Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Series TitleSeries Title
-
Reading LevelReading Level
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersContent TypeItem TypeIs Full-Text AvailableSubjectCountry Of PublicationPublisherSourceTarget AudienceDonorLanguagePlace of PublicationContributorsLocation
Done
Filters
Reset
771,443
result(s) for
"SOCIOLOGY "
Sort by:
LOS CAMINOS INCIERTOS DEL VÍNCULO
2025
Este texto quiere proponer algunos caminos para responder a una demanda, la de repensar la noción de vínculo social. La demanda resulta tanto de un debate, muy generalizado en el campo de las ciencias sociales y especialmente las dedicadas al estudio del parentesco, que se interroga por la vigencia de las herramientas teóricas heredadas para pensar el vínculo, sobre todo cuando nos enfrentamos a situaciones empíricas propias de lo que llamamos “desaparición social”, esto es, la producción sistemática de vidas fracturadas, de existencias en las que se quiebra lo que daba consistencia y sentido a la vida, incluyendo los vínculos. Alejándonos de argumentos de tono apocalíptico, que vaticinan el colapso sin remedio de la vida tal y como la conocíamos, y también de otros más ingenuos, confiados en su recuperación, apostamos por entender el vínculo en las situaciones en las que este parece negado o insostenible pensándolo en el terreno de un hacer que se articula sobre tres verbos: emparentar, buscar, sustanciar. Cerramos el texto apostando porque ese movimiento ha de ir acompañado de un replanteamiento de nuestros modos de hacer ciencias sociales.
Journal Article
Univerzitetska nastava u „tvrdim“ i „mekim“ naukama: akademska plemena ili ka zajedničkoj kulturi?
2025
This paper critically analyzes the distinction between the so-called“hard” and “soft” sciences, with a particular emphasis on the teaching quality inthese academic fields. Firstly, it presents the origin and characteristics of this populardichotomy, as well the idea of a hierarchy of sciences in philosophy and sociology.It then points out the relative inadequacy of this hierarchy, but also its heuristicvalue, based on relevant and contemporary research on scientific knowledge anduniversity teaching. In this regard, it thoroughly analyzes the concepts of academictribes, territories, and epistemic cultures at the university environments. We arguethat the anthropological concept of culture can offer valuable insights into the innerworkings of physical, life, and social sciences, and claim that different academiccultures significantly influence the character of university teaching. Finally, thispaper emphasizes the possibility of building a common academic culture in termsof teaching quality, i.e. a shared quality culture.
Journal Article
Razumevanje demokratije u Evropi: liberalne, populističke i socijaldemokratske dimenzije
2025
How do citizens understand democracy, and how do these understandings vary across social groups and national contexts? Using data from Round 10 of the European Social Survey across 31 countries, this study develops and validates a three-dimensional model of democratic attitudes. Using latent variable analysis, we identify distinct Liberal, Populist, and Social-democratic dimensions of democratic understanding. Our findings demonstrate that these dimensions show partial measurement invariance across countries, allowing for meaningful cross-national comparisons of latent scores. While the dimensions are positively correlated, suggesting citizens want “more of democracy” rather than trading off different aspects, they relate differently to social class, political behavior, and institutional trust. Social class emerges as a particularly important predictor, with workers showing stronger support for Populist and Social-democratic dimensions compared to service professionals. These findings contribute to our understanding of democratic legitimacy and stability by showing how democratic attitudes are embedded in social and political structures.
Journal Article
Imperijalizam i iskustva „litijumskog trougla
2025
This paper examines the concept of extractive imperialism through the lens of the experiences in the “Lithium Triangle.” Extractive imperialism represents a contemporary iteration of historical colonial practices, characterised by the exploitation of natural resources by transnational corporations in underdeveloped countries, frequently resulting in socio-environmental conflicts. This work concentrates on the Lithium Triangle in South America, comprising Chile, Argentina, and Bolivia, where extensive lithium deposits have attracted considerable foreign investment. The analysis demonstrates how the interplay between global capital and national governments frequently results in the marginalisation of local communities, thereby exacerbating social tensions and environmental degradation. The work elucidates the contrasting definitions of extractivism and neo-extractivism, underscoring the persistent exploitation and centralisation of wealth. By focusing on the socio-political dynamics and ownership structures in these regions, the paper emphasises the necessity for sustainable and equitable resource management practices. The work contributes to a broader understanding of extractive practices in the Global South, advocating for policies that prioritise the rights and livelihoods of indigenous populations and local communities over transnational corporate interests.
Journal Article
Različiti uglovi, isti fenomen: klijentelizam između računice, moralne obaveze i habitusa
2025
This paper presents and analyses three dominant approaches thatshape contemporary research on clientelism: the economic exchange approach, whereall involved actors (clients, patrons, or brokers) rationally assess gains and losses;the moral economy perspective, emphasizing moral obligation and reciprocity; andthe sociocultural conception grounded in the idea of clientelist habitus. Researchfollowing one of these theoretical positions often treats the others as rivals, leadingto methodological and normative divisions. This paper argues that the very natureof clientelism, embodied in informal delayed exchange, allows for the integrationof these theoretical perspectives. We argue that its architecture comprises interestsand strategies, as well as affects, dispositions, and habits. We acknowledge theinstrumentalist perspective’s assumption that individuals or groups engaging inclientelist exchanges are aware of their interests, capable of weighing inputs andoutcomes and considering alternatives. Simultaneously, we recognize the sharedview of normative and sociocultural approaches that transactions do not occur ina vacuum or a purely economic calculus but within a community imposing specificobligations and expectations, thus ensuring the stability and longevity of clientelistrelationships. Finally, we advocate for a critical and reflective integration of theseapproaches.
Journal Article