Explore the vast range of titles available.

Objectives After years of decreasing public punitiveness and declining crime rates, politicians are seeking evidence-based crime policies to reduce mass incarceration without increasing crime. One such policy that has been implemented in several US cities is the Operation Peacemaker Fellowship (OPF), which incentivizes conformity and program participation by providing monetary stipends to individuals at risk of violent offending, thereby simultaneously reducing violence and incarceration. Yet, there is no evidence about public support for such policies. Methods Using a nationally representative survey experiment, we examine public support for violence prevention stipends. We employ a referendum-style, contingent valuation design to measure the impact of tax increases versus tax savings on public opinion, and we randomize message framing that emphasizes the stipend program’s risky versus protective features. Results Both tax changes and risk framing matter. The public is willing to vote for stipends when they reduce taxes and are framed as a method to save lives. Most Republicans oppose stipends under all conditions. Conclusions Reformers can increase public support for effective, nonpunitive policies that target violent offenders by emphasizing both their economic and social benefits. However, such policies are likely to face consistent opposition from certain portions of the public.

Background Transportation barriers can hinder patients’ access to timely cancer diagnosis and treatment, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. In Rwanda, where cervical and breast cancer burdens are high, support through transport stipends can alleviate transportation barriers and improve patient outcomes. This study aims to understand the experiences and perspectives of women beneficiaries and program personnel involved in Rwanda’s Bugesera District transport stipend program. Methods Purposive sampling selected seventeen participants for in-depth interviews, including twelve women beneficiaries and five program personnel. Document review and household visits provided context. From September 2021 to May 2023, 204 women attended follow-ups for cervical and breast cancer screening and 75% of them received transport stipends. Results Five themes emerged from beneficiaries’ interviews: financial difficulties in accessing transportation for cancer care, impact of transport stipend on access to cancer services, barriers faced during transportation to cancer services, challenges in the process of receiving transport stipend, and recommendations to overcome stipend provision challenges. Five themes emerged from program personnel’s interviews: impact of transportation stipend on access to cancer services, challenges in the process of providing transport stipend, recommendations to overcome stipend provision challenges, recommendations for implementation of transport stipend in other settings, and sustainability. Conclusions The stipend was found to be impactful, but challenges in the provision process, including communication and delays, were identified. Insufficiency of the stipend was highlighted, with recommendations to expand coverage to other expenses. The study highlights the role of transport stipends in improving cancer early detection and linkage to needed follow-up and recommends strong partnerships and funding for program replication and sustainability. These findings can inform the planning of similar programs in low-income countries of Sub-Saharan Africa.

A key grievance of the student labor movement is that across much of academia, and especially in the social sciences and humanities, stipends tied to PhD assistantships fall short of a living wage. In this article, we consider the issue from a pedagogical perspective, expecting that higher pay may lead to stronger program outcomes. We collect and validate data on assistantship stipends in political science from PhDStipends.com, and on tenure-track placements from an analysis of departmental placement pages. Graduate pay is significantly associated with tenure-track placements in the job market cycles spanning 2019–2021, independently of program size, rank, student unionization, location, and institution type and endowment. Across model specifications, a US$5,000 increase in student pay corresponds with 2.7 more placements per 100 enrolled students (or 34% of the median rate) over this period.

The reform of the doctoral student education system, resulting in a departure from conducting third degree studies in favour of doctoral schools, resulted in changes in the field of social security law. The status of a doctoral student receiving a doctoral scholarship has become independent grounds for compulsory retirement, disability and accident insurance. At the same time, it is the basis for voluntary sickness insurance. The author criticises the granting of doctoral students the right to acquire cover under this type of insurance. Their actual situation when receiving a doctoral scholarship is far different from the situation of other persons (grounds) covered by sickness insurance. The author also discusses the issue of coincidences of grounds for social insurance of doctoral students. The legislator categorised the collection of a doctoral scholarship in the group of absolute grounds for insurance. Unfortunately, it omitted in the regulation of Art. 9 sec. 1a of the Act on Social Insurance System a reference to the basis of the contributions on the received scholarship, which in extreme cases may lead to a significant extension of the doctoral student’s social insurance obligation.

Background Cost of living is one of the key factors in residency selection among U.S. medical graduates, given rising student loan debt. No studies have investigated anesthesiology stipends relative to regional cost of living. This study aimed to compare anesthesiology resident stipends nationwide using the Cost-of-Living Index (COLI) to assess purchasing power. Methods The AAMC directory was queried to obtain accredited anesthesiology residency programs for the 2024–2025 academic year. CA1 (post graduate year 2) stipends were collected via internet search and residency programs were assigned to metro areas using region specific COLI metrics. City, state, geographic region, and reputation ranking were recorded and absolute and relative discrepancies were calculated. Results Of 174 anesthesiology residency programs, 118 (67.8%) were analyzed. The national average CA-1 stipend was $70,757 ± $9,718, with medians of $66,137 in low COLI areas and $74,046 in high COLI areas (median difference $7,909, [95% CI $5,969-$12,728, p  < 0.001]. California showed the largest adjusted deficit (-$26,969, -30.98%), whereas Oklahoma had a $13,096 surplus (+ 21.00%). In the 10 major cities, average stipends decreased from $76,052 ± $10,860 to $59,499 ± $11,252 after COLI adjustment (-21.8%, p  < 0.001). The absolute discrepancy between small and medium programs was not significant (-$3,498, p  = 0.19), while large programs faced a 12.82% shortfall ($9,742) despite higher unadjusted salaries. Among the top 12 programs based on reputation ranking, stipends were higher in high COLI regions with half showing > 30% loss after COLI adjustment. Conclusions Anesthesiology residency stipends showed substantial variation after adjusting for regional cost of living, with many high COLI areas experiencing marked reductions in real purchasing power. Given rising educational debt, applicants should consider COLI adjusted stipends when evaluating programs to better assess regional affordability and financial impact. Trial registration N/A.

Visiting electives provide an opportunity for medical students to engage with radiation oncology (RO) programs, likely influencing residency match outcomes. However, some student’s out-of-pocket costs may be prohibitive, and in attempts to offset the financial burden of visiting electives, particularly for students underrepresented in medicine (URiM), some institutions offer scholarships. Here, we characterized the current domestic landscape of funded RO electives. Visiting electives were identified through the FREIDA and VSLO databases in April 2024. Funded elective availability and departmental characteristics were identified via internet search by two independent reviewers. Fisher’s exact test was used to determine whether there was a difference in the distribution of scholarships across the US due to the small sample size. Ninety-two visiting electives were identified, with 40 programs offering URiM elective scholarships (43.5%). Twelve (30%) were funded specifically by RO departments, and 28 (70%) were part of broader institutional URiM scholarship initiatives. The median stipend provided was $2000 (IQR $500), range $1000–$5000. Analysis of scholarships by US census division and metro area revealed unequal distribution. Electives in New England, Mountain, and East North Central divisions had higher funding proportion compared to electives in the East South Central, West South Central, and Middle Atlantic divisions. Only 1/9 electives in New York City were funded compared with 4/6 in Los Angeles. Departments with funded electives had more faculty physicians and medical residents. In our review of the 2024 landscape, over 40% of RO electives offer financial support. However, we identified geographical disparities in the distribution of scholarships, highlighting the need for interventions to address unequal access to a wide array of training programs. Our study represents a valuable resource for students interested in RO and highlights the continued need to positively contribute to increasing diversity in the field. Future work exploring the impact of funded electives is needed.

Enhancing the role of private sector partners in education can lead to significant improvements in education service delivery. However, the realization of such benefits depends in great part on the design of the partnership between the public and private sectors, on the overall regulatory framework of the country, and on the governmental capacity to oversee and enforce its contracts with the private sector. Under the right terms, private sector participation in education can increase efficiency, choice, and access to education services, particularly for students who tend to fail in traditional education settings. Private-for-profit schools across the world are already serving a vast range of usersâ€\"from elite families to children in poor communities. Through balanced public-private partnerships (PPPs) in education, governments can leverage the specialized skills offered by private organizations as well as overcome operating restrictions such as salary scales and work rules that limit public sector responses. 'The Role and Impact of Public-Private Partnerships in Education' presents a conceptualization of the issues related to PPPs in education, a detailed review of rigorous evaluations, and guidleines on how to create successful PPPs. The book shows how this approach can facilitate service delivery, lead to additional financing, expand equitable access, and improve learning outcomes. The book also discusses the best way to set up these arrangements in practice. This information will be of particular interest to policymakers, teachers, researchers, and development practitioners.

PurposeThis paper aims to find the effects of mothers’ schooling on child schooling.Design/methodology/approachThis paper uses Bangladesh's Household Income and Expenditure Survey (HIES), which is a nationally representative survey. It employs the instrumental variable technique to estimate the intergenerational model.FindingsInterestingly, the results show that the intergenerational transmission of schooling from mothers is slightly higher than that of fathers in Bangladesh.Research limitations/implicationsEstimating the intergenerational model is challenging due to the endogeneity issue. The methodology used in this paper may help to find similar evidence from other countries.Practical implicationsThe findings of the study may help to design and evaluate the educational policies in Bangladesh or a country like Bangladesh. For instance, the results of this paper suggest that the female stipend program (FSP) in Bangladesh is effective for the next generation’s schooling.Originality/valueThis paper is among the first to analyze the effect of mother’s schooling on the child’s schooling, controlling the father’s education and other household characteristics. In addition, it controls for endogeneity bias due to genetic transmission.Peer reviewThe peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/IJSE-06-2023-0491

This paper examines the effects of female education on marriage outcomes by exploiting the exogenous variation generated by the Female Secondary School Stipend Program in Bangladesh, which made secondary education free for rural girls. Our findings show that an additional year of female education leads to an increase in 0.72 years of husband’s education and that better educated women pair with spouses who have better occupations and are closer in age to their own, suggesting assortative mating. Those educated women appear to experience greater autonomy in making decisions on receiving their own health care and visiting their family. Furthermore, educated women have lower fertility and use more maternal health care, and their children have better health outcomes than those of less-educated women. Overall, our results suggest that the marriage market is one of the channels through which women’s education affects their life outcomes.

Graduate unemployment is one of the major socio-economic development problems in South Africa and many other developing countries. Previous research has described various factors causing graduate unemployment, one of which is a lack of relevant work experience. Internships are increasingly supported to address this problem. However, internships have been criticised for being exploitative, illegal, and unjust. This paper seeks to present a new perspective on internships. It seeks to examine the perspectives on the impact of stipend level on graduate intern work productivity. Thus, the objectives of this study are to: explore the impact of stipend level on the work productivity of graduate interns; explore the exploitative nature of internship as perceived by participants; and explore the concerns of graduate interns over compensation. This study is qualitative and exploratory in nature. Fifty semi-structured interviews were conducted with interns, mentors, and HR managers at eThekwini municipality, Durban, South Africa, to address these research objectives. Data from interviews was analysed through content analysis. The results indicate that there is a relationship between the level of stipend earned by interns and their work productivity. This study found that low pay is associated with low work productivity. Therefore, work compensation is the primary motivator of productivity, not only for full-time employees but also for graduate interns.