Explore the vast range of titles available.

Increasing epithelial repair and regeneration may hasten resolution of lung injury in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In animal models of ARDS, keratinocyte growth factor (KGF) reduces injury and increases epithelial proliferation and repair. The effect of KGF in the human alveolus is unknown. To test whether KGF can attenuate alveolar injury in a human model of ARDS. Volunteers were randomized to intravenous KGF (60 μg/kg) or placebo for 3 days, before inhaling 50 μg LPS. Six hours later, subjects underwent bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) to quantify markers of alveolar inflammation and cell-specific injury. KGF did not alter leukocyte infiltration or markers of permeability in response to LPS. KGF increased BAL concentrations of surfactant protein D, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9, IL-1Ra, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and C-reactive protein. In vitro, BAL fluid from KGF-treated subjects inhibited pulmonary fibroblast proliferation, but increased alveolar epithelial proliferation. Active MMP-9 increased alveolar epithelial wound repair. Finally, BAL from the KGF-pretreated group enhanced macrophage phagocytic uptake of apoptotic epithelial cells and bacteria compared with BAL from the placebo-treated group. This effect was blocked by inhibiting activation of the GM-CSF receptor. KGF treatment increases BAL surfactant protein D, a marker of type II alveolar epithelial cell proliferation in a human model of acute lung injury. Additionally, KGF increases alveolar concentrations of the antiinflammatory cytokine IL-1Ra, and mediators that drive epithelial repair (MMP-9) and enhance macrophage clearance of dead cells and bacteria (GM-CSF). Clinical trial registered with ISRCTN 98813895.

Antenatal betamethasone is recommended before preterm delivery to accelerate fetal lung maturation. However, reports of growth and neurodevelopmental dose-related side-effects suggest that the current dose (12 mg plus 12 mg, 24 h apart) might be too high. We therefore investigated whether a half dose would be non-inferior to the current full dose for preventing respiratory distress syndrome. We designed a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority trial in 37 level 3 referral perinatal centres in France. Eligible participants were pregnant women aged 18 years or older with a singleton fetus at risk of preterm delivery and already treated with the first injection of antenatal betamethasone (11·4 mg) before 32 weeks’ gestation. We used a computer-generated code producing permuted blocks of varying sizes to randomly assign (1:1) women to receive either a placebo (half-dose group) or a second 11·4 mg betamethasone injection (full-dose group) 24 h later. Randomisation was stratified by gestational age (before or after 28 weeks). Participants, clinicians, and study staff were masked to the treatment allocation. The primary outcome was the need for exogenous intratracheal surfactant within 48 h after birth. Non-inferiority would be shown if the higher limit of the 95% CI for the between-group difference between the half-dose and full-dose groups in the primary endpoint was less than 4 percentage points (corresponding to a maximum relative risk of 1·20). Four interim analyses monitoring the primary and the secondary safety outcomes were done during the study period, using a sequential data analysis method that provided futility and non-inferiority stopping rules and checked for type I and II errors. Interim analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02897076. Between Jan 2, 2017, and Oct 9, 2019, 3244 women were randomly assigned to the half-dose (n=1620 [49·9%]) or the full-dose group (n=1624 [50·1%]); 48 women withdrew consent, 30 fetuses were stillborn, 16 neonates were lost to follow-up, and 9 neonates died before evaluation, so that 3141 neonates remained for analysis. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the primary outcome occurred in 313 (20·0%) of 1567 neonates in the half-dose group and 276 (17·5%) of 1574 neonates in the full-dose group (risk difference 2·4%, 95% CI –0·3 to 5·2); thus non-inferiority was not shown. The per-protocol analysis also did not show non-inferiority (risk difference 2·2%, 95% CI –0·6 to 5·1). No between-group differences appeared in the rates of neonatal death, grade 3–4 intraventricular haemorrhage, stage ≥2 necrotising enterocolitis, severe retinopathy of prematurity, or bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Because non-inferiority of the half-dose compared with the full-dose regimen was not shown, our results do not support practice changes towards antenatal betamethasone dose reduction. French Ministry of Health.

There is much debate on the use of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in severe acute respiratory syndrome–coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2)–infected patients. Although it has been suggested that ARBs might lead to a higher susceptibility and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection, experimental data suggest that ARBs may reduce acute lung injury via blocking angiotensin-II–mediated pulmonary permeability, inflammation, and fibrosis. However, despite these hypotheses, specific studies on ARBs in SARS-CoV-2 patients are lacking. The PRAETORIAN-COVID trial is a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled 1:1 randomized clinical trial in adult hospitalized SARS-CoV-2–infected patients (n = 651). The primary aim is to investigate the effect of the ARB valsartan compared to placebo on the composite end point of admission to an intensive care unit, mechanical ventilation, or death within 14 days of randomization. The active-treatment arm will receive valsartan in a dosage titrated to blood pressure up to a maximum of 160 mg bid, and the placebo arm will receive matching placebo. Treatment duration will be 14 days, or until the occurrence of the primary end point or until hospital discharge, if either of these occurs within 14 days. The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04335786, 2020). The PRAETORIAN-COVID trial is a double-blind, placebo-controlled 1:1 randomized trial to assess the effect of valsartan compared to placebo on the occurrence of ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, and death in hospitalized SARS-CoV-2–infected patients. The results of this study might impact the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 patients globally.

Antenatal corticosteroids for women at risk of preterm birth reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality, but there is limited evidence regarding their effects on long-term health. This study assessed cardiovascular outcomes at 50 years after antenatal exposure to corticosteroids. We assessed the adult offspring of women who participated in the first randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of antenatal betamethasone for the prevention of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) (1969 to 1974). The first 717 mothers received 2 intramuscular injections of 12 mg betamethasone or placebo 24 h apart and the subsequent 398 received 2 injections of 24 mg betamethasone or equivalent volume of placebo. Follow-up included a health questionnaire and consent to access administrative data sources. The co-primary outcomes were the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors (any of hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, diabetes mellitus, gestational diabetes mellitus, or prediabetes) and age at first major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, coronary revascularisation, stroke, admission for peripheral vascular disease, and admission for heart failure). Analyses were adjusted for gestational age at entry, sex, and clustering. Of 1,218 infants born to 1,115 mothers, we followed up 424 (46% of survivors; 212 [50%] female) at mean (standard deviation) age 49.3 (1.0) years. There were no differences between those exposed to betamethasone or placebo for cardiovascular risk factors (159/229 [69.4%] versus 131/195 [67.2%]; adjusted relative risk 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.89, 1.18;]; p = 0.735) or age at first MACE (adjusted hazard ratio 0.58, 95% CI [0.23, 1.49]; p = 0.261). There were also no differences in the components of these composite outcomes or in any of the other secondary outcomes. Key limitations were follow-up rate and lack of in-person assessments. There is no evidence that antenatal corticosteroids increase the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors or incidence of cardiovascular events up to 50 years of age. Established benefits of antenatal corticosteroids are not outweighed by an increase in adult cardiovascular disease.

ObjectiveDipeptidase-1 (DPEP-1) is a recently discovered leucocyte adhesion receptor for neutrophils and monocytes in the lungs and kidneys and serves as a potential therapeutic target to attenuate inflammation in moderate-to-severe COVID-19. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the DPEP-1 inhibitor, LSALT peptide, to prevent specific organ dysfunction in patients hospitalised with COVID-19.DesignPhase 2a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, trial.SettingHospitals in Canada, Turkey and the USA.ParticipantsA total of 61 subjects with moderate-to-severe COVID-19.InterventionsRandomisation to LSALT peptide 5 mg intravenously daily or placebo for up to 14 days.Primary and secondary outcome measuresThe primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects alive and free of respiratory failure and/or the need for renal replacement therapy (RRT). Numerous secondary and exploratory endpoints were assessed including ventilation-free days, and changes in kidney function or serum biomarkers.ResultsAt 28 days, 27 (90.3%) and 28 (93.3%) of subjects in the placebo and LSALT groups were free of respiratory failure and the need for RRT (p=0.86). On days 14 and 28, the number of patients still requiring more intensive respiratory support (O2 ≥6 L/minute, non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) was 6 (19.4%) and 3 (9.7%) in the placebo group versus 2 (6.7%) and 2 (6.7%) in the LSALT group, respectively (p=0.14; p=0.67). Unadjusted analysis of ventilation-free days demonstrated 22.8 days for the LSALT group compared with 20.9 in the placebo group (p=0.4). LSALT-treated subjects had a significant reduction in the fold expression from baseline to end of treatment of serum CXCL10 compared with placebo (p=0.02). Treatment-emergent adverse events were similar between groups.ConclusionIn a Phase 2 study, LSALT peptide was demonstrated to be safe and tolerated in patients hospitalised with moderate-to-severe COVID-19.Trial registration numberNCT04402957.

Correspondence to Dr Joseph Hagan, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA; jlhagan@bcm.edu Gaertner et al1 published a randomised clinical trial of preterm infants comparing, as the primary outcome, the difference in end-expiratory lung impedance from birth to 30 min after birth (ΔEELI30min) for infants randomised to receive positive distending pressure, either alone (standard care) or with surfactant nebulisation (SN). According to figure 2 and the online supplemental table in Gaertner et al, the median ΔEELI was higher in the SN group at all 12 time points—often dramatically higher (eg, at 6 and 12 hours which showed a statistically significant difference until adjustment for multiple comparisons). [...]the data presented in this article suggests that surfactant nebulisation significantly increases the ΔEELI of preterm infants over the first 24 hours of life, although larger, better powered studies are needed to confirm this.

Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, as a consequence of preterm birth, is a major cause of early mortality and morbidity. The withdrawal of progesterone, either actual or functional, is thought to be an antecedent to the onset of labour. There remains limited information on clinically relevant health outcomes as to whether vaginal progesterone may be of benefit for pregnant women with a history of a previous preterm birth, who are at high risk of a recurrence. Our primary aim was to assess whether the use of vaginal progesterone pessaries in women with a history of previous spontaneous preterm birth reduced the risk and severity of respiratory distress syndrome in their infants, with secondary aims of examining the effects on other neonatal morbidities and maternal health and assessing the adverse effects of treatment. Women with a live singleton or twin pregnancy between 18 to <24 weeks' gestation and a history of prior preterm birth at less than 37 weeks' gestation in the preceding pregnancy, where labour occurred spontaneously or in association with cervical incompetence or following preterm prelabour rupture of the membranes, were eligible. Women were recruited from 39 Australian, New Zealand, and Canadian maternity hospitals and assigned by randomisation to vaginal progesterone pessaries (equivalent to 100 mg vaginal progesterone) (n = 398) or placebo (n = 389). Participants and investigators were masked to the treatment allocation. The primary outcome was respiratory distress syndrome and severity. Secondary outcomes were other respiratory morbidities; other adverse neonatal outcomes; adverse outcomes for the woman, especially related to preterm birth; and side effects of progesterone treatment. Data were analysed for all the 787 women (100%) randomised and their 799 infants. Most women used their allocated study treatment (740 women, 94.0%), with median use similar for both study groups (51.0 days, interquartile range [IQR] 28.0-69.0, in the progesterone group versus 52.0 days, IQR 27.0-76.0, in the placebo group). The incidence of respiratory distress syndrome was similar in both study groups-10.5% (42/402) in the progesterone group and 10.6% (41/388) in the placebo group (adjusted relative risk [RR] 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-1.49, p = 0.912)-as was the severity of any neonatal respiratory disease (adjusted treatment effect 1.02, 95% CI 0.69-1.53, p = 0.905). No differences were seen between study groups for other respiratory morbidities and adverse infant outcomes, including serious infant composite outcome (155/406 [38.2%] in the progesterone group and 152/393 [38.7%] in the placebo group, adjusted RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.82-1.17, p = 0.798). The proportion of infants born before 37 weeks' gestation was similar in both study groups (148/406 [36.5%] in the progesterone group and 146/393 [37.2%] in the placebo group, adjusted RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.81-1.17, p = 0.765). A similar proportion of women in both study groups had maternal morbidities, especially those related to preterm birth, or experienced side effects of treatment. In 9.9% (39/394) of the women in the progesterone group and 7.3% (28/382) of the women in the placebo group, treatment was stopped because of side effects (adjusted RR 1.35, 95% CI 0.85-2.15, p = 0.204). The main limitation of the study was that almost 9% of the women did not start the medication or forgot to use it 3 or more times a week. Our results do not support the use of vaginal progesterone pessaries in women with a history of a previous spontaneous preterm birth to reduce the risk of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome or other neonatal and maternal morbidities related to preterm birth. Individual participant data meta-analysis of the relevant trials may identify specific women for whom vaginal progesterone might be of benefit. Current Clinical Trials ISRCTN20269066.

ObjectiveTo compare the effect of peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) target range (TR) (either 91%–95% and 92%–96%) on the frequency and duration of hypoxic and hyperoxic episodes while on automated oxygen control using the OxyGenie controller.DesignRandomised cross-over study.SettingTertiary-level neonatal unit in the Netherlands.PatientsInfants (n=27) with a median (IQR) gestational age of 27+0 (25+5–27+3) weeks and postnatal age of 16 (10–22) days, receiving invasive or non-invasive respiratory support.InterventionsIn both groups supplemental oxygen was titrated to a TR of 91%–95% (TRlow) or 92%–96% (TRhigh) by the OxyGenie controller (SLE6000 ventilator) for 24 hours each, in random sequence. After a switch in TR, a 1-hour washout period was applied to prevent carry-over bias.Main outcome measuresFrequency and duration of hypoxic (SpO2<80% for ≥1 s) and hyperoxic episodes (SpO2>98% for ≥1 s).ResultsHypoxic episodes were less frequent when the higher range was targeted (TRhigh vs TRlow: 2.5 (0.7–6.2)/hour vs 2.4 (0.9–10.2)/hour, p=0.02), but hyperoxic episodes were more frequent (5.3 (1.8–12.3)/hour vs 2.9 (1.0–7.1)/hour, p<0.001). The duration of the out-of-range episodes was not significantly different (hypoxia: 4.7 (2.8–7.1) s vs 4.4 (3.7–6.5) s, p=0.67; hyperoxia: 4.3 (3.3–4.9) s vs 3.9 (2.8–5.5) s, p=0.89).ConclusionTargeting a higher SpO2 TR with the OxyGenie controller reduced hypoxic episodes but increased hyperoxic episodes. This study highlights the feasibility of using an automated oxygen titration device to explore the effects of subtle TR adjustments on clinical outcomes in neonatal care.Trial registration numberNL9662.

For women who have received a course of antenatal corticosteroids ≥7 days prior and have ongoing risk of preterm birth within the next 7 days, repeat dose(s) of corticosteroids up to 32 weeks' gestation have been shown to reduce neonatal respiratory distress syndrome and serious health problems in the neonatal period but not other neonatal morbidities such as chronic lung disease, death, severe intraventricular haemorrhage or necrotising enterocolitis. Repeat antenatal corticosteroids were not associated with either benefit or harms in mid-childhood. However, this may have been too early to evaluate potential adverse effects on respiratory and other long-term outcomes. We aimed to assess if exposure to repeat dose(s) of antenatal corticosteroids administered to pregnant women up to 32 weeks' gestation has beneficial or harmful effects on respiratory and general health of the offspring in adulthood. We assessed the adult offspring of New Zealand participants in the Australasian Collaborative Trial of Repeat Doses of Corticosteroids for the Prevention of Neonatal Respiratory Disease (ACTORDS), a multicentre, placebo-controlled trial where women at risk of preterm birth within the next week, 7 or more days after having received a single course of corticosteroids were randomised to a repeat dose of intramuscular betamethasone or placebo, that could be repeated weekly if at ongoing preterm birth risk. Follow-up at 20 years included a health questionnaire and consent to access administrative data sources. The primary outcome was any asthma diagnosis. Secondary outcomes included neurodevelopmental, cardiovascular, mental and general health, functional difficulties and social outcomes. Of 352 infants born to 290 maternal trial participants, we assessed 214 (61%; 96 (45%) female) at mean (standard deviation) age 20.5 (1.5) years. The rate of any asthma diagnosis was similar in both groups (58/107 (54%) repeat bethamethasone versus 50/107 (47%) placebo; risk ratio adjusted for gestational age at trial entry, multiplicity and birth centre 1.13, 95% confidence interval, 0.87, 1.46). Differences between the groups for the secondary outcomes were generally small and confidence intervals included the possibility of no difference between groups. In this follow-up of a randomised clinical trial, our data suggest neither major harm nor benefit for the offspring in early adulthood following exposure to repeat dose(s) of antenatal corticosteroids compared with a single course prior to 32 weeks' gestation. Smaller effects cannot be excluded and follow-up of adult offspring from other trials of repeat antenatal corticosteroids is recommended. International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN48656428.

Correspondence to Dr Vincent D Gaertner, Department of Neonatology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; vincent.gaertner@usz.ch We thank Dr Hagan for his letter highlighting the importance of a critical interpretation of statistical analyses. 1 2 Designing trials to investigate novel therapeutic approaches in the neonatal population is difficult, mainly due to lack of high-quality data for adequate sample size calculation. There was no significant effect of nebulised surfactant (SN) compared with standard care on changes in end-expiratory lung impedance in the first 24 hours in either analysis (mixed effects linear model: estimate=0.28, SE=0.63, p=0.66; median regression model: estimate=0.5, SE=0.47, p=0.29). [...]this has recently been confirmed by a large clinical trial demonstrating no significant clinical effect from this combination of SN on early respiratory failure and other clinical outcomes.3 Finally, it is of utmost importance in clinical research to report and discuss outcomes as they are. Since there was no significant effect, we cannot and must not suggest that there is a signficant change in end-expiratory lung impedance as promoted by Dr Hagan.