Explore the vast range of titles available.

Patients with ST-segment elevation MI and multivessel coronary disease who had undergone successful culprit-lesion PCI were assigned to a strategy of either PCI of all other suitable stenoses or no further revascularization. At 3 years, the risk of cardiovascular death or new MI was lower with complete revascularization.

•The STREAM-1 trial demonstrated similar outcomes with a PI strategy compared to primary PCI (PPCI) in STEMI patients presenting <3 hours of symptom onset and unable to undergo timely cardiac catheterization within 1 hour.•However, an excess of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in those ≥75 years receiving PI treatment was observed early in the trial prompting a dose reduction amendment of tenecteplase (TNK) to half-dose after which no further ICH occurred.•An analysis of STREAM-1 and STREAM-2 patients 60 to <75 years, found similar ST resolution and TIMI-3 patency with both half- and full-dose PI strategies with PI treatment (irrespective of TNK dose). These findings were also at least comparable than that achieved after their PPCI comparators.•Whereas the risk of ICH with half-dose PI treatment was 2.1% compared to 1.5% with full-dose PI therapy, there was substantially less major (non-ICH) bleeding. Clinical outcomes were similar to those with their respective within trial PPCI comparators. Previous studies indicate a safety risk with full-dose TNK in elderly patients. In a study of patients ≥60 years STREAM-2 (STrategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial infarction-2), a pharmaco-invasive (PI) strategy with half-dose TNK was similar (in efficacy and safety) to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients presenting <3 hours. While no treatment difference ± 75 years was observed, the role of this half-dose PI strategy in patients <75 years is unknown. In this comparison of STEAM-1 and -2, we analyzed PI strategies with full-dose (STREAM-1) versus half-dose TNK (STREAM-2) to evaluate their relative efficacy and safety in this younger STEMI cohort. We evaluated patients 60 to <75 years from STREAM-1 and STREAM-2 receiving PI treatment versus PPCI for their resolution of ST-elevation after fibrinolysis and angiography, primary efficacy composite of 30-day all-cause death, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and shock, and safety events. Among 1103 patients, 327 received a full-dose PI strategy (STREAM-1), 289 a half-dose PI strategy (STREAM-2) and 487 PPCI (338 in STREAM-1; 149 in STREAM-2). Half- compared to full-dose TNK resulted in similar proportions of patients achieving ST resolution ≥50% (71.2% vs 68.7%, P = .519): their ICH risks were 2.1% vs 1.5%, P = .605 respectively). Following angiography, PI patients had nominally better ST resolution ≥50% compared to their PPCI counterpart (STREAM-1: 87.7% vs. 83.2%, P = .120; STREAM-2: 88.2% vs. 81.0%, P = .048) with similar primary composite outcome at 30 days (STREAM-1: 14.4% vs. 16.3%, 0.90 [0.62, 1.31]; STREAM-2: 9.0% vs 8.1%, 1.29 [0.64, 2.61]). Major (non-ICH) bleeding markedly declined in STREAM-2 compared to STREAM-1 in both treatment groups (STREAM-1: 7.1% vs. 6.0%; STREAM-2: 0.3% vs. 0.7%). In STEMI patients 60 to <75 years presenting within 3 hours of symptoms, half-dose PI treatment appears as efficacious as a full-dose PI strategy with a low systemic bleeding risk. Half-dose PI treatment deserves consideration when timely PPCI is not attainable in this important STEMI sub-group. NCT00623623, NCT02777580. [Display omitted]

Studies assessing the treatment of refractory no-reflow in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are limited to clinical cases and pilot studies. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intracoronary adrenaline administration in such patients. Ninety consecutive patients with refractory coronary no-reflow during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were prospectively included after the initial failure of conventional treatment. They were randomized into 2 groups: 45 patients in Group 1 received adrenaline, and 45 patients in Group 2 (control) received conventional treatments alone. After intracoronary drug administration, the adrenaline group demonstrated significantly higher rates of coronary flow restoration in the infarct-related artery to the level of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction grade 3 (56% vs 29% [p = 0.01]) and resolution of STEMI >50% after PCI (78% vs 36% [p <0.001]). Additionally, the adrenaline group showed a lower indexed microvascular obstruction (MVO) volume compared with the control group (0.9 [0.3; 3.1] % vs 1.9 [0.6; 7.9] % [p = 0.048]). A significant improvement in ejection fraction (EF) was observed in the adrenaline group (p = 0.025). Intracoronary adrenaline administration during PCI in patients with STEMI with refractory no-reflow is more effective compared with conventional treatments. This approach improves coronary flow in the infarct-related artery, facilitates a faster resolution of STEMI, enhances EF, and reduces MVO volume. Intracoronary adrenaline administration demonstrates a comparable safety profile to conventional treatment strategies in terms of life-threatening arrhythmias occurrence. The study suggests that intracoronary adrenaline administration during PCI could be an effective treatment strategy for patients with STEMI with refractory no-reflow. [Display omitted]

Inflammation is associated with adverse cardiovascular events. Data from recent trials suggest that colchicine reduces the risk of cardiovascular events. In this multicenter trial with a 2-by-2 factorial design, we randomly assigned patients who had myocardial infarction to receive either colchicine or placebo and either spironolactone or placebo. The results of the colchicine trial are reported here. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, or unplanned ischemia-driven coronary revascularization, evaluated in a time-to-event analysis. C-reactive protein was measured at 3 months in a subgroup of patients, and safety was also assessed. A total of 7062 patients at 104 centers in 14 countries underwent randomization; at the time of analysis, the vital status was unknown for 45 patients (0.6%), and this information was most likely missing at random. A primary-outcome event occurred in 322 of 3528 patients (9.1%) in the colchicine group and 327 of 3534 patients (9.3%) in the placebo group over a median follow-up period of 3 years (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85 to 1.16; P = 0.93). The incidence of individual components of the primary outcome appeared to be similar in the two groups. The least-squares mean difference in C-reactive protein levels between the colchicine group and the placebo group at 3 months, adjusted according to the baseline values, was -1.28 mg per liter (95% CI, -1.81 to -0.75). Diarrhea occurred in a higher percentage of patients with colchicine than with placebo (10.2% vs. 6.6%; P<0.001), but the incidence of serious infections did not differ between groups. Among patients who had myocardial infarction, treatment with colchicine, when started soon after myocardial infarction and continued for a median of 3 years, did not reduce the incidence of the composite primary outcome (death from cardiovascular causes, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, or unplanned ischemia-driven coronary revascularization). (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; CLEAR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03048825.).

Introduction Empagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, improves cardiovascular outcomes in heart failure patients, but data regarding the efficacy of empagliflozin in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is still unclear. The current study aimed to evaluate whether treatment with empagliflozin before primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves parameters associated with patients’ outcomes. Methods We randomly assigned 101 non-diabetic and non-heart failure patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who underwent primary PCI to receive either empagliflozin (10 mg before PCI and once daily for 40 days) or placebo, in addition to the standard treatment. The primary outcomes were changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 40 days after PCI, changes in cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and estimates of its area under the curve (AUC) and the peak level, and resolution of ST-segment in > 50% of leads 90 min after PCI. Results No significant difference was observed in terms of the occurrence of ST-segment resolution > 50% (46.0% versus 45.0%; p = 0.92) and the mean level of cTnI at each time point between the two groups. The estimated mean [standard deviation (SD)] AUC of cTnI was 955.0 (595.7) ng h/ml in the intervention and 999.7 (474.7) ng h/ml in the control groups ( p = 0.85) without any significant difference in peak cTnI level. The mean (SD) LVEF 40 days after primary PCI was significantly higher in empagliflozin-treated patients than the placebo group [43.2% (5.8%) versus 39.2% (6.7%); p = 0.002]. Conclusion In this study, no significant differences were observed across the groups in terms of cTnI levels and ST-segment resolution in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. However, it shed light on the potential benefits of empagliflozin in improving LVEF following STEMI. Registration Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials Platform ( https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/ ) identifier number IRCT20111206008307N42.

Biomarker measures of infarct size and myocardial salvage index (MSI) are important surrogate measures of clinical outcomes after a myocardial infarction. However, there is variability in infarct size unaccounted for by conventional adjustment factors. This post hoc analysis of Evaluation of Myocardial Effects of Bendavia for Reducing Reperfusion Injury in Patients With Acute Coronary Events (EMBRACE) ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) trial evaluates the association between left ventricular (LV) mass and infarct size as assessed by areas under the curve for creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) and troponin I release over the first 72 hours (CK-MB area under the curve [AUC] and troponin I [TnI] AUC) and the MSI. Patients with first anterior STEMI, occluded left anterior descending artery, and available LV mass measurement in EMBRACE STEMI trial were included (n = 100) (ClinicalTrials.govNCT01572909). MSI, end-diastolic LV mass on day 4 cardiac magnetic resonance, and CK-MB and troponin I concentrations were evaluated by a core laboratory. After saturated multivariate analysis, dominance analysis was performed to estimate the contribution of each independent variable to the predicted variance of each outcome. In multivariate models that included age, gender, body surface area, lesion location, smoking, and ischemia time, LV mass remained independently associated with biomarker measures of infarct size (CK-MB AUC p = 0.02, TnI AUC p = 0.03) and MSI (p = 0.003). Dominance analysis demonstrated that LV mass accounted for 58%, 47%, and 60% of the predicted variances for CK-MB AUC, TnI AUC, and MSI, respectively. In conclusion, LV mass accounts for approximately half of the predicted variance in biomarker measures of infarct size. It should be considered as an adjustment variable in studies evaluating infarct size.

In a registry-based trial, FFR-guided PCI of nonculprit lesions did not result in a lower risk of a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization than culprit-lesion-only PCI.

In a randomized trial involving patients with STEMI and cardiogenic shock, mortality at 6 months was lower with mechanical circulatory support with a microaxial flow pump than with standard care alone.

The benefit of complete revascularization in older patients (≥75 years of age) with myocardial infarction and multivessel disease remains unclear. In this multicenter, randomized trial, we assigned older patients with myocardial infarction and multivessel disease who were undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the culprit lesion to receive either physiology-guided complete revascularization of nonculprit lesions or to receive no further revascularization. Functionally significant nonculprit lesions were identified either by pressure wire or angiography. The primary outcome was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or any revascularization at 1 year. The key secondary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction. Safety was assessed as a composite of contrast-associated acute kidney injury, stroke, or bleeding. A total of 1445 patients underwent randomization (720 to receive complete revascularization and 725 to receive culprit-only revascularization). The median age of the patients was 80 years (interquartile range, 77 to 84); 528 patients (36.5%) were women, and 509 (35.2%) were admitted for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. A primary-outcome event occurred in 113 patients (15.7%) in the complete-revascularization group and in 152 patients (21.0%) in the culprit-only group (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57 to 0.93; P = 0.01). Cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction occurred in 64 patients (8.9%) in the complete-revascularization group and in 98 patients (13.5%) in the culprit-only group (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.88). The safety outcome did not appear to differ between the groups (22.5% vs. 20.4%; P = 0.37). Among patients who were 75 years of age or older with myocardial infarction and multivessel disease, those who underwent physiology-guided complete revascularization had a lower risk of a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or ischemia-driven revascularization at 1 year than those who received culprit-lesion-only PCI. (Funded by Consorzio Futuro in Ricerca and others; FIRE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03772743.).

The DanGer Shock trial test the hypothesis that left ventricular (LV) mechanical circulatory support with Impella CP transvalvular microaxial flow pump improves survival in patients with ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS) compared to conventional guideline-driven treatment. This paper describes the rationale and design of the randomized trial, in addition to the baseline characteristics of the population screened and enrolled so far. The DanGer Shock study is a prospective, multicenter, open-label trial in patients with AMICS randomized 1:1 to Impella CP or current guideline-driven therapy with planned enrollment of 360 patients. Patients comatose after out of hospital cardiac arrest are excluded. Eligible patients are randomized immediately following shock diagnosis. Among patients randomized to receive Impella CP, the device is placed prior to angioplasty. The primary endpoint is all-cause mortality at 180 days. Baseline characteristics of patients screened and randomized in the DanGer Shock as of June 2018 are compared with 2 contemporary AMICS studies. As of end of June 2018, 314 patients were screened and 100 patients were randomized. Patients had median arterial lactate of 5.5 mmol/L (interquartile range 3.7-8.8 mmol/L), median systolic blood pressure of 76 mmHg (interquartile range 70-88 mmHg), and median LV ejection fraction of 20% (interquartile range 10%-30%). The DanGer Shock trial will be the first adequately powered randomized trial to address whether mechanical circulatory LV support with Impella CP can improve survival in AMICS. Baseline characteristics of the first 100 randomized patients indicate a population in profound cardiogenic shock.