Explore the vast range of titles available.

In this trial, one intravitreal injection of bevacizumab was administered to treat retinopathy of prematurity of stage 3+. Bevacizumab was more effective than conventional laser therapy in preventing recurrence of neovascularization in infants with zone I but not zone II posterior retinopathy. Retinopathy of prematurity is a neovascular retinal disorder of childhood that causes loss of vision by means of macular dragging and retinal detachment. It is a leading cause of childhood blindness in the United States and other highly industrialized nations, occurring primarily in infants of low birth weight (≤1250 g; mean, 700 g). 1 The incidence of blindness in infants due to retinopathy of prematurity is relatively low, about 1 case in 820 infants, 2 because of good neonatal care and appropriate screening and treatment. 1 The disorder is a major cause of childhood blindness in developing countries, manifesting in larger premature infants . . .

ObjectiveTo determine if very low dose (VLD, 0.5% phenylephrine, 0.1% cyclopentolate) mydriatic microdrop (approximately 7 μL) administration (up to three doses) is non-inferior to low dose (LD, 1% phenylephrine, 0.2% cyclopentolate) mydriatic microdrop administration for ophthalmologist-determined successful retinopathy of prematurity eye examination (ROPEE).DesignMulticentre, prospective, randomised controlled, non-inferiority clinical trial.SettingFour neonatal intensive care units in Aotearoa, New Zealand from October 2019 to September 2021.PatientsInfants with a birth weight less than 1250 g or gestational age less than 30+6 weeks and who required a ROPEE.InterventionsThe intervention: microdrop (approximately 7 μL) of VLD (0.5% phenylephrine and 0.1% cyclopentolate) to both eyes, or the comparison: microdrop of LD (1% phenylephrine and 0.2% cyclopentolate) to both eyes. Up to three doses could be administered.Main outcome measuresThe primary outcome measure was an ophthalmologist-determined successful ROPEE.ResultsOne hundred and fifty preterm infants (LD mean GA=27.4±1.8 weeks, mean birth weight=1011±290 g, VLD mean GA=27.5±1.9 weeks, mean birth weight=1049±281 g,) were randomised. Non-inferiority for successful ROPEE was demonstrated for the VLD group compared with the LD group (VLD successful ROPEE=100%, LD successful ROPEE=100%, 95% CI no continuity correction −0.05 to 0.05) and for Māori (95% CI no continuity correction −0.02 to 0.19).ConclusionVLD microdrops enable safe and effective screening for ROPEE in both Māori and non-Māori preterm infants.Trial registration numberACTRN12619000795190.

Background There are no data on pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity of intravitreal aflibercept in preterm infants with retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). FIREFLEYE compared aflibercept 0.4 mg/eye and laser photocoagulation in infants with acute-phase ROP requiring treatment. Methods Infants (gestational age ≤32 weeks or birthweight ≤1500 g) with treatment-requiring ROP in ≥1 eye were randomized 2:1 to receive aflibercept 0.4 mg or laser photocoagulation at baseline in this 24-week, randomized, open-label, noninferiority, phase 3 study. Endpoints include concentrations of free and adjusted bound aflibercept in plasma, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic exploration of systemic anti-vascular endothelial growth factor effects, and immunogenicity. Results Of 113 treated infants, 75 received aflibercept 0.4 mg per eye at baseline (mean chronological age: 10.4 weeks), mostly bilaterally (71 infants), and with 1 injection/eye (120/146 eyes). Concentrations of free aflibercept were highly variable, with maximum concentration at day 1, declining thereafter. Plasma concentrations of adjusted bound (pharmacologically inactive) aflibercept increased from day 1 to week 4, decreasing up to week 24. Six infants experienced treatment-emergent serious adverse events within 30 days of treatment; aflibercept concentrations were within the range observed in other infants. There was no pattern between free and adjusted bound aflibercept concentrations and blood pressure changes up to week 4. A low-titer (1:30), non-neutralizing, treatment-emergent anti-drug antibody response was reported in 1 infant, though was not clinically relevant. Conclusions 24-week data suggest intravitreal aflibercept for treatment of acute-phase ROP is not associated with clinically relevant effects on blood pressure, further systemic adverse events, or immunogenicity. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04004208.

Objectives To evaluate respiratory outcomes in preterm infants with retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) following intravitreal bevacizumab injection (IVB). Methods This single-centre study enroled preterm infants with a gestational age (GA) < 34 weeks or a birth weight (BW) < 1500 g with bilateral type 1 ROP who received a single IVB, and a treatment-free control group matched by GA, postmenstrual age, and respiratory status at the time of the IVB. The primary outcome was serial respiratory changes in mean airway pressure (MAP), fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO 2 ), and respiratory severity score (RSS, MAP x FiO 2 ) during the 28-day post-IVB/matching period and overall respiratory improvement at day 28 and at discharge. The duration of supplemental oxygen therapy following IVB/matching was documented. Results A total of 5578 infants were included. Seventy-eight infants were enroled in the IVB group, and another 78 infants were matched as the control group. Both groups had downward trends in the MAP, FiO 2 , and RSS over the study period (all P  < 0.001), but there were no between-group differences in these measures. The percentage of overall respiratory improvement was similar between the IVB and control groups, so was the duration of invasive and in-hospital oxygen ventilation. A lower percentage of oxygen dependence at discharge in the IVB group ( P  = 0.03) remained significant after adjusting for GA and BW. Conclusions This is a matched case study to evaluate respiratory outcomes in preterm infants following IVB for ROP. We found that the IVBs did not compromise respiratory outcomes in preterm infants during the 28-day post-IVB period and at discharge.

Ranibizumab (Lucentis ® ) is a monoclonal antibody fragment targeted against VEGF-A that is the first approved anti-VEGF agent for the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). In the pivotal, randomized, phase III RAINBOW trial in infants with ROP, the majority of intravitreal ranibizumab recipients experienced treatment success at 24 weeks, with a numerically greater treatment success rate in the ranibizumab 0.2 mg (80% of patients) than laser therapy (66%) group without reaching statistical significance for superiority. Long-term effects on vision following ranibizumab treatment are not yet known, but interim analyses from the RAINBOW extension study do not show evidence of degraded vision. Adverse reactions to ranibizumab in pediatric patients were consistent with the known safety profile in adults, with most adverse reactions attributed to the intravitreal injection procedure. Furthermore, systemic VEGF suppression was not observed in clinical trials, which is congruent with the rapid systemic clearance of ranibizumab. Overall, ranibizumab is an effective and generally well tolerated treatment for ROP and is not associated with systemic VEGF suppression. Although results for its long-term effects on vision are not yet available, ranibizumab is a promising alternative option to laser therapy for treating ROP.

BackgroundData on long-term outcomes of antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy in retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) are still rare. We present 5-year post-treatment ophthalmological and paediatric outcomes of the prospective, multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, controlled pilot study CARE-ROP (Comparing Alternative Ranibizumab Dosages for Safety and Efficacy in Retinopathy of Prematurity).Methods14 patients (28 eyes) completed the ophthalmologic and 5 patients completed the paediatric 5-year follow-up assessment. The ophthalmological assessment included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), orthoptic status, slit lamp examination, intraocular pressure and funduscopy. The paediatric examination followed the German Neonatal Network protocol and covered cognitive, motor and sensory development.Results17 of 28 eyes exhibited at least one ocular abnormality, such as optic disc pallor or atrophy of the optic nerve head, retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) pigment changes, persistent tortuosity or macular hypoplasia. Despite this, 19 of 26 eyes demonstrated a logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR) BCVA of 0.3 or better. Mean refractive error was −0.9 D (±3.4 D) with only two eyes of one infant having high myopia of < −5 D. The neurodevelopmental results were within the expected range for a population of preterm infants with treatment-warranting ROP but need to be interpreted with caution due to the low number of five patients.ConclusionThe 5-year ophthalmologic and paediatric outcomes of the CARE-ROP study confirm the previous results and add important additional information on long-term safety of 0.12 and 0.20 mg ranibizumab for the treatment of ROP. The ophthalmologic functional outcome regarding BCVA and refraction is promising. These exploratory long-term data, however, need to be interpreted with caution due to the low patient number both in the ophthalmologic and paediatric assessment.

One of the biggest challenges when using anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents to treat retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is the need to perform long-term follow-up examinations to identify eyes at risk of ROP reactivation requiring retreatment. To evaluate whether an artificial intelligence (AI)-based vascular severity score (VSS) can be used to analyze ROP regression and reactivation after anti-VEGF treatment and potentially identify eyes at risk of ROP reactivation requiring retreatment. This prognostic study was a secondary analysis of posterior pole fundus images collected during the multicenter, double-blind, investigator-initiated Comparing Alternative Ranibizumab Dosages for Safety and Efficacy in Retinopathy of Prematurity (CARE-ROP) randomized clinical trial, which compared 2 different doses of ranibizumab (0.12 mg vs 0.20 mg) for the treatment of ROP. The CARE-ROP trial screened and enrolled infants between September 5, 2014, and July 14, 2016. A total of 1046 wide-angle fundus images obtained from 19 infants at predefined study time points were analyzed. The analyses of VSS were performed between January 20, 2021, and November 18, 2022. An AI-based algorithm assigned a VSS between 1 (normal) and 9 (most severe) to fundus images. Analysis of VSS in infants with ROP over time and VSS comparisons between the 2 treatment groups (0.12 mg vs 0.20 mg of ranibizumab) and between infants who did and did not receive retreatment for ROP reactivation. Among 19 infants with ROP in the CARE-ROP randomized clinical trial, the median (range) postmenstrual age at first treatment was 36.4 (34.7-39.7) weeks; 10 infants (52.6%) were male, and 18 (94.7%) were White. The mean (SD) VSS was 6.7 (1.9) at baseline and significantly decreased to 2.7 (1.9) at week 1 (P < .001) and 2.9 (1.3) at week 4 (P < .001). The mean (SD) VSS of infants with ROP reactivation requiring retreatment was 6.5 (1.9) at the time of retreatment, which was significantly higher than the VSS at week 4 (P < .001). No significant difference was found in VSS between the 2 treatment groups, but the change in VSS between baseline and week 1 was higher for infants who later required retreatment (mean [SD], 7.8 [1.3] at baseline vs 1.7 [0.7] at week 1) vs infants who did not (mean [SD], 6.4 [1.9] at baseline vs 3.0 [2.0] at week 1). In eyes requiring retreatment, higher baseline VSS was correlated with earlier time of retreatment (Pearson r = -0.9997; P < .001). In this study, VSS decreased after ranibizumab treatment, consistent with clinical disease regression. In cases of ROP reactivation requiring retreatment, VSS increased again to values comparable with baseline values. In addition, a greater change in VSS during the first week after initial treatment was found to be associated with a higher risk of later ROP reactivation, and high baseline VSS was correlated with earlier retreatment. These findings may have implications for monitoring ROP regression and reactivation after anti-VEGF treatment.

Background. Preterm neonates perceive multiple painful procedures during Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) stay, having long term neurobehavioral effects. This study aims to compare the analgesic efficacy of oral melatonin with 24% sucrose in neonates during retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening. Methods. A prospective, non-blinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted in a tertiary care NICU. All preterm neonates with gestational age (GA) < 34 weeks or birth weight (BW) < 2000 grams eligible for ROP screening were randomized into oral melatonin (4 mg/kg) and oral 24% sucrose (0.5 ml) groups. Both groups received standard non-pharmacological measures and topical proparacaine. The intensity of pain was measured by Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) score during the procedure, at 1st and 5th minutes following the procedure and compared between the two groups by Mann-Whitney U test with p value < 0.05 considered as significant. Results. A total of 60 preterm neonates were randomized with 30 neonates in the melatonin (median [interquartile range] GA: 30.86 [3.78] weeks, BW: 1160 [430] grams) and 30 neonates in the 24% sucrose (median [IQR] GA: 29.29 [4.68] weeks, BW: 1070 [315] grams) group. The median PIPP score during the procedure in the melatonin and sucrose groups were 17 and 16, respectively (p=0.64). The median (Q1-Q3) PIPP score at the 1st minute was significantly lower among the melatonin group (7 [5.25-10]) vs 24% sucrose group (9.5 [7.25-11]) (p=0.02); and at the 5th minute, the median (Q1-Q3) PIPP scores in the melatonin group (5 [4-6]) was comparable to the 24% sucrose group (5.5 [3.25-7]) (p= 0.52). Conclusions. Oral melatonin is not inferior to oral 24% sucrose for pain management during ROP screening.

Background: Oral propranolol reduces retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) progression, although not safely. This study evaluated safety and efficacy of propranolol eye micro-drops in preterm newborns with ROP. Methods: A multicenter open-label trial, planned according to the Simon optimal two-stage design, was performed to analyze safety and efficacy of propranolol micro-drops in newborns with stage 2 ROP. To this end, hemodynamic and respiratory parameters were monitored, and blood samples were collected weekly, for 3 wk. Propranolol plasma levels were also monitored. The progression of the disease was evaluated with serial ophthalmologic examinations. Results: Twenty-three newborns were enrolled. Since the fourth of the first 19 newborns enrolled in the first stage of the study showed a progression to stage 2 or 3 with plus, the second stage was prematurely discontinued. Even though the objective to complete the second stage was not achieved, the percentage of ROP progression (26%) was similar to that obtained previously with oral propranolol administration. However, no adverse effects were observed and propranolol plasma levels were significantly lower than those measured after oral administration. Conclusion: Propranolol 0.1% eye micro-drops are well tolerated, but not sufficiently effective. Further studies are required to identify the optimal dose and administration schedule.

Background To evaluate the results of near confluent laser therapy versus combined less dense laser and intra vitreal bevacizumab in treatment of infants with type 1 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in zone II. Methods This is a prospective double-blinded randomized clinical trial study. Infants with Type 1 ROP in Zone 2 were randomized into case and control groups. Conventional laser therapy was executed for control group and combination of IVB and laser treatment was employed for the case group. Results Eighty-six eyes from 43 infants were analyzed in this trial. The first group included 42 eyes from 21 infants receiving a combination of laser ablation and IVB. The second group contained 44 eyes from 22 infants who received only conventional laser therapy. The combined IVB and laser ablation group demonstrated the neovascularization regression (20 out of 21 infants) one week after the procedure. In the conventional laser therapy group, this regression was found in (12 out of 22 infants) within one week after laser therapy ( P  = 0.001). Plus disease regression was observed in 20 (20/21) of combined treatment group and 7 infants (7/22) of conventional laser treatment group after one week. Conclusion Combined less dense laser and bevacizumab treatment resulted in more rapid regression in comparison with the conventional laser treatment. Trial registration IRCT20201120049450N1, 27/12/2021.