Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background The engagement of community partners in equitable partnerships with academic teams is necessary to achieve health equity. However, there is no standardized approach to support bidirectional engagement among research stakeholders in the context of partnership equity at each phase of the research process. Objective We describe the development of a systematic framework along with competencies and tools promoting bidirectional engagement and equity within community–academic partnerships at each phase of the research process. Design We conducted a four‐step research process between November 2020 and December 2023 for framework development: (1) a narrative literature review; (2) expansion of existing bidirectional, equitable framework; (3) a scientific review with two groups of cognitive interviews (five community engagement researchers and five community leaders and members); and (4) three community‐based organization leader focus groups. Thematic analysis was used to analyse focus group data. Results Using results of each step, the framework was iteratively developed, yielding four phases of the bidirectional engagement and equity (BEE) research framework: Relationship building and assessment of goals and resources (Phase I); form a community–academic partnership based on shared research interests (may include multilevel stakeholders) (Phase II); develop a research team comprising members from each partnering organization (Phase III); and implement the six‐step equitable research process (Phase IV). Bidirectional learning and partnership principles are at the core of the partnership, particularly in Phases II–IV. Competencies and tools for conducting an equitable, engaged research process were provided. Discussion This conceptual framework offers a novel, stepwise approach and competencies for community–academic partners to successfully partner and conduct the research process equitably. Conclusion The BEE research framework can be implemented to standardize the conduct of an equitable, engaged research process within a community–academic partnership, while improving knowledge and trust across partners and, ultimately, an increased return on investment and sustainability to benefit both partners in the area of health outcomes and ultimately health equity. Patient or Public Contribution The development of this framework was co‐led with a community organization in which two leaders in the organization were equitably involved in each phase of the research process, including grant development, study design, participant recruitment, protocol development for focus groups and community and researcher review, framework design and content and dissemination of this manuscript as a co‐author. For grant development, the community leader completed the give‐get grid components for them as a partner. They also wrote up their lived experience in the research process for the progress report. For the focus groups, one community leader co‐led the focus group with the academic partner. For the narrative review, the community leaders did not actively conduct the narrative review but observed the process through the academic partners. One community leader wrote the section ‘relationship building’ and ‘bidirectional learning’ sections with the assistance of the academic partner, while they both equally provided input on other sections of the manuscript alongside academic partners. The community leaders have extensive experience in leading programmes, along with partnering with researchers to address health equity issues and improve health outcomes.

Regardless of the prevalence and value of change initiatives in contemporary organizations, these often face resistance by employees. This resistance is the outcome of change recipients’ cognitive and behavioral reactions towards change. To better understand the causes and effects of reactions to change, a holistic view of prior research is needed. Accordingly, we provide a systematic literature review on this topic. We categorize extant research into four major and several subcategories: micro and macro reactions. We analyze the essential characteristics of the emerging field of change reactions along research issues and challenges, benefits of (even negative) reactions, managerial implications, and propose future research opportunities.

Despite the publicity regarding big data and analytics (BDA), the success rate of these projects and strategic value created from them are unclear. Most literature on BDA focuses on how it can be used to enhance tactical organizational capabilities, but very few studies examine its impact on organizational value. Further, we see limited framing of how BDA can create strategic value for the organization. After all, the ultimate success of any BDA project lies in realizing strategic business value, which gives firms a competitive advantage. In this study, we describe the value proposition of BDA by delineating its components. We offer a framing of BDA value by extending existing frameworks of information technology value, then illustrate the framework through BDA applications in practice. The framework is then discussed in terms of its ability to study constructs and relationships that focus on BDA value creation and realization. We also present a problem-oriented view of the framework-where problems in BDA components can give rise to targeted research questions and areas for future study. The framing in this study could help develop a significant research agenda for BDA that can better target research and practice based on effective use of data resources.

While blockchain technology is commonly considered potentially disruptive in various regards, there is a lack of understanding where and how blockchain technology is effectively applicable and where it has mentionable practical effects. This issue has given rise to critical voices that judge the technology as over-hyped. Against this backdrop, this study adapts an established research framework to structure the insights of the current body of research on blockchain technology, outline the present research scope as well as disregarded topics, and sketch out multidisciplinary research approaches. The framework differentiates three groups of activities (design and features, measurement and value, management and organization) at four levels of analysis (users and society, intermediaries, platforms, firms and industry). The review shows that research has predominantly focused on technological questions of design and features, while neglecting application, value creation, and governance. In order to foster substantial blockchain research that addresses meaningful questions, this study identifies several avenues for future studies. Given the breadth of open questions, it shows where research can benefit from multidisciplinary collaborations and presents data sources as starting points for empirical investigations.

The mission of UN Decade of Healthy Ageing (2020–2030) is to improve the lives of older people, their families and their communities. In this paper, we create a conceptual framework and research agenda for researchers to knowledge to address the Decade action items. The framework builds on the main components of healthy ageing: Environments (highlighting society and community) across life courses (of work and family) toward wellbeing (of individuals, family members and communities). Knowledge gaps are identified within each area as priority research actions. Within societal environments, interrogating beliefs about ageism and about familism are proposed as a way to illustrate how macro approaches to older people influence their experiences. We need to interrogate the extent to which communities are good places to grow old; and whether they have sufficient resources to be supportive to older residents. Further articulation of trajectories and turning points across the full span of work and of family life courses is proposed to better understand their diversities and the extent to which they lead to adequate financial and social resources in later life. Components of wellbeing are proposed to monitor improvement in the lives of older people, their families and communities. Researcher priorities can be informed by regional and national strategies reflecting Decade actions.

Purpose Confusion and conflation about the components of research continue to hinder how scholars position, design, and communicate their research. In response, this article aims to clarify the components of research and how they can be effectively illustrated and written through the lens of frameworks. Design/methodology/approach This article adopts a conceptual approach to achieve its purpose by integrating allied literature and drawing on established theory-building heuristics to articulate a five-part research framework, with each part accompanied by a set of criteria (what it is, what it is not, what to do, and what to evaluate). Findings This article introduces the notion of research framework as a framework of frameworks comprising theoretical, conceptual, contextual, methodological, and impact frameworks. The article clarifies the distinct role of each component, sets out criteria for what each framework is and is not and what it should do and be evaluated on, and shows how alignment across the five parts connects explanation, scope, design, and stakeholder-relevant outcomes into a coherent whole. An exemplar on brand switching and brand loyalty in consumer goods traded across markets illustrates how this integrated framework can organize research questions, justify design choices, and foreground scholarly, managerial, and societal implications. Originality/value The notion of research framework introduced herein this article is an original conceptualization that should help both emerging and established researchers better position their research. More specifically, the article advances a framework of frameworks that differentiates and links theoretical, conceptual, contextual, methodological, and impact frameworks and, in doing so, addresses common confusion and conflation among them. The resulting criteria and visual tools enable authors, reviewers, and trainers to design, evaluate, and teach research in a more coherent and consistent way across business and trade domains.

Social media are fundamentally changing the way we communicate, collaborate, consume, and create. They represent one of the most transformative impacts of information technology on business, both within and outside firm boundaries. This special issue was designed to stimulate innovative investigations of the relationship between social media and business transformation. In this paper we outline a broad research agenda for understanding the relationships among social media, business, and society. We place the papers comprising the special issue within this research framework and identify areas where further research is needed. We hope that the flexible framework we outline will help guide future research and develop a cumulative research tradition in this area.

New-type urbanization and rural revitalization have gradually become national strategies, and are an objective requirement for China to be able to enter into a new era of socialism with Chinese characteristics and also an inevitable result of the integration of new-type urbanization and rural development in the new stage. This paper reviews the classic theories and cognition of the research on urban–rural relations at home and abroad, and outlines the stage evolution characteristics of urban–rural relations in China. It is believed that urban-biased urbanization has widened the development gap between urban and rural areas since reform and opening up. Under the guidance of the two strategies of new-type urbanization and rural revitalization, urban and rural areas have transitioned from “one-way flow” to “bilateral interaction”, and from “urban bias” to “urban–rural integration”. This paper puts forward a research framework and scientific issues regarding the integration of new-type urbanization and rural revitalization from multidisciplinary perspectives. The integration of these two major strategies will contribute to a new situation of the coordinated and high-quality development of urban and rural areas in the new era.

A major stream of research within the field of information systems security examines the use of organizational policies that specify how users of information and technology resources should behave in order to prevent, detect, and respond to security incidents. However, this growing (and at times, conflicting) body of research has made it challenging for researchers and practitioners to comprehend the current state of knowledge on the formation, implementation, and effectiveness of security policies in organizations. Accordingly, the purpose of this paper is to synthesize what we know and what remains to be learned about organizational information security policies, with an eye toward a holistic understanding of this research stream and the identification of promising paths for future study. We review 114 influential security policy-related journal articles and identify five core relationships examined in the literature. Based on these relationships, we outline a research framework that synthesizes the construct linkages within the current literature. Building on our analysis of these results, we identify a series of gaps and draw on additional theoretical perspectives to propose a revised framework that can be used as a basis for future research.