Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
187 result(s) for "Richtmeyer-Meshkov instability"
Sort by:
On shock-induced heavy-fluid-layer evolution
Investigation on the shock-induced finite-thickness fluid-layer evolution is very desirable but remains a challenge because it not only involves both the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability (RMI) and the Rayleigh–Taylor instability (RTI), but also strongly depends on the waves reverberated inside the layer. We experimentally and theoretically examined the evolution of a shocked $\\textrm {SF}_6$ gas layer with a finite thickness surrounded by air. Specifically, three kinds of quasi-one-dimensional $\\textrm {SF}_6$ gas layers with different layer thicknesses are generated to study the wave patterns and interface motions, and six types of quasi-two-dimensional $\\textrm {SF}_6$ gas layers with diverse layer thicknesses and amplitude combinations are created to explore the interfacial instabilities of the layer. When the initial fluid layer is thin, the two interfaces of the layer coalesce at a late time. The present study is the first to report that except for the RMI induced by a shock wave on the two interfaces, the rarefaction waves (RW) inside the fluid layer induce the additional RTI and decompression effect on the first interface, and the compression waves (CW) inside the fluid layer cause the additional Rayleigh–Taylor stabilisation (RTS) and compression effect on the second interface. A general one-dimensional theory is established to describe the motions of the two interfaces. Linear and nonlinear models are successfully established by considering the interface-coupling effect on the RMI and the additional interfacial instabilities induced by these waves inside the heavy fluid layer. The established models predict well the perturbation growths on the two interfaces at all regimes.
Manipulation of Richtmyer–Meshkov instability on a heavy–light interface via successive shocks
The manipulation of the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability growth at a heavy–light interface via successive shocks is theoretically analysed and experimentally realized in a specific shock-tube facility. An analytical model is developed to forecast the interface evolution before and after the second shock impact, and the possibilities for the amplitude evolution pattern are systematically discussed. Based on the model, the parameter conditions for each scenario are designed, and all possibilities are experimentally realized by altering the time interval between two shock impacts. These findings may enhance the understanding of how successive shocks influence hydrodynamic instabilities in practical applications.
Atwood-number dependence of the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability at a heavy–light single-mode interface
The dependence of the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability (RMI) on post-shock Atwood number ( $A_1$ ) is experimentally investigated for a heavy–light single-mode interface. We create initial interfaces with density ratios of heavy to light gases ranging from 1.73 to 34.07, and achieve the highest $|A_1|$ value reported to date for gaseous-interface experiments (0.95). For the first time, spike acceleration is observed in experiments with a heavy–light configuration. The models for the start-up, linear and weakly nonlinear evolution stages are evaluated over a wide range of $A_1$ conditions. Specifically, the models proposed by Li et al. (Phys. Fluids, vol. 36, 2024, 056104) and Wouchuk & Nishihara (Phys. Plasmas, vol. 4, 1997, 1028–1038) effectively describe the start-up and linear stages, respectively, across all cases. None of the considered nonlinear models is valid under all $A_1$ conditions. Based on the dependence of spike and bubble evolutions on $A_1$ provided by the present work and previous study (Chen et al., J. Fluid Mech., vol. 975, 2023, A29), the SEA model (Sadot et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 80, 1998, pp. 1654–1657), whose expression has clear physical meanings, is modified by revising the coefficient that governs its prediction for early-time evolution. The modified model applies to prediction of the weakly nonlinear evolution of RMI with $A_1$ ranging from −0.95 to −0.35 and from 0.30 to 0.86. Based on this model, an approximation of the critical $A_1$ for the occurrence of spike acceleration is obtained.
Shock-tube studies of single- and quasi-single-mode perturbation growth in Richtmyer–Meshkov flows with reshock
The Richtmyer–Meshkov instability of heavy/light single-mode (SM), trapezoid (TR) and sawtooth (ST) interfaces is studied experimentally by considering the reshock. The TR and ST interfaces can be expanded into Fourier series with a dominant fundamental mode and more high-order modes, recognized as quasi-single-mode ones. In experiments, the distorted interfaces at the time of first reshock arrival develop in the weakly nonlinear stage, ensuring an approximate single-scale function of evolving interface. The results show an evident memory of initial interface shapes: the bubbles and spikes of ST interface after reshock mainly develop in the streamwise direction with sharp heads, while the counterparts of TR interface tend to grow in the spanwise direction. The influences of high-order modes are amplified by the reshock, resulting in significant interface shape dependence of mixing width growths. The amplitude superposition of major odd-order modes promotes the growth rates of mixing widths for the SM and ST cases, different from the TR one. The ST interface has larger mixing width growth rates in comparison with the SM interface, since high-order modes play a great role in promoting the increase of ST amplitudes, while the TR interface has a relatively small one. The linear and nonlinear mixing width growths of SM, TR and ST interfaces before and after reshock are further analysed theoretically, indicating that the fundamental mode still has a predominant influence on the interface evolution after reshock, and the growth behaviours exhibit strong similarities to those for the singly shocked cases.
Supernova, nuclear synthesis, fluid instabilities, and interfacial mixing
Supernovae and their remnants are a central problem in astrophysics due to their role in the stellar evolution and nuclear synthesis. A supernova’s explosion is driven by a blast wave causing the development of Rayleigh–Taylor and Richtmyer–Meshkov instabilities and leading to intensive interfacial mixing of materials of a progenitor star. Rayleigh–Taylor and Richtmyer–Meshkov mixing breaks spherical symmetry of a star and provides conditions for synthesis of heavy mass elements in addition to light mass elements synthesized in the star before its explosion. By focusing on hydrodynamic aspects of the problem, we apply group theory analysis to identify the properties of Rayleigh–Taylor and Richtmyer–Meshkov dynamics with variable acceleration, discover subdiffusive character of the blast wave-induced interfacial mixing, and reveal the mechanism of energy accumulation and transport at small scales in supernovae.
Hydrodynamic instabilities of two successive slow/fast interfaces induced by a weak shock
Shock-induced instability developments of two successive interfaces have attracted much attention, but remain a difficult problem to solve. The feedthrough and reverberating waves between two successive interfaces significantly influence the hydrodynamic instabilities of the two interfaces. The evolutions of two successive slow/fast interfaces driven by a weak shock wave are examined experimentally and numerically. First, a general one-dimensional theory is established to describe the movements of the two interfaces by studying the rarefaction waves reflected between the two interfaces. Second, an analytical, linear model is established by considering the arbitrary wavenumber and phase combinations and compressibility to quantify the feedthrough effect on the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability (RMI) of two successive slow/fast interfaces. The feedthrough significantly influences the RMI of the two interfaces, and even leads to abnormal RMI (i.e. phase reversal of a shocked slow/fast interface is inhibited) which is the first observational evidence of the abnormal RMI provided by the present study. Moreover, the stretching effect and short-time Rayleigh–Taylor instability or Rayleigh–Taylor stabilisation imposed by the rarefaction waves on the two interfaces are quantified considering the two interfaces’ phase reversal. The conditions and outcomes of the freeze-out and abnormal RMI caused by the feedthrough are summarised based on the theoretical model and numerical simulation. A specific requirement for the simultaneously freeze-out of the instability of the two interfaces is proposed, which can potentially be used in the applications to suppress the hydrodynamic instabilities.
The influence of the shock-to-reshock time on the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability in reshock
Experiments on the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability (RMI) in a dual driver vertical shock tube (DDVST) are described. An initially planar, stably stratified membraneless interface is formed by flowing air from above and sulfur hexafluoride from below the interface location using the method of Jones & Jacobs (Phys. Fluids, vol. 9, issue 1997, 1997, pp. 3078–3085). A random three-dimensional, multi-modal initial perturbation is imposed by vertically oscillating the gas column to produce Faraday waves. The DDVST design generates two shock waves, one originating above and one below the interface, with these shocks having independently controllable strengths and interface arrival times. The shock waves have nominal strengths of $M_L=1.17$ and $M_H=1.18$ for the shock wave originating in the light and heavy gas, respectively, with these strengths chosen to result in arrested bulk interface motion following reshock. The influence of the length of the shock-to-reshock time, as well as the order of shock arrival, on the post-reshock RMI is examined. The mixing layer width grows according to $h\\propto t^\\theta$, where $\\theta _H=0.36\\pm 0.018$ (95 %) and $\\theta _L=0.38\\pm 0.02$ (95 %) for heavy and light shock first experiments, respectively, indicating no strong dependence on the order of shock wave arrival. Volume integrated specific turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) in the mixing layer versus time is found to decay according to $E_{tot}/\\bar {\\rho }\\propto t^p$ with $p_H=-0.823\\pm 0.06$ (95 %) and $p_L=-1.061\\pm 0.032$ (95 %) for heavy and light shock first experiments, respectively. Notably, the 95 % confidence intervals do not overlap. Analysis on the influence of the shock-to-reshock time on turbulent length scales, transition criteria, spectra and mixing layer anisotropy are also presented.
On shock-induced light-fluid-layer evolution
Shock-induced light-fluid-layer evolution is firstly investigated experimentally and theoretically. Specifically, three quasi-one-dimensional helium gas layers with different layer thicknesses are generated to study the wave patterns and interface motions. Six quasi-two-dimensional helium gas layers with diverse layer thicknesses and amplitude combinations are created to explore the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability of a light-fluid layer. Due to the multiple reflected shocks reverberating inside a light-fluid layer, the speeds of the two interfaces gradually converge, and the layer thickness saturates eventually. A general one-dimensional theory is adopted to describe the two interfaces’ motions and the layer thickness variations. It is found that, for the first interface, the end time of its phase reversal determines the influence of the reflected shocks on it. However, the reverberated shocks indeed lead to the second interface being more unstable. When the two interfaces are initially in phase, and the initial fluid layer is very thin, the two interfaces’ spike heads collide and stabilise the two interfaces. Linear and nonlinear models are successfully adopted by considering the interface-coupling effect and the reverberated shocks to predict the two interfaces’ perturbation growths in all regimes. The interfacial instability of a light-fluid layer is quantitatively compared with that of a heavy-fluid layer. It is concluded that the kind of waves reverberating inside a fluid layer significantly affects the fluid-layer evolution.
Shock-tube experiments on strong-shock-driven single-mode Richtmyer–Meshkov instability
We report the first shock-tube experiments on Richtmyer–Meshkov instability at a single-mode light–heavy interface accelerated by a strong shock wave with Mach number higher than 3.0. Under the proximity effect of the transmitted shock and its induced secondary compression effect, the interface profile is markedly different from that in weakly compressible flows. For the first time, the validity of the compressible linear theory and the failure of the impulsive model in predicting the linear amplitude evolution in highly compressible flows are verified through experiments. Existing nonlinear and modal models fail to accurately describe the perturbation evolution, as they do not account for the shock proximity and secondary compression effects on interface evolution. The shock proximity effect manifests mainly in the early stages when the transmitted shock remains close to the interface, while the effect of secondary compression manifests primarily at the period when interactions of transverse shocks occur at the bubble tips. Based on these findings, we propose an empirical model capable of predicting the bubble evolution in highly compressible flows.
Evolution of shock-accelerated heavy gas layer
Richtmyer–Meshkov instability of the SF 6 gas layer surrounded by air is experimentally investigated. Using the soap film technique, five kinds of gas layer with two sharp interfaces are generated such that the development of each individual interface is highlighted. The flow patterns are determined by the amplitudes and phases of two corrugated interfaces. For a layer with both interfaces planar, the interface velocity shows that the reflected rarefaction waves from the second interface accelerate the first interface motion. For a layer with the second interface corrugated but the first interface planar, the reflected rarefaction waves make the first interface develop with the same phase as the second interface. For a layer with the first interface corrugated but the second interface planar, the rippled shock seeded from the first interface makes the second interface develop with the same phase as the first interface and the layer evolves into an ‘upstream mushroom’ shape. For two interfaces corrugated with opposite (the same) phase but a larger amplitude for the first interface, the layer evolves into ‘sinuous’ shape (‘bow and arrow’ shape, which has never been observed previously). For the interface amplitude growth in the linear stage, the waves’ effects are considered in the model to give a better prediction. In the nonlinear stage, the effect of the rarefaction waves on the first interface evolution is quantitatively evaluated, and the nonlinear growth is well predicted. It is the first time in experiments to quantify the interfacial instability induced by the rarefaction waves inside the heavy gas layer.