Explore the vast range of titles available.

The reported coverage of the measles-rubella (MR) or measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine is greater than 99.0% in Zhejiang province. However, the incidence of measles, mumps, and rubella remains high. In this study, we assessed MMR seropositivity and disease distribution by age on the basis of the current vaccination program, wherein the first dose of MR is administered at 8 months and the second dose of MMR is administered at 18-24 months. Cross-sectional serological surveys of MMR antibodies were conducted by collecting epidemiological data in Zhejiang province, China in 2011. In total, 1015 participants were randomly selected from two surveillance sites. Serum MMR-specific immunoglobulin G levels were tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The geometric mean titers and seroprevalence with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by age and gender. Proportions of different dose of vaccine by age by vaccine were also identified. Statistically significant differences between categories were assessed by the Chi-square test. Over 95% seroprevalence rates of measles were seen in all age groups except <7 months infants. Children aged 5-9 years were shown lower seropositivity rates of mumps while elder adolescences and young adults were presented lower rubella seroprevalence. Especially, rubella seropositivity was significantly lower in female adults than in male. Nine measles cases were unvaccinated or unknown vaccination history. Among them, 66.67% (6/9) patients were aged 20-29 years while 33.33% (3/9) were infants aged 8-12 months. In addition, 57.75% (648/1122) patients with mumps were children aged 5-9 years, and 50.54% (94/186) rubella cases were aged 15-39 years. A timely two-dose MMR vaccination schedule is recommended, with the first dose at 8 months and the second dose at 18-24 months. An MR vaccination speed-up campaign may be necessary for elder adolescents and young adults, particularly young females.

Microneedle patches (MNPs) have been ranked as the highest global priority innovation for overcoming immunisation barriers in low-income and middle-income countries. This trial aimed to provide the first data on the tolerability, safety, and immunogenicity of a measles and rubella vaccine (MRV)-MNP in children. This single-centre, phase 1/2, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, active-controlled, age de-escalation trial was conducted in The Gambia. To be eligible, all participants had to be healthy according to prespecified criteria, aged 18–40 years for the adult cohort, 15–18 months for toddlers, or 9–10 months for infants, and to be available for visits throughout the follow-up period. The three age cohorts were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio (adults) or 1:1 ratio (toddlers and infants) to receive either an MRV-MNP (Micron Biomedical, Atlanta, GA, USA) and a placebo (0·9% sodium chloride) subcutaneous injection, or a placebo-MNP and an MRV subcutaneous injection (MRV-SC; Serum Institute of India, Pune, India). Unmasked staff ransomly assigned the participants using an online application, and they prepared visually identical preparations of the MRV-MNP or placebo-MNP and MRV-SC or placebo-SC, but were not involved in collecting endpoint data. Staff administering the study interventions, participants, parents, and study staff assessing trial endpoints were masked to treatment allocation. The safety population consists of all vaccinated participants, and analysis was conducted according to route of MRV administration, irrespective of subsequent protocol deviations. The immunogenicity population consisted of all vaccinated participants who had a baseline and day 42 visit result available, and who had no protocol deviations considered to substantially affect the immunogenicity endpoints. Solicited local and systemic adverse events were collected for 14 days following vaccination. Unsolicited adverse events were collected to day 180. Age de-escalation between cohorts was based on the review of the safety data to day 14 by an independent data monitoring committee. Serum neutralising antibodies to measles and rubella were measured at baseline, day 42, and day 180. Analysis was descriptive and included safety events, seroprotection and seroconversion rates, and geometric mean antibody concentrations. The trial was registered with the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry PACTR202008836432905, and is complete. Recruitment took place between May 18, 2021, and May 27, 2022. 45 adults, 120 toddlers, and 120 infants were randomly allocated and vaccinated. There were no safety concerns in the first 14 days following vaccination in either adults or toddlers, and age de-escalation proceeded accordingly. In infants, 93% (52/56; 95% CI 83·0–97·2) seroconverted to measles and 100% (58/58; 93·8–100) seroconverted to rubella following MRV-MNP administration, while 90% (52/58; 79·2–95·2) and 100% (59/59; 93·9–100) seroconverted to measles and rubella respectively, following MRV-SC. Induration at the MRV-MNP application site was the most frequent local reaction occurring in 46 (77%) of 60 toddlers and 39 (65%) of 60 infants. Related unsolicited adverse events, most commonly discolouration at the application site, were reported in 35 (58%) of 60 toddlers and 57 (95%) of 60 infants that had received the MRV-MNP. All local reactions were mild. There were no related severe or serious adverse events. The safety and immunogenicity data support the accelerated development of the MRV-MNP. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

JVC-001 is a new live attenuated measles–mumps–rubella vaccine (measles AIK-C, mumps RIT4385, and rubella Takahashi strains). Two phase 3 studies were conducted, one to verify the non-inferior immunogenicity of JVC-001 versus the approved mumps and measles–rubella vaccines (J301 study) and another to compare the immunogenicity and safety of different titers (J302 study). Both studies were multicenter, randomized, observer-blinded, phase 3 studies. J301 compared the immunogenicity elicited with a single dose of JVC-001 or control vaccines (measles–rubella vaccine + mumps vaccine [Hoshino strain]). J302 was a titer-confirmation study of a single dose of a low- or high-titer formulation of JVC-001. Both studies enrolled healthy Japanese children (aged 1 year) and had a primary efficacy endpoint of seropositive rate on Day 43. Overall, 861 participants completed J301 (JVC-001, n = 429; control, n = 432) and 100 participants completed J302 (low-titer, n = 48; high-titer, n = 52). For measles and rubella virus antibody titer, non-inferiority of JVC-001 was demonstrated: seropositive rates were ≥ 99.5 %. For mumps virus genotype D antibody titer, seropositive rates were 80.6 % (95 % confidence interval 76.5 % to 84.4 %) with JVC-001 and 88.1 % (84.6 % to 91.0 %) with control vaccination. Thus, non-inferiority for mumps virus genotype D antibody titer was not confirmed. Seropositive rates were similar in the low- and high-titer groups. There were no events leading to discontinuation, or cases of aseptic meningitis in either study. Although the non-inferiority of JVC-001 to currently approved vaccines was not demonstrated for the mumps component, clinical significance and consistent efficacy were indicated. Vaccine titer did not affect immunogenicity. JVC-001 is expected to have a lower risk of aseptic meningitis to currently approved vaccines and raised no new safety signals emerged. •JVC-001 is a new MMR vaccine (measles: AIK-C, mumps: RIT4385, rubella: Takahashi).•Comparative clinical trial of JVC-001 was conducted using MR and mumps vaccines.•Non-inferiority of immunogenicity was not demonstrated only against mumps virus.•However, clinical significance and consistent efficacy were indicated for JVC-001.•Different virus doses of JVC-001 did not affect immunogenicity and safety profile.

Typhoid fever, measles, and rubella continue to contribute significantly to childhood morbidity and mortality in India. In line with WHO recommendations for co-administration of Typhoid Conjugate Vaccine (TCV) and measles–rubella (MR) vaccine at 9 months of age, this phase IV, randomized, open-label, multicenter clinical trial was conducted to assess their immunological compatibility and safety when administered concomitantly. A total of 900 healthy Indian infants aged 9–10 months were randomized into three groups: Group A received TCV and MR vaccine concomitantly; Group B received MR on Day 0 and TCV on Day 28; Group C received TCV on Day 0 and MR on Day 28. Subjects were followed for 6 months after concomitant/last vaccination. Seroconversion rates (SC) in Groups A/B/C at Day 28 were 90.2%/75.3%/89.5% for anti-Vi; 80.4%/75.2%/77.7% for anti-measles, and 87.7%/84.0%/85.2% for anti-rubella antibodies. By study end, SC for anti-Vi was 87.1%/71.6%/83.0%, while SC for anti-measles and anti-rubella reached ~90% and ≥98%, respectively, across all groups. Geometric mean titers increased significantly for all antigens, with no evidence of immunological interference. Safety assessments showed adverse events in 23.9%/32.0%/32.7% participants in Group A/B/C. Most adverse events were mild, and only one serious adverse event was reported. These findings support the co-administration of TCV and MR vaccine as a safe and effective strategy.

Chikungunya is an emerging arthropod-borne disease that has spread from tropical endemic areas to more temperate climates of the USA and Europe. However, no specific treatment or preventive measure is yet available. We aimed to investigate the immunogenicity and safety of a live recombinant measles-virus-based chikungunya vaccine. We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, active-comparator, phase 1, dose-escalation study at one centre in Vienna, Austria. Healthy men and women aged 18–45 years with no comorbidities were randomly assigned, by computer-generated block randomisation (block size of 14), to receive either one of three escalating doses of the measles-virus-based candidate vaccine (low dose [1·5 × 104 median tissue culture infection doses (TCID50) per 0·05 mL], medium dose [7·5 × 104 TCID50 per 0·25 mL], or high dose [3·0 × 105 TCID50 per 1·0 mL]), or the active comparator—Priorix. Participants were additionally block-randomised to receive a booster injection on either day 28 or day 90 after the first vaccination. Participants and study investigators were masked to group allocation. The primary endpoint was the presence of neutralising anti-chikungunya antibodies on day 28, as assessed by 50% plaque reduction neutralisation test. Analysis was by intention to treat and per protocol. This trial is registered with EudraCT, number 2013-001084-23. Between Nov 22, 2013, and Feb 25, 2014, we randomly assigned 42 participants to receive the low dose (n=12), the medium dose (n=12), or the high dose (n=12) of the measles-virus-based candidate vaccine, or Priorix (n=6), of whom 36 participants (86%; n=9, n=12, n=10, n=5, respectively) were included in the per-protocol population. The candidate vaccine raised neutralising antibodies in all dose cohorts after one immunisation, with seroconversion rates of 44% (n=4) in the low-dose group, 92% (n=11) in the medium-dose group, and 90% (n=10) in the high-dose group. The immunogenicity of the candidate vaccine was not affected by pre-existing anti-measles immunity. The second vaccination resulted in a 100% seroconversion for all participants in the candidate vaccine groups. The candidate vaccine had an overall good safety profile, and the rate of adverse events increased with vaccine dose and volume. No vaccination-related serious adverse events were recorded. The live recombinant measles-virus-based chikungunya vaccine had good immunogenicity, even in the presence of anti-vector immunity, was safe, and had a generally acceptable tolerability profile. This vaccine is the first promising measles-virus-based candidate vaccine for use in human beings. Themis Bioscience GmBH.

In China, measles-rubella vaccine and live attenuated SA 14–14–2 Japanese encephalitis vaccine (LJEV) are recommended for simultaneous administration at 8 months of age, which is the youngest recommended age for these vaccines worldwide. We aimed to assess the effect of the co-administration of these vaccines at 8 months of age on the immunogenicity of measles-rubella vaccine. We did a multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority, two-group randomised controlled trial in eight counties or districts in China. We recruited healthy infants aged 8 months who had received all scheduled vaccinations according to the national immunisation recommendations and who lived in the county of the study site. Enrolled infants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either measles-rubella vaccine and LJEV simultaneously (measles-rubella plus LJEV group) or measles-rubella vaccine alone (measles-rubella group). The primary outcome was the proportion of infants with IgG antibody seroconversion for measles 6 weeks after vaccination, and a secondary outcome was the proportion of infants with IgG antibody seroconversion for rubella 6 weeks after vaccination. Analyses included all infants who completed the study. We used a 5% margin to establish non-inferiority. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02643433). 1173 infants were assessed for eligibility between Aug 13, 2015, and June 10, 2016. Of 1093 (93%) enrolled infants, 545 were randomly assigned to the measles-rubella plus LJEV group and 548 to the measles-rubella group. Of the infants assigned to each group, 507 in the measles-rubella plus LJEV group and 506 in the measles-rubella group completed the study. Before vaccination, six (1%) of 507 infants in the measles-rubella plus LJEV group and one (<1%) of 506 in the measles-rubella group were seropositive for measles; eight (2%) infants in the measles-rubella plus LJEV group and two (<1%) in the measles-rubella group were seropositive for rubella. 6 weeks after vaccination, measles seroconversion in the measles-rubella plus LJEV group (496 [98%] of 507) was non-inferior to that in the measles-rubella group (499 [99%] of 506; difference −0·8% [90% CI −2·6 to 1·1]) and rubella seroconversion in the measles-rubella plus LJEV group (478 [94%] of 507) was non-inferior to that in the measles-rubella group (473 [94%] of 506 infants; difference 0·8% [90% CI −1·8 to 3·4]). There were no serious adverse events in either group and no evidence of a difference between the two groups in the prevalence of any local adverse event (redness, rashes, and pain) or systemic adverse event (fever, allergy, respiratory infections, diarrhoea, and vomiting). Fever was the most common adverse event (97 [19%] of 507 infants in the measles-rubella plus LJEV group; 108 [21%] of 506 infants in the measles-rubella group). The evidence of similar seroconversion and safety with co-administered LJEV and measles-rubella vaccines supports the co-administration of these vaccines to infants aged 8 months. These results will be important for measles and rubella elimination and the expansion of Japanese encephalitis vaccination in countries where it is endemic. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services; China–US Collaborative Program on Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases.

► Yellow fever vaccines (YFV) were given either simultaneously or 30 days after a combined measles-mumps-rubella vaccine (MMR) to compare their immunogenicity and reactogenicity in children. ► The immune response to YFV was substantially weaker when given simultaneously to MMR. ► The immune response to the rubella and mumps components of MMR was also weaker with simultaneous administration of YFV. ► Immune response to the measles component was strong regardless of time interval between vaccines. A randomized trial was conducted to assess the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of yellow fever vaccines (YFV) given either simultaneously in separate injections, or 30 days or more after a combined measles–mumps–rubella (MMR) vaccine. Volunteers were also randomized to YFV produced from 17DD and WHO-17D-213 substrains. The study group comprised 1769 healthy 12-month-old children brought to health care centers in Brasilia for routine vaccination. The reactogenicity was of the type and frequency expected for the vaccines and no severe adverse event was associated to either vaccine. Seroconversion and seropositivity 30 days or more after vaccination against yellow fever was similar across groups defined by YFV substrain. Subjects injected YFV and MMR simultaneously had lower seroconversion rates – 90% for rubella, 70% for yellow fever and 61% for mumps – compared with those vaccinated 30 days apart – 97% for rubella, 87% for yellow fever and 71% for mumps. Seroconversion rates for measles were higher than 98% in both comparison groups. Geometric mean titers for rubella and for yellow fever were approximately three times higher among those who got the vaccines 30 days apart. For measles and mumps antibodies GMTs were similar across groups. MMR's interference in immune response of YFV and YFV's interference in immune response of rubella and mumps components of MMR had never been reported before but are consistent with previous observations from other live vaccines. These results may affect the recommendations regarding primary vaccination with yellow fever vaccine and MMR.

There are increasing reports of outbreaks of measles in countries that achieved measles elimination using two doses of measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine, particularly in health care settings. While responses to a third dose of MMR in two-dose recipients have been examined, these studies have all administered MMR by the standard (intramuscular or subcutaneous) route, and data on the duration of antibody are limited. We have developed a protocol for an open-label parallel-arm randomized-controlled trial to compare measles antibody responses and safety after intradermal and aerosol administration of MMR with intramuscular, the usual mode of administration in Aotearoa (New Zealand). Eligible participants are aged ≥ 18 years who have previously received two doses of the MMR vaccine and based on levels of IgG antibody to measles or mumps below the threshold for seropositivity in commercially available screening tests are required to receive the MMR vaccine prior to entering health professional training programs at Aotearoa universities. The participants will be randomized to three routes of administration (1:1:1) to receive the MMR vaccine by the intradermal (via microneedle), intrapulmonary (via vibrating mesh nebulizer), or intramuscular routes. The primary objective is to determine the proportion of participants who attain levels of measles IgG antibody above the seroprotective threshold using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay, with those in the lowest quartile validated by plaque neutralization assay, at days 6-8, 13-15, 28-42, and at 12-18 months post-vaccination. Secondary objectives include a fold increase in the geometric mean concentration of IgG antibody from baseline, and systemic and local reactions following delivery of MMR by each method. The trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Default.aspx; trial registration no. ACTRN12623000130662).

Measles immunization is a cornerstone in public health, yet vaccine failure affects up to 10 % of the population, leaving some vaccinated individuals susceptible to infection. Many factors influence vaccine responses, and we hypothesize that host genetic factors impact vaccine response to measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccination. We performed Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) associations and a genome-wide association study of measles plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) and Immunoglobin G (IgG) in 607 infants from a randomized, double-blind vaccine trial of the MMR vaccine. We examined HLA and Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) associations with measles vaccine response at 5–7 months and again at 15 months. Association analyses for SNPs were performed using linear and logistic regression, while HLA associations only utilized linear regression. Two novel regions associated with post-vaccine measles PRNT levels were identified - one on chromosome 1 and one on chromosome 9. The most significant SNP at chromosome 9 is the intronic SNP rs77498152 within the LINGO2-gene (p-value = 1.1∙10−9), and on chromosome 1, the intronic SNP rs3005891 (p-value = 2.2∙10−8) in the LOC124904186 gene. Associations of 4-digit HLA type alleles and measles PRNT revealed the HLA-A*2902 (p = 0.006) and measles IgG HLA-B*1801 (p = 0.0025) as the most strongly associated HLA types; both were associated with a lower response. In an MMR vaccine trial, this study identified novel genetic regions on chromosomes 1 and 9 associated with measles PRNT in healthy infants. Four-digit HLA types were associated with both Measles IgG and PRNT. Associations between SNPs and HLA have been investigated previously, and we suspect the difference in results is due to dissimilarities between cohorts and study design, especially regarding participants' age and time from immunization to immune outcome measurement.

The potency of live viral vaccines decreases over time. We compared the immunogenicity and safety of GSK measles-mumps-rubella vaccine (MMR-RIT) formulations at two different potencies with that of the commercially-available MMR II formulation. In this phase III observer-blind clinical study (NCT01681992), 4516 healthy children aged 12–15 months were randomized (1:1:1 ratio) to receive one dose of MMR-RIT at the minimum potency used for this study (MMR-RIT-Min) or MMR-RIT at the second lowest potency used for this study (MMR-RIT-Med), or control MMR II vaccine. A second dose (MMR-RIT or MMR II) was administered 42 days after the first. The study had 10 co-primary objectives to evaluate MMR-RIT versus MMR II immunogenicity via a hierarchical procedure. Anti-measles and anti-rubella antibodies were measured by ELISA and anti-mumps antibodies by ELISA and unenhanced plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT). Each formulation induced immune responses to all vaccine antigens after each MMR dose. While the primary objectives for MMR-RIT-Min were not met, MMR-RIT-Med induced immune responses as measured by ELISA against the three vaccine antigens that met pre-specified non-inferiority criteria. The immune response following MMR-RIT-Med against mumps measured by PRNT failed the non-inferiority criterion for seroresponse rate: the 97.5% confidence interval lower limit (−10.94%) was beyond the pre-defined limit of −10%. Immune responses were comparable among groups post-dose 2. No safety concerns were identified, and MMR-RIT and MMR II vaccines had similar reactogenicity and safety profiles. One dose of MMR-RIT formulation with lower potency (MMR-RIT-Med) induced a non-inferior immune response compared to commercial MMR II vaccine, measured by ELISA in one-year-old children. Non-inferiority was not demonstrated in terms of immune response against mumps virus measured by unenhanced PRNT, although the difference was of uncertain clinical relevance. After the second dose, immune responses were comparable among the MMR-RIT and MMR II groups.