per-protocol cohort. At 36 months, the HPV-16 GMC was 21·4 international units (IU)/mL (95% CI 19·7–23·3) in girls in the single-dose bivalent vaccine group and 42·9 IU/mL (95% CI 38·9–47·3) in women in the three-dose quadrivalent vaccine group, resulting in a GMC ratio of 0·50 (96% CI 0·44–0·57); the HPV-18 GMC was 8·0 IU/mL (95% CI 7·4–8·8) in girls in the single-dose bivalent vaccine group and 7·2 IU/mL (95% CI 6·4–8·1) in women in the three-dose quadrivalent vaccine group, resulting in a GMC ratio of 1·11 (96% CI 0·95–1·29). At 36 months, 538 (99·8%, 95% CI 99·1–100) of 539 girls in the single-dose bivalent vaccine group were seropositive for HPV-16 compared with 366 (100%, 99·2–100) of 366 women in the three-dose quadrivalent vaccine group (p=1·00). The proportion of participants who were seropositive for HPV-18 was higher in the single-dose bivalent vaccine group (517 [98·9%, 95% CI 97·6–99·5] of 523 girls) than in the three-dose quadrivalent vaccine group (358 [96·0%, 93·6–97·6] of 373 women; p=0·0065). Two serious adverse events were reported in 620 girls and 13 serious adverse events were reported in 620 women; all serious adverse events were deemed to be unrelated to HPV vaccination. Non-inferior antibody responses for the single-dose bivalent HPV vaccine were seen for HPV-18 but not HPV-16, which would be insufficient evidence to motivate regulatory change, even though seropositivity approached 100% in the follow-up phase and the observed antibody concentrations were similar to protective levels seen in previous trials. Trials that directly evaluate protection afforded by single-dose HPV vaccination against persistent HPV infection will definitively address the level of protection afforded by single-dose HPV vaccination. National Cancer Institute, Cancer Research UK, and the Gates Foundation. For the Spanish translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

A nine-valent human papilloma virus (9vHPV) vaccine has been developed to prevent infections and diseases related to HPV 6/11/16/18 (as per the licensed quadrivalent HPV (qHPV) vaccine) as well as to five additional oncogenic HPV types (HPV 31/33/45/52/58). The 9vHPV vaccine has the potential to prevent 90% of cervical cancers, HPV-related anal, vaginal and vulval cancers and anogenital warts. We compared the immunogenicity and safety of the 9vHPV vaccine versus the qHPV vaccine in 16–26-year-old men. Participants (N=500) were randomised to receive 9vHPV or qHPV vaccines on day 1, month 2 and month 6. Serology testing was performed on day 1 and month 7. HPV type-specific antibody titres (anti-HPV 6/11/16/18/31/33/45/52/58) were determined by competitive Luminex immunoassay and expressed as geometric mean titres and seroconversion rates. Vaccine safety was also assessed. The HPV 6/11/16/18 immune responses elicited by the 9vHPV vaccine were comparable with those elicited by the qHPV vaccine. All participants receiving the 9vHPV vaccine seroconverted for HPV 31/33/45/52/58. The 9vHPV and qHPV vaccines showed comparable safety profiles. In addition to immune responses to HPV 31/33/45/52/58, a three-dose regimen of the 9vHPV vaccine elicited a similar immune response to HPV 6/11/16/18 when compared with the qHPV vaccine in men aged 16–26years. The safety profile was also similar for the two vaccines. The results from this study support extending the efficacy findings with qHPV vaccine to 9vHPV vaccine in men aged 16–26years. NCT02114385

Antibody persistence in girls (age 9–11 years) receiving two quadrivalent vaccine (4vHPV) doses and impact of an additional dose five years post-primary vaccination were assessed. Girls vaccinated with two 4vHPV (Gardasil) doses (n = 496) were randomized to one- (2 + 1) or no-additional-dose groups five years post-first dose. Geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) for HPV types 6/11/16/18 were measured using M9ELISA at 5, 7.5, and 10 years post-primary vaccination. Antibodies to 4vHPV-targeted types persisted in all participants at each time point in both study arms. Compared to the 2-dose group that had stable antibody levels up to 10 years, GMCs were higher in the 2 + 1 group at 7.5 and 10 years post-primary vaccination (p < .0001). Two doses of 4vHPV administered at ages 9–11 confers stable antibody levels up to 10 years post-vaccination that can be enhanced with an additional dose given several years later, suggesting the presence of immune memory.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines provide excellent protection from infection and disease. The minimum number of doses needed for long-term protection and the potential need for boosters are areas of continuing interest. Studies on the durability of vaccines have focused on antibodies, fewer have analyzed memory immune cells that could provide protection even when antibody levels are low. In this study, subjects who had participated in one of two trials comparing two and three doses (2D, 3D), were given an additional vaccine dose (Gardasil®9, 9vHPV) several years after the initial vaccine doses, and the magnitude of immune responses were compared. Both trials had 2D children who received doses at 0 and 6 months (G1a), 3D children 9–13 (08–001) or 9–14 (V503–010) years old at enrollment in the original trial (G2) and 3D women (age 16–26) (G3). Trial V503–010 had a second 2D group of children vaccinated at 0 and 12 months (G1b). Changes in numbers of HPV specific memory B cells (Bmem) (N = 6 per group, both studies) at 1 month and plasmablasts (PB) (08–001: N = 6 per group, V503–010: G1a N = 12, G1b N = 8, G2 N = 6, G3 N = 28) at 1 week, relative to baseline at the additional dose, were compared among groups. Changes in the geometric mean titers (GMTs) of HPV specific antibodies relative to baseline were compared (N = same as PB). Statistically significant (p < 0.05) increases in the numbers of PB, Bmem and antibody levels (GMT) were seen among subjects receiving an extra vaccine dose relative to baseline. Increases in the number of PB and Bmem were not significantly different among subjects receiving two or three doses. Thus, robust immune responses were observed and did not differ significantly among subjects vaccinated with two or three doses.