Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Item TypeItem Type
-
SubjectSubject
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersSourceLanguage
Done
Filters
Reset
2
result(s) for
"Right of property -- England -- History -- Sources"
Sort by:
Women, Property, and the Letters of the Law in Early Modern England
by
Wright, Nancy E
,
Buck, Andrew
,
Ferguson, Margaret W
in
England
,
English literature-Early modern, 1500-1700-History and criticism
,
HISTORY
2004,2014
Women, Property, and the Letters of the Law in Early Modern Englandexamines the competing narratives of property told by and about women in the early modern period. Through letters, legal treatises, case law, wills, and works of literature, the contributors explore women's complex roles as subjects and agents in commercial and domestic economies, and as objects shaped by a network of social and legal relationships. By constructing conversations across the disciplinary boundaries of legal and social history, sociology and literary criticism, the collection explores a diverse range of women's property relationships.
Recent research has revealed fissures in our knowledge about women's property relationships within a regime characterized by competing jurisdictions, diverse systems of tenure, and multiple concepts of property.Women, Property, and the Letters of the Law in Early Modern Englandturns to these points of departure for the study of women's legal status and property relationships in the early modern period. This interdisciplinary analysis of women and property is written in an accessible manner and will become a valuable resource for scholars and students of Renaissance, Restoration and eighteenth-century literature, early modern social and legal history, and women's studies.
The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain
2003
Boyle examines the theory and history of the public domain. He concludes that the move to expand intellectual property rights is both empirically and theoretically questionable and quite possibly harmful to the very goals it attempts to serve.
Journal Article