Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Series TitleSeries Title
-
Reading LevelReading Level
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersContent TypeItem TypeIs Full-Text AvailableSubjectPublisherSourceDonorLanguagePlace of PublicationContributorsLocation
Done
Filters
Reset
3
result(s) for
"Ribbonism."
Sort by:
'The majority of our people belong to the working classes': the Ancient Order of Hibernians in the United States, c.1850-1884
2020
The Ancient Order of Hibernians has received attention only in broad studies of class and ethnicity in various US urban centres. This article addresses the class contradictions within the Catholic fraternal and Irish nationalist Hibernian movement during the formative period from around 1850 to 1884. Slightly more affluent Hibernian leaders of the lower middle and middle class sought an accommodation with the Catholic Church and mainstream American society. However, they were frequently hampered by the activities of some sections of their rank and file who continued to operate in the mode of Irish Ribbonism. Violence was deployed by working-class Hibernians in a range of settings, forcing its leaders to denounce bloodshed at their conventions and in the press. The relationship of Hibernianism to physical force Irish republicans, determined to stage a revolt in Ireland, also brought issues around class and violence to light. Despite violence and factionalism among different layers of the movement, Hibernianism, bound together by an ethnic Irish nationalism, Catholicism and elements of militant republicanism, survived and even expanded. It was therefore well placed to capitalize on a steady stream of Irish immigrants and the 'golden age' of ethnic societies from the 1890s onwards.
Journal Article
Faith and Fatherland
2007
Although privileged in historical studies, ‘top-down’ institutional and charitable provision needs to be assessed in wider context, taking account of the various networks, formal and otherwise, by which migrants themselves adjusted to new surroundings. Working through family links, social connections and regional solidarities, many arrived in Liverpool through chain migration, with those already at destination helping newcomers (in classic ‘moving European’ fashion) to find jobs and housing, thereby protecting them from disorientation, dislocation and anomic behaviour. Unknown arrivals who lacked such support mechanisms had to integrate themselves into street or court networks of mutual aid. Invariably run by women, those
Book Chapter