Explore the vast range of titles available.

Sepsis and septic shock remain global healthcare problems associated with high mortality rates despite best therapy efforts. Circulating biomarkers may identify those patients at risk for poor outcomes, however, current biomarkers, most prominently lactate, are non-specific and have an inconsistent impact on prognosis and/or disease management. Activation of the renin-angiotensin- system (RAS) is an early event in sepsis patients and elevated levels of circulating renin are more predictive of worse outcomes than lactate. The precursor protein Angiotensinogen is another key component of the circulating RAS; it is the only known substrate for renin and the ultimate source of the vasopressor Angiotensin II (Ang II). We postulate that lower Angiotensinogen concentrations may reflect a dysfunctional RAS characterized by high renin concentrations but attenuated Ang II generation, which is disproportionate to the high renin response and may compromise adequate support of blood pressure and tissue perfusion in septic patients. The current study compared the association between serum Angiotensinogen with mortality to that of lactate and renin in the VICTAS cohort of sepsis patients at baseline (day 0) by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and Kaplan–Meier curve analyses. Serum concentration of Angiotensinogen was more strongly associated with 30-day mortality than either the serum concentrations of renin or lactate in sepsis patients. Moreover, the clinical assessment of Angiotensinogen may have distinct advantages over the typical measures of renin. The assessment of intact Angiotensinogen may potentially facilitate more precise therapeutic approaches (including exogenous angiotensin II) to restore a dysfunctional RAS and improve patient outcomes. Additional prospective validation studies are clearly required for this biomarker in the future.

Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) occurs with preserved (heart failure with preserved ejection fraction [HFpEF] ≥50%) or reduced (heart failure with reduced ejection fraction [HFrEF] <50%) ejection fraction. Natriuretic peptide (NP) levels are lower in HFpEF than HFrEF. We hypothesized that lower NP levels in HFpEF may be associated with other differences in biomarkers, specifically, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) activation, oxidative stress, and a biomarker that reflects collagen synthesis. In this prespecified ancillary analysis of patients with ADHF enrolled in the Diuretic Optimization Strategies Evaluation study, clinical features and N-terminal pro–B-type NP, cystatin C, plasma renin activity, aldosterone, oxidative stress (uric acid), and procollagen type III N-terminal peptide were compared in HFpEF and HFrEF at enrollment and 60-day follow-up. Compared with HFrEF (n = 219), HFpEF (n = 81) patients were older, heavier, more commonly female, less treated with RAAS antagonists, but with similar New York Heart Association class, jugular venous pressure, and edema severity. N-terminal pro–B-type NP was lower, and systolic blood pressure and cystatin C were higher in HFpEF. Despite higher systolic blood pressure and less RAAS antagonist use in HFpEF, plasma renin activity and aldosterone levels were similar in HFpEF and HFrEF as were uric acid and procollagen type III N-terminal peptide levels. Changes in biomarker levels from enrollment to 60 days were similar between HFrEF (n = 149) and HFpEF (n = 50). Lower NP levels in decompensated HFpEF occur in association with similar ADHF severity, more impaired vascular and renal function but similar elevation of biomarkers that reflect RAAS activation, oxidative stress, and collagen synthesis as in HFrEF.

Low-renin hypertension affects 1 in 4 people with hypertension, but the optimal management of this condition is not known. We hypothesize that a large proportion of people with low-renin hypertension is mediated by excess mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) activation and that targeted treatment with an MR antagonist (MRA) will be beneficial. This randomized, single-blinded, titration-to-effect aims to investigate whether targeted treatment in low-renin hypertension with MRA is better compared to standard antihypertensives in terms of blood pressure control and end-organ protection. Adults with hypertension, who are treatment naïve or are receiving up to two antihypertensive agents and have a low direct renin concentration <10 mU/L will be included. Participants with severe hypertension, a secondary cause of hypertension, pregnant, breastfeeding, with moderate-severe cardiovascular and chronic kidney disease, or on medications that confound interpretation of the plasma direct renin or aldosterone concentrations will be excluded. Eligible participants will be randomized 1:1 to either MRA therapy (spironolactone) or standard anti-hypertensive therapy (perindopril+/− amlodipine) for 48 weeks. Anti-hypertensives will be up-titrated every 12 weeks until target blood pressure is achieved. The primary objective will be to determine the total defined daily dose of antihypertensives required to achieve the target blood pressure and change in mean clinic systolic blood pressure at week 48. Current hypertension guidelines do not have specific recommendations for the choice of anti-hypertensive medications for people with low-renin hypertension. The results of this trial could guide future hypertension guidelines.

The aim of this study was to assess dual renin system intervention with the maximum recommended doses of aliskiren and valsartan, compared with each drug alone in patients with hypertension. In this double-blind study, 1797 patients with hypertension (mean sitting diastolic blood pressure 95–109 mm Hg and 8-h daytime ambulatory diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg) were randomly assigned to receive once-daily aliskiren 150 mg (n=437), valsartan 160 mg (455), a combination of aliskiren 150 mg and valsartan 160 mg (446), or placebo (459) for 4 weeks, followed by forced titration to double the dose to the maximum recommended dose for another 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in mean sitting diastolic blood pressure from baseline to week 8 endpoint. Analyses were done by intention to treat. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with the number NCT00219180. 196 (11%) patients discontinued study treatment before the end of the trial (63 in the placebo group, 53 in the aliskiren group, 43 in the valsartan group, and 37 in the aliskiren/valsartan group), mainly due to lack of therapeutic effect. At week 8 endpoint, the combination of aliskiren 300 mg and valsartan 320 mg lowered mean sitting diastolic blood pressure from baseline by 12·2 mm Hg, significantly more than either monotherapy (aliskiren 300 mg 9·0 mm Hg decrease, p<0·0001; valsartan 320 mg, 9·7 mm Hg decrease, p<0·0001), or with placebo (4·1 mm Hg decrease, p<0·0001). Rates of adverse events and laboratory abnormalities were similar in all groups. The combination of aliskiren and valsartan at maximum recommended doses provides significantly greater reductions in blood pressure than does monotherapy with either agent in patients with hypertension, with a tolerability profile similar to that with aliskiren and valsartan alone.

To compare the acute effects of aquatic walking/running versus dry-land walking/running on blood glucose and plasma renin activity (PRA) in individuals with type 2 diabetes, participants with type 2 diabetes performed deep-water or dry-land walking and/or running sessions in a swimming pool or on an athletics track, respectively. Both sessions comprised seven blocks of 3 min at 85–90% of the heart rate deflection point (HRDP), interspersed with 2 min at <85% HRDP, totaling 35 min, with a 48 h interval between sessions. PRA and blood glucose were assessed before and immediately after the sessions. Generalized estimation equations were used to verify the session effects, with the Bonferroni post hoc test, considering the significance level as 0.05. Twelve individuals (53.2 ± 8.9 years) diagnosed with type 2 diabetes for 6.3 ± 6.34 years participated in the study. A reduction in PRA was found only after the aquatic session (−7.75 ng/mL/h; −69%; p: 0.034), while both aquatic and dry-land sessions similarly reduced the blood glucose levels (aquatic: −38 mg/dL, −21%; dry-land: −26 mg/dL, −14%; time effect, p = 0.007). Despite yielding similar glycemic reductions as dry-land walking/running, aquatic walking/running led to an expressive decrease in PRA among individuals with type 2 diabetes.

Around 70% of patients diagnosed with hypertension exhibit increased levels of renin. SPH3127, an inventive renin inhibitor, has shown favorable tolerability and sustained pharmacodynamic inhibitory impact on plasma renin activity (PRA) during previous phase I trials. This phase II study was conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of SPH3127 in patients with essential hypertension. This study was conducted in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension, utilizing a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. The patients were administered either tablet of SPH3127 at doses of 50 mg, 100 mg, or 200 mg, or a placebo. A total of 122 patients were included in the study, with 121 patients included in the full analysis set. Among these patients, there were 30 individuals in each subgroup receiving different dosage regimens of SPH3127, and 31 patients in the placebo group. The reductions in mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (msDBP) after 8 weeks compared to baseline were 5.7 ± 9.5, 8.6 ± 8.8, and 3.8 ± 10.6 mmHg in the SPH3127 50-, 100-, and 200 mg groups, respectively. In the placebo group, the reduction was 3.1 ± 8.4 mmHg. The corresponding reductions in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (msSBP) were 11.8 ± 13.0, 13.8 ± 11.2, 11.1 ± 13.1, and 7.7 ± 9.7 mmHg in each respective group. SPH3127 is a promising drug for the treatment of patients with essential hypertension. The recommended dosage is 100 mg daily. Clinical trial registration: This study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03756103).

IntroductionPrimary aldosteronism (PA) is a highly prevalent but underdiagnosed cause of hypertension, characterised by renin-independent aldosterone production. PA is associated with a higher incidence of cardiovascular and kidney complications, independent of blood pressure. Although mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are the standard treatment when surgical adrenalectomy is not clinically indicated or possible, response is typically monitored using indirect clinical markers such as blood pressure and potassium. Emerging evidence suggests that achieving renin unsuppression may result in better outcomes, yet this hypothesis has not been tested in a randomised controlled trial. The objective of this trial is to evaluate whether a renin-guided MRA titration strategy improves biochemical efficacy compared with standard titration in patients with PA.Methods and analysisThis is a multicentre, open-label, pragmatic randomised controlled trial in four academic centres in Canada. 58 adults with confirmed PA, suppressed renin at baseline, and an indication for long-term MRA therapy will be enrolled. Key exclusion criteria include prior MRA use, estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m², potassium levels >4.8 mmol/L and pregnancy. The primary endpoint is the proportion of participants with unsuppressed renin at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include blood pressure, left ventricular mass, kidney function, MRA dose, quality of life and various safety outcomes. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to a renin-guided titration strategy or standard care. In the intervention arm, MRAs will be titrated to achieve unsuppressed renin (>10 ng/L, >15 mIU/L or >1.0 ng/mL/hour). The control arm follows usual clinical practice, without serial renin measurements during dose titration. All participants will be followed for 12 months, with visits at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle and use Fisher’s exact test for proportions, mixed-effects models for continuous outcomes and Kaplan-Meier estimates for time-to-event data. The trial is powered to detect a 42% absolute difference in the primary outcome (40% in the control groups vs 82% in the experimental group; alpha 0.05, 80% power, 15% loss to follow-up). This trial will be the first to prospectively assess the biochemical efficacy of a renin-guided MRA titration strategy in PA. If successful, the next phase will be to assess the efficacy of this strategy on important surrogate outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures.Ethics and disseminationThis study was approved by the Research and Ethics Board of the Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Nord-de-l’Île-de-Montréal (project number 2024-2727). All the participating sites have received the ethics approval. The findings will be disseminated through national and international presentations and peer-reviewed publications.Trial registration numberNCT06108427.

Many chronic heart failure (CHF) patients have low vitamin D (VitD) and high plasma renin activity (PRA), which are both associated with poor prognosis. Vitamin D may inhibit renin transcription and lower PRA. We investigated whether vitamin D3 (VitD3) supplementation lowers PRA in CHF patients. We conducted a single-center, open-label, blinded end point trial in 101 stable CHF patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Patients were randomized to 6 weeks of 2,000 IU oral VitD3 daily or control. At baseline, mean age was 64 ± 10 years, 93% male, left ventricular ejection fraction 35% ± 8%, and 56% had VitD deficiency. The geometric mean (95% CI) of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 increased from 48 nmol/L (43-54) at baseline to 80 nmol/L (75-87) after 6 weeks in the VitD3 treatment group and decreased from 47 nmol/L (42-53) to 44 nmol/L (39-49) in the control group (P < .001). The primary outcome PRA decreased from 6.5 ng/mL per hour (3.8-11.2) to 5.2 ng/mL per hour (2.9-9.5) in the VitD3 treatment group and increased from 4.9 ng/mL per hour (2.9-8.5) to 7.3 ng/mL per hour (4.5-11.8) in the control group (P = .002). This was paralleled by a larger decrease in plasma renin concentration in the VitD3 treatment group compared to control (P = .020). No significant changes were observed in secondary outcome parameters, including N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide natriuretic peptide and fibrosis markers. Most CHF patients had VitD deficiency and high PRA levels. Six weeks of supplementation with 2,000 IU VitD3 increased 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 levels and decreased PRA and plasma renin concentration.

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is characterized by functional renal failure in end-stage liver disease. Terlipressin is the drug of choice for treating type 1 HRS (HRS-1). It is expensive and often not readily available. We, in an open label, randomized, pilot trial, compared the efficacy of terlipressin and noradrenaline on the renal functions and clinical outcome of patients with HRS-1 and also sought predictors of response. PATIENTS AND Forty consecutive patients with HRS-1 were randomized to receive noradrenaline 0.5-3.0 mg/h and albumin (group A, N = 20) or terlipressin 0.5-2 mg, 6 hourly and albumin (group B, N = 20), until reversal of HRS (primary end point) or completion of 15 days of therapy (secondary end point). Systemic and renal parameters were monitored. Baseline parameters and delta creatinine at day 4 (DCD4) were used to predict response. The two groups were comparable at baseline. At similar time points, 10 (50%) patients in each group achieved primary end points. Patients in both groups had a significant (P < 0.05) decrease in serum creatinine from baseline (group A day 4 2.4 +/- 1.2 mg/dL, day 8 1.6 +/- 1.2 mg/dL, and day 15 1.0 +/- 0.4 mg/dL; group B day 4 2.5 +/- 1.5 mg/dL, day 8 1.8 +/- 0.9 mg/dL, and day 15 1.2 +/- 0.5 mg/dL) and progressive increase in creatinine clearance (group A day 4 26.5 +/- 12.8 mL/min and day 15 59.8 +/- 14.2 mL/min; group B day 4 31.4 +/- 21.4 mL/min and day 15 54.9 +/- 27.5 mL/min, P < 0.05). Median baseline plasma renin activity was reduced from 38.0 and 42.0 ng/mL/h to 3.0 and 8.0 ng/mL/h (P= 0.08) in groups A and B, respectively. Mean arterial BP and urine output significantly increased in both groups with therapy. Eleven (55%) patients in group A (10 responders) and an equal number in group B (8 responders) survived until day 15 (P= 0.798). Reversible cardiac ischemia was seen in one patient in each group. Noradrenaline therapy was significantly less expensive than terlipressin. On univariate analysis, the following baseline parameters predicted response to therapy: lower grade of encephalopathy, lower MELD score, higher creatinine clearance, higher mean arterial pressure (MAP), and lower plasma renin activity. However, on multivariate analysis only baseline creatinine clearance, MAP, and plasma renin activity were independent predictors of response. At day 4 of therapy, DCD4 was computed and a value of 0.15 mg/dL/day or more accurately predicted response. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for DCD4 0.15 mg/dL/day for predicting response to therapy were 90%, 75%, 78%, and 88%, respectively. Noradrenaline may be an effective and safe alternative to terlipressin in improving renal functions. Various baseline parameters and DCD4 can be used to predict response to therapy.